How Client Capabilities, Vendor Configuration, and Location Impact BPO Outcomes

References

• Anderson TW, Darling DA. A test of goodness-of-fit. J Am Stat Assoc 1954;49(268):765–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Barua A, Mani D, Mehra A. Cooperation, coordination, and governance in multisourcing: an agenda for analytical and empirical research. Inf Syst Res 2010;21(4):785–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bardhan IR, Whitaker J, Mithas S. Information technology, production process outsourcing, and manufacturing plant performance. J Manage Inf Syst 2006;23(2):13–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthélemy J, Geyer D. The determinants of total IT outsourcing: an empirical investigation of French and German firms. J Comput Inf Syst. 2004;44(3):91–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression diagnostics: identifying influential data and sources of collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Borman M. Applying multiple perspectives to the BPO decision: a case study of call centres in Australia. J. Inf Technol 2006;21(2):99–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breusch TS, Pagan AR. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica. 1979;47(5):1287–1294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce DJ, Martz WB. Information systems offshoring: differing perspectives of the value statement. J Comput Inf Syst 2007;47(3):17–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmel E, Gao G, Zhang N. The maturing Chinese offshore IT services industry: it takes 10 years to sharpen a sword. MISQ Executive. 2008;7(4):157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty S, Whitten D, Green K. Understanding service quality and relationship quality in IS outsourcing: client orientation & promotion, project management effectiveness, and the task-technology-structure fit. J Comput Inf Syst 2007/2008;48(2):1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou SW, Techatassanasoontorn AA, Hung IH. Understanding commitment in business process outsourcing relationships. Inf. Manage. 2015;52(1):30–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeCarlo S. The world’s leading companies. Forbes. 2005 Apr;18:164–230.
   Google Scholar
• Deming WE. Quality, productivity, and competitive position. Cambridge (MA): Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM. Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Market Res. 2001;38(2):269–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dibbern J, Goles T, Hirschheim R, Jayatilaka B. Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. DATA BASE Adv Inf Syst. 2004;35(4):6–102.
   Google Scholar
• Doh JP, Bunyaratavej K, Hahn ED. Separable but not equal: the location determinants of discrete services offshoring activities. J Int Bus Stud. 2009;40(6):926–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domberger S, Fernandez P, Fiebeg DG. Modelling the price, performance and contract characteristics of IT outsourcing. J. Inf Technol 2000;15(2):107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fersht P, Snowdon J. State of the outsourcing industry 2013: executive findings. Cambridge (MA): HfS Research; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Johnson MD, Anderson EW, Cha J, Bryant BE. The American customer satisfaction index: nature, purpose, and findings. J Market 1996;60(4):7–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvin DA. What does “product quality” really mean? MIT Sloan Manage Rev. 1984;26(1):25–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goo J, Kishore R, Rao HR. The role of service level agreements in relational management of information technology outsourcing: an empirical study. MIS Quart. 2009;33(1):119–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han H-S, Lee J-N, Seo Y-W. Analyzing the impact of a firm’s capability on outsourcing success: a process perspective. Inf. Manage. 2008;45(1):31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harter DE, Krishnan MS, Slaughter SA. Effects of process maturity on quality, cycle time and effort in software product development. Manage Sci. 2000;46(4):451–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman JA. Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica. 1978;46(6):1251–1271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill CWL. Differentiation versus low cost or differentiation and low cost: a contingency framework. Acad Manage Rev. 1988;13(3):401–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough M. Updating our TQM thinking for a knowledge and service economy. Total Qual Manage. 2004;15(5–6):753–791.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston J, DiNardo J. Econometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Joshi K, Mudigonda S. An analysis of India’s future attractiveness as an offshore destination for IT and IT-enabled services. J. Inf Technol 2008;23(4):215–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Balanced scorecard – the measures that drive performance. Harvard Bus Rev. 1992;70(1):71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan RS, Norton DP. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Bus Rev. 1996;74(1):75–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim K, Mithas S, Whitaker J, Roy PK. Industry-specific human capital and wages: evidence from the business process outsourcing industry. Inf Syst Res. 2014;25(3):618–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King WR, Torkzadeh G. Information systems offshoring: research status and issues. MIS Quart. 2008;32(2):205–225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kmenta J. Elements of econometrics. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Kotlarsky J, Oshri I. Country attractiveness for offshoring and offshore outsourcing: additional considerations. J. Inf Technol 2008;23(4):228–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlarsky J, Scarbrough H, Oshri I. Coordinating expertise across knowledge boundaries in offshore-outsourcing projects: the role of codification. MIS Quart. 2014;38(2):607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan MS, Kriebel CH, Kekre S, Mukhopadhyay T. An empirical analysis of productivity and quality in software products. Manage Sci. 2000;46(6):745–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacity MC, Khan S, Yan A, Willcocks LP. A review of the IT outsourcing empirical literature and future research directions. J. Inf Technol 2010;25(4):395–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacity MC, Solomon S, Yan A, Willcocks LP. Business process outsourcing studies: a critical review and research directions. J. Inf Technol 2011;26(4):221–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacity MC, Willcocks LP, Feeny DF. IT outsourcing: maximizing flexibility and control. Harvard Bus Rev. 1995;73(3):84–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina N, Ross JW. From the vendor’s perspective: exploring the value proposition of information technology outsourcing. MIS Quart. 2003;27(3):331–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levina N, Su N. Global multisourcing strategy: the emergence of a supplier portfolio in services offshoring. Decis Sci. 2008;39(3):541–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu L, Yetton P. Sponsorship and IT vendor management of projects. J. Inf Technol 2010;25(1):56–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani D, Barua A, Whinston AB. An empirical analysis of the impact of information capabilities design on business process outsourcing performance. MIS Quart. 2010;34(1):39–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani D, Barua A, Whinston AB. An empirical analysis of the contractual and information structures of business process outsourcing relationships. Inf Syst Res. 2012;24(4):1028–1049.
   Google Scholar
• Mani D, Srikanth K, Bharadwaj A. Efficacy of R&D work in offshore captive centers: an empirical study of task characteristics, coordination mechanisms and performance. Inf Syst Res. 2014;25(4):846–864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marriott I. Gartner’s 30 leading locations for offshore services, 2010–11. Stamford (CT): Gartner; 2010 Dec 13.
   Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Krishnan MS. Human capital and institutional effects in the compensation of information technology professionals in the United States. Manage Sci. 2008;54(3):415–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Whitaker J. Is the world flat or spiky? Information intensity, skills and global service disaggregation. Inf Syst Res. 2007;18(3):237–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ, Iacono CS. Desperately seeking the “IT” in IT research—a call to theorizing the IT artifact. Inf Syst Res. 2001;12(2):121–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshri I. Choosing an evolutionary path for offshore captive centers. MIS Quart. Executive 2013;12(3):151–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshri I, Kotlarsky J. Realising the real benefits of outsourcing: seven steps to effective outsourcing measurement. Coventry (UK): Warwick Business School; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Oshri I, Kotlarsky J, Rottman J, Willcocks LP. Global sourcing: recent trends and issues. Inf Technol People. 2009;22(3):192–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins B. Outsourcing: out of sight, out of mind? Computerworld. 2006 Mar 13;40(11):52.
   Google Scholar
• Plugge A, Bouwman H, Molina-Castillo F-J. Outsourcing capabilities, organizational structure and performance quality monitoring: toward a fit model. Inf. Manage. 2013;50(6):275–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter ME. Competitive strategies: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Powell SG, Schwaninger M, Trimble C. Measurement and control of business processes. Syst Dyn Rev. 2001;17(1):63–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahalad CK, Krishnan MS. The new meaning of quality in the information age. Harvard Bus Rev. 1999;77(5):109–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust RT, Moorman C, Dickson PR. Getting return on quality: revenue expansion, cost reduction, or both? J Market 2002;66(4):7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Hartono E. Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quart. 2003;27(1):125–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz C. Toward an understanding of the nature and conceptualization of outsourcing success. Inf. Manage. 2014;51(1):152–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solli-Sǣther H, Gottschalk P. Stages-of-growth in outsourcing, offshoring and backsourcing: back to the future? J Comput Inf Syst 2015;55(2):88–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Kraemer KL, Gurbaxani V. Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process oriented approach. J Manage Inf Syst 2000;16(4):145–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanriverdi H, Konana P, Ge L. The choice of sourcing mechanisms for business processes. Inf Syst Res. 2007;18(3):280–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westner M, Strahringer S. Determinants of success in is offshoring projects: results from an empirical study of German companies. Inf. Manage. 2010;2010(5–6):291–299.
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker J, Mithas S, Krishnan MS. Organizational learning and capabilities for onshore and offshore business process outsourcing. J Manage Inf Syst 2011;27(3):11–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willcocks LP, Oshri I, Kotlarsky J, Rottman J. Outsourcing and offshoring engineering projects: understanding the value, sourcing models, and coordination practices. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2011;58(4):706–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaino J. Letting the process go. InformationWeek. 2005 Jun 13;1043:45–48.
   Google Scholar
• Zellner A, Theil H. Three stage least squares: simultaneous estimate of simultaneous equations. Econometrica. 1962;29(1):54–78.
   Google Scholar