A Case-Based Approach to the Evaluation of New Audit Clients

References

• AICPA. 1999. Practice Alert No. 94–3 Acceptance and Continuance of Audit Clients (Sept. 1994-updated through 7/1/99): available at www.aicpa.org/members/div/secps/lit/practice/943.htm.
   Google Scholar
• AICPA. 1983. Statement of Auditing Standard No. 47: Audit Risk and Materiality in Conducting an Audit: available in AICPA Professional Standards, Volume 1. 2000. New York. AICPA.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, R. and D.A. Klaus. 1998. Methodology for building CBR applications. Chapter 1 in Case-Based Reasoning: Technology from Foundations to Applications: New York. Springer-Verlag
   Google Scholar
• Byrnes, N., M. McNamee, R. Grover, J. Muller, and A. Park. 2002. Auditing here- consulting over there. Business Week Online (April 8): Available at www.businessweek/content/02_14/b3777051.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cheetham, W. and A. Varma. 2001. Case-based reasoning at General Electric. New York, NY: General Electric's Corporate Research and Development Center.
   Google Scholar
• Chen M. and Liou Y. I. Building a Knowledge-Enabled Electronic Commerce Environment. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2002 Special edition, Volume 42, Issue 5, p. 95–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choohineh J. and Lo A. 2006. Should Rule Based Reasoning Be Enhanced by Case-Based Reasoning For Conceptual Database Design? A Theory and An Experiment? Journal of Computer Information Systems. Summer 2003, Volume 46, Issue 2, p. 69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colbert, J., M. Luehlnng, and C.W. Alderman. 1996. Engagement Risk. The CPA Journal (March): 54–56.
   Google Scholar
• Danziger, E. 1999. Just say no to costly clients. Journal of Accountancy (June): 45–7.
   Google Scholar
• Elhadi, M.T. 2000. Bankruptcy support system: Taking advantage of information retrieval and case-based reasoning. Expert Systems with Applications 18: 215–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Empolis Knowledge Management. 2002. available at www.empolis.com.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschalk P. and Kandelwal V. 2002. Inter-Organizational Knowledge Management: A comparison of Law firms in Norway and Australia. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 2002 Special edition, Volume 42, Issue 5, p. 50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grupe, F. 1993. Case-based reasoning: Applying past experience to new problems. Information System Management. 10(2) (Spring): 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Houston, R. 1999. The effects of fee pressure and client risk on audit seniors' time budget decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 18(2) (Fall): 70–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, Y. 1993. A hybrid system with feedback for diagnosing multiple disorders. MIT: Ph.D. Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone K. M. and Bedard J.C. 2003. Risk Management in Client Acceptance Decisions. The Accounting Review. October 2003, Volume 78, Issue 4, p. 1003–1025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersnar S. 2006. United Mortgage Lenders Pick MindBox for Bull-Eye System. National Mortgage News. May 22, 2006, p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Kolodner, J. 1991. Improved human decision making through case-based decision aiding. AI Magazine 12 (2)(Summer): 52–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzfeldt, R.W., and W.A. Wallace. 1986. Error characteristics in audit populations: Their profile and relationship to environmental factors. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 6 (Fall): 20–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leake, D.B. 1996. Case Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions. Boston, MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee K. and Kwon S. 2006. The Use of Cognitive Maps and Case-Based Reasoning for B2B Negotiation. Journal of Management Information Systems. Spring 2006, Volume 22, Number 4, p. 337–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, L.L.X. 1999. Knowledge-based problem solving: An approach to health assessment. Expert Systems with Applications 16(1): 33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, E. 1997. More accounting firms are dumping risky clients. Wall Street Journal (April 25): Section 3, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Mitri, M. 2003. A knowledge Management Framework For Curriculum Assessment. Journal of Computer Information Systems. Summer 2003, Volume 43, Issue 4, p. 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, T.B., D.A. Simunic, and M.T. Shields. 1994. The production of audit services: Evidence from a major public accounting firm. Journal of Accounting Research 32 (Autumn): 241–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmrose, Z-V. 1986. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (Spring): 97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riesbeck, C.K. and R.C. Schank. 1989. Inside Case-Based Reasoning. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rissland, E.L. and J.J. Daniels. 1995. A Hybrid CBR-IR Approach to Legal Information Retrieval. New York, NY: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C.R. 1992. Should the client be accepted? The CPA Journal Online (November): Available at www.nysscpa.org/cpajournal/old/13856825.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, I. 1997. Applying Case-Based Reasoning: Techniques for Enterprise Systems. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Yin R.K. 1993. Application Of Case Study Research, Applied Social Research methods Series, Volume 34. London: Sage Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang D. 2004. Virtual Mentor and The Lab System — Toward Building an Interactive, Personalized, and Intelligent E-learning Environment. Journal of Computer Information Systems. Spring 2004, Volume 44, Issue 3, p. 35–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar