Cross-Border Institutional Trust in Post-Pandemic Times. The Role of EU b-solutions Initiative

References

• AEBR and EC. 2020a. b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles A Compendium of 43 Cases (vol. I). Brussels: Association of European Border Regions, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• AEBR and E.C. 2020b. b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles A Compendium of 43 Cases (Annex: 10 Pilot Actions and 33 Advice Cases). Brussels: Association of European Border Regions, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• AEBR and EC. 2021. b-solutions: Solving Border Obstacles. A Compendium 2020-2021. Brussels: Association of European Border Regions, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, D., and E. Prokkola2022. Borderlands Resilience Transitions, Adaptation and Resistance at Borders. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, H. 2023. Five Roles of Cross-Border Cooperation Against re-Bordering. Journal of Borderlands Studies 38, no. 3: 487–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschma, R. 2015. Towards an Evolutionary Perspective on Regional Resilience. Regional Studies 49, no. 5: 733–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casaglia, A. 2021. Borders and Mobility Injustice in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Borderlands Studies 36, no. 4: 695–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanho, R., A. Vulevic, J. Fernández, L; Fernández-Pozo, J. Gómez, and L. Loures. 2017. Accessibility and Connectivity – Movement Between Cities, as a Critical Factor to Achieve Success on Cross-Border Cooperation (CBC) Projects. A European Analysis. Sustainable Cities and Society 32, no. 2017: 181–90.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., H. Xiao, W. Huang, and W. He. 2022. Cooperation of Cross-Border E-Commerce: A Reputation and Trust Perspective. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 25, no. 1: 7–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chilla, T., and M. Lambracht. 2022. Institutional Mapping of Crossborder Cooperation. INTERREG Programme Analyses with KEEP Data. European Planning Studies 31, no. 4: 700–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devon, T., K. Stroeken, and P. Weyden. 2015. Measuring Institutional Trust: Evidence from Guyana. Journal of Politics in Latin America 7, no. 3: 85–115.
   Google Scholar
• Durà, A., 2018. Euroregions, Excellence and Innovation Across EU Borders. A Catalogue of Good Practices. Barcelona: U. Autònoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F., and A. Decoville. 2018. Establishing Cross-Border Spatial Planning. In European Territorial Cooperation, ed. E. Medeiros, 229–44. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Durand, F., and A. Decoville. 2019. A Multidimensional Measurement of the Integration Between European Border Regions. Journal of European Integration 42, no. 2: 163–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2015. Flash Eurobarometer 422: Cross-Border Cooperation in the EU. Brussels: Directorate General for Communication, European Commission. June 2015.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2017. Boosting Growth and Cohesion in EU Border Regions, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament (COM(2017) 534 Final). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2021. EU Border Regions: Living Labs of European Integration, Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2021) 393 Final. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• EC. 2023. Amended Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on a Mechanism to Resolve Legal and Administrative Obstacles in a Cross-Border Context, COM(2023) 790 Final, Strasbourg, 12 December 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Engl, A., and E. Evrard. 2019. Agenda-setting Dynamics in the Post-2020 Cohesion Policy Reform: The Pathway Towards the European Cross-Border Mechanism as Possible Policy Change. Journal of European Integration, doi:10.1080/07036337.2019.1689969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EP. 2023a. European Parliament Resolution of 14 September 2023 with Recommendations to the Commission on Amending the Proposed Mechanism to Resolve Legal and Administrative Obstacles in a Cross-Border Context (2022/2194(INL)) P9_TA (2023)0327. European Parliament, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• EP. 2023b. Mechanism to Resolve Legal and Administrative Obstacles in a Cross-Border Context: European Added Value Assessment, PE 740.233, European Parliament Research Service (EPRS), European Added Value Unit, May 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Esau, M. 2016. Exploring Institutional Trust and Organizational Performance Through the Case of the City of Cape Town. International Journal of Public Administration 39, no. 9: 686–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU. 2021. Regulation (EU) 2021/1059 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2021 on Specific Provisions for the European Territorial Cooperation Goal (Interreg) Supported by the European Regional Development Fund and External Financing Instruments, Official Journal of the European Union L 231/94-158, 30 June 2021, p. 111-112.
   Google Scholar
• Evrard, E., and A. Engl. 2018. Taking Stock of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC): From Policy Formulation to Policy Implementation. In European Territorial Cooperation, The Urban Book Series, ed. E. Medeiros, 209–27. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Golunov, S., and V. Smirnova. 2022. Russian Border Controls in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Social, Political, and Economic Implications. Problems of PostCommunism 69, no. 1: 71–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Gómez, T., and E. Gualda. 2020. Disclosing the Relational Structure of Institutional Cross-Border Cooperation in Two Cross-Border Regions in Europe. Journal of Borderlands Studies 35, no. 1: 113–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González de Bustamante, C. 2017. “Politics, Media and THe U.S.-Mexico Borderlands.” Voices of Mexico 102, collaborative dossier.
   Google Scholar
• Guillermo-Ramírez, M. 2020. Debating Real Integrated Territorial Cooperation Approaches to Post-2020 EU Policies: The Challenges Arising from COVID-19 from the Perspective of the Association of European Border Regions (AEBR). Europa XXI 38, no. 2020: 119–37.
   Google Scholar
• Haesebrouck, K., A. Van den Abbeele, and M. Williamson. 2021. Building Trust Through Knowledge Sharing: Implications for Incentive System Design. Accounting, Organizations and Society 93, no. 2021: 101241. doi:10.1016/j.aos.2021.101241.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, P., and G. Serin. 2010. Rescaling or Institutional Flexibility? The Experience of the Cross-Border Øresund. Region, Regional & Federal Studies 20, no. 2: 201–27.
   Google Scholar
• Interact. 2020. ISO 1: Better Cooperation Governance, Interact, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, M., and G. Schenke. 2020. Partisanship and Institutional Trust in Mongolia. Democratization 27, no. 4: 605–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacquey, F. 2019. “Auf Vertrauen Aufbauen und Vertrauen Schaffen” (Trust Building and Achieving), final part of the presentation of a b-solutions case by the Director of the Greater Region Summit Secretariat EGTC during a panel on “Trust Building” at the AEBR Annual Conference held in the City Hall of Dresden, Euregio Elbe-Labe (DE/CZ), on 24 October 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Jurado-Almonte, J.M., F.J. Pazos-García, and R.A. Castanho. 2020. Eurocities of the Iberian Borderland: A Second Generation of Border Cooperation Structures. An Analysis of Their Development Strategies, Sustainability 2020, no. 12: 6438.
   Google Scholar
• Kaucic, J., and C. Sohn. 2021. Mapping the Cross-Border Cooperation ‘Galaxy’: An Exploration of Scalar Arrangements in Europe. European Planning Studies 30, no. 12: 2373–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, K. 2018. The Spatiality of Trust in EU External Cross-Border Cooperation. European Planning Studies 26, no. 3: 591–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lago, X. 2019. Simplifying cross-border mobility that hinders free movement of minor people crossing borders to carry out cultural, sports or educational exchanges, presentation of a b-solutions case by the Director of the Galicia-Norte Portugal (GNP) EGTC during a panel on “Trust Building” at the AEBR Annual Conference held in the City Hall of Dresden, Euregio Elbe-Labe (DE/CZ), on 24 October 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, E., and I. Pires. 2018. The Role and Rise of European Cross-Border Entities. In European Territorial Cooperation. The Urban Book Series, ed. E. Medeiros, 135–49. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lara-Valencia, F., and J. Laine. 2022. The Covid-19 Pandemic: Territorial, Political and Governance Dimensions of Bordering. Journal of Borderlands Studies 37, no. 4: 665–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liedong, T., A. Ghobadian, T. Rajwani, and N. O’Regan. 2015. Toward a View of Complementarity: Trust and Policy Influence Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Political Activity. Group & Organization Management 40, no. 3: 405–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2011. (Re)Defining the Euroregion Concept. European Planning Studies 19, no. 1: 141–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2014. Is There a new ‘Trust’ in Inner Scandinavia? Evidence from Cross-Border Planning and Governance. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 96, no. 4: 363–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E. 2018b. Should EU Cross-Border Cooperation Programmes Focus Mainly on Reducing Border Obstacles? Documents D'Anàlisi Geogràfica 64, no. 3: 467–91.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., ed. 2018. European Territorial Cooperation. Theoretical and Empirical Approaches to the Process and Impacts of Cross-Border and Transnational Cooperation in Europe. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., ed. 2021. Border Cities and Territorial Development. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., M. Guillermo-Ramírez, C. Dellagiacoma, and G. Brustia. 2021b. Will reducing border barriers via the EU’s b-solutions lead towards greater European territorial integration? Regional Studies 56, no. 3: 504–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., M. Guillermo-Ramírez, G. Ocskay, and J. Peyrony. 2021a. Covidfencing Effects on Cross-Border Deterritorialism: The Case of Europe. European Planning Studies 29, no. 5: 962–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medeiros, E., M. Guillermo Ramírez, G. Brustia, C. Dellagiacoma, and C. Mullan. 2022. Reducing Border Barriers for Cross-Border Commuters in Europe via the EU b-Solutions Initiative. European Planning Studies 31(4), no. 4: 822–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. 2022. To Trust or not to Trust? Structures, Practices and Discourses of Transboundary Trust Around the Swedish Nuclear Power Plant Barsebäck Near Copenhagen. Journal of Risk Research 25, no. 5: 562–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. ed. 1996. Trust in Modern Societies: The Search for the Bases of Social Order. New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• MOT. 2020. The effects of COVID-19 induced border closures on cross-border regions. Paris: MOT.
   Google Scholar
• Novotný, L. 2022. Effects of ‘Covidfencing’ on Cross-Border Commuting: A Case of Czech-German Borderland. European Planning Studies 30, no. 4: 590–607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Policy Dialogue, Knowledge Sharing and Engaging in Mutual Learning, OECD POST 2015, Element 9 Paper 1, OECD, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Opiłowska, E. 2021. The COVID-19 Crisis: The end of a Borderless Europe? European Societies 23, no. 1: S589–S600.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P. 2002. Institution-based Trust in Interorganizational Exchange Relationships: The Role of Online B2B Marketplaces on Trust Formation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11: 215–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polverari, L., E. Domorenok, and P. Graziano. 2022. Empowerment via Delegation? The Administrative Capacity-Building Potential of Cohesion Policy Urban Development Strategies. Regional Studies, doi:10.1080/00343404.2022.2058698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitel, B., B. Wassenberg, and J. Peyrony. 2018. The INTERREG Experience in Bridging European Territories. A 30-Year Summary. In European Territorial Cooperation. The Urban Book Series, ed. E. Medeiros, 7–23. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trillo-Santamaría, J.M., V. Paül, and R. Vila-Lage. 2021. Two Generations of Eurocities Along the Northern Section of the Spanish-Portuguese Border. In Twin Cities Across Five Continents, eds. E. Mikhailova, and J. Garrard, 104–17. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2023. Capacity-Building, https://www.un.org/en/academic-impact/capacity-building [accessed 9/11/23].
   Google Scholar
• van der Velde, M., D. Sijtsma, M. Goossens, and B. Maartense. 2021. The Dutch–German Border: Open in Times of Coronavirus Lockdowns. Borders in Globalization Review 2, no. 2: 149–53.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, F. 2022. Cross-border Cooperation in the Border Region of Germany, France, and Luxembourg in Times of Covid-19. European Societies 24, no. 3: 354–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welter, F., N. Veleva, and S. Kolb. 2008. Trust and Learning in Cross-Border Partnerships in an Enlarged Europe. Deliverable 15. Sixth Framework Programme Priority 7 – Citizens and Governance in a Knowledge Based Society, Brussels.
   Google Scholar