Whose Border? Contested Geographies and Columbia River Treaty Modernization

References

• Agnew, J. 1994. The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory. Review of International Political Economy 1, no. 1: 53–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, J., and U. Oslender. 2013. Overlapping Territorialities, Sovereignty in Dispute: Empirical Lessons From Latin America. In Spaces of Contention: Spatialities and Social Movements, eds. W. Nicholls, B. Miller, and J. Beaumont, 121–140. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. 1995. Dismantling the Divide between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge. Development and Change 26, no. 3: 413–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfred, T. 2005. Sovereignty. In Sovereignty Matters: Locations of Contestation and Possibility in Indigenous Struggles for Self-Determination, ed. J. Barker, 33–50. Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anaya, S.J. 1996. Indigenous Peoples in International Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anaya, S.J. 2004. International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples: The Move Toward the Multicultural State. Arizona Journal of International & Comparative Law 21, no. 1: 14–61. https://doi.org/10.3366/ajicl.2011.0005.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., and L. O’Dowd. 1999. Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance. Regional Studies 33, no. 7: 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409950078648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, M. 2014. On Being Here to Stay: Treaties and Aboriginal Rights in Canada. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barg, S., and S. Tyler. 2009. Decentralization of Decision-Making. In Creating Adaptive Policies: A Guide for Policy-Making in an Uncertain World, ed. D. Swanson and S. Bhadwal, 80–94. Ottawa, Canada: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bauerkemper, J., and H.K. Stark. 2012. The Trans/National Terrain of Anishinaabe Law and Diplomacy Introduction: Patrolling Permeable Borders. Journal of Transnational American Studies, American Cultures and Global Contexts 4, no. 1: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2003. Navigating Social-Ecological Systems: Building Resilience for Complexity and Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borrows, J. 1999. Sovereignty’s Alchemy: An Analysis of Delgamuukw v. British Columbia. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 37, no. 3: 537–96.
   Google Scholar
• Borrows, J. 2005. Crown and Aboriginal Occupations of Land: A History and Comparison. Ottawa: Government of Ontario.
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla, C. 2015. Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept. Geopolitics 20, no. 1: 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2014.884561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla, C., J. Laine, J.W. Scott, and G. Bocchi. 2015. Introduction: Thinking, Mapping, Acting and Living Borders Under Contemporary Globalization. In Borderscaping: Imaginations and Practices of Border Making, ed. C. Brambilla, J. Laine, J.W. Scott, and G Bocchi, 1–9. London, U.K: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Brunet-Jailly, E. 2005. Theorizing Borders: an Interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics 10, no. 4: 633–49.
   Google Scholar
• Brunet-Jailly, E., ed. 2007. Borderlands: Comparing Border Security in North America and Europe. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campion, M. 2018. The Construction of the Amazonian Borderlands Through the longue duree: An Indigenous Perspective. Journal of Borderlands Studies 33, no. 1: 123–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canada Department of Justice. 2017. Principles Respecting the Government of Canada’s Relationship with Indigenous Peoples. Government of Canada’s Department of Justice. http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/principles-principes.html.
   Google Scholar
• CCRIFC & CRITFC. 2015. Fish Passage & Reintroduction into the U.S. & Canadian Upper Columbia Basin. Canadian Columbia River Inter-tribal Fisheries Commission & Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission. https://ucut.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Fish_Passage_and_Reintroduction_into_the_US_And_Canadian_Upper_Columbia_River4-1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Champagne, D. 2005. Rethinking Native Relations with Contemporary Nation-States. In Indigenous Peoples and the Modern State, ed. D. Champagne, K. J. Torjensen, and S. Steiner, 3–23. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Charron, A. 2016. Contesting the Northwest Passage: Four Far-North Narratives. In Border Flows: A Century of Canada-American Water Relationships, ed. L. Heasley, and D Macfarlane, 87–110. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., and A.M. Duda. 2013. Towards a New Paradigm for Transboundary Water Governance: Implementing Regional Frameworks Through Local Actions. Ocean & Coastal Management 85: 244–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.10.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiovitti, R.F., and N. Piran. 2003. Rigour and Grounded Theory Research. Journal of Advanced Nursing 44, no. 4: 427–35. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0309-2402.2003.02822.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, A. 2005. Understanding Tribal Sovereignty: Definitions, Conceptualizations, and Interpretations. American Studies 46, no. 3/4: 115–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40643893.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Corntassel, J. 2007. Towards a New Partnership? Indigenous Political Mobilization and Co-Optation During the First UN Indigenous Decade (1995–2004). Human Rights Quarterly 29, no. 1: 137–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2007.0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corntassel, J. 2008. Toward Sustainable Self-Determination: Rethinking the Contemporary Indigenous-Rights Discourse. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 33, no. 1: 105–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/030437540803300106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corntassel, J. 2012. Re-envisioning Resurgence: Indigenous Pathways to Decolonization and Sustainable Self-Determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1, no. 1: 86–101.
