Visualizing Changing Requirements with Self-Organizing Maps

References

• Adolph, S. and P. Bramble. Patterns for Effective Use Cases. New York: Addison-Wesley, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Anda, B. and D.I.K. Sjeberg. “Towards an Inspection Technique for Use Case Models,” Fourteenth IEEE Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKS'02), Ischia, Italy, IEEE Computer Society, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C. “Good Communication That Blocks Learning,” Harvard Business Review, 1994, pp. 77–85.
   Google Scholar
• Armour, F. and G. Miller. Advanced Use Case Modeling. New York: Addison-Wesley, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Astesiano, E. and G. Reggio. “Knowledge Structuring and Representation in Requirement Specification,” 14^th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Ischia, Italy. New York: ACM, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, G.J. and M.B. Rogich. “An Empirical Investigation of User Requirements Elicitation: Comparing the Effectiveness of Prompting Techniques,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 17:4, 2001, pp. 223–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan-Kinns, N. and F. Hamilton. “One for All and All for One? Case Studies of Using Prototypes in Commercial Projects,” Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-computer Interaction, Aarhus, Denmark. New York: ACM, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, A. and T. Spracklen. “Discovering Common Features in Software Code Using Self-organizing Maps,” International Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Kosice, Slovakia, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Deboeck, G. and T. Kohonen. Visual Explorations in Finance with Self-organizing Maps. London: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E.E.F., L.M.L. Delcambre, and M.J. Freiling. “Change Cases: Use Cases that Identify Future Requirements,” The Eleventh Annual ACM Conference on Object-oriented Programming Systems, Languages and Applications, San Jose, CA. New York: ACM, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Ellipse. eSoM, 2004. http://www.ellipse.fi/main.html?page=company
   Google Scholar
• Eudaptics. Discovery Decision Maker, 2004. http://www.eudaptics.at/loesungen/produkte.decisionmaker.php?sprache=en
   Google Scholar
• Gottesdiener, E. Use Cases: Best Practices. Carmel, IN: EBG Consulting, Inc., 2003, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• IBM. Rational® RequisitePro®, 2004. http://www.rational.com/products/reqpro/index.jsp.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, I., et al. Object-oriented Software Engineering: A Use Case Drive Approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Kaski, S., J. Nikkilä, and T. Kohonen. “Methods for Interpreting a Self-organized Map in Data Analysis,” 6^th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN98), Bruges, Belgium, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Kirner, D., et al. “Extending Use Cases Throughout the Software Lifecycle,” Software Engineering Notes, 24:3, 1999, pp. 66–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kohonen, T. Self-organizing Maps, 3rd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kulak, D. and E. Guiney. Use Cases Requirements in Context. New York: Addison-Wesley, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.W. “Proxy Viewpoints Mode-based Requirements Engineering,” 17^th ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC), Madrid, Spain. New York: ACM, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Li, L. “Use Case Patterns,” International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 12:1, 2002, pp. 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loucopoulos, P. and E. Kavakli. “Enterprise Modeling and the Telelogical Approach to Requirements Engineering,” International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 4:1, 1995, pp. 45–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathworks. Neural Network Toolbox 4.03, 2003. http://www.mathworks.com/products/neuralnet/
   Google Scholar
• Merkl, D. “Self-organizing Maps and Software Reuse.” In Pedrycz, W. and J.F. Peters (Eds.). Computational Intelligence in Software Engineering. Singapore: World Scientific, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Ngwenyama, O.K. and A.S. Lee. “Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning,” MIS Quarterly, 21:2, 1997, pp. 145–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. and N. Konno. “The Concept of ‘BA:’ Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation,” California Management Review, 40:3, 1998, pp. 40–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuseibeh, B. and S. Easterbrook. “Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap,” International Conference on Software Engineering (CSE-2000), Limerick, Ireland. New York: ACM, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Nuseibeh, B., J. Kramer, and A. Finkelstein. “Viewpoints: Meaningful Relationships are Difficult!” Proceedings of the 25^th International Conference on Software Engineering. Portland, OR: IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Quatrani, T. Visual Modeling with Rational Rose 2002 and UML. New York: Addison Wesley, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D. and K. Scott. Use Case Driven Object Modeling with UML. New York: Addison-Wesley, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. “Creativity Support Tools,” Communications of the ACM, 45:10, 2002, pp. 116–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, A. User-centered Requirements Engineering: Theory and Practice. New York: Springer, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Telelogic, Telelogic DOORS®, 2003. http://www.telelogic.com/products/doorsers/doors/index.cfm.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, A., H.M. Kienle, and H.A. Müller. “Live Documents with Contextual, Data-driven Information Components,” 20^th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. New York: ACM, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfram Research. Mathematica, 2004. http://www.wolfram.com/
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. “The Nature of External Representations in Problem Solving,” Cognitive Science, 21:2, 1997, pp. 179–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., D. Xie, and W. Zou. “Viewing use Cases as Active Objects,” Software Engineering Notes, 26:2, 2001, pp. 44–48.
   Google Scholar