113
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Does Cognitive Overload Matter in Understanding Bpmn Models?

Pages 59-69 | Received 14 Jul 2011, Accepted 09 Jan 2012, Published online: 11 Dec 2015

References

  • Becker, J., Rosemann, M. and Uthmann, C. (2000) “Guidelines of Business process Modeling” Business Process Management: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies, v. d. Aalst, W. Desel and J. Oberweis, eds., pp. 30–49: Springer, Berlin.
  • Recker, J. and Dreiling, A. (2011) “The Effects of Content Presentation Format and User Characteristics on Novice Developers' Understanding of Process Models,”Communications of the Association for Information Systems: 28 (6).
  • Weber, R. (2003) “Conceptual Modelling and Ontology: Possibilities and Pitfalls,” Journal of Database Management, 14 (3), pp. 1–20.
  • White, S. (2004) “Introduction to BPMN,” http://www.omg.org/bpmn/Documents/Introduction_to_BPMN.pdf].
  • Recker, J. and Dreiling, A. (2007) “Does it matter which process modelling language we teach or use? An experimental study on understanding process modelling languages without formal education,” in 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 356–366.
  • Sweller, J. (1988) “Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning,” Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 257–285.
  • Mayer, R. (1983) Thinking, problem solving, cognition: W.H. Freeman and Company.
  • Mayer, R. (2001) Multimedia learning, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chandler, P. and Sweller, J. (1991) “Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction,” Cognition and Instruction, 8, pp. 293–33.
  • Sweller, J. (2002). Visualisation and instructional design. Paper presented at the International. Workshop on Dynamic Visualisations and Learning, Tubingen
  • Ward, M. and Sweller, J. (1990) “Structuring Effective Worked Examples,” Cognition and Instruction, 7, pp. 1–39.
  • Glaser, R. (1996) “Changing the agency for learning: Acquiring expert performance,” The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games, K. A. Ericsson, ed., pp. 303–311, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Gemino, A. and Wand, Y. (2005) “Complexity and clarity in conceptual modeling: Comparison of mandatory and optional properties,” Data and Knowledge Engineering, 55, pp. 301–326.
  • Mayer, R. (1989) “Models for Understanding,” Review of Educational Research, 59 (1), pp. 43–64.
  • Arnott, D. (2006) “Cognitive biases and decision support systems development: A design science approach,” Information Systems Journal, 16 (1), pp. 55–78.
  • Evermann, J. and Wand, Y. (2006) “Ontological Modelling Rules for UML: An Empirical Assessment,” Journal of Computer Information Systems, 47 (1).
  • Gemino, A. and Wand, Y. (2004) “A framework for empirical evaluation of conceptual modeling techniques,” Requirements Engineering Journal, 9 (4), pp. 248–260.
  • A. Gemino (1998) “Comparing Object Oriented with Structured Analysis Techniques in Conceptual Modeling (PhD Thesis),” Sauder School of Business, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
  • Ainsworth, S. and Loizou, A. (2003) “The effects of self-explaining when learning with text or diagrams,” Cognitive Science, 27(4), pp. 669–681.
  • Burton-Jones, A. and Meso, P. (2006) “Conceptualizing Systems for Understanding: An Empirical Test of Decomposition Principles in Object-Oriented Analysis,” Information Systems Research, 17(1), pp. 38–60.
  • Larkin, J. H. and Simon, H. A. (1987) “Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words,” Cognitive Science, v11, pp. 65–99.
  • Nunnally, J. and Bernstein, I. (1994) Psychometric Theory, 3 ed., New York: McGraw Hill.
  • S. White, (2006) “Tutorial on BPMN,” http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/OMG_BPMN_Tutorial.pdf,].
  • Vessey, I., and Conger, S. (1994) Requirements Specification: Learning Object, Process, and Data Methodologies, Communications of the ACM 37 (5) pp. 102–113.
  • Ericsson, K.A. and Simon, H.A. (1984) Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data, MIT Press
  • Wang, S. and Wang, H. (2010) Towards Innovative Design Research in Information Systems. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51 (1) pp. 11–18
  • Lee, J. (2008) Status of Business Process Courses in AACSB — Accredited Undergraduate Programs. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49 (1), pp. 10–16

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.