   Google Scholar
• Cosens, B., ed. 2012. The Columbia River Treaty Revisited: Transboundary River Governance in the Face of Uncertainty. Corvallis, Oregon: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, S. 2005. Border Crossing/Crossing Borders: Native Americans and the Issue of Border Crossing. In Indigenous Peoples and the Modern State, ed. D. Champagne, K. J. Torjesen, and S. Steiner, 24–32. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deloria, V. Jr. 1969. Custer Died for Your Sins: An Indian Manifesto. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, A.C., and J. Hagen. 2009. Theorizing Borders in a “Borderless World”: Globalization, Territory and Identity. Geography Compass 3, no. 3: 1196–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00230.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fleras, A. 2000. The Politics of Jurisdiction: Pathway or Predicament. In Visions of the Heart: Canadian Aboriginal Issues, ed. D. Long, and O. P. Dickason, 2nd ed., 107–142. Toronto, Canada: Harcourt Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Fleras, A., and J.L. Elliott. 1992. The Nations Within: Aboriginal-State Relations in Canada, the United States, and New Zealand. Toronto, ON: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and J. Holton. 2004. Remodeling Grounded Theory. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 5, no. 2. http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/607/1315Volume#g33.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2008. Opportunities for Democracy in Cross-Border Regions? Lessons from the Øresund Region. Regional Studies 42, no. 3: 423–35. http://doi.org/10.1080/00343400701281592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst, P. 2005. Space and Power: Politics, War and Architecture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, C. 2012. Toward Post-Sovereign Environmental Governance? Politics, Scale, and EU Water Framework Directive. Water Alternatives 5, no. 1: 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• King, T. 2012. The Inconvenient Indian: A Curious Account of Native People in North America. Toronto: Anchor Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Koivurova, T. 2014. Can Saami Transnational Indigenous Peoples Exercise Their Self-Determination in a World of Sovereign States? In The Proposed Nordic Saami Convention: National and International Dimensions of Indigenous Property Rights, eds. N. Banks and T. Koivurova, 105–124. London: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kolossov, V., and J. Scott. 2013. Selected Conceptual Issues in Border Studies. Belgeo 1, no. October: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4000/belgeo.10532.
   Google Scholar
• Koschade, B., E.P. Koschade, and B. Peters. 2006. Algonquin Notions of Jurisdiction: Inserting Indigenous Voices Into Legal Spaces. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88, no. 3: 299–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwaymullina, A. 2018. Aboriginal Nations, the Australian Nation-State and Indigenous International Legal Traditions. In Indigenous Peoples as Subjects of International Law, ed. I. Watson, 5–17. New York, NY: Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laine, J. 2016. The Multiscalar Production of Borders. Geopolitics 21, no. 3: 465–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1195132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapid, Y. 2001. Introduction: Identities, Borders, Orders: Nudging International Relations Theory in a New Direction. In Identities, Borders, Orders: Rethinking International Relations Theory, eds. M. Albert, D. Jacobson, and Y. Lapid, 1–20. Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minneapolis Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lightfoot, S. 2016. Global Indigenous Politics: A Subtle Revolution. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loo, T. 2004. People in the Way: Modernity, Environment, and Society on the Arrow Lakes. BC Studies 142, no. January: 161–96.
   Google Scholar
• Loukacheva, N. 2009. Arctic Indigenous Peoples’ Internationalism: In Search of a Legal Justification. Polar Record 45, no. 232: 51–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247408007742.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozar, P. 2018. “My Home Is on Both Sides”: Indigenous Communities and the US-Canadian Border on the Columbia Plateau, 1880s–1910s. Ethnohistory (columbus, Ohio) 65, no. 3: 391–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence, B., and E. Dua. 2005. Decolonizing Antiracism. Social Justice 32, no. 4: 120–143.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M., L. Baker, A. Buvel, A. Fischer, D. Foster, and C. Paula. 2010. Managing Transboundary Natural Resources: An Assessment of the Need to Revise and Update the Columbia River Treaty. Hastings West-Northwest Journal of Environmental Law and Policy 16, no. 2: 307–52. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.23.
   Google Scholar
• Nadalutti, E. 2014. Cross-border-cooperation in the Upper Adriatic: A New Kind of Citizenship? European Urban and Regional Studies 21, no. 2: 175–90. http://doi.org/10.1177/0969776412445828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadasdy, P. 1999. The Politics of Tek: Power and the “Integration” of Knowledge. Arctic Anthropology 36, no. 1: 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomb, S. 2011. The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and the Paradigm of Domination. Griffith Law Review 20, no. 3: 578–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2011.10854711.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D. 2003. On Borders and Power: A Theoretical Framework. Journal of Borderlands Studies 18, no. 1: 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2003.9695598.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, D., and A. Paasi. 1998. Fences and Neighbours in the Postmodern World: Boundary Narratives in Political Geography. Progress in Human Geography 22, no. 2: 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, E., and K. Bakker. 2009. Transgressing Scales: Water Governance across the Canada–U.S. Borderland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 99, no. 1: 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045600802317218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, E., and K. Bakker. 2017. Transcending Borders Through Postcolonial Water Governance? Indigenous Water Governance Across the Canada-US Border. In Water Policy and Governance in Canada, ed. S. Renzetti, and D. Dupont, 139–157. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42806-2_8.
