Looking inside the “it Black Box”: Technological Effects on it Usage

References

• *Adams, D.A., Nelson, R.R. and Todd, P.A. “Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication”, MIS Quarterly, (16: 2), 1992, 227–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. “Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage”, MIS Quarterly, (24: 4), 2000, 665–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. “The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies”, Decision Sciences, (28: 3), 1997, 557–582.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. “The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption”, Decision Support Systems, (22: 1), 1998, 15–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. “Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?”, Decision Sciences, (30: 2), 1999, 361–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Ahn, T., Ryu, S. and Han, I. “The impact of web quality and playfulness on user acceptance of online retailing”, Information & Management, (44: 3), 2007, 263–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen, I. “The theory of planned behavior”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, (50: 2), 1991, 179–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Al-Gahtani, S.S., Hubona, G.S. and Wang, J. “Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT”, Information & Management, (44: 8), 2007, 681–691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Al-Jabri, I.M. and Al-Hadab, A., “End user adoption of ERP systems: Investigation of four beliefs”, Americas Conference on Information Systems, Canada, 2008, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• *Al-Khaldi, M.A. and Olusegun Wallace, R.S. “The influence of attitudes on personal computer utilization among knowledge workers: The case of saudi arabia”, Information & Management, (36: 4), 1999, 185–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Aladwani, A.M. “The development of two tools for measuring the easiness and usefulness of transactional web sites”, European Journal of Information Systems, (11: 3), 2002, 223–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Aldosari, B.M.B. “Factors affecting physicians' attitudes about the medical information system usage and acceptance through the mandated implementation of integrated medical information system at the saudi arabia national guard health system: A modified technology acceptance model,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• *An, J.-Y. “Correlates and predictors of consumers' health information and services usage behavior on the internet: A structural equation modeling approach,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, New York University, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M. and Kydd, C. “Individual characteristics associated with world wide web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivation”, ACM SIGMIS Database, (28: 2), 1997, 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bajaj, A. and Nidumolu, S.R. “A feedback model to understand information system usage”, Information & Management, (33: 4), 1998, 213–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. “Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency”, American Psychologist, (37: 2), 1982, 122–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. “The identity crisis within the is discipline: Defining and communicating the discipline's core properties”, MIS Quarterly, (27: 2), 2003, 183–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bhattacherjee, A. and Hikmet, N. “Physicians' resistance toward healthcare information technology: A theoretical model and empirical test”, European Journal of Information Systems, (16: 6), 2007, 725–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Bhattacherjee, A. and Sanford, C. “Influence processes for information technology acceptance: An elaboration likelihood model”, MIS Quarterly, (30: 4), 2006, 805–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Brown, S.A. and Venkatesh, V. “Model of adoption of technology in households: A baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle”, MIS Quarterly, (29: 3), 2005, 399–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Burton-Jones, A. and Hubona, G.S. “The mediation of external variables in the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, (43: 6), 2006, 706–717'.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Busch, E.A. “Integrating technology acceptance and innovation diffusion factors to predict intentions to use an electronic messaging system,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• *Castañeda, J.A., Muñz-Leiva, F. and Luque, T. “Web acceptance model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience”, Information & Management, (44: 4), 2007, 384–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chakraborty, I., Hu, P.J.-H. and Cui, D. “Examining the effects of cognitive style in individuals' technology use decision making”, Decision Support Systems, (45: 2), 2008, 228–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, P. and Hu, P. “Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: A model comparison approach”, Decision Sciences, (32: 4), 2001, 699–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Chea, S. “Understanding the roles of emotion in technology acceptance,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, W.W. and Gopal, A. “Adoption intention in GSS: Relative importance of beliefs”, ACM SIGMIS Database, (26: 2-3), 1995, 42–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Cho, V. “A study of the roles of trusts and risks in information-oriented online legal services using an integrated model”, Information & Management, (43: 4), 2006, 502–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, New York, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Compeau, D., Higgins, C.A. and Huff, S. “Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study”, MIS Quarterly, (23: 2), 1999, 145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Compeau, D.R. and Higgins, C.A. “Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test”, MIS Quarterly, (19: 2), 1995, 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Compeau, D.R., Meister, D.B. and Higgins, C.A. “From prediction to explanation: Reconceptualizing and extending the perceived characteristics of innovating”, Journal of the AIS, (8: 1), 2007, 409–439.
