A Multidimensional Perspective on the Diffusion of Ontologies

References

• Alshare, K.A., Freeze, R., and Obyung, K. “Student Intention to Use Expert Systems: An Exploratory Study”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49:(4), 2009, p. 105–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Local Government Association (ALGA), 2009-2010 Budget Submission: Securing Australia's Economic and Social Future. 2009: Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Austroads. Asset Management — FAQ. 2009. Available from: http://www.austroads.com.au/asset/faq.html, [cited 01 April].
   Google Scholar
• Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. “The Semantic Web”, Scientific American, 284:(5), 2001, p. 34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgo, S., Cristani, M., and Cuel, R. “Formal ontology meets industry”, Applied Ontology, 1:(3-4), 2006, p. 217–220.
   Google Scholar
• Borgo, S. and Lesmo, L., “The Attractiveness of Foundational Ontologies in Industry”, in Formal ontologies meet industry, S. Borgo and L. Lesmo, Editors, IOS: Amsterdam, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Casadesús, M., Marimon, F., and Heras, I. “ISO 14001 diffusion after the success of the ISO 9001 model”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 16:(16), 2008, p. 1741–1754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, H., Kim, S.-H., and Lee, J. “Role of network structure and network effects in diffusion of innovations”, Industrial Marketing Management, 39:(1), 2010, p. 170–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed., Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, Calif, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology”, MIS Quarterly, 13:(3), 1989, p. 318–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., and Warshaw, P.R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, vol. 35:(no. 8), 1989, p. pp. 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S., eds. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. 2005, SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, California.
   Google Scholar
• Fensel, D. Ontologies: A Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce, 1st. ed., Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gruber, T.R. “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications”, Knowledge Acquisition, 5:(2), 1993, p. 199–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guarino, N. “Understanding, building and using ontologies”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 46:(2-3), 1997, p. 293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepp, M. “Possible Ontologies: How Reality Constrains the Development of Relevant Ontologies”, Internet Computing, IEEE, 11:(1), 2007, p. 90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility”, The American Economic Review, 75:(3), 1985, p. 424–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. “Systems Competition and Network Effects”, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8:(2), 1994, p. 93–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C. “Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities”, Journal of Political Economy, 94:(4), 1986, p. 822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindleberger, C.P. “Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods”, Kyklos, 36:(3), 1983, p. 377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorence, D.P. “Outsourcing Services in Partial Digital Environments: Assessing Management Preferences Where Paper is King”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, 48:(3), 2008, p. 103–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L., “Power, Politics and MIS Implementation”, in Qualitative research in information systems: a reader, M.D. Myers and D. Avison, Editors, SAGE Publications: London, 2002, p. 19–48.
   Google Scholar
• Markus, M.L., Steinfield, C.W., Wigand, R.T., and Minton, G. “Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry”, MIS Quarterly, 30, 2006, p. 439–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meersman, R., The use of lexicons and other computer-linguistic tools in semantics, design and cooperation of database systems, in STAR Lab Technical Report. 2005, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium.
   Google Scholar
• Nastasie, D.L., Koronios, A., and Sandhu, K. “Factors Influencing the Diffusion of Ontologies in Road Asset Management — A Preliminary Conceptual Model”, in Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and Intelligent Maintenance Systems (WCEAM-IMS), 27-30 October. Beijing, China: Springer-Verlag London Ltd., 2008, pg. 1162–1176.
   Google Scholar
• Ntaliani, M., Costopoulou, C., Karetsos, S., Tambouris, E., et al. “Agricultural e-government services: An implementation framework and case study”, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 70:(2), 2010, p. 337–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obrst, L. “Ontologies for semantically interoperable systems”, in Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on Information and knowledge management. New Orleans, LA, USA: ACM, 2003, pg. 366–369.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups Harvard University Press. Cambridge, Mass., 1965, 176.
   Google Scholar
• Penrose, H. Physical Asset Management for the Executive: Don't Read This If You Are on an Airplane. Success By Design, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Petrie, C. “Pragmatic semantic unification”, Internet Computing, IEEE, 9:(5), 2005, p. 96–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezgui, Y., Boddy, S., Wetherill, M., and Cooper, G. “Past, present and future of information and knowledge sharing in the construction industry: Towards semantic service-based e-construction?”, Computer-Aided Design, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.cad.2009.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• Rockart, J.F. “Chief executives define their own data needs”, Harvard Business Review, 57:(2), 1979, p. 81–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed., Free Press. New York, 1995, xvii, 519 p.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed., Free Press. New York, 2003, xxi, 551 p.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D.M., Cavero, J.M., and Marinez, E.M., “The Road Toward Ontologies”, in Ontologies: a handbook of principles, concepts and applications in information systems, R. Sharman, R. Kishore, and R. Ramesh, Editors, Springer: New York, 2007, p. pg. 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tornatzky, L.G. and Fleischer, M. The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books. Lexington, MA, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, 46:(2), 2000, p. 186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. “User Acceptance Of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View”, MIS Quarterly, 27:(3), 2003, p. 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. and Cargill, C. “Consortia in the Standards Development Process”, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43:(8), 1992, p. 559–565.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K. Case study research: design and methods, 4th ed., Sage Publications. Thousand Oaks, Calif, 2009, xiv, 219.
   Google Scholar