The Effect of Moral Intensity on it Employees' Bad News Reporting

References

• Parnas, D.L., van Schouwen, A.J., and Kwan, S.P. “Evaluation of safety critical software,” Communications of the ACM 33(6). 1990, 636–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedecke, D. The role of the software practitioner in the development of public safety software-intensive systems, Australian Computer Society, Inc., 2007, 13–19.
   Google Scholar
• Leveson, N. Safeware - System Safety and Computers: A Guide to Preventing Accidents and Losses Caused By Technology, Addison Wesley, Boston, MA, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Kopec, D., and Tamang, S. “Failures in complex systems: Case studies, causes, and possible remedies,” ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 39(2), 2007, 180–184.
   Google Scholar
• Robey, D., and Keil, M. “Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects.” Communications of the ACM 44(4), 2001, 87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Tiwana, A., Sainsbury, R., and Sneha, S. “Toward a theory of whistleblowing intentions: A benefit-to-cost differential perspective,” Decision Sciences 41(4), 2010, 787–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C., and Keil, M. “Organizational silence and whistleblowing on IT projects: An integrated model,” Decision Sciences 40(4), 2009, 901–918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, C., Keil, M., and Kim, J.W. “The effect of IT failure impact and personal morality on IT project reporting behavior,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 56(1), 2009, 45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H.J., and Keil, M. “The reluctance to report bad news on troubled software projects: A theoretical model,” Information Systems Journal 13(1), 2003, 69–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M., Mitchell, S., and Turner, J. “Consideration of moral intensity in ethicality judgments: Its relationship with whistle-blowing and need-for-cognition,” Journal of Business Ethics 17(5), 1998, 527–541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henik, E. “Ethical decision-making in the domain of whistleblowing: How issue characteristics affect judgments and intentions,” Working Paper Series, Center for Responsible Business, UC Berkeley, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen, S., and Tesser, A. “On reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect.” Sociometry 33(3), 1970, 253–263.
   Google Scholar
• Tesser, A., Rosen, S., and Tesser, M. “On the reluctance to communicate undesirable messages (the MUM effect): A field study,” Psychological Reports 29(2), 1971, 651–654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Im, G.P., and Mähring, M. “Reporting bad news on software projects: The effects of culturally constituted views of face-saving,” Information Systems Journal 17:(1), 2007, 59–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Smith, H.J., Pawlowski, S., and Jin, L. “‘Why didn't somebody tell me?: Climate, information asymmetry, and bad news about troubled projects,” ACM SIGMIS Database 35(2). 2004, 65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Park, C., Im, G., and Keil, M. “Overcoming the mum effect in IT project reporting: Impacts of fault responsibility and time urgency,” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 9(7), 2008, Article 17, Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/jais/vo19/iss7/17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H.J., Keil, M., and Depledge, G. “Keeping mum as the project goes under: Toward an explanatory model,” Journal of Management Information Systems 18(2), 2001, 189–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, M.P., and Near, J.P. Blowing the whistle: The organizational and legal implications for companies and employees, Lexington Books, New York, NY, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, E.W., and Milliken, F.J. “Organizational silence: A barrier to change and development in a pluralistic world,” Academy of Management Review 25(4), 2000, 706–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, B., and Olivera, F. “Error reporting in organizations,” Academy of Management Review 31(4), 2006. 1012–1030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., and Park, C.W. “Bad news reporting on troubled IT projects: Reassessing the mediating role of responsibility in the basic whistleblowing model,” Journal of Systems and Software 83(11), 2010, 2305–2316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., and Robey, D. “Blowing the whistle on troubled software projects,” Communications of the ACM 44(4), 2001, 87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, B.C.Y., Smith, H.J., Keil, M., and Montealegre, R. “Reporting bad news about software projects: Impact of organizational climate and information asymmetry in an individualistic and a collectivistic culture,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 50(1). 2003, 64–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia, A., and Mee, L.S. “The Effects of issue characteristics on the recognition of moral issues,” Journal of Business Ethics 27(3). 2000, 255–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, T.M. “Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model,” Academy of Management Review 38(4), 1991. 366–395.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, T. “Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: An empirical study,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31:(5), 2001, 1038–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. “The role of moral intensity and fairness perception in judgments of ethicality: A comparison of managerial professionals and the general public,” Journal of Business Ethics 15(4), 1996. 469–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J. “Influences upon managerial moral decision making: Nature of the harm and magnitude of consequences,” Human Relations 49(1), 1996, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, S.A., and McDonald, R.A. ?The role of moral intensity in moral judgments: An empirical investigation,” Journal of Business Ethics 14(9), 1995, 715–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, R.S., Milburn, T.W., and Schaalman, M.L. “A model of crisis perception: A theoretical and empirical analysis,” Administrative Science Quarterly 25(2), 1980, 300–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, M., Tiwana, A., Sainsbury, R., and Sneha, S. “Toward a Theory of Whistleblowing Intentions: A Benefit-to-cost Differential Perspective”, Decision Sciences 41(4). 2010, 787–812.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana, A., Keil, M., and Fichman, R.G. “Information systems project continuation in escalation situations: A real options model,” Decision Sciences 37(3), 2006, 357–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J.J. “Conjoint analysis modeling of stated preferences: A review of theory, methods, recent developments and external validity,” Journal of transport economics and policy 22(1), 1988, 93–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhfeld, W.F., Tobias, R.D., and Garratt, M. “Efficient experimental design with marketing research applications,” Journal of Marketing Research 31(4), 1994, 545–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P.E., Helsen, K., and Shandler, B. “Conjoint internal validity under alternative profile presentations,” Journal of Consumer Research 15(3), 1988, 392–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J.J. Analyzing decision making: Metric conjoint analysis, Sage Publications, Incorporated Thousand Oaks, CA, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Priem, R.L. “An application of metric conjoint analysis for the evaluation of top managers' individual strategic decision making processes: A research note,” Strategic Management Journal 13(S1), 2007, 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molin, E., Oppewal, H., and Timmermans, H. “A comparison of full profile and hierarchical information integration conjoint methods to modeling group preferences,” Marketing Letters 11(2), 2000, 165–175.
   Google Scholar
• MacKinnon, D., Lockwood, C., Hoffman, J., West, S., and Sheets, V. “A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects,” Psychological Methods 7(1), 2002, 83–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A. “The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations,” Journal of personality and social psychology 51 (6), 1986, 1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, L.R. “A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models,” In. I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, and Ostendorf, F., (eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Tilburg Univ. Press, Tilburg, The Netherlands, 1999, pp. 7–28.
   Google Scholar