7,148
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Editor’s choice paper

Determinants of routine cervical screening participation in underserved women: a qualitative systematic review

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 145-170 | Received 08 Oct 2021, Accepted 02 Mar 2022, Published online: 16 Mar 2022

References

  • A., Addawe, M., B., Mburu, C., A. & Madar, (2018). Abarriers to cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study among Somali women in Oslo Norway. Heal Prim Care, 2(1), 1–5.
  • Abdullahi, A., Copping, J., Kessel, A., Luck, M., & Bonell, C. (2009). Cervical screening: Perceptions and barriers to uptake among Somali women in Camden. Public Health, 123(10), 680–685.
  • Anaman-Torgbor, J. A., King, J., & Correa-Velez, I. (2017). Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening practices among African immigrant women living in Brisbane, Australia. European Journal of Oncology Nursing: The Official Journal of European Oncology Nursing Society, 31, 22–29.
  • Arbyn, M., Anttila, A., Jordan, J., Ronco, G., Schenck, U., Segnan, N., Wiener, H., Herbert, A., & von Karsa, L. (2010). European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. second edition-summary document. Annals of Oncology: Official Journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 21(3), 448–458.
  • Australian Government Department of Health. (2021). How cervical screening works [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 27]. https://www.health.gov.au/initiatives-and-programs/national-cervical-screening-program/getting-a-cervical-screening-test/how-cervical-screening-works
  • Azerkan, F., Sparén, P., Sandin, S., Tillgren, P., Faxelid, E., & Zendehdel, K. (2012). Cervical screening participation and risk among Swedish-born and immigrant women in Sweden. International Journal of Cancer, 130(4), 937–947. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.2608421437898
  • Azerkan, F., Widmark, C., Sparén, P., Weiderpass, E., Tillgren, P., & Faxelid, E. (2015). When life got in the way: How Danish and Norwegian immigrant women in Sweden reason about cervical screening and why they postpone attendance. PLoS One, 10(7), e0107624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107624
  • Bambra, C., Gibson, M., Sowden, A., Wright, K., Whitehead, M., & Petticrew, M. (2010). Tackling the wider social determinants of health and health inequalities: Evidence from systematic reviews. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 64(4), 284–291. [Internet]. [cited 2021 Sep. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC2921286/.
  • Bambra, C., Smith, K., & Lynch, J. (2021). The unequal pandemic: COVID-19 and health inequalities (pp. 1–184). Policy Press.
  • Batarfi, N. S. (2012). Women’s experiences, barriers, and facilitators when accessing breast and cervical cancer screening services. University of York.
  • Baum, F. (2007). Cracking the nut of health equity: Top down and bottom up pressure for action on the social determinants of health. Promotion & Education, 14(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/10253823070140022002
  • Bonevski, B., Randell, M., Paul, C., Chapman, K., Twyman, L., Bryant, J., Brozek, I., & Hughes, C. (2014). Reaching the hard-to-reach: A systematic review of strategies for improving health and medical research with socially disadvantaged groups. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14(1), 42–2018.
  • Bongaerts, T. H., Büchner, F. L., Middelkoop, B. J., Guicherit, O. R., & Numans, M. E. (2020). Determinants of (non-)attendance at the Dutch cancer screening programmes: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Screening, 27(3), 121–129.
  • Bukowska-Durawa, A., & Luszczynska, A. (2014). Cervical cancer screening and psychosocial barriers perceived by patients. A systematic review. Wspolczesna Onkol, 18(3), 153–159. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25520573] [25520573]
  • Butler, T. L., Anderson, K., Condon, J. R., Garvey, G., Brotherton, J. M. L., Cunningham, J., Tong, A., Moore, S. P., Maher, C. M., Mein, J. K., Warren, E. F., & Whop, L. J. (2020). Indigenous Australian women’s experiences of participation in cervical screening. PLoS One, 15(6), e0234536. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234536
  • Cadman, L., Ashdown-Barr, L., Waller, J., & Szarewski, A. (2015). Attitudes towards cytology and human papillomavirus self-sample collection for cervical screening among Hindu women in London, UK: A mixed methods study. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 41(1), 38–47.
  • Cadman, L., Waller, J., Ashdown-Barr, L., & Szarewski, A. (2012). Barriers to cervical screening in women who have experienced sexual abuse: An exploratory study. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 38(4), 214–220.
  • Cancer Research UK. Cervical cancer statistics. (2017). [Internet]. [cited 2020 Sep 11]. https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/cervical-cancer
  • Chan, D. N. S., & So, W. K. W. (2017). A systematic review of the factors influencing ethnic minority women’s cervical cancer screening behavior: From intrapersonal to policy level. Cancer Nursing, 40(6), E1–30.
  • Chiu, L. F., Heywood, P., Jordan, J., McKinney, P., & Dowell, T. (1999). Balancing the equation: The significance of professional and lay perceptions in the promotion of cervical screening amongst minority ethnic women. Critical Public Health, 9(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581599908409216
  • Chorley, A. J., Marlow, L. A. V., Forster, A. S., Haddrell, J. B., & Waller, J. (2017). Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: A systematic review and thematic synthesis. Psycho-oncology, 26(2), 161–172.
  • Craig, P., Ruggiero, E., Di, Frohlich Kl, Mykhalovskiy, E., White, M., & Campbell, R. (2018). Taking account of context in population health intervention research: Guidance for producers, users and funders of research. [Internet]. UK. [cited 2020 Jul 29]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3310/CIHR-NIHR-01
  • Cumpston, M., Chandler. (2020). Updating a review (Chapter IV). In J. P. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler, M. Cumpston, T. L, & M. Page (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane. [cited 2021 Jan 6]. www.traning.cochrane.org/handbook
  • Dahlgren, W. (2007). European strategies for tackling social inequities in health: Levelling up Part 2. [Internet]. WHO, Regional Office for Europe.; [cited 2019 Jul 12]. Available from: www.euro.who.int
  • Dahlgren, G., & Whitehead, M. (1991). Policies and strategies to promote social equity in health Background document to WHO: Strategy paper (Vol. 14, pp. 67). Institute for Future Studies. http://ideas.repec.org/p/hhs/ifswps/2007_014.html.
  • Dalton, J., Booth, A., Noyes, J., & Sowden, A. J. (2017 [cited 2021 Sep 2). Potential value of systematic reviews of qualitative evidence in informing user-centered health and social care: Findings from a descriptive overview. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 88, 37–46. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.020
  • De Prez, V., Jolidon, V., Willems, B., Cullati, S., Burton-Jeangros, C., & Bracke, P. (2021). Cervical cancer screening programs and their context-dependent effect on inequalities in screening uptake: A dynamic interplay between public health policy and welfare state redistribution. International Journal for Equity in Health, 20(1) [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01548-6
  • Diderichsen, F., Evans, T., & Whitehead, M. (2001). The social basis of disparities in health. In T. Evans, M. Whitehead, F. Diderichsen, A. Bhuiya, M. Wirth (Eds.), Challenging inequities in health: From ethics to action (pp. 12–23). Oxford University Press.
  • Douglas, E., Waller, J., Duffy, S. W., & Wardle, J. (2016). Socioeconomic inequalities in breast and cervical screening coverage in England: Are we closing the gap? Journal of Medical Screening, 23(2), 98–103.
  • Dugué, P.-A., Lynge, E., & Rebolj, M. (2014). Mortality of non-participants in cervical screening: Register-based cohort study. International Journal of Cancer, 134(11)
  • Elfström, K. M., Arnheim-Dahlström, L., Von Karsa, L., & Dillner, J. (2015). Cervical cancer screening in Europe: Quality assurance and organisation of programmes. European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990), 51(8), 950–968.
  • Garside, R. (2014). Should we appraise the quality of qualitative research reports for systematic reviews, and if so, how? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(1), 67–79. [Internet]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2013.777270
  • Gele, A. A., Qureshi, S. A., Kour, P., Kumar, B., & Diaz, E. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening among Pakistani and Somali immigrant women in Oslo: A qualitative study. International Journal of Women’s Health, 9(9), 487–496. Jul
  • George, R. E., Thornicroft, G., & Dogra, N. (2015). Exploration of cultural competency training in UK healthcare settings: A critical interpretive review of the literature. Divers Equal Heal Care, 12(3), 104–115.
