326
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Mobile Work Continuance of Knowledge Workers: An Empirical Study

References

  • Anderson J, Gerbing D. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):411–423.
  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Marketing Sci. 1988;16(1):74–94.
  • Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Q. 2001;25(3):351–370.
  • Bhattacherjee A. An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decis Support Syst. 2001;32:201–214.
  • Bhattacherjee A, Lin C. A unified model of IT continuance. Eur J Inf Syst. 2015;24(4):364–373.
  • Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1998.
  • Chen L, Corritore C. A theoretical model of nomadic culture: Assumptions, values, artifacts and the impact on employee job satisfaction. Commun AIS 2008;22:235–260.
  • Chen L, Meservy T, Gillenson M. Understanding information systems continuance for information-oriented mobile applications. Commun AIS 2012;30:Article 9.
  • Chen L, Muthitacharoen A. An empirical investigation of the consequences of technostress: Evidence from China. Inf Resour Manage J. 2016;29(2):14–36.
  • Chen L, Nath R. A socio-technical perspective of mobile work. Inf Knowledge Syst Manage. 2008;7:41–60.
  • Chen L, Nath R. Impediments to mobile work: An empirical study. Int J Mobile Commun. 2011;9(5):522–540.
  • Cheng E. SEM being more effective than multiple regression in parsimonious model testing for management development research. J Manage Dev. 20(7–8):650–667.
  • Chesley N. Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. J Marriage Family 2005;67(5):1237–1248.
  • Conlin M. Smashing the clock, Businessweek, December 11, 2006, 60–68.
  • Crowe R, Middleton C. Women, smartphones and the work-place: Pragmatic realities and performative identities. Feminist Media Stud. 2012;12(4):560–569.
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi R, Warshaw P. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003.
  • Davis GB. Anytime/Anyplace computing and the future of knowledge work. Commun ACM 2002;42(12):67–73.
  • Dery K, Kolb D, Maccormick J. Working with connective flow: How smartphone use is evolving in practice. Eur J Inf Syst. 2014;23(5):558–570.
  • Drew M. Bringing enterprise mobility to industry, Manufacturers’ Monthly, December, 28, 2006.
  • Etezadi-Amoli J, Farhoomand A. On end-user computing satisfaction. MIS Q. 1991;15(1):1–4.
  • Fornell C, Larcker D. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.
  • Goodhue D, Thompson R. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 1995;19(2):213–236.
  • Gordon G. Corporate hiring practices for telecommuting homeworkers. In: Christensen KE, editor. The new era of home-based work. Boulder and London: Westview Press; 1988. p. 65–78.
  • Hair J, Anderson R, Tatham R, Black W. Multivariate data analysis with readings. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1998.
  • Hoang A, Nickerson R, Beckman P, Eng J. Telecommuting and corporate culture: Implications for the mobile enterprise. Information-knowledge-systems management – enterprise mobility: Applications, technologies and strategies 2008;7(1–2):77–97.
  • Hong S, Kim J, Lee H. Antecedents of use-continuance in information systems: Toward an integrative view. J Comput Inf Syst. 2008;48(3):61–73.
  • Jacobs G. Diagnosing the distance: managing communication with dispersed technical workforces. Corporate Commun. 2004;9(2):118–127.
  • Jarvenpaa S, Lang K, Tuunainen V. Friend of foe? The ambivalent relationship between mobile technology and its users. In: Sorensen C, Yoo Y, Lyytinen K, DeGross J, editors. Designing ubiquitous information environment: Socio-technical issues and challenges. New York: Springer; 2005. p. 29–42.
  • Jessup L, Robey D. The relevance of social issues in ubiquitous computing environment. Commun ACM 2002;45(12):88–91.
  • Kaiser S, Ringlstetter M, Eikhof P, Cunha M. Creating balance? International perspectives on the work-life integration of professionals. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.
  • Karahanna E, Straub D. The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Inf Manage. 1999;35(4):237–250.
  • Karanasios S, Allen D. Mobile technology in mobile work: Contradictions and congruencies in activity systems. Eur J Inf Syst 2014;23:529–542.
  • Kim B, Han I. What drives the adoption of mobile data services? An approach from a value perspective. J Inf Technol. 2009;24(1):35–45.
  • Kim H, Choi H, Kim J. A comparative study of the effects of low and high uncertainty avoidance on continuance behavior. J Global Inf Manage. 2010;18(2):1–29.
  • Kleinrock L. Breaking loose. Commun ACM 2001;44(9):41–45.
  • Leclercq-Vandelannoitte A, Isaac H, Kalika M. Mobile information systems and organizational control: Beyond the panopticon metaphor? Eur J Inf Syst. 2014;23:543–557.
  • Limayem M, Hirt S, Cheung C. How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Q. 2007;31(4):705–737.
  • Lopez-Nicolas C, Molina-Castillo F, Bouwman H. An assessment of advanced mobile services acceptance: contributions from TAM and diffusion theory models. Inf Manage. 2008;45(6):359–364.
  • MacCallum R, Browne M, Sugawara H. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1996;1:130–149.
  • Mathieson K, Keil M. Beyond the interface: Ease of use and task-technology fit. Inf Manage. 1998;34(4):221–230.
  • McIntosh J, Baron J. Mobile commerce’s impact on today’s workforce. Int J Mobile Commun. 2005;3(2):99–113.
  • Middleton C, Cukier W. Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage. Eur J Inf Syst. 2006;15(3):252–260.
  • Middleton C, Scheepers R, Tuunainen V. When mobile is the norm: researching mobile information systems and mobility as post-adoption phenomena. Eur J Inf Syst 2014;23:503–512.
  • Nicholson DB, Nicholson JA, Parboteeah DV, Valacich JS. Knowledge worker productivity: The effects of distraction and task complexity in mobile computing environments. In: Clarke S, Dwivedi A, editors. Organizational and end-user interactions: New exploration. Hershey (PA): Information Science Reference; 2011. p. 311–330.
  • Olson M. New information technology and organizational culture. MIS Q. 1982;6(4):71–92.
  • Picoto W, Belanger F, Palma-dos-Reis A. An organizational perspective on m-business: usage factors and value determination. Eur J Inf Syst. 2014;23:571–592.
  • Popescu A. Continuing training in Romania: Reasons and benefits from the perspective of the knowledge economy. Econ Sociology 2012;5(2):35–49.
  • Prasopoulou E, Pouloudi A, Panteli N. Enacting new temporal boundaries: the role of mobile phones. Eur J Inf Syst. 2006;15(3):277–284.
  • Scott J. Mobility, business process management, software sourcing, and maturity model trends: propositions for the IS organization of the future. Inf Syst Manage. 2007;24:139–145.
  • Svejvig P, Pries-Heje J. Enterprise systems outsourcing ‘behind the curtain’: A case study showing how rational and institutional explanations coexist and complement each other. Int J Enterp Inf Syst. 2011;7(1):1–17.
  • Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan BS, Ragu-Nathan TS. The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. J Manage Inf Syst. 2007;24(1):301–328.
  • Thong J, Hong S, Tam K. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2006;64(9):799–810.
  • VARBusiness. Mobile users pursue risky business. VARBusiness 2006;22:51.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–478.
  • Yuan Y, Archer N, Connelly C, Zheng W. Identifying the ideal fit between mobile work and mobile work support. Inf Manage 2010;47(3):125–137.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.