   Google Scholar
• *Cyr, D., Head, M. and Ivanov, A. “Design aesthetics leading to m-loyalty in mobile commerce”, Information & Management, (43: 8), 2006, 950–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dasgupta, S. and Gupta, B., “Role of organizational culture in internet technology adoption: An empirical study”, Americas Conference on Information Systems, USA, 2005, 1304–1311.
   Google Scholar
• *Davis, F.D. “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, (13: 3), 1989, 319–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. “User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models”, Management Science, (35: 8), 1989, 982–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. “Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, (22: 14), 1992, 1111–1132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L., Intrinsic motivation, New York, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• *Devaraj, S., Easley, R.F. and Crant, J.M. “How does personality matter? Relating the five-factor model to technology acceptance and use”, Information Systems Research, (19: 1), 2008, 93–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Dinev, T. and Hu, Q. “The centrality of awareness in the formation of user behavioral intention toward protective information technologies”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, (8: 1), 2007, 386–408.
   Google Scholar
• *Fayad, R. “Extension of the technology acceptance model in electronic commerce,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Utah State University, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, MA, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• *Gefen, D., Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W. “Inexperience and experience with online stores: The importance of tarn and trust”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, (50: 3), 2003, 307–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, G.V., McGaw, B. and Smith, M.L., Meta-analysis in social research, Beverly Hills, CA, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• *Ha, I., Yoon, Y. and Choi, M. “Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment”, Information & Management, (44: 3), 2007, 276–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Habelow, E.M. “Factors related to the use of an electronic performance support system (EPSS),” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Temple University, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• *Hasan, B. “Delineating the effects of general and system-specific computer self-efficacy beliefs on is acceptance”, Information & Management, (43: 5), 2006, 565–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L.V. and Olkin, I., Statistical methods for meta-analysis, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• *Hong, S.-J. and Tarn, K.Y. “Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services”, Information Systems Research, (17: 2), 2006, 162–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hong, S.-J., Thong, J.Y.L. and Tarn, K.Y. “Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet”, Decision Support Systems, (42: 3), 2006, 1819–1834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hong, W., Thong, J.Y.L., Wong, W.-M. and Tarn, K.-Y. “Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: An empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics”, Journal of Management Information Systems, (18: 3), 2001, 97–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hsieh, J.J.P.-A., Rai, A. and Keil, M. “Understanding digital inequality: Comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged”, MIS Quarterly, (32: 1), 2008, 97–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hsu, C.-L. and Lin, J.C.-C. “Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation”, Information & Management, (45: 1), 2008, 65–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hsu, C.-L. and Lu, H.-P. “Why do people play on-line games? An extended tarn with social influences and flow experience”, Information & Management, (41: 7), 2004, 853–868.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Hsu, M.-H. and Chiu, C.-M. “Internet self-efficacy and electronic service acceptance”, Decision Support Systems, (38:3), 2004, 369–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, S.E., Nahrgang, J.D. and Morgeson, F.P. “Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (92: 5), 2007, 1332–1356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J.E. and Schmidt, F.L., Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• *Hur, Y. “Determinants of sport website acceptance: An application and extension of the technology acceptance model,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Washington State University, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• *Hwang, Y. “Investigating enterprise systems adoption: Uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model”, European Journal of Information Systems, (14: 2), 2005, 150–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Igbaria, M. “User acceptance of microcomputer technology”, Omega, (21: 1), 1993, 73–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Igbaria, M., Guimaraes, T. and Davis, G.B. “Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model”, Journal of Management Information Systems, (11: 4), 1995, 87–114.
