An Agency Theory Explanation of Project Success

References

• Abrahamson, E. and Park C. 1994. “Concealment of Negative Organizational Outcomes: An Agency Theory Perspective,” Academy of Management Journal (37:5), 1302–1334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W. 1988. “Structural Equation Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach,” Psychological Bulletin (103:3), 411–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, J. S., and Overton, T. S. 1977. “Estimating Non-response Bias in Mail Surveys,” Journal of Marketing Research (14:3), 396–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiman, S. 1982. “Agency Research in Management Accounting: A Survey,” Journal of Accounting Literature (1), 154–213.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, G. P., Jensen, M. C., and Murphy, K. J. 1988. “Compensation and Incentives: Practice Versus Theory,” Journal of Finance (43:3), 593–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Lee, S-Y, Potter, G., and Srinivasan, D. 1996. “Contextual Analysis of Performance Impacts of Outcome-Based Incentive Compensation,” Academy of Management Journal (39:4), 920–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, A., Konana, P., Whinston, A., and Yin, F. 2004. “An Empirical Investigation of Net-Enabled Business Value,” MIS Quarterly (28:4), 585–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baugh, S. G., and Roberts, R. M. 1994. “Professional and Organizational Commitment among Engineers: Conflicting or Complementing,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management (41:2), 108–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. 1989. EQS: Structural Equations Program Manual, Los Angeles, CA, BMDP Statistical Software, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bergen, M., Dutta, S., and Walker, O. C., Jr. 1992. “Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories,” Journal of Marketing (56:3), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, C., and Fox, R. 1992. “Elements of Successful Project Management,” Journal of Systems Management (43:9), 10–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, C., and Yen, S.-H. 2007. “The Effects of Moral Development and Adverse Selection Conditions on Managers' Project Continuance Decisions: A Study in the Pacific-Rim Region,” Journal of Business Ethics (76:3), 347–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Churchill, G. A. 1979. “A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs,” Journal of Marketing Research (16), February, 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaraj, S., Fan, M., and Kohli, R. 2002. “Antecedents of B2C Channel Satisfaction and Preference: Validating E-Commerce Metrics,” Information Systems Research (13:3), 316–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and Internet Surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review,” Academy of Management Review (14:1), 57–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review (14:4), 532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gefen, D., Straub, D. W., and Boudreau, M. 2000. “Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice,” Communication of AIS (4:7), 1–78.
   Google Scholar
• Guinan, P. J., Cooprider, J. G., and Faraj, S. 1998. “Enabling Software Development Team Performance During Requirements Definition: A Behavioral Versus Technical Approach,” Information Systems Research (9:2), 101–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 5th edition, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Harrell, A., and Harrison, P. 1994. “An Incentive to Shirk, Privately Held Information, and Managers' Project Evaluation Decisions,” Accounting, Organizations & Society (19:7), 569–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, L. 1994. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling, Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jaskiewicz, P., and Klein, S. 2007. “The Impact of Goal Alignment on Board Composition and Board Size in Family Businesses,” Journal of Business Research (60:10), 1080–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D.E. 1998. Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysis, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Cule, P. E., Lyytinen, K., and Schmidt, R. C. 1998. “A Framework for Identifying Software Project Risks,” Communications of the ACM (41:11), 76–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Mann, J., Rai, A. 2000. “Why Software Projects Escalate: An Empirical Analysis and Test of Four Theoretical Models,” MIS Quarterly (24:4), 631–664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W. R., and Marks, P.V. 2008. “Motivating Knowledge Sharing Through a Knowledge Management System,” Omega (36:1), 131–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby, S. L., and Davis, M. A. 1998. “A Study of Escalating Commitment in Principal Agent Relationships: Effects of Monitoring and Personal Responsibility,” Journal of Applied Psychology (83:2), 206–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, C., Ang, S., and Straub, D. 2004. “IT Outsourcing Success: A Psychological Contract Perspective,” Information Systems Research (15:4), 356–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolbe, R. H., and Burnett, M. S. 1991. “Content-Analysis Research: An Examination of Applications with Directives for Improving Research Reliability and Objectivity,” Journal of Consumer Research (18:2), 243–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreitner, R. 2007. Management, 10th edition, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
   Google Scholar
• Mahaney, R.C. and Lederer A.L. 2006. “The Effect of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Rewards for Developers on Information Systems Project Success,” Project Management Journal, (37:4), September, 42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, N.L., Pearson, J. M., and Furumo, K. 2007. “IS Project Management: Size, Practices and the Project Management Office,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Summer (47:4), 52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric Theory, New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto, J. K., and Slevin, D. P. 1988. “Project Success: Definitions and Measurement Techniques,” Project Management Journal (19:1), 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, M., and Organ, D. 1986. “Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects,” Journal of Management (12:4), 531–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Project Management Institute. 2003. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge, 3rd ed., Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Schriesheim, C. 1979. “The Similarity of Individual-directed and Group-directed Leader Behavior Descriptions,” Academy of Management Journal (22:2), 345–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slevin, D. P., and Pinto, J. K. 1986. “The Project Implementation Profile: New Tool for Project Managers,” Project Management Journal (17:4), 57–70.
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, J. W., Cron Jr., W. L., and Brown, S. P. 2002. “The Effect of Goal Conflict on Performance,” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies (9:1), Summer, 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, A.P and Keil, M. 2002. A framework for assessing the reliability of software project management reports. Engineering Management Journal (14:2), 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, A. P., Keil, M., and Wallace, L. 2007. “The Effects of Optimistic and Pessimistic Biasing on Software Project Status Reporting,” Information & Management (44:2), 130–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprinkle, G. 2000. “The Effect of Incentive Contracts on Learning and Performance,” The Accounting Review (75:3), 299–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Standish Group. 2003. Chaos Chronicles, v3.0, The Standish Group International, Inc.: West Yarmouth, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Straub, D.W. 1989. “Validating Instruments in MIS Research,” MIS Quarterly (13:2), 147–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T. S. H., Lim, V. K. G., and Lai, R. Y. C. 1999. “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Internet Usage,” Omega (27:1), 25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tesch, D., Kloppenborg, T.J., and Frolick, M.N. 2007. “IT Project Risk Factors: The Project Management Professionals Perspective,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, Summer (47:4), 61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., and Bush, A.A. 2007. “A Comparison of Transaction Cost, Agency, and Knowledge-Based Predictors of IT Outsourcing Decisions: A U.S.-Japan Cross-Cultural Field Study,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:1), 259–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosi, H. L., Katz, J. P., and Gomez-Mejia, L. R. 1997. “Disaggregating the Agency Contract: The Effects of Monitoring, Incentive Alignment, and Term in Office on Agent Decision Making,” Academy of Management Journal (40:3), 584–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, L. and Keil, M. 2004. “Software Project Risks and Their Impact on Outcomes,” Communications of the ACM (47:4), 68–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, L., Keil, M. and Rai, A. 2004. “Understanding Software Project Risk: A Cluster Analysis,” Information & Management (42:1), 115–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, R. and Wallace, J. 1998. “Cyber Research: The Impact of the Internet on Data Collection,” Marketing Research (10:3), 19–24, 31.
   Google Scholar