References
- Chang, H., and M.C. Linn. 2013. Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (7): 858–886.
- Chiu, J.L., C.J. DeJaegher, and J. Chao. 2015. The effects of augmented virtual science laboratories on middle school students’ understanding of gas properties. Computers & Education 85 (1): 59–73.
- Davidson, R. 2014, March. Using infographics in the science classroom: Three investigations in which students present their results in infographics. The Science Teacher 81 (3): 34–39.
- Falk, A., and L. Brodsky. 2013. Incorporating models into science teaching to meet the Next Generation Science Standards. Science Scope 37 (1): 61–69.
- Hilton, M., and M.A. Honey, eds. 2011. Learning science through computer games and simulations. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
- Linn, M.C., H.Y. Chang, J. Chiu, H. Zhang, and K. McElhaney. 2010. Can desirable difficulties overcome deceptive clarity in scientific visualizations? In Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A Festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork, ed. A. Benjamin, 239–262. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
- NGSS Lead States. 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://www.nextgenscience.org/
- Pea, C., and D.R. Sterling. 2002. Cold facts about viruses. NSTA WebNews Digest. https://www.nsta.org/publications/news/story.aspx?id=47546
- Ryoo, K., and M.C. Linn. 2012. Can dynamic visualizations improve middle school students’ understanding of energy in photosynthesis? Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49 (2): 218–243.
- Walker, A., M. Recker, L. Ye, M.B. Robertshaw, L. Sellers, and H. Leary. 2012. Comparing technology-related teacher professional development designs: A multilevel study of teacher and student impacts. Education Technology Research Development 60 (3): 421–444.
- Windschitl, M., J. Thompson, and M. Braaten. 2018. Ambitious science teaching. Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.