   Google Scholar
• Okanagan Nation Alliance. 2017. About Us: Syilx/Okanagan Nation. https://www.syilx.org/about-us/syilx-nation/.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2012. Commentary – Border Studies Reanimated: Going Beyond the Territorial/Relational Divide. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 44, no. 2303–2309: 2303–9. https://doi.org/10.1068/a45282.
   Google Scholar
• Paisley, R., M. McKinney, and M. Stenovec. 2015. A Sacred Responsibility: Governing the Use of Water and Related Resources in the International Columbia Basin through the Prism of Tribes and First Nations. http://www.columbiarivergovernance.org/A_Shared_Responsibility_2015_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, N., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2009. Lines in the Sand? Towards an Agenda for Critical Border Studies. Geopolitics 14, no. 3: 582–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, C., and C. Rumford. 2013. The Politics of (Un)Fixity and the Vernacularisation of Borders. Global Society 27, no. 3: 267–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2013.790784.
   Google Scholar
• Prosper, K., L.J. McMillan, A.A. David, and M. Moffitt. 2011. Returning to Netukulimk: Mi’kmaq Cultural and Spiritual Connections with Resource Stewardship and Self-Governance. The International Indigenous Policy Journal 2, no. 7: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pulitano, E., and M. Trask. 2012. Indigenous Rights in the age of the UN Declaration. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M.G., and S. Bruyneel. 2010. Rescaling Environmental Governance, Rethinking the State: A Three-Dimensional Review. Progress in Human Geography 34, no. 5: 646–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509354836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sbaraini, A., et al. 2011. How to do a Grounded Theory Study: A Worked Example of a Study of Dental Practices. BMC Medical Research Methodology 11, no. 1: 128. Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2288/11/128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scholte, J.A. 2005. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Second. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Shadian, J. 2018. Navigating Political Borders Old and New: The Territoriality of Indigenous Inuit Governance. Journal of Borderlands Studies 33, no. 2: 273–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. 2008. Indigeneity and Political Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, W.S., R.D.K. Herman, and G.R. Dobbs. 2006. Encountering Indigeneity: Re-Imagining and Decolonizing Geography. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 88, no. 3: 267–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A. 2000. Path Towards a Mohawk Nation: Narratives of Citizenship and Nationhood in Kahnawake. In Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ed. D. Ivison, P. Patton, and W. Sanders, 113–136. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singleton, S. 2008. ‘Not our Borders’: Indigenous People and the Struggle to Maintain Shared Cultures and Polities in the Post-9/11 United States. Journal of Borderlands Studies 23, no. 3: 39–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2008.9695707.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, M., R. Simms, and O.M. Brandes, eds. 2018. Columbia River Treaty Symposium: Edited Proceedings. In POLIS Water Sustainability Project, 1–28. British Columbia: University of Victoria. Online: https://poliswaterproject.org/files/2018/11/CRT-Proceedings_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, H.K. 2013. Nenabozho’s Smart Berries: Rethinking Tribal Sovereignty and Accountability. Michigan State Law Review 2013: 339–54. http://www.uvic.ca/socialsciences/politicalscience/assets/docs/faculty/stark/msu-law-review-nenabozhos-smartberries.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Syilx Unity Declaration. 2010. Syilx Unity Declaration. Okanagan Nation Alliance and Colville Confederated Tribes. https://www.syilx.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Unity-Declaration.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tennberg, M. 2010. Indigenous Peoples as International Political Actors: A Summary. Polar Record 46, no. 238: 264–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0032247409990398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tully, J. 2000. The Struggles of Indigenous Peoples for and of Freedom. In Political Theory and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ed. D. Ivison, P. Patton, and W. Sanders, 36–59. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 2007. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. United Nations. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Justice. 2017. Native American Policies. Government of the United States of America Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gov/otj/native-american-policies.
   Google Scholar
• Van Houtum, H. 2005. The Geopolitics of Borders and Boundaries. Geopolitics 10 (4): 672–9.
   Google Scholar
• van Houtum, H., O. Kramsch, and W. Zierhofer, eds. 2005. B/Ordering Space. B/Ordering Space. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• von der Porten, S. 2012. Canadian Indigenous Governance Literature: A Review. AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 8, no. 1: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• von der Porten, S., and R. De Loë. 2013a. Collaborative Approaches to Governance for Water and Indigenous Peoples: A Case Study from British Columbia, Canada. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 50: 149–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von der Porten, S., and R. De Loë. 2013b. Water Governance and Indigenous Governance: Towards a Synthesis. Indigenous Policy Journal 16, no. 2: 222–43.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkins, D.E., and H.K. Stark. 2011. American Indian Politics and the American Political System. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, N.J. 2014. Indigenous Water Governance: Insights from the Hydrosocial Relations of the Koyukon Athabascan Village of Ruby, Alaska. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences 57: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. 2009. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Fourth. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• YRIWC. 2017. About us. Yukon River Inter-Tribal Watershed Commission. https://www.yritwc.org/about.
   Google Scholar