Subculture, Critical Mass, and Technology Use

References

• Al-Tameem, A. A. “An Inhibiting Context Hampering Role of Information Technology as an Enabler in Organizational Learning,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, (44:4), 2004, 34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, A. E. “Faculty Cultures, Faculty Values,” In Assessing Academic Climates and Cultures: New Directions for Institutional Research (no. 68), W. G. Tierney (Ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1990, 61–74.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. “Disciplinary Shaping of the Profession,” In The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary, and Institutional Settings, B. R. Clark (Ed.), University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Becher, T. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of the Disciplines, Open University Press, Bristol, PA, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Bendoly, E., Bachrach, D. G., Wang, H., & Zhang, S. “ERP in the Minds of Supervisors: Joint Roles of Task Interdependence and Cultural Norms,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, (26:5), 2006, 558–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensimon, E. M. “The Meaning of ‘Good Presidential Leadership’: A Frame Analysis,” In ASHE Reader Series: Organization and Governance in Higher Education, M. W. Peterson (Ed.), Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing, Needham Heights, MA, 1991, 421–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee, A., & Hikmet, N. “Reconceptualizing Organizational Support and its Effect on Information Technology Usage: Evidence from the Health Care Sector,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, (48:4), 2008, 69–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. “The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas,” Journal of Applied Psychology, (57:3), 1973, 195–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biglan, A. “Relationships between Subject Matter Characteristics and the Structure and Output of University Departments,” Journal of Applied Psychology, (57:3), 1973, 204–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikson, T., & Law, S. “Electronic Mail Use at the World Bank: Messages from Users,” Information Society, (9:22), 1993, 89–124.
   Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, R. How Colleges Work, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. Reframing organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Braxton, J. M., & Nordvall, R. C. “Selective Liberal Arts Colleges: Higher Quality as well as Higher Prestige?” Journal of Higher Education, (56:5), 1985, 538–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, B. R. The Academic Life: Small Worlds, Different Worlds, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ, 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Del Favero, M. “An Examination of the Relationship between Academic Discipline and Cognitive Complexity in Academic Deans' Administrative Behavior,” Research in Higher Education, (47:3), 2006, 281–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. “Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory,” Organization Science, (5:2), 1994, 121–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, D. C. “The Development and Enforcement of Group Norms,” Academy of Management Review, (9:1), 1984, 47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, M. J., & Pfnister, A. O. “From the Firing Line: Adaptation from the Administrator's Perspective,” Journal of Higher Education, (55:2), 1984, 297–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, S. H., & Jean, P. M. “Bridging the Disciplines: Interdisciplinary Discourse and Faculty Scholarship,” Journal of Higher Education, (74:2), 2003, 119–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. A., & Steinfield, C. W. “A Social Influence Model of Technology Use,” In Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990, 117–142.
   Google Scholar
• Gaff, J. G., & Wilson, R. C. “Faculty Cultures and Interdisciplinary Studies,” Journal of Higher Education, (42:3), 1971, 186–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, J. P. “Norms: The Problem of Definition and Classification,” American Journal of Sociology, (70:5), 1965, 586–594.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes, T., Igbaria, M., & Lu, M. “The Determinants of DSS Success: An Integrated Model,” Decision Sciences, (23:2), 1992, 409–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumport, P. J., & Snydman, S. K. “The Formal Organization of Knowledge: An Analysis of Academic Structure,” The Journal of Higher Education, (73:3), 2002, 375–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargens, L. L. “Relations between Work Habits, Research Technologies, and Eminence in Science,” Sociology of Work and Occupations, (5:1), 1978, 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, R., & Paul, R. “IS Service Quality and Culture: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, (47:1), 2006, 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khazanchi, D. “Information Technology (IT) Appropriateness: The Contingency Theory of ‘Fit’ and IT Implementation is Small and Medium Enterprises,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, (45:3), 88–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr, E. B., & Hiltz, S. R. Computer-Mediated Communication Systems, Academic Press, New York, 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Kraut, R. E., Rice, R. E., Cool, C., & Fish, R. S. “Varieties of Social Influence: The Role of Utility and Norms in the Success of a New Communication Medium,” Organization Science, (9:4), 1998, 437–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou, H., Scamell, R., & Shah, J. R. “Use of a Groupware Product: A Test of Three Theoretical Perspectives,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, (46:4), 2006, 35–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahler, A., & Rogers, E. M. “The Diffusion of Interactive Communication Innovations and the Critical Mass: The Adoption of Telecommunications Services by German Banks,” Telecommunications Policy, (23:10/11), 1999, 719–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L. “Toward a ‘Critical Mass’ Theory of Interactive Media: Universal Access, Interdependence and Diffusion,” Communication Research, (14:5), 1987, 491–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M. L. “Toward a Critical Mass Theory of Interactive Media: Universal Access, Interdependence and Diffusion,” In Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990, 194–218.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. Organizational Culture: Mapping the Terrain, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, D. S. “Statistics among the Liberal Arts,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, (93:444), 1998, 1253–1259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morphew, C. C. “Challenges Facing Shared Governance within the College,” New Directions for Higher Education, 105, 1999, 71–79.
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, Y., & Finaly-Neumann, E. “The Reward-Support Framework and Faculty Commitment to Their University,” Research in Higher Education, (31:1), 1990, 75–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanisamy, R. “Organizational Culture and Knowledge Management in ERP Implementation: An Empirical Study,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, (48:2), 2007/2008, 100–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. “Understanding the Use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration.” In Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990, 173–193.
   Google Scholar
• Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. “Decision Development in Computer-Assisted Group Decision Making.” Human Communication Research, (22:1), 1995, 90–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., Collins-Jarvis, L., & Zydney-Walker, S. “Individual and Structural Influences on Information Technology Helping Relationships,” Journal of Applied Communication Research, (27:4), 1999, 285–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, R. E., Grant, A., Schmitz, J., Torobin, J. “Individual and Network Influences on the Adoption and Perceived Outcomes of Electronic Messaging,” Social Networks, (12:1), 1990, 27–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, T. S., & Kennedy, J. N. “Prediction of Consumer Innovators: Application of Multiple Discriminant Analysis,” Journal of Marketing Research, (5:1), 1968, 64–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M., & Allbritton, M. M. “Interactive Communication Technologies in Business Organizations,” The Journal of Business Communication, (32:2), 1995, 177–195.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, G. L., & Courtney, J. F. “A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success,” MIS Quarterly, (9:1), 1985, 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. H. Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitz, J., & Fulk, J. “Organizational Colleagues, Media Richness, and Electronic Mail,” Communication Research, (18:4), 1991, 487–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. “The Contingent Effects of Management Support and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation,” MIS Quarterly, (27:4), 2003, 533–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., & Yetton, P. “The Contingent Effects of Training, Technical Complexity, and Task Interdependence on Successful Information Systems Implementation,” MIS Quarterly, (31:2), 2007, 219–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, J. C., & Elton, C. F. “Validation of the Biglan Model,” Research in Higher Education, (17:3), 1982, 213–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart, J. C., & McLaughlin, G. W. “Reward Structures of Academic Disciplines.” Research in Higher Education, (8:1), 1978, 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, J. S. “Classifying Professional Preparation Programs,” Journal of Higher Education, (69:4), 1998, 353–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinfield, C. “Computer-Mediated Communications in Organizational Settings: Emerging onceptual Frameworks and Directions for Research,” Management Communication Quarterly, (5:3), 1992, 348–365.
   Google Scholar
• Stoecker, J. “The Biglan Classification Revisited,” Research in Higher Education, (34:4), 1993, 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sue, L., & Markus, M. L. “Technological or Social Utility? Unraveling Explanations of Email, Vmail, and Fax Use,” Information Society, (9:3), 1993, 213–236.
   Google Scholar
• Taggar, S., & Haines III, V. Y. “I Need You, You Need Me: A Model of Initiated Task Interdependence,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, (21:3), 2006, 211–230.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G. “Organizational Socialization in Higher Education,” Journal of Higher Education, (68:1), 1997, 116.
   Google Scholar
• Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. Enhancing Promotion, Tenure, and Beyond: Faculty Socialization as a Cultural Process, ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6., Association for the Study of Higher Education, Washington, DC, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Trevino, L. K., Lengel, R. H., & Daft, R. L. “Media Symbolism, Media Richness, and Media Choice in Organizations,” Communication Research, (14:5), 1987, 553–574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wageman, R. “The Meaning of Interdependence,” In Groups at Work: Advances in Theory and Research, M. Turner (Ed.), Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wageman, R., & Gordon, F. M. “As the Twig is Bent: How Group Values Shape Emergent Task Interdependence in Groups,” Organization Science, (16:6), 2005, 687–700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Butler, J. E., Hsieh, P., & Hsu S. “Innovate with Complex Information Technologies: A Theoretical Model and Empirical Examination,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, (49:1), 2008, 27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar