A discursive psychology analysis of emotional support for men with colorectal cancer

References

• Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (1998). Identity as an achievement and as a tool. In C. Antaki, & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 1–14). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., & Middleton, D. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cancer Research UK. (2010). High risk groups for bowel cancer. Retrieved from www.cancerhelp.org.uk/type/bowel-cancer/about/risks/high-risk-groups-for-bowel-cancer#incidence
   Google Scholar
• Coates, J. (2003). Men talk: Stories in the making of masculinities. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men’s well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 1385–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutrona, C. E., & Russell, D. W. (1990). Type of social support and specific stress: Toward a theory of optimal matching. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 319–366). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dakof, G. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1990). Victims’ perceptions of social support: What is helpful from whom? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 80–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, B., & Harré, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 20, 43–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Visser, R. O., Smith, J. A., & McDonnell, E. J. (2009). ‘That’s not masculine’: Masculine capital and health-related behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 1047–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edley, N. (2001). Analysing masculinity: Interpretive repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis (pp. 189–228). Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Emslie, C., Hunt, K., & O’Brien, R. (2004). Masculinities in older men: A qualitative study in the west of Scotland. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 12, 207–226.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, R. E., Fitch, M. I., Fergus, K. D., Mykhalovskiy, E., & Church, K. (2002). Hegemonic masculinity and the experience of prostate cancer: A narrative approach. Journal of Aging and Identity, 7, 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, C. (2007). Being dead and being there: Research interview, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing ‘naturally occurring data’. Discourse Studies, 9, 246–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harré, R., & Gillett, G. (1994). The discursive mind. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Helgeson, V. S., & Cohen, S. (1996). Social support and adjustment to cancer: Reconciling descriptive, correlational and intervention research. Health Psychology, 15, 135–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepore, S., & Helgeson, V. S. (1998). Social constraints, intrusive thoughts, and mental health after prostate cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 17, 89–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little, S., Jordens, C. F. C., Paul, K., Montgomery, K., & Philipson, B. (1998). Liminality: A major category of the experience of cancer illness. Social Science and Medicine, 47, 1485–1494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan Cancer Support. (2011). Why talk? Why listen? Retrieved from www.macmillan.org.uk/Cancerinformation/Ifsomeoneelsehascancer/Talkingtosomeone/WhytalkWhylisten.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Mahalik, J. R., Burns, S. M., & Syzdek, M. (2007). Masculinity and perceived normative health behaviours as predictors of men’s health behaviours. Social Science and Medicine, 64, 2201–2209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Men’s Health Forum. (2010). MHF’s challenges to the NHS and Government. Retrieved from www.menshealthforum.org.uk/improving-health-services/20199-mhfs-challenges-nhs-and-government
   Google Scholar
• Peel, E., Parry, O., Douglas, M., & Lawton, J. (2005). Taking the biscuit? A discursive approach to managing diet in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology, 10, 779–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 38–55.
   Google Scholar
• Seale, C. (2002). Cancer heroics: A study of news reports with particular reference to gender. Sociology, 36, 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Seymour-Smith, S. (2008). ‘Blokes don’t like that sort of thing’: Men’s negotiation of a ‘troubled’ self-help group identity. Journal of Health Psychology, 13, 785–797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour-Smith, S., Wetherell, M., & Phoenix, A. (2002). “My wife ordered me to come!” A discursive analysis of doctors’ and nurses’ accounts of men’s use of general practitioners. Journal of Health Psychology, 7, 253–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. (2001). Textualizing global politics. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 318–344). Milton Keynes: Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. A. (1995). Semi-structured interviewing and qualitative analysis. In J. A. Smith, R. Harré, & L. Van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 9–26). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 387–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (1999). Negotiating hegemonic masculinity: Imaginary positions and psycho-discursive practices. Feminism and Psychology, 9, 335–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Kitzinger, C. (2000). Thinking differently about thinking positive: A discursive approach to cancer patient’s talk. Social Science and Medicine, 50, 797–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P., Barclay, L., & Schmied, V. (2004). Defining social support in context: A necessary step to improving research, intervention and practice. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 942–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabora, J., Brintzenhofeszoc, K., Curbow, B., Hooker, C., & Piantadosi, S. (2001). The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psycho-Oncology, 10, 19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar