Creating Value through Managing Knowledge in an E-Government to Constituency (G2C) Environment

References

• Allard, S. and C.W. Holsapple. “Knowledge Management as a Key for E-business Competitiveness: From the Knowledge Chain to KM Audits,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42:5, 2002, pp. 19–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almashari, M., M. Zairi, and A. Alathari. “An Empirical Study of the Impact of Knowledge Management on Organizational Performance,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42:5, 2002, pp. 74–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S.R. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation,” American Institute of Planners, 34, 1969, pp. 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, C. and A.D. Maio. “Gartner's Four Phases of E-government Model. E-government Strategies-State & Local.” http://old.gartner.com/public/static/hotc/00094235.html, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bose, R. “Knowledge Management Capabilities & Infrastructure for E-commerce,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42:5, 2002, pp. 42–49.
   Google Scholar
• Bukowitz, W. “At the Core of a Knowledge Base,” Journal of Knowledge Management, 1, 1998, pp. 215–224.
   Google Scholar
• Cabrera, A., E. Cabrera, and S. Barajas. “The Key Role of Organizational Culture in a Multi-system View of Technology Driven Change,” International Journal of Information Management, 21:3, 2001, pp. 245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chase, R.L. “The Knowledge-based Organization: An International Survey,” Journal of Knowledge Measurement, 1, 1997, pp. 38–49.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, H., J. Schroeder, R.V. Hauck, L. Ridgeway, H. Atabakhsh, H. Gupta, C. Boarman, K. Rasmussen and A.W. Clements. “COPLINK Connect: Information and Knowledge Management for Law Enforcement,” Decision Support Systems, 34:3, 2003, pp. 271–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y.C. and J. Gant. “Transforming Local E-government Services: The Use of Application Service Providers,” Government Information Quarterly, 18, 2001, pp. 343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• City of Denton. “Increasing the Contribution of IT Investments to the Quality, Productivity, and Effectiveness of City of Denton Government Operations,” Report prepared by the University of North Texas Research Team, August 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Civic Resource Group, Cities on the Internet 2001: E-government Applied (Executive Brief), CRG Research Series, August 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Constant, D., S. Kiesler, and L. Spoull. “What's Mine is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing,” Information Systems Research, 5:4, 1994, pp. 400–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dearstyne, B.W. “E-business, E-government and Information Proficiency,” Information Management Journal, 35:4, 2001, pp. 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Deloitte Consulting and Deloitte & Touche. “At the Dawn of E-government: The Citizen as Customer,” Deloitte Research Report, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Devadoss, P.R., S.L. Pan, and J.C. Huang. “Structural Analysis of E-government Initiatives: A Case Study of SCO,” Decision Support Systems, 34:3, 2003, pp. 253–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgarah, W. and J.F. Courtney. “Enhancing the G2C Relationship Through New Channels of Communication: Web-based Citizen Input,” Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, 2002, pp. 564–568.
   Google Scholar
• Fountain, J.E. Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C.G. and R.L. Nolan. “Managing the Four Stages of EDP Growth,” Harvard Business Review, 52:1, 1974, pp. 76–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold, A.H., A. Malhotra, and A.H. Segars. “Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 18:1, 2001, pp. 185–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, P.D. and R.M. Teeter. “E-government: The Next American Revolution,” A Research Report for the Council for Excellence in Government, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. and N. Venkatraman. “Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations,” IBM Systems Journal, 32:2, 1993, pp. 4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Hoenig, C. “Beyond E-government,” Government Executive, 33:14, 2001, pp. 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Hufnagel, E.M. “Information Systems Planning: Lessons from Strategic Planning,” Information & Management, 12:5, 1987, pp. 263–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janz, B.D. and P. Prasarnphanich. “Understanding the Antecedents of Effective Knowledge Management: The Importance of a Knowledge-centered Culture,” Decision Sciences, 34:2, 2003, pp. 351–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journal of Government Financial Management. “Surveys of Federal and State CIOs Show E-government a Challenge, Priority,” Journal of Government Financial Management, 50:2, 2001, pp. 8–9.
   Google Scholar
• Karlenzig, W. “Tap Into the Power of Knowledge Collaboration,” Customer Inter@action Solutions, 20:11, 2002, pp. 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kaylor, C., R. Deshazo, and D. Van Eck. “Gauging E-government: A Report on Implementing Services Among American Cities,” Government Information Quarterly, 18, 2001, pp. 293–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocharekar, R. “K-commerce: Knowledge-based Commerce Architecture with Convergence of E-commerce and Knowledge Management,” Information Systems Management, 18:2, 2001, p. 30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, C.E. and V.R. Prybutok. “The Three Ring Model and Development of an Instrument for Measuring Dimensions of E-government Functions,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 33:3, 2003, pp. 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, H. and T. Chu. “Knowledge Management: A Review of Industrial Cases,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 42:5, 2002, pp. 26–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laskowski, M.S. “The Impact of Electronic Access to Government Information: What Users and Document Specialists Think,” Journal of Government Information, 27:2, 2000, pp. 173–185.
   Google Scholar
• Layne, K. and J. Lee. “Developing Fully Functional E-government: A Four Stage Model,” Government Information Quarterly, 18, 2001, pp. 122–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebowitz, J. “A Knowledge Management Strategy for the Jason Organization: A Case Study,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44:2, 2003–2004, pp. 1–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., L. Pratchett, and G. Stoker. “Trends in Public Participation: Part 2 — Citizen's Perspectives,” Public Administration, 79:2, 2001, pp. 445–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, P.B., C.C. Albrecht, J.F. Nunamaker, and J.D. Lee. “Evolutionary Development and Research on Internet-based Collaborative Writing Tools and Processes to Enhance eWriting in an eGovernment Setting,” Decision Support Systems, 34:3, 2003, pp. 229–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majchrzak, A., R.E. Rice, N. King, A. Malhotra, and S. Ba. “Computer-mediated Inter-organizational Knowledge-sharing: Insights from a Virtual Team Innovation Using a Collaborative Tool,” Information Resources Management Journal, 13:1, 2000, pp. 44–53.
   Google Scholar
• Malhotra, A. “Knowledge Management and New Organization Forms: A Framework for Business Model Innovation,” Information Resources Management Journal, 13:1, 2000, pp. 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Marwick, A.D. “Knowledge Management Technology,” IBM Systems Journal, 40:4, 2001, pp. 814–830.
   Google Scholar
• McHenry, W.K. “Using Knowledge Management to Reform the Russian Criminal Procedural Codex,” Decision Support Systems, 34:3, 2003, pp. 339–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meredith, J.R., A. Raturi, A.K. Gyampah, and B. Kaplan. “Alternative Research Paradigms in Operations,” Journal of Operations Management, 8, 1989, pp. 297–320.
   Google Scholar
• Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi. The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. Personal Knowledge: Toward a Post-critical Philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Rapoport, R.N. “Three Dilemmas in Action Research,” Human Relations, 23, 1970, pp. 499–513.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, S.D. and D.A. Harrison. “Considering Social Subsystem Costs and Benefits in Information Technology Investments Decisions: A View from the Field on Anticipated Payoffs,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 16:4, 2000, pp. 11–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, S.D. and V.R. Prybutok. “Factors Affecting the Adoption of Knowledge Management Technologies,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41, 2001, pp. 31–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segars, A.H. and V. Grover. “Strategic Information Systems Planning Success: An Investigation of the Construct and Its Measurement,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, 2:2, 1998, pp. 139–163.
   Google Scholar
• Stenmark, D. “Leveraging Tacit Organizational Knowledge,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 17:3, 2001, pp. 9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M. and S.D. Vaidya. “Evolution of the Use of IT for E-business at Century Financial Services: An Analysis of Internal and External Facilitators and Inhibitors,” Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications, 4:4, 2002, pp. 49–76.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R.T. and B. Mundy. “A Strategic Perspective of Electronic Democracy,” Communications of the ACM, 44:1, 2000, pp. 27–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D. “Urban E-government: An Assessment of City Government Websites,” Inside Politics, 2001. http://www.Onlinepolitics.org.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1989.
   Google Scholar