1,419
Views
25
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Cloud Computing: An Examination of Factors Impacting Users’ Adoption

&

References

  • Aaron L, Roche C. 2012. Teaching, learning, and collaborating in the cloud: Applications of cloud computing for educators in post-secondary institutions. Educ Technol Syst. 40:95–111.
  • Agarwal R, Karahanna E. 2000. Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q. 24:665–694.
  • Agarwal R, Prasad J. 1999. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of information technologies? Decis Sci. 30:361–391.
  • Aljabre A. 2012. Cloud computing for increased business value. Int J Bus Social Sci. 3:234–239.
  • Altaf F, Schuff D. 2010. Taking a flexible approach to ASPs. Commun ACM 53:139–143.
  • Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph AD, Katz R, Konwinski A, Lee G, Patterson D. 2010. A View of Cloud Computing. Commun ACM. 53:50–58.
  • Bagozzi R. 2007. The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. J Assoc Inf Syst. 8:244–254.
  • Behrend T, Wiebe EN, London J, Johnson E. 2011. Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges. Behav Inf Technol. 30:231–240.
  • Benlian A, Koufaris M, Hess T. 2012. Service quality in soft ware-as-a-service: developing the SaaS-Qual measure and examining its role in usage continuance. J Manage Inf Syst. 28: 85–126.
  • Blue E, Tirotta R. 2011. The benefits and drawbacks of integrating cloud computing and interactive whiteboards in teacher preparation. TechTrends 55:31–39.
  • Breeding M. 2013. Digital archiving in the age of cloud computing. Syst Librarian 33:23–26
  • Christauskas C, Miseviciene R. 2012. Cloud – Computing based accounting for small to medium sized business. Eng Econ. 23:14–21.
  • Changchit C. 2008. Data protection and privacy issue. J Inf Privacy Secur. 4:1.
  • Changchit C. 2014. Students’ perceptions of cloud computing. Issue Inf Syst. 15:312–322.
  • Changchit C. 2015. Cloud computing - should it be integrated into the curriculum. Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ. 11:105–117.
  • Chau P, Hu P. 2001. Information technology acceptance by individual professionals: a model comparison approach. Decis Sci. 32:699–719.
  • Chinyao L, Yahsueh C, Mingchang W. 2011. Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Indus Manage Data Syst. 111:1006–1023.
  • Das P, Classen H, Dave R. 2013. Cyber-Security threats and privacy controls for cloud computing, emphasizing software as a service. Comput Internet Lawyer. 30:20–24.
  • Davis F, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 35:982–1003.
  • Denton D. 2012. Enhancing instruction through constructivism, cooperative learning, and cloud computing. TechTrends 56:34–41.
  • Diamantopoulos A, Riefler P, Roth KP. 2008. Advancing formative measurement models. J Bus Res. 58:203–1218.
  • Dutta A, Peng G, Chao A, Choudhary A. 2013. Risks in enterprise cloud computing: the perspective of it experts. J Comput Inf Syst. 53:39–48.
  • Ellison N, Steinfield C, Lampe C. 2007. The benefits of Facebook friends: social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. J Computer-Mediated Commun. 12:1143–1168.
  • Fan Y, Wu C, Chen C, Fang Y. 2015. The effect of status quo bias on cloud system adoption. J Comput Inf Syst. 55:55–64.
  • Fariba S, Narges S, Alireza H. 2015. The adoption of software-as-a-service (SaaS): ranking the determinants. J Enterp Inf Manage. 28:400–422.
  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Flavián C, Guinalíu M. 2006. Consumer trust, perceived security and privacy policy: three basic elements of loyalty to a web site. Indus Manage Data Syst. 106:601–620.
  • Gangwar H, Date H, Ramaswamy R. 2015. Understanding determinants of cloud computing adoption using an integrated TAM-TOE model. J Enterp Inf Manage. 28:107–130.
  • Garrison G, Kim S, Wakefield R. 2012. Success factors for deploying cloud computing. Commun ACM. 55:62–68.
  • Goscinski A, Brock M. 2010. Toward dynamic and attribute based publication, discovery and selection for cloud computing. Future Gener Comput Syst. 26:947–970.
  • Gupta P, Seetharaman A, Raj J. 2013. The usage and adoption of cloud computing by small and medium businesses. Int J Inf Manage. 33:861–874.
  • Han Y. 2010. On the clouds: A new way of computing. Inf Technol Libraries 29:87–92.
  • Hair J, Black W, Babin B, Anderson R. 2009. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Hong W, Thing J, Wong W, Tam K. 2001. Determinants of user acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics. J Manage Inf Syst. 97–125.
  • Khansa L, Zobel CW. 2014. Assessing innovations in cloud security. J Comput Inf Syst. 54:45–56.
  • Khorshed M, Shawkat A, Wasimi S. 2012. A survey on gaps, threat remediation challenges and some thoughts for proactive attack detection in cloud computing. Future Gener Comput Syst. 28:833–851.
  • Lawler J, Joseph A, Howell-Barber H. 2012. A case study of determinants of an effective cloud computing strategy. Rev Bus Inf Syst (RBIS). 16:145–156.
  • Lee Y, Kozar K, Larsen K. 2003. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 12:752–780.
  • Legris P, Ingham J, Collerette P. 2003. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf Manage. 40:191–204.
  • Lian J, Yen D, Wang Y. 2014. An exploratory study to understand the critical factors affecting the decision to adopt cloud computing in Taiwan hospital. Int J Inf Manage. 34:28–36.
  • Lin A, Chen N. 2012. Cloud computing as an innovation: perception, attitude, and adoption. Int J Inf Manage. 32:1–8.
  • Loebbecke C, Thomas B, Ullrich T. 2012. Assessing cloud readiness at continental AG. MIS Q Executive. 11:11–23.
  • Marston S, Li Z, Bandyopadhyay S, Zhang J, Ghalsasi A. 2011. Cloud computing – the business perspective. Decis Support Syst. 51:176–189.
  • Mell P, Grance T. 2009. Draft NIST working definition of cloud computing. Referenced on June. 3rd. Gaithersburg: NIST, (15), 32.
  • Pikkarainen T, Pikkarainen K, Karjaluoto H, Pahnila S. 2004. Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Internet Res. 14:224–235.
  • Ratten V. 2013. Cloud computing: A social cognitive perspective of ethics, entrepreneurship, technology marketing, computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy on behavioural intentions. Australasian Marketing J. 21:137–146.
  • Rightscale. (2014) 2014 State of the Cloud Report: See the Latest Trends on Cloud Adoption. Retrieved from http://www.rightscale.com/lp/2014-state-of-the-cloud-report.
  • Roca J, Garcia J, De La Vega J. 2009. The importance of perceived trust, security and privacy in online trading systems. Inf Manage Comput Secur. 96–113.
  • Santalesa R. 2011. Definition of cloud computing – NIST releases final SP 800-145. Retrieved from http://www.infolawgroup.com/2011/10/articles/cloud-computing1/definition-of-cloud-computing-nist-releases-final-sp-800145/
  • Singh S, Veralakshmi R. 2012. Cloud computing: A promising economic model for library and information centers. DESIDOC Journal OF Library and Information Technology, (32), 526–532.
  • Statista. 2015. Revenue of the Global Cloud Software Market. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/460010/worldwide-cloud-software-market-revenue/
  • Susanto H, Almunawar M, Kang C. 2012. Toward cloud computing evolution: efficiency vs. trendy vs. security. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2039739
  • Venkatesh V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model. Inf. Syst. Res. 11:342–365.
  • Venkatesh V, Davis F. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 46:186–204.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27:425–478.
  • Vijayasarathy L. 2004. Predicting consumer intentions to use on-line shopping: the case for an augmented Technology Acceptance Model. Inf Manage. 47:747–762.
  • Voorsluys W, Brober J, Buyya R. 2011. Introduction to cloud computing. In: Buyya R, Broberg J, Goscinski AM, editors. Cloud computing principles and paradigms. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, p. 3–42.
  • Wong Y, Hsu C. 2008. A confidence-based framework for business to consumer (B2C) mobile commerce adoption. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 12:77–84.
  • Wood L. 2011. Cloud storage a steep climb. Comput World http://resources.idgenterprise.com/original/AST-0062134_DS2_FINAL.pdf.
  • Yenisey M, Ozok A, Salvendy G. 2005. Perceived security determinants in e-commerce among Turkish university students. Behav Inf Technol. 24:259–274.
  • Xin T, Yongbeom K. 2015. User acceptance of SaaS-based collaboration tools: a case of Google Docs. J Enterp Inf Manage. 28:423–442.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.