   Google Scholar
• *Igbaria, M., Iivari, J. and Maragahh, H. “Why do individuals use computer technology? A finnish case study”, Information & Management, (29: 5), 1995, 227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Igbaria, M., Parasuraman, S. and Baroudi, J.J. “A motivational model of microcomputer usage”, Journal of Management Information Systems, (13: 1), 1996, 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• *Igbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P. and Cavaye, A.L.M. “Personal computing acceptance factors in small firms: A structural equation model”, MIS Quarterly, (21: 3), 1997, 279–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Iivari, J. and Maansaari, J., “The impact of case on is professionals' work and motivation to use case”, International Conference on Information Systems, 1997, 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• *Ilie, V., Slyke, C.V., Parikh, M.A. and Courtney, J.F. “Paper versus electronic medical records: The effects of access on physicians' decisions to use complex information technologies”, Decision Sciences, (40: 2), 2009, 213–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Im, I., Kim, Y. and Han, H.-J. “The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users' acceptance of technologies”, Information & Management, (45: 1), 2008, 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Jiang, Z. and Benbasat, I. “Research note investigating the influence of the functional mechanisms of online product presentations”, Information Systems Research, (18: 4), 2007, 454–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, B.T., Mullen, B. and Salas, E. “Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches”, Journal of Applied Psychology, (80: 1), 1995, 94–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R. and Angst, C.M. “Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research”, MIS Quarterly, (30: 4), 2006, 781–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karahanna, E., Ahuja, M., Srite, M. and Galvin, J. “Individual differences and relative advantage: The case of gss”, Decision Support Systems, (32: 4), 2002, 327–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Keeton, K. “An extension of the utaut model: How organizational factors and individual differences influence technology acceptance,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Houston, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• *Keil, M., Beranek, P.M. and Konsynski, B.R. “Usefulness and ease of use: Field study evidence regarding task considerations”, Decision Support Systems, (13: 1), 1995, 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, H.C. “Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, (2: 1), 1958, 51–60.
   Google Scholar
• *Kim, H.-W., Chan, H.C. and Gupta, S. “Value-based adoption of mobile internet: An empirical investigation”, Decision Support Systems, (43: 1), 2007, 111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, J.-A. “User acceptance of web-based subscription databases: Extending the technology acceptance model,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The Florida State University, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J.Y., Shim, J. and Ahn, K.M. “Social networking service: Motivation, pleasure, and behavioral intention to use”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, (51: 4), 2011, 92–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, S.H. “Moderating effects of job relevance and experience on mobile wireless technology acceptance: Adoption of a smartphone by individuals”, Information & Management, (45: 6), 2008, 387–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, S.S. and Malhotra, N.K. “A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena”, Management Science, (51: 5), 2005, 741–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kim, S.S., Malhotra, N.K. and Narasimhan, S. “Research note — two competing perspectives on automatic use: A theoretical and empirical comparison”, Information Systems Research, (16: 4), 2005, 418–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, W.R. and He, J. “Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in is research”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, (16: 1), 2005, 665–686.
