How Multinational Corporations Use Information Technology to Manage Global Operations

References

• Aeppel T. August 9, 2007. Overseas profits provide shelter for US firms. Wall Street J A1.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen T, Foss NJ. 2005. Strategic opportunity and economic performance in multinational enterprises: The role and effects of information and communication technology. J Int Manage 11(2):293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett CA, Ghoshal S. 1989. Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau M-C, Loch KD, Robey D, Straub D. 1998. Going global: Using information technology to advance the competitiveness of the virtual transnational organization. Acad Manage Executive 12(4):120–128.
   Google Scholar
• Cavusgil ST, Zou S, Naidu GM. 1993. Product and promotion adaptation in export ventures: An empirical investigation. J Int Bus Stud 24(3):479–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collis D, Young D, Goold M. 2007. The size, structure, and performance of corporate headquarters. Strategic Manage J 28(4):383–405.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW. 2012. Qualitative research design & inquiry: Choosing among five approaches. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. 1989. Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev 14(4):532–550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Graebner ME. 2007. Theory building from case studies: Opportunities and challenges. Acad Manage J 50(1):25–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enright MJ, Subramanian V. 2007. An organizing framework for MNC subsidiary typologies. Manage Int Rev 47(6):895–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensign PC. 1999. The multinational corporation as a coordinated network: Organizing and managing differently. Thunderbird Int Bus Rev 41(3):291–322.
   Google Scholar
• Finnegan P, Longaigh SN. 2002. Examining the effects of information technology on control and coordination relationships: An exploratory study in subsidiaries of pan-national corporations. J Inf Technol 17(3):149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J, Bryant BE. 1996. The American customer satisfaction index: Nature, purpose, and findings. J Market 60(4):7–18.
   Google Scholar
• Ghoshal S, Nohria N. 1989. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations. Strategic Manage J 10(4):323–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta AK, Govindarajan V 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. Acad Manage Rev 16(4):768–792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Ireland RD. 1985. Corporate distinctive competence, strategy, industry and performance. Strategic Manage J 6(3):273–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm DB, Eriksson K, Johanson J. 1999. Creating value through mutual commitment to business network relationships. Strategic Manage J 20(5):467–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ito K, Rose EL. 2010. The implicit return on domestic and international sales: An empirical analysis of US and Japanese firms. J Int Bus Stud 41(6):1074–1089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaussad J, Schapper J. 2006. Control mechanisms of their subsidiaries by international firms: A multidimensional perspective. J Int Manage 12(1):23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Jean R-J, Sinkovics RR, Kim D. 2008. Information technology and organizational performance within international business to business relationships. Int Market Rev 25(5):563–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi J, Konsynski BR. 1991. Globalization and information management strategies. J Manage Inf Syst 7(4):7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Kettinger WJ, Marchand DA, Davis JM. 2010. Designing enterprise IT architectures to optimize flexibility and standardization in global business. MIS Q Executive 9(2):95–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keutel M, Michalik B, Richter J. 2014. Towards mindful case study research in IS: A critical analysis of the past 10 years. Eur J Inf Syst 23(3):256–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Park J-H, Prescott JE. 2003. The global integration of business functions: A study of multinational businesses in integrated global industries. J Int Bus Stud 34(4):327–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King WR, Flor PR. 2008. The development of global IT infrastructure. Omega 36(3):486–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King WR, Sethi V. 2001. Patterns in the organization of transnational information systems. Inf Manage 38(4):201–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lahart J. September 8, 2010. Divided by a two-track economy. Wall Street J B1.
   Google Scholar
• Leith C, Malley J. 2007. A sectoral analysis of price-setting behavior in US manufacturing industries. Rev Econ Stat 89(2):335–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewin AY, Massini S, Peeters C. 2009. Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. J Int Bus Stud 40(6):901–925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo Y. 2003. Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent-subsidiary links shape overseas success. J Int Bus Stud 34(3):290–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manwani S, O’Keefe RM. 2003. The IT contribution in developing a transnational capability at Electrolux. J Strategic Inf Syst 12(2):111–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall B, Cardon P, Poddar A, Fontenot R. 2013. Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in IS research. J Comput Inf Syst 54(1):11–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirchandani DA, Lederer AL. 2004. IS planning autonomy in US subsidiaries of multinational firms. Inf Manage 41(8)1021–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Whitaker J. 2007. Is the world flat or spiky? Information intensity, skills and global service disaggregation. Inf Syst Res 18(3):237–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Whitaker J, Tafti A. 2016. Information technology, revenues and profits: Exploring the role of foreign and domestic operations. Working paper. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Mohdzain MB, Ward JM. 2007. A study of subsidiaries’ views of information systems strategic planning in multinational organizations. J Strategic Inf Syst 16(4):324–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngniatedema T. 2012. A mass customization information systems architecture framework. J Comput Inf Syst 52(3):60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palvia PC. 1997. Developing a model of the global and strategic impact of information technology. Inf Manage 32(5):229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pare G. 2004. Investigating information systems with positivist case study research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 13(1):233–264.
   Google Scholar
• Peppard J. 1999. Information management in the global enterprise: An organising framework. Eur J Inf Syst 8(2):77–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Millar VE. 1985. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harv Bus Rev 63(4):149–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramarapu NK, Lado AA. 1995. Linking information technology to global business strategy to gain competitive advantage: An integrative model. J Inf Technol 10(2):115–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathnam RG, Johnsen J, Wen HJ. 2004–2005. Alignment of business strategy and IT strategy: A case study of a Fortune 50 financial services company. J Comput Inf Syst 45(2):1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safizadeh MH, Field JM, Ritman LP 2003. An empirical analysis of financial services processes with a front-office or back-office orientation. J Oper Manage 21(5):557–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambharya RB, Kumaraswamy A, Banerjee S. 2005. Information technologies and the future of the multinational enterprise. J Int Manage 11(2):143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Schilke O, Reimann M, Thomas JS. 2009. When does international marketing standardization matter to firm performance? J Int Market 17(4):24–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sia SK, Soh C, Weill P. 2010. Global IT management: Structuring for scale, responsiveness, and innovation. Commun ACM 53(3):59–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V. 2000. Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: A process oriented approach. J Manage Inf Syst 16(4):145–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Economist. September 11, 2008. A turn for the worse. Economist.
   Google Scholar
• Thietart RA, Vivas R. 1984. An empirical investigation of success strategies for businesses along the product life cycle. Manage Sci 30(12):1405–1423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson S, Ekman P, Selby D, Whitaker J. 2014. A model to support IT infrastructure planning and the allocation of IT governance authority. Decis Support Syst 59(1):108–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tractinsky N, Jarvenpaa SL. 1995. Information systems design decisions in a global versus domestic context. MIS Q 19(4):507–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinekar V, Teng JTC. 2012. IT impacts in information and physical product industries. J Comput Inf Syst 53(1):65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsham G. 1995. Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. Eur J Inf Syst 4(2):74–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin RK. 2014. Case study research: Design and methods. 5th edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zomerdijk LG, de Vries J. 2007. Structuring front office and back office work in service delivery systems: An empirical study of three design decisions. Int J Oper Prod Manage 27(1):108–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar