416
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparison of Mobile Web Browsers for Smartphones

References

  • Blavier A, Nyssen AS. 2009. Influence of 2D and 3D view on performance and time estimation in minimal invasive surgery. Ergonomics 52:1342–1349.
  • Capra R. 2011. HCI Browser: A tool for administration and data collection for studies of web search behaviors. In Design, user experience, and usability. theory, methods, tools and practice. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; p. 259–268.
  • Charland A, Leroux B. 2011. Mobile application development: web vs. native. Commun ACM 54:49–53.
  • Cronbach LJ. 1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334.
  • De Bruijn O, Spence R, Chong MY. 2002. RSVP browser: web browsing on small screen devices. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 6:245–252.
  • Dziadosz S, Chandrasekar R. 2002. Do thumbnail previews help users make better relevance decisions about web search results? In Proceedings of the 25th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval (pp. 365–366). ACM.
  • Dzida W, Herda S, Itzfeldt WD. 1978. User-perceived quality of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on Software engineering (pp. 188–195). IEEE Press.
  • George D. 2003. SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e. Pearson Education India.
  • Gray J. 2009. Google Chrome: the making of a cross-platform browser. Linux J. 2009:1.
  • Holzinger A, Errath M. 2007. Mobile computer Web-application design in medicine: some research based guidelines. Universal Access Inf Soc. 6:31–41.
  • Im HH, Kim DY. 2010. A study on standardization of Web browser icon by Web paradigm. Korea Digital Des Counc. 10:33–42.
  • Ji YG, Park JH, Lee C, Yun MH. 2006. A usability checklist for the usability evaluation of mobile phone user interface. Int J Human-Computer Interact. 20:207–231.
  • Jung JY, Lee JY, Lee JS. 2009. A study on comparison of usability of mobile fullbrowsing browser. In Proceedings of HCI Korea (pp. 1015–1019).
  • Kärkkäinen L, Laarni J. 2002. Designing for small display screens. In Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction (pp. 227–230). ACM.
  • Katsanos C, Tselios N, Goncalves J, Juntunen T, Kostakos V. 2014. Multipurpose public displays: Can automated grouping of applications and services enhance user experience? Int J Human-Computer Interact. 30:237–249.
  • Kim HM, Ryoo HY. 2008. A prototype design for internet full-browsing using the fish-eye view. Korea Digital Des Counc. 8:149–159.
  • Kim IS. 2012. A study on the continuity of user experience in the mobile web. J Korean Soc Des Sci. 25:298–307.
  • Kim KS. 2001. Implications of user characteristics in information seeking on the World Wide Web. Int J Human-Computer Interact. 13:323–340.
  • Kimball J, Robins J, Thistlethwaite DA, Lu LL, Prendergast MS. 2004. U.S. Patent No. 6,704,031. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
  • Kitajima M, Blackmon MH, Polson PG. 2000. A comprehension-based model of Web navigation and its application to Web usability analysis. In People and Computers XIV—Usability or Else! (pp. 357–374). London: Springer.
  • Lin CS, Wu S, Tsai RJ. 2005. Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Inf Manage. 42:683–693.
  • Liu X, Hui Y, Sun W, Liang H. 2007. Towards service composition based on mashup. In IEEE Congress on Services, 2007 (pp. 332–339). IEEE.
  • Lund AM. 2001. Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface 8:3–6.
  • Miller FP, Vandome AF, McBrewster J. 2009. Browser wars: Metaphor, Web browser, Microsoft, Internet Explorer, Netscape, Netscape Navigator, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome, Safari (web browser), Opera (web browser), Usage share of web browsers.
  • Molina JP, González P, Lozano MD, Montero F, López-Jaquero V. 2003. Bridging the gap: developing 2D and 3D user interfaces with the IDEAS methodology. In Interactive systems. Design, specification, and verification. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; p. 303–315.
  • Nielsen J. 1993. Usability engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
  • Park W, Han SH. 2013. Intuitive multi-touch gestures for mobile web browsers. Interact Comput. 25:335–350.
  • Pew Research Center. 2015. The smartphone difference. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
  • Roth V, Turner T. 2009. Bezel swipe: Conflict-free scrolling and multiple selection on mobile touch screen devices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1523–1526). ACM.
  • Statcounter. 2014a. Top 9 Mobile Browsers from July 2013 to July 2014. Available at: http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_browser-ww-monthly-201307-201407-bar
  • Statcounter. 2014b. Top 8 Mobile Operating Systems from July 2013 to July 2014. Available at: http://gs.statcounter.com/#mobile_os-ww-monthly-201307-201407-bar
  • Telang R, Mukhopadhyay T. 2005. Drivers of web portal use. Electron Commerce Res Appl. 4:49–65.
  • Tossell C, Kortum P, Rahmati A, Shepard C, Zhong L. 2012. Characterizing web use on smartphones. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2769–2778). ACM.
  • Trevor J, Hilbert DM, Schilit BN, Koh TK. 2001. From desktop to phonetop: a UI for web interaction on very small devices. In Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (pp. 121–130). ACM.
  • Trewin S. 2006. Physical usability and the mobile web. In Proceedings of the 2006 international cross-disciplinary workshop on Web accessibility (W4A): Building the mobile web: Rediscovering accessibility? (pp. 109–112). ACM.
  • Tukey JW. 1977. Exploratory data analysis. Reading, Ma, 231, 32.
  • Um GJ. 2014. A study on UX guideline of the University mobile web the perspective of an information design. Korea Digital Des Counc. 14:161–170.
  • Vartiainen E, Roto V, Kaasalainen J. 2008. Graphical history list with multi-window support on a mobile web browser. In Internet and Web Applications and Services, 2008. ICIW’08. Third International Conference on (pp. 121–129). IEEE.
  • Welsch RE. 1977. Stepwise multiple comparison procedures. J Am Stat Assoc. 72:566–575.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.