User Control of Information Display in Menus

References

• Brooks, R.E. “Studying Programming Behavior Experimentally: The Problems of Proper Methodology,” Communications of the ACM, 23, 1980, pp. 207–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Card, S.K. “User Perceptual Mechanisms in the Search of Computer Command Menus,” Proceedings of the CHI'82 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Science, New York: ACM, 1982, pp. 190–196.
   Google Scholar
• EDGE: Work-Group Computing Report. “Menuing Software: Direct Access Menuing Software Package for Microsoft Windows,” 3:98, April 6, 1992, pp. 14(1).
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, M. and B. Freedman. “Borland Loss Rings Hollow for Lotus,” PC Week, 9:32, August 10, 1992, pp. 1(2).
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, L. and R. Belleau. “What's on the Menu? The Influence of Menu Content on the Selection Process,” Behavior and Information Technology, 5:2, 1986, pp. 169–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould, J.D. and C. Lewis. “Designing for Usability: Key Principles and What Designers Think,” Communications of the ACM, 28:3, 1985, pp. 300–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, S. and I.H. Witten. “Adaptive Personalized Interfaces–A Question of Viability,” Behavior and Information Technology, 4:1, Jan.-Mar. 1985, pp. 31–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grudin, J. “The Case Against User Interface Consistency,” Communications of the ACM, 32:10, 1989, pp. 1164–1173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, G.P. “Cognitive Style as a Basis for MIS and DSS Designs: Much Ado About Nothing,” Management Science, 29:5, May 1983, pp. 567–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C.T. and M.L. Gibson. “Students as Surrogates for Managers in a Decision Making Environment,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 8:2, 1991, pp. 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kantorowitz, E. and O. Sudarsky. “The Adaptable User Interface,” Communications of the ACM, 32:11, 1989, pp. 1352–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiger, J.L. “The Depth/Breadth Trade-off in the Design of Menu-Driven User Interfaces,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 20, 1984, pp. 201–213.
   Google Scholar
• Kreigh, R.J., J.F. Pesot, and C.G. Halcomb. “An Evaluation of Look-ahead Fields on Various Types of Menu Hierarchies,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 32:6, June 1990, pp. 649–661.
   Google Scholar
• Landauer, T.K. and D.W. Nachbar. “Selection from Alphabetic and Numeric Menu Trees Using a Touch Screen: Breadth, Depth, and Width,” Proceedings of Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM SIGCHI, New York: ACM, 1985, pp. 73–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E. and J. MacGregor. “Minimizing User Search Time in Menu Retrieval Systems,” Human Factors, 27:2, 1985, pp. 157–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E., J. MacGregor, N. Lam, and G. Chao. “Keyword-Menu Retrieval: An Effective Alternative to Menu Indexes,” Ergonomics, 29:1, 1986, pp. 115–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magers, C. “An Experimental Evaluation of On-Line Help for Nonprogrammers,” Proceedings of the CHI'83 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Science, New York: ACM, 1983, pp. 277–281.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J.E., T. Dayton, and D.H. McDonald. “Adapting Menu Layout to Tasks,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 28:4, April 1988, pp. 417–435.
   Google Scholar
• Mehlenbacher, B., T.M. Duffy, and J. Palmer. “Finding Information on a Menu: Linking Menu Organization to the User's Goals,” Human-Computer Interaction, 4:3, 1989, pp. 231–241.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D.P. “The Depth/Breadth Trade-off in Hierarchical Computer Menus,” Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, New York: ACM, 1981, pp. 296–300.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, L.A. and J.C. Thomas, Jr. “Behavior Issues in the Use of Interactive Systems,” International Journal of Man Machine Studies, 9, 1977, pp. 509–536.
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, J.T. and J.D. Ahrens. “An Experiment to Test User Validation of Requirements: Data-flow Diagrams vs. Task-oriented Menus,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 1986, pp. 675–684.
   Google Scholar
• Paap, K.R. and R.J. Roske-Hofstrand. “The Optimal Number of Menu Options Per Panel,” Human Factors, 28:4, 1986, pp. 377–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne, S.J. “Display-based Action at the User Interface,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 35, 1991, pp. 275–289.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, T.S. and J. Voelcker. “Of Mice and Menus: Designing the User-friendly Interface,” IEEE Spectrum, September 1989, pp. 46–51.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, S. “GUI Face-off,” PC Computing, December 1991, pp. 157–169.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, G., D. McCracken, and A. Newell. “The ZOG Approach to Man-Machine Communication,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23, 1981, pp. 689–697.
   Google Scholar
• Sheil, B.A. “The Psychological Study of Programming,” Computing Surveys, 13, 1981, pp. 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hoe, R., K. Poupeye, A. Vandierendonck, and G. De Soete. “Some Effects of Menu Characteristics and User Personality on Performance with Menu-driven Interfaces,” Behavior and Information Technology, 9:1, January-February 1990, pp. 17–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, T. “Menu Works Personal,” PC User, 184, May 6, 1992, pp. 92(1).
   Google Scholar