330
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Computer and Smartphone Continuance Intention: A Motivational Model

&

REFERENCES

  • Agarwal R, Karahanna, E. 2000. Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q. 24:665–694.
  • Agrifoglio R, Black S, Metallo C, Ferrara M. 2012. Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivation in continued Twitter usage. J Comput Inf Syst. 53:33–41.
  • Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Processes 50:179–211.
  • Benabou R, Tirole J. 2003. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Rev Econ Stud. 70:489–520.
  • Bhattacherjee A. 2001. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 25:351–370.
  • Chang HH, Wang IC. 2009. An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments. Comput Hum Behav. 24:2336–2356.
  • Chen SC, Chen HH, Cheny MF. 2009. Determinants of satisfaction and continuance intention towards self-service technologies. Ind Manage Data Syst. 109:1248–1263.
  • Chin WW. 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Q. 22:7–16.
  • Chiu Y-T, Fang SC, Tseng CC. 2010. Early versus potential adopters: exploring the antecedents of use intention in the context of retail service innovations. Int J Retail Distrib Manage 38:443–459.
  • Davis FD. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13:319–339.
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi EP, Warshaw PR. 1992. Extrinsic and Intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J Appl Soc Psychol. 22:1109–1130.
  • Dean DH. 2008. Shopper age and the use of self-service technologies. Managing Ser Q. 18:225–238.
  • Deci EL, Ryan RM. 1985. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  • Fagan MH, Neill S, Wooldridge BR. 2008. Exploring the intention to use computers: an empirical investigation of the role of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and perceived ease of use. J Comput Inf Syst. 48:31–37.
  • Fornell C, Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 48:39–50.
  • Gefen D, Straub DW. 2000. The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. J Assoc Inf Syst. 1:1–29.
  • Hart M, Porter G. 2004. The impact of cognitive and other factors on the perceived usefulness of OLAP. J Comput Inf Syst. 45:47–57.
  • Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M. 2010. Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. 2008. Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6:53–59.
  • Hsiao L-H. 2013. Android smartphone adoption and intention to pay for mobile Internet: Perspectives from software, hardware, design and value. Library Hi Tech. 31:216–235.
  • Igbaria M, Parasuraman S, Baroudi J. 1996. A motivational model of microcomputer usage. J Manage Inf Syst. 13:127–143.
  • Klemperer P. 1987. The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. RAND J Econ 18:138–150.
  • Lin C-P, Bhattacherjee A. 2008. Learning online social support: an investigation of network information technology based on UTAUT. CyberPsychol Behav. 11:268–72.
  • Lippert SK, Forman H. 2005. Utilization of information technology: examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 52:363–381.
  • Locke EA, Latham GPA. 1990. Theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Malhotra Y, Galletta D, Kirsch LJ. 2008. How endogenous motivations influence user intentions: Beyond the dichotomy of extrinsic and intrinsic motivations. J Manage Inf Syst. 25:267–299.
  • Moon JW, Kim YG. 2001. Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Inf Manage. 38:217–230.
  • Nambisan S, Agarwal R, Tanniru M. 1999. Organizational mechanisms for enhancing user innovations in information technology. MIS Q. 23:365–395.
  • Nanda P, Bos J, Kramer K-L, Hay C, Ignacz J. 2008. Effect of smartphone aesthetic design on users’ emotional reaction: an empirical study. TQM J. 20:348–355.
  • Nunnally G. 1978. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Osborne M. 2011. Consumer learning, switching costs and heterogeneity: a structural examination. Quant Mark Econ. 9:25–70.
  • Parasuraman A. 2000. Technology readiness index (TRI): a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies. J Ser Res. 2:307–321.
  • Roberts JA, Hann I-H, Slaughter S. 2006. Understanding the motivations, participation, and performance of open source software developers: a longitudinal study of the apache projects. Manage Sci. 52:984–999.
  • Rorer LG. 1965. The great response-style myth. Psychol Bull. 63:129–156.
  • Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Contemp Educ Psychol. 25:54–67.
  • Salovaara A, Helfenstein S, Oulasvirta A. 2011. Everyday appropriations of information technology. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 62:2347–2363.
  • Schmitt N, Stults D. 1985. Factors defined by negatively keyed items: the result of careless respondents? Appl Psychol Meas 9:367–373.
  • Simons J, Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, Lacante M. 2004. Placing motivation and future time perspective theory in a temporal perspective. Educ Psychol Rev. 16:121–139.
  • Taylor S, Todd PA. 1995. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res. 6:144–176.
  • Teo TSH, Lim VKG, Lai RYC. 1999. Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in internet usage. Int J Manage Sci. 27:25–37.
  • Thong JYL, Hong SJ, Tam KY. 2006. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 64:799–810.
  • Tripathi KN. 1992. Competition and intrinsic motivation. J Soc Psychol. 132:709–715.
  • Van der Heijden H. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q. 28:695–705.
  • Vansteenkiste M, Simons J, Lens W, Sheldon KM, Deci EL. 2004. Motivating learning, performance and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. J Pers Soc Psychol. 87:246–260.
  • Venkatesh V. 1999. Creation of favorable user perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation. MIS Q. 23:239–260.
  • Venkatesh V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Inf Syst Res 11:343–365.
  • Venkatesh V, Davis FD. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 46:186–204.
  • Venkatesh V, Speier C, Morris MG. 2002. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward and integrated model. Decis Sci. 33:297–316.
  • Webster EJ, Martocchio JJ. 1992. Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS Q. 16:201–226.
  • Zhou J, Shalley CE. 2003. Research on employee creativity: a critical review and directions for future research. Res Pers Hum Resour Manage. 22:165–217.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.