Effects of tailoring ingredients in auditory persuasive health messages on fruit and vegetable intake

References

• Bogers, R. P., van Assema, P., Kester, A. D. M., Westerterp, K. R., & Dagnelie, P. C. (2004). Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness to change of a short questionnaire for measuring fruit and vegetable intake. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159, 900–909. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2013). Begrippen – Ervaren gezondheid [Definitions – Experienced health]. Retrieved October 22, 2013, from http://www.cbs.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Cesario, J., Grant, H., & Higgins, E. T. (2004). Regulatory fit and persuasion: Transfer from “feeling Right”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 388–404. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.3.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A. H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 241–256. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, J., & Armitage, C. J. (2012). Do techniques that increase fruit intake also increase vegetable intake? Evidence from a comparison of two implementation intention interventions. Appetite, 58, 28–33. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analyses for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A. (2005). Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: Evidence from smoking cessation. Health Education Research, 20, 527–539. doi:10.1093/her/cyh014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A. (2008). The psychology of tailoring-ingredients in computer-tailored persuasion. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 765–784. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00081.x
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A. (2014). The persuasive effects of personalization through name mentioning in a smoking cessation message. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 24, 393–411. doi:10.1007/s11257-014-9147-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A., & Ballast, K. (2012). Personalization and perceived personal relevance in computer-tailored persuasion in smoking cessation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17, 60–73. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02029.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A., De Vries, H., & Bakker, M. (1996). Pros and cons of quitting, self-efficacy, and the stages of change in smoking cessation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 758–763.10.1037/0022-006X.64.4.758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A., Rothman, A., & Pietersma, S. (2011). The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory. Psychology & Health, 26, 1036–1048. doi:10.1080/08870446.2010.526715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbert, S. P., & Dijkstra, A. (2014). An experimental test of the relationship between voice intonation and persuasion in the domain of health. Psychology & Health, 29, 1014–1031. doi:10.1080/08870446.2014.903842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillaumie, L., Godin, G., & Vézina-Im, L.-A. (2010). Psychosocial determinants of fruit and vegetable intake in adult population: A systematic review. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 7, 1. doi:10.1186/1479-5868-7-12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R. P., Kreuter, M., Resnicow, K., Fishbein, M., & Dijkstra, A. (2008). Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Education Research, 23, 454–466. doi:10.1093/her/cyn004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C., Farnham, S. D., Drucker, S. M., & Kollock, P. (2000). The effect of communication modality on cooperation in online environments. In T. Turner, G. Szwillus, M. Czerwinski, F. Peterno, & S. Pemberton (Eds.), CHI2000 Conference Proceedings (pp. 470–477). New York, NY: ACM Press. doi:10.1145/332040.332478
   Google Scholar
• Kreausukon, P., Gellert, P., Lippke, S., & Schwarzer, R. (2012). Planning and self-efficacy can increase fruit and vegetable consumption: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 443–451. doi:10.1007/s10865-011-9373-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W., Bull, F. C., Clark, E. M., & Oswald, D. L. (1999a). Understanding how people process health information: A comparison of tailored and nontailored weight-loss materials. Health Psychology, 18, 487–494. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.18.5.487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M. W., Strecher, V. J., & Glassman, B. (1999). One size does not fit all: The case for tailoring print materials. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 276–283. doi:10.1007/BF02895958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustria, M. L. A., Noar, S. M., Cortese, J., Van Stee, S. K., Glueckauf, R. L., & Lee, J. (2013). A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 1039–1069. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.768727
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maloney, E. K., Lapinski, M. K., & Witte, K. (2011). Fear appeals and persuasion: A review and update of the extended parallel process model. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 206–219. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00341.x
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands Nutrition Centre. (2011). Richtlijnen voedselkeuze [Guidelines for choices of food]. Den Haag: Voedingscentrum.
   Google Scholar
• Netherlands Nutrition Centre. (2016). Richtlijnen schijf van vijf [Food guide pyramid]. Den Haag: Voedingscentrum.
   Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Benac, C. N., & Harris, M. S. (2007). Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 673–693. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oenema, A., & Brug, J. (2003). Feedback strategies to raise awareness of personal dietary intake: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 36, 429–439. doi:10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00043-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oenema, A., Tan, F., & Brug, J. (2005). Short-term efficacy of a web-based computer-tailored nutrition intervention: Main effects and mediators. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 29, 54–63. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2901_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re- analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7, 1–24. doi:10.1080/17437199.2012.703527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2012). The elaboration likelihood model. In P. A. M. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 224–245). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pietersma, S., & Dijkstra, A. (2011). Do behavioural health intentions engender health behaviour change? A study on the moderating role of self-affirmation on actual fruit intake versus vegetable intake. British Journal of Health Psychology, 16, 815–827. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02018.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677–688. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.9.677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. S., Strecher, V. J., & Hospers, H. (1994). Physicians’ recommendations for mammography: Do tailored messages make a difference? American Journal of Public Health, 84, 43–49. doi:10.2105/AJPH.84.1.43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, M., & DeBono, K. G. (1985). Appeals to image and claims about quality: Understanding the psychology of advertising. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 586–597. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams-Piehota, P., Schneider, T. R., Pizarro, J., Mowad, L., & Salovey, P. (2003). Matching health messages to information-processing styles: Need for cognition and mammography utilization. Health Communication, 15, 375–392. doi:10.1207/S15327027HC1504_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61, 113–134. doi:10.1080/03637759409376328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar