Supporting Business Intelligence Usage: An Integrated Framework with Automatic Weighting

REFERENCES

• Aguilar-Saven RS. 2003. business process modeling: review and framework. Int J Prod Econ. 90:129–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldin L, Cesare SD.2009. a comparative analysis of business process modelling techniques. Proceedings of the U.K. Academy for Information Systems. April 2009, 1–17; Oxford, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Ballou D, Wang R, Pazer H, Kumar.Tayi G. 1998. Modeling information manufacturing systems to determine information product quality. Manage Sci. 44:462–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandara W, Rosemann M. 2005. What are the secrets of successful process modeling?. French J Strategic Inf Syst. 10:47–68.
   Google Scholar
• Batini C, Cappiello C, Francalanci C, Maurino A. 2009. Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement. ACM Comput Surv. 41:1–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucher T, Gericke A, Sigg S. 2009. Process-centric business intelligence. Bus Process Manage J. 15:408–429.
   Google Scholar
• Chee CH, Yeoh W, Gao S. 2011. Enhancing business intelligence traceability through an integrated metadata framework. Proceedings of 22nd Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport TH. 2010. Business intelligence and organizational decisions. Int J Bus Intell Res. 1:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher C, Lauria E, Chengalur-Smith S, Wang R. 2006. Introduction to information quality. USA: M.I.T. Information Quality Program, 1–198.
   Google Scholar
• Foshay N, Mukherjee A, Taylor A. 2007. Does data warehouse end-user metadata add value?. Commun. ACM, 50:70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartner Press Release. 2013. Gartner Says Worldwide Business Intelligence Software Revenue to Grow 7 Percent in 2013. Stamford, Conn., http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2340216.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner Press Release. 2013. Gartner Executive Program Survey of More Than 2,000 CIOs Shows Digital Technologies Are Top Priorities in 2013. Stamford, Conn., http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2304615
   Google Scholar
• Gile K, Russom P, Moore C, Teubner C. 2004. The emergence of process-centric BI. Forrester Res. Cambridge, MA.
   Google Scholar
• Glowalla DWIP, Sunyaev JPDA. 2013. Process-Driven data quality management through integration of data quality into existing process models. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 5:433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. 2004. Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28:75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mili H, Tremblay G, Jaoude G, Lefebvre E, Elabed L, Boussaidi GE. 2010. Business process modeling languages sorting through the alphabet soup. ACM Comput Surv. 43:1–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negash S. 2004. Business intelligence. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 13:177–195.
   Google Scholar
• Ou L, Peng H. 2006. Knowledge and process based decision support in business intelligence system. Proceedings of the International Multi-Symposiums on Computer and Computational Sciences. Hanzhou, Zhejiang, 2, 780–786.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos J. 2003. Using TF-IDF to determine word relevance in document queries. The First Instructional Conference on Machine Learning. Piscataway, NJ, USA. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Redman TC. 1997. Data quality for the information age. Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House. 1–303.
   Google Scholar
• Shankaranarayanan G, Wang RY, Ziad M. 2000. IP-MAP: Representing the Manufacture of an Information Product. Proceedings of the 5^th International Conference on Information Quality. Cambridge, MA, USA, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Shankaranarayanan G. 2005. Towards implementing total data quality management in a data warehouse J Inf Technol Manage. 16:21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Shankaranarayanan G, Cai Y. 2006. Supporting data quality management in decision-making. Decis Support Syst. 42:302–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankaranarayanan G, Even A. 2006. The metadata enigma. Commun ACM. 49:88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankaranarayanan G, Ziad M, Wang RY. 2003. Managing data quality in dynamic decision environments: An information product approach. J Database Manage. 14:14–32.
   Google Scholar
• Wang RY, Strong DM. 1996. Beyond accuracy: What data quality means to data consumers. J Manage Inf Syst. 12:5–34.
   Google Scholar
• Wang RY. 1998. A product perspective on total data quality management. Commun ACM. 41:58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangler B, Paheerathan SJ. 2000. Horizontal and vertical integration of organizational IT systems In: Brinkkemper S., Lindencrona E, Solvberg A, editor. Information Systems Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Weske M, 2007. Business process management: Concepts, languages, architectures. Berlin: Springer. 1–365.
   Google Scholar
• White SA. 2004. Introduction to BPMN. 3IBM Corporation. 1–11
   Google Scholar
• Wixom B, Watson H. 2010. The BI-based organization. Int J Bus Intell Res. 1:13–28.
   Google Scholar
• Yeoh W, Richards G, Wang S. 2014. Benefits and barriers to corporate performance management systems. J Comput Inf Syst. 55:105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar