The Acceptance of Women-Centric Websites

References

• Adams, D.A., R.P. Nelson, and P.A. Todd. “Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication,” MIS Quarterly, 60:2, 1992, pp. 227–247.
   Google Scholar
• Afuah, A. and C.L. Tucci. Internet Business Models and Strategies. McGraw-Hill, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Card, S.K., T.P. Moran, and A. Newell. The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction. Hillsdale, NJ, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, L.D., M.L. Gillenson, and D.L. Sherrell. “Enticing Online Consumers: An Extended Technology Acceptance Perspective,” Information & Management, 39, 2002, pp. 705–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin, W.C. and P.A. Todd. “On the Use, Usefulness and Ease of Use of Structural Equation Modeling in MIS Research: A Note of Caution,” MIS Quarterly, 19:2, 1992, pp. 237–246.
   Google Scholar
• Chung, J. and F.B. Tan. “Antecedents of Perceived Playfulness: An Exploratory Study on User Acceptance of General Information-searching Websites,” Information & Management, 41:7, 2004, pp. 869–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cognitiative, Inc. “Building, Maintaining and Repairing Web Brand Loyalty.” www.cognitiative.com, October 1999, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. A Technology Acceptance Model of Empirically Testing New End-User Information System: Theory and Results. Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, 13:3, 1989, pp. 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science, 35:8, 1989, pp. 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, H.L. “Dimensions of Marital Roles in Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 1970, pp. 168–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dishaw, M.T. and D.M. Strong. “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs,” Information & Management, 36, 1999, pp. 9–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferber, R. and C.L. Lucy. “Husband-wife Influence in Family Purchasing Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 1, 1974, pp. 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. and I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intension and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. MS: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Garbarino, E. and M. Strahilevitz. “Gender Differences in the Perceived Risk of Buying Online and the Effects of Receiving a Site Recommendation,” Journal of Business Research, 57:6, 2004, pp. 768–775.
   Google Scholar
• Gassaway, S., G. Davis, and C. Gregory. Designing Multimedia Web Sites. Hayden, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Gefen, D. and D. Straug. “Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model,” MIS Quarterly, 21:4, 1997, pp. 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J.F., R.E. Anderson, R.L. Tatham, and W.C. Black. Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th ed. Prentice Hall, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, S. “Gender Differences in CMC: Findings and Implications,” CPSR Newsletter, 18:1, 2000. Available at http://www.cpsr.orc/.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, M.B. “Aims, Concepts, and Methods for the Presentation of Individual Differences in Esthetic Responses to Design Features,” Journal of Consumer Research, 13, 1986, pp. 337–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. and H. Lu. “Why do People Play On-line Games? An Extended TAM with Social Influences and Flow Experience,” Information & Management, 41:7, 2004, pp. 853–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, L.A., K.S. Ervin, P.D. Gardner, and N. Schmitt. “Gender and the Internet: Women Communicating and Men Searching,” Sex Roles, 44:5, 2001, pp. 363–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R.A. and M.A. Hignite. “Applying the Technology Acceptance Model to the www,” Academy of Information and Management Sciences Journal, 3:2, 2000, pp. 130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Li, C.C. Path Analysis: A Primer, Boxwood Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Li, D., J. Day, H. Lou, and G. Coombs. “The Effect of Affiliation Motivation on the Intention to Use Groupware in an MBA Program,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44:3, Spring 2004, pp. 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, J.C.C. and H. Lu. “Towards an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use a Web Site,” International Journal of Information Management, 20, 2000, pp. 197–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.L. “Reading Taiwan's Women-focused Websites,” Women and Gender, 11, 2000, pp. 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Marcella, R. “Women on the Web, a Critical Appraisal of a Sample Reflecting the Range and Content of Women's Sites on the Internet, with Particular Reference to the Support of Women's Interaction and Participation,” Journal of Documentation, 58:1, 2002, pp. 79–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcella, R. and S. Binfield. “Gender Differences in the Oral Communication of Technical Information,” Education for Information, 14:3, 1996, pp. 181–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, A. “Making Multimedia Usable: User Interface Design,” New Media, February 1995, pp. 98–100.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. “Evaluating Electronic Commerce Acceptance with the Technology Acceptance Model,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44:2, Winter 2003, pp. 49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J.W. and Y.G. Kim. “Extending the TAM for a World-wide-web Context,” Information & Management, 38, 2001, pp. 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M.H. Hutner. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 3rd ed. Irwin, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J.C. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Page, C. and E. Lepkowska-White. “Web Equity: A Framework for Building Consumer Value in Online Companies,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 19:3, 2002, pp. 231–248.
   Google Scholar
• Rainer, R.K., K. Laosethakul, and M.K. Astone. “Are Gender Perceptions of Computing Changing Over Time?” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43:4, Summer 2003, pp. 108–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayport, J.F. and B.J. Jaworski. E-Commerce. McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan, K.B. “An Investigation of Gender Differences in On-line Privacy Concerns and Resultant Behaviors,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 13:4, 1999, pp. 24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Shih, H. “Extended Technology Acceptance Model of Internet Utilization Behavior,” Information and Management, 41:6, 2004, pp. 719–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, J.S. “The Impact of Culture and Gender on Web Sites: An Empirical Study,” Database for Advances in Information Systems, 32:1, 2001, pp. 18–37.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. and M.G. Morris. “Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior,” MIS Quarterly, 24:1, 2000, pp. 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield, R.L., M.H. Stocks, and W.M. Wilder. “The Role of Web Site Characteristics in Initial Trust Formation,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 45:1, Fall 2004, pp. 94–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wylie, M. “No Place for Women: Internet is Flawed Model for the Infobahn,” Digital Media, 4:8, 1995, pp. 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, W.L. and M. Lu. “Gaining Competitive Advantages Through a Functionality Grid for Website Evaluation,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44:4, Summer 2004, pp. 67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar