93
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Ready for Battle? A Phenomenological Study of Military Simulation Systems

, &
Pages 33-40 | Received 04 Sep 2009, Accepted 03 Dec 2009, Published online: 11 Dec 2015

References

  • Belanger, F., Collins, R.W., & Cheney, P.H. (2001). Technology Requirements and Work Group Communications for Telecommuters. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 155–176.
  • Benbasat, I., & Barki, H. (2007). Quo Vadis, TAM? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 8(4), 211–218.
  • Borodzicz, E.P. (2004). The Missing Ingredient is the Value of Flexibility. Simulation & Gaming, 35(3), 414–426.
  • Cane, S., McCarthy, R., (Fall 2009), Analyzing the Factors that Affect Information Systems Use: A Task-Technology Fit Meta-Analysis, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 50(1), 108–123.
  • Cane, S.A., Aronson, J.E., & McCarthy, R.V. War Games: Evaluating Interactive Simulation Software for the Battlefield and the Board Room. Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, New York, NY, August 6-8, 2004, 3288–3293.
  • Chase, R.M. (1983). The Management Game. The Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Quarterly, 24(2), 15–22.
  • Cho, J., & Trent, A. (2006). Validity in Qualitative Research Revisited. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 319–340.
  • Crain, C.R. (2003). The Domain of Decision-Making Variables in General Management Simulation Models. 2003 Business and Industry Symposium, downloaded 3/21/06 from http://www.scs.org/getDoc.cfm?id=2163.
  • Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications, Inc.
  • D'Ambra, J., & Rice, R.E. (2001). Emerging Factors in User Evaluation of the World Wide Web. Information and Management, 38, 373–384.
  • D'Ambra, J., & Wilson, C.S. (2004a). Explaining Perceived Performance of the World Wide Web: Uncertainty and the Task-Technology Fit Model. Internet Research, 14(4), 294–310.
  • D'Ambra, J., & Wilson, C.S. (2004b). Use of the World Wide Web for International Travel: Integrating the Construct of Uncertainty in Information Seeking and the Task- Technology Fit Model. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 731–742.
  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  • Dennis, A.R., Wixom, B.H., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2001). Understanding Fit and Appropriation Effects in Group Support Systems Via Meta-Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 25(2), 167–193.
  • Dishaw, M.T., & Strong, D.M. (1998a). Assessing Software Maintenance Tool Utilization using Task-Technology Fit and Fitness-For-Use Models. Software Maintenance: Research and Practice, 10, 151–179.
  • Dishaw, M.T., & Strong, D.M. (1998b). Supporting Software Maintenance with Software Engineering Tools: A Computed Task-Technology Fit Analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software, 44(2), 107–120.
  • Dishaw, M.T., & Strong, D.M. (1999). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model with Task-Technology Fit Constructs. Information & Management, 36(1), 9–21.
  • Dishaw, M.T., & Strong, D.M. (2003). The Effect of Task and Tool Experience on Maintenance CASE Tool Usage. Information Resources Management Journal, 16(3), 1–16.
  • Ferratt, T.W., & Vlahos, G.E. (1998). An Investigation of Task-Technology Fit for Managers in Greece and the US. European Journal of Information Systems, 7(2), 123–136.
  • Freeman, J., & Evangeliou, N. (1996). Simulation for Training in Quality Control. Training for Quality, 4(1) 27–31.
  • Fuller, R.M., & Dennis, A.R (2004). Does Fit Matter? The Impact of Fit on Collaboration Technology Effectiveness over Time. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii Conference on System Sciences, HA, 1–10.
  • Gebauer, J., & Shaw, M.J. (2004). Success Factors and Impacts of Mobile Business Applications: Results from a Mobile e-Procurement Study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(3), 19–41.
  • Goette, T. (2000). Keys to the Adoption and Use of Voice Recognition Technology in Organizations. Information Technology & People, 13(1), 67–80.
  • Goodhue, D. L. (1995). Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems. Management Science, 41(12), 1827–1844.
  • Goodhue, D.L. (1998). Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Information Systems. Decision Sciences, 29(1), 105–138.
  • Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236.
  • Grossman, M., Aronson, J.E., & McCarthy, R.V. (2004). Does UML Make the Grade? Insights from the Software Development Community. Information and Software Technology, 47(6), (2005), 383–397.
  • Hahn, J & Wang, T. (2009). Knowledge Management Systems and Organizational Knowledge Processing Challenges: A Field Experiment. Decision Support Systems, 47, 332–342.
  • Hill, R.R., Miller, J.O., & McIntyre, G.A. Applications of Discrete Event Simulation Modeling to Military Problems. Proceedings of the 33rd Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, VA, 2001, 780–788.
  • IP Kwai Fun, R. (2005). An Exploratory Study on how Weblog Technologies Fit Virtual Community Members' Social Needs. Proceedings of the Eleventh Americas Conference on Information Systems, Omaha, NE, August 11-14, 3555–3560.
  • Karimi, J., Somers, T.M., & Gupta, Y.P. (2004). Impact of Environmental Uncertainty and Task Characteristics on User Satisfaction with Data. Information Systems Research, 15(2), 175–193.
  • Keane, J.A. (1998). The Virtual Factory Approach to Quality Education. Quality Progress, 31(10), 62–64.
  • Kenkel, P., Wingender, J.R., & Tilley, D.S. (1996). Designing an International Joint Venture Negotiation Game. Simulation & Gaming, 27(3), 316–331.
  • Kerr, D.S., & Murthy, U.S. (2004). Divergent and Convergent Idea Generation in Teams: A Comparison of Computer-Mediated and Face-to-face Communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13(4), 381–399.
  • Keys, J.B., Fulmer, R.M., & Stumpf, S.A. (1996). Microworlds and Simuworlds: Practice Fields for the Learning Organization. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 36–49.
  • Klopping, I.M., & McKinney, E. (2004). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model and the Task-Technology Fit Model to Consumer E-Commerce. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 22(1), 35–48.
  • Kositanurit, B., Ngwenyama, O., & Osei-Bryson, K. (2007). An Exploration of Factors that Impact Individual Performance in and ERP Environment: An Analysis using Multiple Analytical Techniques. European Journal of Information Systems, 15, 556–568.
  • Kriz, W.C. (2003). Creating Effective Learning Environments and Learning Organizations through Gaming Simulation Design. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 495–511.
  • Lainema, T., & Makkonen, P. (2003). Applying Constructivist Approach to Educational Business Games: Case REALGAME. Simulation & Gaming, 34(1), 131–149.
  • LeClair, D.T, & Ferrell, L. (2000). Innovation in Experiential Business Ethics Training. Journal of Business Ethics, 23(3), 313–322.
  • Lee, C., Cheng, H.K, & Cheng, H. (2007). An Empirical Study of Mobile Commerce in Insurance Industry: Task-Technology Fit and Individual Differences. Decision Support Systems, 43(2007), 95–110.
  • Lending, D., & Straub, D.W. (1997). Impacts of an Integrated Information Center on Faculty End-Users: A Qualitative Assessment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(5), 466–471.
  • Lightner, N. Assessing (2002). User Competence for Multiattribute Data Cognition. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, Aug 9-11,1082–1091.
  • Lim, K.H., & Benbasat, I. (2000). The Effect of Multimedia on Perceived Equivocality and Perceived Usefulness of Information Systems. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 449–471.
  • Macedonia, M., (2002). Games Soldiers Play. IEEE Spectrum, 39(3), 32–37.
  • McCarthy, R.V., & Aronson, J.E. (2003). An Analysis of Knowledge Management in the Public and Private Sectors. Invited Chapter in Information Systems: Academic and Practitioner Global Alliances. The Information Institute.