   Google Scholar
• King, W.R. and He, J. “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, (43: 6), 2006, 740–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Klein, R. “An empirical examination of patient-physician portal acceptance”, European Journal of Information Systems, (16: 6), 2007, 751–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kling, R. and Scacchi, W. “The web of computing: Computer technology as social organization”, Advances in computers, (21) 1982, 1–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Koufaris, M. “Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior”, Information Systems Research, (13: 2), 2002, 205–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kowitlawakul, Y. “Technology acceptance model: Predicting nurses' acceptance of telemedicine technology (eICU),” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, George Mason University, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• *Kulviwat, S. “An investigation of factors predicting consumer adoption of high-technology innovations: The integrative roles of cognition and affect,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• *Kumar, N., Mohan, K. and Holowczak, R. “Locking the door but leaving the computer vulnerable: Factors inhibiting home users' adoption of software firewalls”, Decision Support Systems, (46: 1), 2008, 254–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Kwahk, K.-Y., “An empirical study on the effect of attitude toward change and computer self-efficacy on ERP adoption: A comparison of the local and global packages”, Americas Conference on Information Systems, Canada, 2008, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• *Kwahk, K.-Y. and Lee, J.-N. “The role of readiness for change in ERP implementation: Theoretical bases and empirical validation”, Information & Management, (45: 7), 2008, 474–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lapczynski, P.H. “An integrated model of technology acceptance for mobile computing,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Pace University, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• *Lee, M.-C. “Predicting and explaining the adoption of online trading: An empirical study in taiwan”, Decision Support Systems, (47: 2), 2009, 133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, M.K.O., Cheung, C.M.K. and Chen, Z. “Acceptance of internet-based learning medium: The role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation”, Information & Management, (42:8), 2005, 1095–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lee, Y.-K. “Factors affecting learner behavioral intentions to adopt web-based learning technology in adult and higher education,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of South Dakota, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, (40: 3),
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Leong, L.Y.S. “A test of the technology acceptance model in database application: Ms access use,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• *Lewis, W., Agarwal, R. and Sambamurthy, V. “Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers”, MIS Quarterly, (27: 4), 2003, 657–678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Li, D., Chau, P.Y.K. and Lou, H. “Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: An empirical investigation”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, (6: 4), 2005, 102–129.
   Google Scholar
• *Limayem, M., Cheung, C. and Chan, G., “Explaining information systems adoption and post-adoption: Toward an integrative model”, International Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, WA, 2003, 720–731.
   Google Scholar
• *Limayem, M. and Cheung, C.M.K. “Understanding information systems continuance: The case of internet-based learning technologies”, Information & Management, (45: 4), 2008, 227–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Limayem, M., Hirt, S.G. and Cheung, C.M.K. “How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance”, MIS Quarterly, (31: 4), 2007, 705–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Lou, H., Luo, W. and Strong, D. “Perceived critical mass effect on groupware acceptance”, European Journal of Information Systems, (9: 2), 2000, 91–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Luo, M.-L. “Technology acceptance of information services,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Hawai'i, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, Q. and Liu, L. “The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings”, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, (16: 1), 2004, 59–72.
   Google Scholar
• *Malhotra, Y., Galletta, D.F. and Kirsch, L.J. “How endogenous motivations influence user intentions: Beyond the dichotomy of extrinsic and intrinsic user motivations”, Journal of Management Information Systems, (25: 1), 2008, 267–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieson, K. “Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior”, Information Systems Research, (2: 3), 1991, 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *McElroy, J.C., Hendrickson, A.R., Townsend, A.M. and DeMarie, S.M. “Dispositional factors in internet use: Personality versus cognitive style”, MIS Quarterly, (31: 4), 2007, 809–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Meli, P. “Perspectives of health information management faculty use of an e-learning laboratory and technology acceptance,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• *Mellarkod, V., Appan, R., Jones, D.R. and Sherif, K. “A multi-level analysis of factors affecting software developers' intention to reuse software assets: An empirical investigation”, Information & Management, (44: 7), 2007, 613–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J.-W. and Kim, Y.-G. “Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context”, Information & Management, (38: 4), 2001, 217–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I. “Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation”, Information Systems Research, (2: 3), 1991, 192–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Mun, Y.Y., Kirk, D.F. and Jae, S.P. “Understanding the role of individual innovativeness in the acceptance of it-based innovations: Comparative analyses of models and measures”, Decision Sciences, (37: 3), 2006, 393–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Myers, B.L. “Moving beyond computer-based information technology: A comparison of the technology acceptance model with the theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behavior in an industry specifications context,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, New York University, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• *Neufeld, D., Dong, L. and Higgins, C. “Charismatic leadership and user acceptance of information technology”, European Journal of Information Systems, (16: 4), 2007, 494–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Or, K. “Development of a model of consumer health information technology acceptance of patients with chronic illness,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J. and Iacono, C.S. “Research commentary: Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research-A call to theorizing the IT artifact”, Information Systems Research, (12: 2), 2001, 121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Pan, C.-C. “System use of webct in the light of the technology acceptance model: A student perspective,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• *Park, N. “User acceptance of computer-based voip phone service: An application of the technology acceptance model,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• *Pavlou, P., “Integrating trust in electronic commerce with the technology acceptance model: Model development and validation”, Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2001, 816–822.
   Google Scholar
• *Pavlou, P.A. and Fygenson, M. “Understanding and prediction electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior”, MIS Quarterly, (30: 1), 2006, 115–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Plouffe, C.R., Hulland, J.S. and Vandenbosch, M. “Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions–understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system”, Information Systems Research, (12: 2), 2001, 208–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Premkumar, G., Ramamurthy, K. and Liu, H.-N. “Internet messaging: An examination of the impact of attitudinal, normative, and control belief systems”, Information & Management, (45: 7), 2008, 451–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Qiu, L. and Benbasat, I. “Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: A social relationship perspective to designing information systems”, Journal of Management Information Systems, (25: 4), 2009, 145–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of innovations, 4th ed., New York, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• *Rosen, P.A. “The effect of personal innovativeness on technology acceptance and use,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oklahoma State University, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., Meta-analytic procedures for social research, Beverly Hills, CA, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• *Saade', R. and Bahli, B. “The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: An extension of the technology acceptance model”, Information & Management, (42: 2), 2005, 317–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal, R., Jeyaraj, A. and Chowa, C. “Information system success: Individual and organizational determinants”, Management Science, (52: 12), 2006, 1849–1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sachidanandam, S. “Why physicians do or do not use computerized physican order entry systems: Applying the technology acceptance model,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• *Sambamurthy, V. and Chin, W.W. “The effects of group attitudes toward alternative gdss designs on the decisionmaking performance of computer-supported groups”, Decision Sciences, (25: 2), 1994, 215–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepers, J. and Wetzels, M. “A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model: Investigating subjective norm and moderation effects”, Information & Management, (44: 1), 2007, 90–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F.L. and Le, H. “Software for the hunter-schmidt meta-analysis methods,” University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 42242, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• *Seligman, L.S. “Perceived value impact as an antecedent of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude: A perspective on the influence of values on technology acceptance,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• *Shih, H.-P. “An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on the web”, Information & Management, (41: 3), 2004, 351–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shih, H.-P. “Extended technology acceptance model of internet utilization behavior”, Information & Management, (41:6), 2004, 719–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Shin, D.H. “Determinants of customer acceptance of multi-service network: An implication for ip-based technologies”, Information & Management, (46: 1), 2009, 16–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sledgianowski, D. and Kulviwat, S., “Social network sites: Antecedents of user adoption and usage”, Americas Conference on Information Systems, Canada, 2008, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• *Slyke, C.V., Hie, V., Lou, H. and Stafford, T. “Perceived critical mass and the adoption of a communication technology”, European Journal of Information Systems, (16: 3), 2007, 270–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Smith, J.A.B. “The effect of social presence on teacher technology acceptance, continuance intention, and performance in an online teacher professional development course,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Central Florida, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• *Son, J.Y., Kim, S.S. and Riggins, F.J. “Consumer adoption of net-enabled infomediaries: Theoretical explanations and an empirical test”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, (7: 1), 2006, 473–508.
   Google Scholar
• *Srite, M. and Karahanna, E. “The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance”, MIS Quarterly, (30: 3), 2006, 679–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subramanian, G.H. “A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement”, Decision Sciences, (25: 5-6), 1994, 863–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šumak, B., Herièko, M. and Pušnik, M. “A meta-analysis of e-learning technology acceptance: The role of user types and e-learning technology types”, Computers in human behavior, (27: 6), 2011, 2067–2077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sun, H. and Zhang, P. “Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: An alternative approach”, Journal of the Association for Information Systems, (7: 9), 2006, 618–645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, H. and Zhang, P. “The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance”, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, (64: 2), 2006, 53–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sun, Y., Bhattacherjee, A. and Ma, Q. “Extending technology usage to work settings: The role of perceived work compatibility in ERP implementation”, Information & Management, (46: 6), 2009, 351–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Sykes, T.A., Venkatesh, V. and Gosain, S. “Model of acceptance with peer support: A social network perspective to understand employees' system use”, MIS Quarterly, (33: 2), 2009, 371–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Szajna, B. “Empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model”, Management Science, (42: 1), 1996, 85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Taft, J. “An examination of the antecedents of electronic banking technology acceptance and use,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Touro University International, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, G.W.-H., Ooi, K.-B., Sim, J.-J. and Phusavat, K. “Determinants of mobile learning adoption: An empirical analysis”, Journal of Computer Information Systems, (52: 3), 2012, 82–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. “Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models”, Information Systems Research, (6: 2), 1995, 144–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G. and Lai, R.Y.C. “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage”, Omega, (27: 1), 1999, 25–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Thomas, P. “Information systems success and technology acceptance within a government organization,” unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of North Texas, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• *Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A. and Howell, J.M. “Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model”, Journal of Management Information Systems, (11: 1), 1994, 167–187.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M., Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., Charters, S. and Budgen, D. “Does the technology acceptance model predict actual use? A systematic literature review”, Information & Software Technology, (52: 5), 2010, 463–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, H. “Hedonic information systems”, MIS Quarterly, (28: 4), 2004, 695–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Venkatesh, V. “Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model”, Information Systems Research, (11: 4), 2000, 342–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Venkatesh, V., Brown, S.A., Maruping, L.M. and Bala, H. “Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation”, MIS Quarterly, (32: 3), 2008, 483–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, (46: 2), 2000, 186–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Venkatesh, V. and Morris, M.G. “Why don't men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior”, MIS Quarterly, (24: 1), 2000, 115–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Gordon, B.D. and Davis, F.D. “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view”, MIS Quarterly, (27: 3), 2003, 425–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Venkatesh, V., Speier, C. and Morris, M.G. “User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model”, Decision Sciences, (33: 2), 2002, 297–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wakefield, R.L. and Whitten, D. “Mobile computing: A user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage”, European Journal of Information Systems, (15: 3), 2006, 292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Walczuch, R., Lemmink, J. and Streukens, S. “The effect of service employees' technology readiness on technology acceptance”, Information & Management, (44: 2), 2007, 206–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Wang, W. and Benbasat, I., “Trust and tarn for online recommendation agents”, Americas Conference on Information Systems, USA, 2004, 2042–2051.
   Google Scholar
• *Wilson, E.V., Mao, E. and Lankton, N.K., “Predicting continuing acceptance of it in conditions of sporadic use”, Americas Conference on Information Systems, USA, 2005, 406–414.
   Google Scholar
• *Wixom, B.H. and Todd, P.A. “A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance”, Information Systems Research, (16: 1), 2005, 85–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, F.M., Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis, Beverly Hills, CA, 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J. and Lederer, A. “A meta-analysis of the role of environment-based voluntariness in information technology acceptance”, MIS Quarterly, (33: 2), 2009, 419–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, K., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Q., Tan, X. and Zheng, H. “A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type”, International Journal of Information Management, (31: 6), 2011, 572–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yang, H.-D. and Yoo, Y. “It's all about attitude: Revisiting the technology acceptance model”, Decision Support Systems, (38: 1), 2004, 19–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Yi, M.Y., Jackson, J.D., Park, J.S. and Probst, J.C. “Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view”, Information & Management, (43: 3), 2006, 350–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousafzai, S.Y., Foxall, G.R. and Pallister, J.G. “Technology acceptance: A meta-analysis of the tarn: Part 2”, Journal of Modelling in Management, (2: 3), 2007, 281–304.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Zhu, J. and Liu, Q. “A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture”, Computers in human behavior, (28: 5), 2012, 1902–1911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• *Zhang, P. and Li, N., “Love at first sight or sustained effect? The role of perceived affective quality on users' cognitive reactions to information technology”, International Conference on Information Systems, 2004, 283–296.
   Google Scholar