Understanding Technology Adoption Trade-Offs: A Conjoint Analysis Approach

References

• Anderson, B.B., Bajaj, A., and Gorr, W. “An Estimation Of The Relative Effects Of External Software Quality Factors On Senior IS Managers' Evaluation of Computing Architecture,” Journal of Systems and Software (61:1), 2002, 59–75.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaj, A. “Conjoint Analysis: A Potential Methodology For Is Research,” Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin: 1999, 689–691.
   Google Scholar
• Bajaj, A. “A Study of Senior Information Systems Managers' Decision Models in Adopting New Computing Architectures,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems (1:4), 2000, 1–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bekkering, E., Johnston, A.C., Warkentin, M., and Schmidt, M.B. “An Empirical Assessment of Perceptions of Tablet PC Attractiveness,” Information Resources Management Journal (22:4), 2009, 23–44.
   Google Scholar
• Chellappa, R. and Pavlou, P. “Perceived Information Security, Financial Liability and Consumer Trust in Electronic Commerce Transaction,” Logistics Information Management (15:5), 2002, 358–368.
   Google Scholar
• Cisco. “Cisco Mobile Office,” 2002.
   Google Scholar
• DSS-Research. “A Review of Conjoint Analysis,” 2004, http://www.dssresearch.com/toolkit/resource/papers.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavior Impacts,” International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (38), 1993, 475–487.
   Google Scholar
• DeSarbo, W.S., Ramaswamy, V., and Cohen, S. “Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis,” Marketing Letters (6:2), 1995, 137–147.
   Google Scholar
• Dekleva, S., Shim, J.P, Varshney, U., and Knoerzer, G. “Evolution and Emerging Issues in Mobile Wireless Networks,” Communications of the ACM (50:6), 2007, 38–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Featherman, M.S. and Pavlou, P.A. “Predicting E-services Adoption: A Perceived Risk Facets Perspective,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (59), 2003, 451–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, S.M., Green, P.E., and Wind, Y. “Conjoint Analysis of Price Premiums for Hotel Amenities,” Journal of Business (57:1), 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, L.A. “Snowball Sampling,” Annals of Mathematical Statistics (32:1), 1961, 148–170.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P.E., Krieger, A.M., and Wind, Y. “Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects,” Interfaces (31), 2001, 56–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P.E. and Srinivasan, V. “Conjoint Analysis in Consumer Research: Issues and Outlook,” Journal of Consumer Research (5), 1978, 103–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P.E. and Srinivasan, V. “Conjoint Analysis in Marketing, New Developments with Implications for Research and Practice,” Journal of Marketing (54), 1990, 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruman, G. “Taking IT to the Streets: 3G Arrives,” InfoWorld (27:10), 2005, 30–31.
   Google Scholar
• Hann, I.-H., Hui, K.-L., Lee, S.-Y.T., and Png, I.P.L. “Overcoming Online Information Privacy Concerns: An Information-Processing Theory Approach,” Journal of Management Information Systems (24:2), 2007, 13–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D.D. “Respondent-Driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations,” Social Problems (44:2), 1997, 174–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM. “Mobile Office: The Next Breakthough in Professional Productivity Gains,” 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Intel. “Anytime, Anywhere Mobile Office,” 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Intel. “CGE&Y — Mobile Office,” 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W. “Information Technology Adoption across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs,” MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, 183–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijnen, M. and Ruyter, K. de. “Factors Influencing the Adoption of Mobile Gaming Services,” In, B.E. Mennecke and T.J. Strader, eds., Mobile Commerce Technology, Theory and Applications. Idea Group Publishing, 2003, pp. 202–217.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, T.-P and Wei, C.-P. “Introduction to the Special Issue: Mobile Commerce Applications,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce (8:3), 2004, 1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahajan, V. and Peterson, R.A. Models for Innovation Diffusion (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences), SAGE Publications, Beverly Hills, California, 1985, 1–88.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, J. “Dilemmatics: The Study of Research Choices and Dilemmas,” In, J.M. McGrath and R. J. Kulka, eds., Judgment Calls in Research. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, 1982, pp. 69–103.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research (2:3), 1991, 192–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty, R.T. Industrial Buying Behaviour, D.C. Health and Company, Lexington, MA, 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Muthaiyah, S. and Ehsan, S.D. “Readiness towards 3G: Antecedents of 3G Adoption and Deployment in Malaysia,” Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Wireless Information Systems, Porto, Portugal: INSTICC Press 2004, 100–110.
   Google Scholar
• Orme, B. K., Getting Started with Conjoint Analysis, Research Publishers LLC, Madison, WI, 2010
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P.A. and Gefen, D. “Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust,” Information Systems Research (15:1), 2004, 37–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers, K. and Tuunanen, T. “Planning for IS Applications: A Practical, Information Theoretical Method and Case Study in Mobile Financial Services,” Information & Management (42:3), 2005, 483–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plouffe, C.R., Hulland, J.S., and Vandenbosch, M. “Richness Versus Parsimony in Modeling Technology Adoption Decisions — Understanding Merchant Adoption of a Smart Card-Based Payment System,” Information Systems Research (12:2), 2001, 208–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovation, Free Press, New York, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Sawtooth Software. “The CBC system for choice-based conjoint analysis,” 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Schaupp, L.C. and Bélanger, F. “A Conjoint Analysis of Online Consumer Satisfaction,” Journal of Electronic Commerce (6:2), 2005, 95–111.
   Google Scholar
• Scornavacca, E., Barnes, J.S., and Huff, S. “Mobile Business Research Published in 2000-2004: Emergence, Current Status, and Future Opportunities,” Communications of the Association for Information Systems (17), 2006, 635–646.
   Google Scholar
• Shim, J.P, Varshney, U., Dekleva, S., and Nickerson, R.C. “Wireless Telecommunications Issues: Cell Phone TV, Wireless Networks in Disaster Management, Ubiquitous Computing, and Adoption of Future Wireless Applications,” Communications of the AIS (20:29), 2007, 442–456.
   Google Scholar
• Suoranta, M. and Mattila, M. “Mobile Banking and Consumer Behavior: New Insights into the Diffusion Pattern,” Journal of Financial Service Marketing (8:4), 2004, 354–366.
   Google Scholar
• Tarasewich, P., Nickerson, R.C., and Warkentin, M. “Issues in Mobile E-commerce,” Communications of the AIS (8:3), 2002, 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Tarasewich, P. and Warkentin, M. “Information Everywhere,” Information Systems Management (19:1), 2002, 8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B., and Davis, F.D. “User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View,” MIS Quarterly (27:3), 2003, 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wailgum, T. “Blowing Mobile,” CIO Magazine (20:20), 2007, 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, X. and Butler, B.S. “Individual Technology Acceptance under Conditions of Change,” International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, Washington: 2003, 732–742.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin, M. and Bajaj, A. “An Investigation into Online Grocer Selection Criteria,” Proceedings of the 2000 Annual Northeast Conference of the Decision Sciences Institute, 2000, 155–157.
   Google Scholar
• Wittink, D.R., Krishnamurthi, L., and Reibstein, D.J. “The Effect of Differences in the Number of Attribute Levels on Conjoint Results” Marketing Letters (1:2), 1990, 113–129.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, G. and Connolly, T. “Between-subject Designs in Testing Expectancy Models: A Methodological Note,” Decision Sciences (12:1), 1981, 39–45.
   Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., and Holbek, J. Innovations and Organizations, Wiley and Sons, New York, 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Zellweger, P. “Web-based Sales: Defining the Cognitive Buyer,” Electronic Markets (7:3), 1997, 10–16.
   Google Scholar