  • Hamdiui, N., Marchena, E., Stein, M. L., van Steenbergen, J. E., Crutzen, R., van Keulen, H. M., Reis, R., van den Muijsenbergh, M. E. T. C., & Timen, A. (2021). Decision-making, barriers, and facilitators regarding cervical cancer screening participation among Turkish and Moroccan women in the Netherlands: A focus group study. Ethnicity & Health, 0(0), 1–19. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2020.1863921
  • Harder, E., Juul, K. E., Jensen, S. M., Thomsen, L. T., Frederiksen, K., & Kjaer, S. K. (2018). Factors associated with non-participation in cervical cancer screening: A nationwide study of nearly half a million women in Denmark. Preventive Medicine, 111, 94–100.
  • Holman, D., Lynch, R., & Reeves, A. (2018). How do health behaviour interventions take account of social context? A literature trend and co-citation analysis. Health (London, England: 1997), 22(4), 389–410. [Internet]. Aug 14]Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459317695630
  • Idehen, E. E., Koponen, P., Härkänen, T., Kangasniemi, M., Pietilä, A. M., & Korhonen, T. (2018). Disparities in cervical screening participation: A comparison of Russian, Somali and Kurdish immigrants with the general Finnish population. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0768-2
  • Idehen, E. E., Pietilä, A. M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to cervical screening among migrant women of African origin: A qualitative study in Finland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health., 17(20), 1–20.
  • Jackowska, M., Von Wagner, C., Wardle, J., Juszczyk, D., Luszczynska, A., & Waller, J. (2012). Cervical screening among migrant women: A qualitative study of Polish, Slovak and Romanian women in London, UK. The Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 38(4), 229–238.
  • Jansen, E. E. L., Zielonke, N., Gini, A., Anttila, A., Segnan, N., Vokó, Z., Ivanuš, U., McKee, M., de Koning, H. J., de Kok, I. M. C. M, & EU-TOPIA Consortium. (2020). Effect of organised cervical cancer screening on cervical cancer mortality in Europe: A systematic review. European Journal of Cancer (Oxford, England: 1990), 127, 207–223.
  • Johnson, C. E., Mues, K. E., Mayne, S. L., & Kiblawi, A. N. (2008). Cervical cancer screening among immigrants and ethnic minorities. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, 12(3), 232–241. [18596467]
  • Kwok, C., White, K., & Roydhouse, J. K. J. K. (2011). Chinese-Australian women’s knowledge, facilitators and barriers related to cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 13(6), 1076–1083.
  • Lee, S.-Y. (2015). Cultural factors associated with breast and cervical cancer screening in Korean American women in the US: An integrative literature review. Asian Nursing Research, 9(2), 81–90. PMC] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2015.05.00326160234
  • Leinonen, M. K., Campbell, S., Klungsøyr, O., Lönnberg, S., Hansen, B. T. B. T., & Nygård, M. (2017). Personal and provider level factors influence participation to cervical cancer screening: A retrospective register-based study of 1.3 million women in Norway. Preventive Medicine, 94, 31–39. [Internet]. Jan 1 [cited 2019 Aug 7]Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743516303735
  • Logan, L., & McIlfatrick, S. (2011). Exploring women’s knowledge, experiences and perceptions of cervical cancer screening in an area of social deprivation. European Journal of Cancer Care, 20(6), 720–727.
  • Lorenc, T., Petticrew, M., Welch, V., & Tugwell, P. (2013). What types of interventions generate inequalities? Evidence from systematic reviews. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 67(2), 190–193.
  • Lovell, B., Wetherell, M. A., & Shepherd, L. (2015). Barriers to cervical screening participation in high-risk women. Journal of Public Health, 23(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-014-0649-0
  • Lovell, N., & Bibby, J. (2018). What makes us healthy? An introduction to the social determinants of health. [Internet]. London; Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/sites/default/files/What-makes-us-healthy-quick-guide.pdf
  • Marlow, L., McBride, E., Varnes, L., & Waller, J. (2019). Barriers to cervical screening among older women from hard-to-reach groups: A qualitative study in England. BMC Women’s Health, 19(1), 38.
  • Marlow, L., Waller, J., & Wardle, J. (2015). Barriers to cervical cancer screening among ethnic minority women: A qualitative study. Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, 41(4), 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2014-101082
  • Marlow, L., Wardle, J., & Waller, J. (2015). Understanding cervical screening non-attendance among ethnic minority women in England. British Journal of Cancer, 113(5), 833–839.
  • Marmot, M., Allen, J., Goldblatt, P., Boyce, T., McNeish, D. & Grady, M ( 2010). The Marmot review: Fair society, healthy lives. [Internet].[cited 2019 Jul 10]. http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/resources-reports/fair-society-healthy-lives-the-marmot-review/fair-society-healthy-lives-full-report-pdf.pdf
  • McGeechan, G. J., Byrnes, K., Campbell, M., Carthy, N., Eberhardt, J., Paton, W., Swainston, K., & Giles, E. L. (2021). A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of the experience of living with colorectal cancer as a chronic illness. Psychology & Health, 0(0), 1–25. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2020.1867137
  • McGill, R., Anwar, E., Orton, L., Bromley, H., Lloyd-Williams, F., O’Flaherty, M., Taylor-Robinson, D., Guzman-Castillo, M., Gillespie, D., Moreira, P., Allen, K., Hyseni, L., Calder, N., Petticrew, M., White, M., Whitehead, M., & Capewell, S. (2015). Are interventions to promote healthy eating equally effective for all? Systematic review of socioeconomic inequalities in impact Health behavior, health promotion and society. BMC Public Health [Internet], 15(1), 457.
  • Moser, K., Patnick, J., & Beral, V. (2009). Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: Analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed), 338, b2025.
  • Moss, J. L., Gilkey, M. B., Rimer, B. K., & Brewer, N. T. (2016). Disparities in collaborative patient-provider communication about human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 12(6), 1476–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2015.1128601
  • NHS. (2020). What is cervical screening? [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 20]. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/cervical-screening/
  • Office for National Statistics. (2018). People living in deprived neighbourhoods [Internet]. [cited 2019 Dec 3]. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/uk-population-by-ethnicity/demographics/people-living-in-deprived-neighbourhoods/latest
  • Ogunsiji, O., Wilkes, L., Peters, K., & Jackson, D. (2013). Knowledge, attitudes and usage of cancer screening among West African migrant women. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 22(7–8), 1026–1033.
  • Omolo, D. (2019). The uptake of pap smear screening among Kenyan migrants in the Netherlands: A qualitative study [Internet]. Available from: https://thesis.eur.nl/pub/51368/Omolo-Deborah_MA2018_19_SJP.pdf.
  • Oscarsson, M. G., Wijma, B. E., & Benzein, E. G. (2008). I do not need to. I do not want to. I do not give it priority.” Why women choose not to attend cervical cancer screening. Heal Expect, 11(1).
  • Parajuli, J., Horey, D., & Avgoulas, M. I. (2020). Perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening among refugee women after resettlement: A qualitative study. Contemporary Nurse, 56(4), 363–375.
  • Patel, H., Sherman, S. M., Tincello, D., & Moss, E. L. (2020). Awareness of and attitudes towards cervical cancer prevention among migrant Eastern European women in England. Journal of Medical Screening, 27(1), 40–47.
  • Peters, K. (2010). Reasons why women choose a medical practice or a women’s health centre for routine health screening: Worker and client perspectives. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(17–18), 2557–2564. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03245.x
  • Peterson, E. B., Ostroff, J. S., DuHamel, K. N., D’Agostino, T. A., Hernandez, M., Canzona, M. R., & Bylund, C. L. (2016). Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 93, 96–105.
  • Plourde, N., Brown, H. K., Vigod, S., & Cobigo, V. (2016). Contextual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review of the literature. Women & Health, 56(8), 906–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2016.1145169
  • Public Health England. (2017). Health profile for England: [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2019 Jul 15]. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/health-profile-for-england
  • Public Health England. (2014). National cancer intelligence network. Cancer by deprivation in England incidence. 1996–2010 Mortality, 1997–2011. London, UK.
  • Public Health England. (2021). Cervical screening: Programme overview [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 27]. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/cervical-screening-programme-overview
  • Salad, J., Verdonk, P., De Boer, F., & Abma, T. A. T. A. (2015). A Somali girl is Muslim and does not have premarital sex. Is vaccination really necessary?” A qualitative study into the perceptions of Somali women in the Netherlands about the prevention of cervical cancer. International Journal for Equity in Health, 14(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0198-3
  • Salway, S., Mir, G., Turner, D., Ellison, G. T. H., Carter, L., & Gerrish, K. (2016). Obstacles to “race equality” in the english national health service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena. Social Science & Medicine (1982), 152, 102–110. [Internet]. Mar 1 [cited 2020 Sep 2]Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC4774476/?report = abstract
  • Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S., & Emden, C. (1997). Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(4), 365–371. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199708)20:4<365::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-E
  • Seers, K. (2014). Correction to what is a qualitative synthesis? Evidence-Based Nursing, 15, 66.
  • Sheppard, V. B., Adams, I. F., Lamdan, R., & Taylor, K. L. (2011). The role of patient-provider communication for black women making decisions about breast cancer treatment. Psycho-oncology, 20(12), 1309–1316. [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1852
  • Short, S. E., & Mollborn, S. (2015). Social determinants and health behaviors: Conceptual frames and empirical advances. Curr Opin Psychol [Internet]. 5:78–84. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26213711] [26213711]
  • Sorensen, G., Emmons, K., Hunt, M. K., Barbeau, E., Goldman, R., Peterson, K., Kuntz, K., Stoddard, A., & Berkman, L. (2003). Model for incorporating social context in health behavior interventions: Applications for cancer prevention for working-class, multiethnic populations. Preventive Medicine, 37(3), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(03)00111-7
  • Szarewski, A., Cadman, L., Ashdown-Barr, L., & Waller, J. (2009). Exploring the acceptability of two self-sampling devices for human papillomavirus testing in the cervical screening context: A qualitative study of Muslim women in London. Journal of Medical Screening, 16(4), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1258/jms.2009.009069
  • Team, V., Manderson, L. H., & Markovic, M. (2013). From state care to self-care: cancer screening behaviours among Russian-speaking Australian women. Australian Journal of Primary Health, 19(2), 130. https://doi.org/10.1071/PY11158
  • Thomas, J., O’Mara-Eves, A., Harden, A., & Newman, M. (2017). Synthesis methods for textual or mixed methods data. In An Introduction to Systematic Reviews (pp. 181–210). [Internet]. SAGE. [cited 2019 Aug 27]. Available from: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1551097/
  • Tong, A., Flemming, K., McInnes, E., Oliver, S., & Craig, J. (2012). Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12(1), 181. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
  • Tran, N. T., Choe, S. I., Taylor, R., Ko, W. S., Pyo, H. S., & So, H. C. (2011). Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) concerning cervical cancer and screening among rural and urban women in six provinces of the democratic People’s Republic of Korea. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev, 12(11), 3029–3033.
  • Tung, W. C., Lu, M., Granner, M., & Sohn, J. (2017). Assessing perceived benefits/barriers and self-efficacy for cervical cancer screening among Korean American women. Health Care Women International, 38(9), 945–955.
  • von Wagner, C., Good, A., Whitaker, K. L., & Wardle, J. (2011). Psychosocial determinants of socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening participation: A conceptual framework. Epidemiologic Reviews, 33(1), 135–147. [Internet]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/epirev/article-lookup https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxq018
  • Waller, J., Jackowska, M., Marlow, L., & Wardle, J. (2012). Exploring age differences in reasons for nonattendance for cervical screening: A qualitative study. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 119(1), 26–32.
  • White, M., Adams, J., & Heywood, P. (2009). How and why do interventions that increase health overall widen inequalities within populations?. In S. J. Babones (Ed.), Social inequality and public health. Policy Press.
  • Young, B., Bedford, L., Kendrick, D., Vedhara, K., Robertson, J. F. R., & das Nair, R. (2018). Das Nair R. Factors influencing the decision to attend screening for cancer in the UK: A meta-ethnography of qualitative research. Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England), 40(2), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdx026