References
- Bell, J. “The Effect of Presentation Form on the Use of Information in Annual Reports,” Management Science, 30:2, 1984, pp. 169–185.
- Benbasat, I. and A.S. Dexter. “An Experimental Evaluation of Graphical and Color-Enhanced Information Presentation,” Management Science, 31, 1985, pp. 1349–1364.
- Bettman, J.R. and P. Kakkar. “Effects of Information Presentation Format on Consumer Information Acquisition Strategies,” Journal of Consumer Research, 3, 1977, pp. 233–240.
- Crutchfield, R.J. “Getting Down to Business: Business Graphics are Taking on an Increasingly Important Role in Corporations,” Datamation, 32, 1986, p. 43.
- Henson, K.L. “Interactions of Presentation Format and Decision Maker Characteristics upon Multiple Decision-Making Tasks: An Experiment Using Multiple Cognitive Assessments,” Ph.D. diss., University of North Texas, 1994.
- Jarret, I.M. Computer Graphics and Reporting Financial Data, New York: Wiley, 1983.
- Jarvenpaa, S.L. “Graphic Displays in Decision Making-The Visual Salience Effect,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 1990, pp. 247–262.
- MacGregor, D. and P. Slovic. “Graphic Representation of Judgmental Information,” Human Computer Interaction, 2, 1986, pp. 179–200.
- Payne, J.W. “Contingent Decision Behavior,” Psychological Bulletin, 92:2, 1982, pp. 382–402.
- Rao, K.V. “Graphics in Business Information Systems,” Journal of Systems Management, 36:7, 1985, pp. 18–21.
- Reyes, R.M., W.C. Thompson, and G.H. Bower. “Judgment Biases Resulting from Differing Availabilities of Arguments,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39:1, 1980, pp. 2–12.
- Schutz, H.G. “An Evaluation of Formats for Graphic Trend Displays - Experiment II,” Human Factors, 3, 1961, pp. 99–107.
- Taylor, S.E. and S.C. Thompson. “Stalking the Elusive ‘Vividness’ Effect,” Psychological Review, 89:2, 1982, pp. 155–181.
- Todd, P. and I. Benbasat. “An Experimental Investigation of the Impact of Computer Based Decision Aids on Decision Making Strategies,” Information Systems Research, 2:2, 1991, pp. 87–115.
- Tufte, E.R. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 1983.
- Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. “Availability: A Heuristic for Judging Frequency and Probability,” Cognitive Psychology, 4, 1973, pp. 207–232.
- Umanath, N.S. “Effects of IS Variables on Information Acquisition Modes: An Experimental Investigation,” Information and Management, 27, 1994, pp. 287–301.
- Umanath, N.S. and R.W. Scamell. “An Experimental Evaluation of the Impact of Data Display Format on Recall Performance,” Communications of the ACM, 31:5, 1988, pp. 652–670.
- Umanath, N.S. and I. Vessy. “Multiattribute Data Presentation and Human Judgment: A Cognitive Fit Perspective,” Decision Sciences, 25:5, 1994, pp. 795–824.
- Washburne, J.N. “An Experimental Study of Various Graphic, Tabular and Textual Methods of Presenting Quantitative Material,” Journal of Educational Psychology, 18:6, 1927, pp. 361–376.
- Watson, C.J. and R.W. Driver. “The Influence of Computer Graphics on the Recall of Information,” MIS Quarterly, 7:1, 1983, pp. 45–53.
- Wolfe, J.M., K.R. Cave, and S.L. Franzel. “Guided Search: An Alternative to the Feature Integration Model for Visual Search,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 15:3, 1989, pp. 419–433.