An Exploratory Study into Determining the Relative Importance of Key Criteria in Web Usability: A Multi-Criteria Approach

References

• Adams, D., Nelson, R., Todd, P. “Perceived Usefulness, EOU, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication,” MIS Quarterly (16:2), 1992, 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal R., and Prasad, J. “A Conceptual and Operational Definition of Personal Innovativeness in the Domain of Information Technology,” Information Systems Research (9:2), 1998,204–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. and Stair, R. “Research Report: The Evolving Relationship Between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy — An Empirical Assessment,” Information Systems Research (11:4), 2000, 418–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, R. and Venkatesh V. “Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability,” Information Systems Research (13:2), 2002,168–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundation of Thought and Action Prenctice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Becker S. and Mottay, F. “A Global Perspective on Website Usability,” IEEE Software, (19:1), 2001, 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, E. “The 2006 State of Retail Online,” Forrester Research Group. Retrieved March 10, 2006 from http://www.clickz.com/stats/sectors/retailing/article.php/3575456.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J.K. Jr. and Cantrell, R.S. “A Behavioral Model of Ethical and Unethical Decision-Making,” Journal of Business Ethics, (6), 1984, 265–280.
   Google Scholar
• Census 1970. “Statistical Abstract of the United States 1971,” Bureau of Census, retrieved March 28, 2006 from http://www.census.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Census 2000. “Statistical Abstract of the United States 2001,” Bureau of Census, retrieved March 28, 2006 from http://www.census.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Whiteman, J.A., Gully, S.M. and Kilcullen, R.N. “Examination of Relationships Among Trait-Like Individual Differences, State-Like Individual Differences, and Learning Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, (85:6), 2000, 835–847.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. “Computer Self-efficacy: Development of Measure and Initial Test,” MIS Quarterly, (19:2), 1995, 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau, D., Higgins, C.A. and Huff, S. “Social Cognitive Theory Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study,” MIS Quarterly, (23:2), 1999, 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived EOU, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, (13:3), 1989, 318–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donahue, G.M. “Usability and the Bottom Line,” IEEE Software, (18:1), 2001, 31–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, R.D. and Kurniawan, S.H. “Increasing the Usability of Online Information for Older Users: A Case Study in Participatory Design,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (12:2), 2000, 263–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagan, M.H., Neill, S. and Wooldridge, B.R. “An Empirical Investigation Into The Relationship Between Computer Self-Efficacy, Anxiety, Experience, Support and Usage,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, (44:2), 2003–2004, 95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D. and Straub, D. “Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance,” MIS Quarterly, (21:4), 1997, 389–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, L.M. and Karren, R.J. “Interviewer Decision Processes and Effectiveness: An Experimental Policy Capturing Investigation,” Personnel Psychology, (75:2), 1992, 313–341.
   Google Scholar
• Green, D.T. and Pearson, J.M. “Developing a model for B2C web site usability and e-commerce acceptance,” Proceedings of Web 2006: The 5th Conference on E-Business (Pre-ICIS SIG-eBiz), 2006, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
   Google Scholar
• Hackbarth, G., Grover, V. and Yi, M.Y. “Computer Playfulness and Anxiety: Positive and Negative Mediators of the System Experience Effect on Perceived Ease of Use,” Information & Management, (40:3), 2003, 221–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardy, G.E. and Barkham, M. “The Relationship Between Interpersonal Attachment Styles and Work Difficulties,” Human Relations, (47:3), 1994, 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris Interactive Goldman Sachs NetRatings “Holiday eSpending Report,” Retrieved 3-10-2006 from http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_051229.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A.W., Rainer, R.K., Hochwarter, W.A., and Thompson, K.R. “Testing the Self-Efficacy-Performance Linkage of Social-Cognitive Theory,” Journal of Social Psychology, (137:1), 1997, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison A. and Rainer, Jr, R. “The Influence of Individual Differences on Skill in End-User Computing,” Journal of Management Information Systems, (9:1), 1992, 93–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hasan, B. “Effectiveness of Computer Training: The Role of Multilevel Computer Self-Efficacy,” Journal of Organizational & End User Computing, (18:1), 2006, 50–68.
   Google Scholar
• Hayashi A., Chen C, Ryan T., and Wu, J. “The Role of Social Presence and Moderating Role of Computer Self-Efficacy in Predicting the Continuance Usage of E-Learning Systems,” Journal of Information Systems Education. (15:2), 2004, 139–154.
   Google Scholar
• Heldal, F., Sjovold, E., and Heldal, A.F. “Success on the Internet: Optimizing Relationship Through the Corporate Site,” International Journal of Information Management, (24:2), 2004, 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, A. “An Empirical Study of Corporate Website Usability,” Human Systems Management, (22:1), 2003, 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M., and Parasuraman, S. “A Path Analytic Study of Individual Characteristics, Computer Anxiety, and Attitudes Toward Microcomputers,” Journal of Management, (15:3), 1989,373–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivory, M. and Megraw, R. “Evolution of Website Design Patterns,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems, (23:4), 2005, 463–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahng, J., Jain, H., and Ramamurthy, K. “Effective Design of Electronic Commerce Environments: A Proposed Theory of Congruence and an Illustration,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (30:4), 2000,456–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karat, J. “Evolving the Scope of User-centered Design,” Communications of the ACM, (40:7), 1997, 33–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krug, S. Don't Make Me Think - A Common Sense Approach to Web Usability New Riders, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Korukonda, A.R. “Personality, Individual Characteristics, and Predisposition of Technophobia: Some Answers, Questions, and Points to Ponder About,” Information Sciences (170), 2005, 309–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, T. and Sorebo, O. “Impact of Peronal Innovativenss on the Use of the Internet Among Employees at Work,” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, (17:2), 2005, 43–63.
   Google Scholar
• Lecerof, A. and Paterno, F. “Automatic Support for Usability Evaluation,” IEEE Transaction Software Engineering, (24:10), 1998, 863–887.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. and Goffin, R. “Measuring Job Interview Anxiety: Beyond Weak Knees and Sweaty Palms,” Personnel Psychology, (57:3), 2004, 607–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKinney, V., Yoon, K. and Zahedi, F. “The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach,” Information Systems Research, (13:3), 2002, 296–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKnight, D., Choudhury, V., and Kacmar, C. “Developing and Validating Trust Measures for E-Commerce: An Integrative Typology,” Information Systems Research, (13:3), 2002, 334–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNichols, C. and Zimmerer, T. “Situational Ethics: An Empirical Study of Differentiates of Student Attitudes,” Journal of Business Ethics, (4:3), 1985, 175–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerurkar, U. “Web User Interface Design: Forgotten Lessons,” IEEE Software, (18:6), 2001, 69–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. “Usability 101: Introduction to Usability,” Retrieved Nov 1, 2005, from http://www.useit.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen J. Designing Web Usability. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis, Indiana, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. “Website Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics,” Information Systems Research, (13:2), 2002, 151–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. and Kim, J. “Contextual Navigation Aids for Two World Wide Web Systems,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, (12:2), 2000, 193–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, J., Crosby, L. and Shim, J.P., “Measuring the importance of ethical behavior criteria,” Communication of the ACM, (40:9), 1997, 94–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, J.M., Crosby, L., and Shim, J.P. “Modeling the Relative Importance of Ethical Behavior Criteria: A Simulation of Information Systems Professionals' Ethical Decisions,” Journal of Strategic Information Systems, (5:4), 1997, 275–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quesenbery, W. “Dimensions of Usability,” In M. Aburs and B. Mazur's Content and Complexity, Erlbaum, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G., Khoo, H., and Straub, D. “Current Technological Impediments to Business-to-Consumer Electronic Commerce,” Communications of AIS, (16), 1999, 1–74.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, C. and Timmerman, C.E. “Relating Computer, Communication, and Computer-Mediated Communication Apprehensions to New Communication Technology Use in the Workplace,” Communication Research, (32:6), 2005, 683–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. Designing the User Interface, Fourth Edition, Pearson-Addison Wesley, New York, New York, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Shneiderman B. Designing the User Interface Addision-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, Massachusetts, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, B.A. and Butler, J.K. Jr. “Measuring the Relative Importance of Social Responsibility Components: A Decision Modeling Approach,” Journal of Business Ethics, (6:7) 1987, 573–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, M.J. and Zimmerer, T.W. “Modeling Strategic Acquisition Policies: A Simulation of Executives' Acquisition Decisions,” Academy of Management Journal, (27:2), 1984, 369–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straub, D. and Watson, R. “Research commentary; Transformational Issues in Researching IS and Net-enabled Organizations,” Information Systems Research. (12:4), 2001, 337–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar, M. and Zhang, J. “Analyzing the Influence of Website Design Parameters on Website Usability,” Information Resources Management Journal, (18:4), 2005, 62–80.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, J.B. and Perrewe, P.L. “An Empirical Examination of Individual Traits as Antecedents to Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy,” MIS Quarterly, (26:4), 2002, 381–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R., Compeau, D. and Higgins, C. “Intentions to Use Information Technologies: An Integrative Model,” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, (18:3), 2006, 25–46.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A. & Howell, J.M. “Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems, (11:1), 1994, 167–187.
   Google Scholar
• Truman, G. and Baroudi, J. “Gender Differences in the Information Systems Managerial Ranks: An Assessment of Potential,” MIS Quarterly, (18:2), 1994, 129–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turban, E. and Gehrke, D. “Determinants of E-Commerce Website,” Human Systems Management, (19), 2000, 111–120.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. “Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Perceived Behavioral Control, Computer Anxiety and Computer Self-Efficacy,” MIS Quarterly, (11:4), 2000, 342–365.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. “A Model of the Antecedentsof Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, (27:3), 1996, 451–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. and Davis, F. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly, (27:3), 2003, 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatramen, P. M. “The Impact of Innovativeness and Innovation Type and Adoption,” Journal of Retailing, (67:1), 1991, 51–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, J. and Trevino, L.K. “Rational and Social Theories as Complementary Explanations of Communication Media Choices: Two Policy Capturing Studies,” Academy of Management Journal, (38:6), 1995, 1544–1573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Wide Web Consortium (WC3). “What is Web Accessibility?”, Retrieved on March 15, 2006 from http://www.w3.org/WAI/intro/accessibility.php.
   Google Scholar
• http://www.usability.gov retrieved March 10, 2006.
   Google Scholar