  • McCarthy, R.V., Aronson, J.E., & Claffey, G. (2002) Task-Technology Fit in Data Warehousing Environments: Analyzing the Factors that Affect Utilization. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX, Aug 9-11,40–46.
  • Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA. Sage Publications, Inc.
  • Murrell, K.L., & Blanchard, D. (1992). OrgSim: Using an Organizational Simulation to Create a “Live” Case. The Journal of Management Development, 11(7), 67–76.
  • Murthy, U.S., & Kerr, D.S. (2000) Task/Technology Fit and the Effectiveness of Group Support Systems: Evidence in the Context of Tasks Requiring Domain Specific Knowledge. Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HA, 1–10.
  • Nance, R.E., & Sargent, R.G. (2002). Perspectives on the Evolution of Simulation. Operations Research, 50(1), 161–172.
  • Nance, W.D., & Straub, D.W. (1996). An Investigation of Task/Technology Fit and Information Technology Choices in Knowledge Work. Journal of Information Technology Management, 7(3&4), 1–14
  • Ogus, L.R., Jancaitis, J.R., & Hauck, R.E. Wargame-based Training Systems. Proceedings of the 13th Winter Simulation Conference, Atlanta, GA, 1981, 667–677.
  • Rolands and Associates (2004). JTLS Executive Overview, Joint Theater Level Simulation (JTLS 2.6A). Downloaded Feb 27, 2005 from http://www.rolands.com/Home/Projects/Project_index.htm.
  • Seidner, C.J. (1995). Simulation and the Bottom Line. Simulation & Gaming, Silver Anniversary Issue 4, 503–510.
  • Senge, P.M., & Fulmer, R.M. (1993). Simulations, Systems Thinking and Anticipatory Learning. The Journal of Management Development, 12(6), 21–33.
  • Shinseki, E. (2002). Shinseki: Army Needs Better Simulations. Defense Daily, 215, i46, pNA, 1.
  • Shirani, A.I., Tafti, M.H.A., & Affisco, J.F. (1999). Task and Technology Fit: A Comparison of Two Technologies for Synchronous and Asynchronous Group Communication. Information & Management, 36, 139–150.
  • Shirts, R.G. (1992). 10 Secrets of Successful Simulations. Training, 29(10), 79–83.
  • Smith, R.D. Essential Techniques for Military Modeling and Simulation. Proceedings of the 30th Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, 1998, 805–812.
  • Solomon, C.M. (1993). Simulation Training Builds Teams through Experience. Personnel Journal, 72(6), 100–108.
  • Stolk, D., Alexandrian, D., Gros, B., & Paggio, R. (2001). Gaming and Multimedia Applications for Environmental Crisis Management Training. Computers in Human Behavior, 17, 627–642.
  • Summers, G.J. (2004). Today's Business Simulation Industry. Simulation & Gaming, 35(2), 208–241.
  • Thornton III, G.C., & Cleveland, J.N. (1990). Developing Managerial Talent through Simulation. American Psychologist, 45(2), 190–199.
  • Venkatraman, N. (1989). The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: Toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423–444.
  • Vessey, I. (1986). Cognitive Fit: A Theory-Based Analysis of the Graphs versus Tables Literature. Decision Sciences, 22(2), 219–240.
  • Vlahos, G.E. Ferratt, T.W., & Knoepfle, G. Use and Perceived Value of Computer-Based Information Systems in Supporting the Decision Making of German Managers. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research, Chicago, IL, 2000, 111–123.
  • Wongpinunwatana, N., Ferguson, C., & Bowen, P. (2000). An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Artificial Intelligence Systems on the Training of Novice Auditors. Managerial Auditing Journal, 15(6), 306–316.
  • Wise, R.L., & Iverson, N.L. (1989, Oct 2). High-Fidelity War Games Can Save Defense Dollars. Government Computer News, 8(20), 40–43.
  • Zigurs, I., & Buckland, B., K. (1998). A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 22(3), 313–334.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.