Novelties Within the Framework for Information System Due Diligence

References

• Andriole SJ. 2007. Mining for digital gold: technology due diligence for CIOs. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 20:371–381.
   Google Scholar
• Baublits T, Lee HS, Stanis G, Sundberg B, Tan Z-D. 2005. Development of an IT Assessment Program for Acquisition, Final Report of the student project in the IT Audit and Security Course at the Red McCombs Business School of the University of Texas at Austin (USA).
   Google Scholar
• Bayuk J. 2009. Vendor due diligence ISACA J. 3:34–38.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatia M. 2007. IT merger due diligence – a blueprint. Inf Syst Control J. 1:46–49.
   Google Scholar
• Delak B, Bajec M. 2013. Framework for the delivery of information system due diligence. Inf Syst Manage 30:137–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delak B, Bajec M. 2013. Information system due diligence data as an input for knowledge management Online J Appl Knowl Manage. 1:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Delak B. 2014. Information system mirror – approach how to analyze information system strengths and weaknesses within organization. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technologies and Information Society - ITIS 2014, Šmarješke toplice, Slovenia.
   Google Scholar
• DeLone W, McLean E. 1992. Information system success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf SystRes. 3:60–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. Mergers and acquisition. Note No. 4, EC – Economic and Financial Affairs, Retrieved August 10, 2014 from http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/publication6414_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Herold R. 2011. Managing an information security and privacy awareness and training program. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group 10.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner AR, Ram S, March ST, Park J. 2004. Design science in information system research. MIS Q. 28:75–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IMAA - Institute of Mergers, Acquisition and Alliances. Statistics on Mergers & Acquisitions Worldwide. 2010. Retrieved August 10, 2014 from http://www.imaa-institute.org/statistics-mergers-acquisitions.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ives B, Olson MH, Baroudi JJ. 1983. The measurement of user information satisfaction. Commun ACM 26:785–793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia R, Reich BH, Pearson JM. 2008. IT service climate: an extension to IT service quality research. J Assoc Inf Syst. 8:294–320.
   Google Scholar
• Kronimus A, Roos A, Stelter D. 2009. M&A: Ready for Liftoff?. A Survey of European Companies’ Merger and Acquisition Plans for 2010, The Boston Consulting Group (BCG).
   Google Scholar
• Landrum H, Prybutok V, Zhang X, Peak D. 2009. Measuring IS system service quality with SERVQUAL: users’ perceptions of relative importance of the five SERVPERF dimensions. Inf Sci Int J Emerging Transdiscipline. 12:17–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Kozar KA, Larsen KRT. 2003. The technology acceptance model: past, present, and future. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 12:752–780.
   Google Scholar
• Martynova M, Renneboog L. 2006. Mergers and acquisition in Europe. Tilburg University – discussion paper, No. 2006-06.
   Google Scholar
• Rabaa’i AA. Assessing information system success models: empirical comparison (Research in Progress), Proceedings of 20th Australian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2009), Melbourne, Australia: December 2–4, 2009, Paper 61.
   Google Scholar
• Roztocki N, Weistroffer HR. 2008. Editorial introduction: information technology investments in emerging economies. Inf Technol Dev. 14:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Sedera D, Tan F. User satisfaction: an overarching measure of enterprise system success. Proceedings of Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2005), Bangkok, Thailand: July 7–10, 2005, Paper 80.
   Google Scholar
• Silver MS, Markus LM, Beath CM. 1995. The information technology interaction model: a foundation for the MBA core course. MIS Q. 19:361–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spedding LS. 2004. Due diligence and corporate governance,” LexisNexis, Antony Rowe, Ltd. Chippenham, Wiltshire, UK, 123.
   Google Scholar
• Tislerova K. 2012. Information interaction in terms of eCommerce. Proceedings of the 6th European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, 307–313.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank County Classification 2009. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Zviran M, Erlich Z. 2003. Measuring IS user satisfaction: review and implications. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 12:81–103.
   Google Scholar