Factors affecting the performance of the deep cervical flexors in young people using smartphones

References

• Berolo S, Wells RP, Amick III BC. Musculoskeletal symptoms among mobile hand-held device users and their relationship to device use: a preliminary study in a Canadian university population. Appl Ergon. 2011;42(2):371–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haug S, Castro RP, Kwon M, et al. Smartphone use and smartphone addiction among young people in Switzerland. J Behav Addict. 2015;4(4):299–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljomaa SS, Qudah MFA, Albursan IS, et al. Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;61:155–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok J-Y, Choi S-W, Kim D-J, et al. Latent class analysis on internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014;10:817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szeto G, To D, Tsang S, et al., editor. Neck postures during smartphone use in university students and office workers: a field study. Congress of the International Ergonomics Association. New York (NY): Springer; 2018. 122–125 . doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-96083-8_15.
   Google Scholar
• Lee M-Y, Lee H-Y, Yong M-S. Characteristics of cervical position sense in subjects with forward head posture. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(11):1741–1743.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weon J-H, J-S O, Cynn H-S, et al. Influence of forward head posture on scapular upward rotators during isometric shoulder flexion. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010;14(4):367–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jull GA. Deep cervical flexor muscle dysfunction in whiplash. J Musculoskelet Pain. 2000;8(1–2):143–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan X, Fan G, Chen Z, et al. Gender difference in mobile phone use and the impact of digital device exposure on neck posture. Ergonomics. 2016;59(11):1453–1461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith CC. Gender differences in personality: an item-level analysis. Phd, CUNY, New York (NY): USA, Academic Works; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Miller B, Carter J, MacRae C, et al. A comparative analysis of attitudes towards female and male breadwinners in Germany, Sweden and the United States. J Gend Stud. 2021;1–13. doi:10.1080/09589236.2021.1872510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee MS, Dasgupta S. Development and validation of the smartphone use scale. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AlAbdulwahab SS, Kachanathu SJ, AlMotairi MS. Smartphone use addiction can cause neck disability. Musculoskelet Care. 2017;15(1):10–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Can HB, Tuna F. Relation between endurance of deep cervical flexor muscles and physical activity level, perceived stress, sleep quality, and smartphone addiction. CRANIO®. 2022;40(2):126–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demirci K, Orhan H, Demirdas A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the smartphone addiction scale in a younger population. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014;24(3):226–234.
   Google Scholar
• Kwon M, Lee J-Y, Won W-Y, et al. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PloS One. 2013;8(2):e56936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jull GA, O’Leary SP, Falla DL. Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008;31(7):525–533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audette I, Dumas J-P, Côté JN, et al. Validity and between-day reliability of the cervical range of motion (CROM) device. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010;40(5):318–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall FP, McCreary EK, Provance PG, et al. Muscles testing and function with posture and pain. Fifth. Philadelphia (PA): LWW; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu TT, Lam T-H, Hedley AJ. Maximal isometric muscle strength of the cervical spine in healthy volunteers. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16(7):772–779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley MS, Meyer RA, Feeback DL, et al. Noninvasive analysis of human neck muscle function. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995;20(23):2505–2512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010;111(1):278–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjorstrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oner N, Le Compte A. State-trait anxiety inventory hand book. Istanbul, Turkey: Bogazici University; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger CD. Weiner , B, Craighead, E eds. State‐trait anxiety inventory . In: The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology.Hoboken (NJ):Wiley; 2010. 1–1. DOI:10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0943.
   Google Scholar
• Hayran M. Basic statistics for health researchers. [Sağlık araştırmaları için temel istatistik]. Ankara, Turkey: Omega Araştırma; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Guenther WC. Desk calculation of probabilities for the distribution of the sample correlation coefficient. Am Stat. 1977;31(1):45–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng C-H, Chien A, Hsu W-L, et al. Investigation of the differential contributions of superficial and deep muscles on cervical spinal loads with changing head postures. PloS One. 2016;11(3):e0150608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold JE, Driban J, Thomas N, et al. Postures, typing strategies, and gender differences in mobile device usage: an observational study. Appl Ergon. 2012;43(2):408–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchner DM. Preserving mobility in older adults. West J Med. 1997;167(4):258.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tolea MI, Terracciano A, Simonsick EM, et al. Associations between personality traits, physical activity level, and muscle strength. J Res Pers. 2012;46(3):264–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borisut S, Vongsirinavarat M, Vachalathiti R, et al. Effects of strength and endurance training of superficial and deep neck muscles on muscle activities and pain levels of females with chronic neck pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(9):1157–1162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheng C-H, Wang J-L, Lin -J-J, et al. Position accuracy and electromyographic responses during head reposition in young adults with chronic neck pain. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2010;20(5):1014–1020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie YF, Szeto G, Madeleine P, et al. Spinal kinematics during smartphone texting–A comparison between young adults with and without chronic neck-shoulder pain. Appl Ergon. 2018;68:160–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Choi Y-H, Kim J. Effects of the cervical flexion angle during smartphone use on muscle fatigue and pain in the cervical erector spinae and upper trapezius in normal adults in their 20s. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(5):921–923.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Namwongsa S, Puntumetakul R, Neubert MS, et al. Effect of neck flexion angles on neck muscle activity among smartphone users with and without neck pain. Ergonomics. 2019;62(12):1524–1533.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abadiyan F, Hadadnezhad M, Khosrokiani Z, et al. Adding a smartphone app to global postural re-education to improve neck pain, posture, quality of life, and endurance in people with nonspecific neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Park J-H, Kang S-Y, Lee S-G, et al. The effects of smart phone gaming duration on muscle activation and spinal posture: pilot study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2017;33(8):661–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Seo K. The comparison of cervical repositioning errors according to smartphone addiction grades. J Phys Ther Sci. 2014;26(4):595–598.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar