1,730
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Effects of Perceived Risk on Intention to Purchase: A Meta-Analysis

ORCID Icon, &

References

  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behaviour. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.
  • Aytug ZG, Rothstein HR, Zhou W, Kern MC. Revealed or concealed? Transparency of procedures, decisions, and judgment calls in meta-analyses. ‎Organ Res Meth. 2012;15(1):103–133.
  • Bauer RA. Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking. Dynamic Marketing for a Changing World. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association; 1960. pp. 398–398.
  • Borenstein M, Hedges L, Higgins J, Rothstein H. Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2. Englewood, NJ: Biostat; 2005.
  • Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JPT, Rothstein HR. References. In: Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2009; p. 409–414. DOI: 10.1002/9780470743386.refs
  • Broekhuizen T, Huizingh EKRE. Online purchase determinants: is their effect moderated by direct experience? Manag Res News 2009;32(5):440–457.
  • Calder BJ, Phillips LW, Tybout AM. Designing research for application. J Cons Res. 1981;8:197–207.
  • Chen CW. The power of crowdsourcing: purchase intention under majority and minority influences. Term paper. Baruch College., 2012
  • Chen YH A thesis of the Influence of Product Involvement and Perceived Risk on Internet Bookstore Web Visitors’ Purchase Intention. Publishing Organizations Management. Nan Hau University; 2006.
  • Chen Z, Dubinsky AJ. A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: a preliminary investigation. Psychol Market. 2003;20(4):323–347.
  • Chiu CM, Wang ET, Fang YH, Huang HY. Understanding customers’ repeat purchase intentions in B2C e‐commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk. ‎Inform Syst J. 2014;24(1):85–114.
  • Cho V. A study of the roles of trusts and risks in information-oriented online legal services using an integrated model. Inform Manag. 2006;43(4):502–520.
  • Corbitt BJ, Thanasankit T, Yi, H. Trust and e-commerce: a study of consumer perceptions. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2003;2(3):203–215.
  • Cowart KO, Fox GL, Wilson AE. A structural look at consumer innovativeness and self-congruence in new product purchases. Psychol Market, 2008;25(12):1111–1130.
  • Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organ Sci. 1999;10(1):104–115.
  • Cunningham SM. The major dimensions of perceived risk. In: Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior. Boston (MA): Harvard University Press; 1967. p. 82–108.
  • Dai B, Forsythe S, Kwon WS. The impact of online shopping experience on risk perceptions and online purchase intentions: does product category matter? J Electron Comm Res. 2014;15(1):13.
  • Dash S, Saji K. The role of consumer self-efficacy and website social-presence in customers’ adoption of B2C online shopping: an empirical study in the Indian context. J Int Consum Market. 2007;20(2):33.
  • Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q1989;13(3):319–340.
  • Doolin B, Dillon S, Thompson F, Corner JL. Perceived risk, the Internet shopping experience and online purchasing behavior: a New Zealand perspective. J Global Inform Manag. 2005;13(2):66–88.
  • Dowling GR, Staelin R. A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. J Consum Res. 1994;21:119–134.
  • Duval S. The trim and fill method. In H. R. Rothstein, A. J. Sutton, & M. Borenstein (Eds.), Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments. Chichester, England: Wiley; 2005. pp. 127–144.
  • Evans JR, Mathur A. The value of online surveys. Internet Res. 2005;15(2):195–219.
  • Fazio RH, Zanna MP. On the predictive validity of attitudes: the roles of direct experience and confidence1. J Personal.1978; 46(2):228–243.
  • Featherman M. Extending the technology acceptance model by inclusion of perceived risk. AMCIS 2001 Proceedings. Paper 148, 2001.
  • Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Boston, MA: Addition-Wesley; 1975.
  • Forsythe SM, Shi B. Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping. J Bus Res. 2008;56(11):867–875.
  • Ganguly B, Dash S, Cyr D. Website characteristics, trust, and purchase intention in online stores: an empirical study in the Indian context. J Inform Sci Tech. 2009;6(2):22–44.
  • Gefen D, Karahanna E, Straub DW. Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Q. 2003;27(1):51–90.
  • Goldin G. Meta-analysis of problem-solving studies: a critical response. J Res Math Educ. 1992;23(3):274–283. doi:10.2307/749121
  • Hembree R. Response to critique of meta-analysis. J Res Math Educ. 1992;23(3):284–289. doi:10.2307/749122
  • Higgins J, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327(7414):557.
  • Hoffman DL, Novak TP, Peralta MA. Building consumer trust online. Commun ACM 1999;42(4):80–85.
  • Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1999.
  • Hyun-Hwa L, Seung-Eun L. Mobile commerce: an analysis of key success factors. J Shopp Cent Res. 2007;14:29–62.
  • Im I, Kim Y, Han HJ. The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users’ acceptance of technologies. Inform Manag. 2008;45(1):1–9.
  • Jarvenpaa SL, Tractinsky N, Saarinen L. Consumer trust in an internet store: a cross-cultural validation. J Comput Mediated Commun. 1999;5(2):45–71.
  • Kim DJ, Ferrin DL, Rao HR. A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce: the role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents Decis support syst. 2008;44(2):544–564.
  • Kimery KM, McCord M. Third-party assurances: the road to trust in online retailing. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference, Hawaii, 2002.
  • King WR, He J. A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Inform manag. 2006;43(6):740–755.
  • Kuhlmeier D, Knight G. Antecedents to internet-based purchasing: a multinational study. Int Market Rev. 2005;22(4):460–473.
  • Kyere-Duodu K, Yamoah DD. Adoption of Internet Banking among Ghanaian Consumers. Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology; 2011.
  • Lee H-H, Lee S-E. Mobile commerce: An analysis of key success factors. J Shopp Cent Res. 2007;14(2):29–62.
  • Lee J-H, Kim SW, Song CH. The Effects of Trust and Perceived Risk on Users’ Acceptance of ICT Services (October 1, 2010). KAIST Business School Working Paper Series No. 2010–007, 2010. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1703213
  • Lee MC. Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: an integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2009;8(3):130–141.
  • Li YH, Huang JW. Applying theory of perceived risk and technology acceptance model in the online shopping channel. World Acad Sci Eng Technol. 2009;53:919–925.
  • Liang T-P. Need for consistency in information system research. Pacific Asia J Assoc Inform Syst. 2012;3(4),Article 1. Available at: http://aisel.aisnet.org/pajais/vol3/iss4/1
  • Liebermann Y, Stashevsky S. Perceived risks as barriers to Internet and e-commerce usage. Qual Market Res Int J. 2002;5(4):291–300.
  • Lu HP, Hsu CL, Hsu HY. An empirical study of the effect of perceived risk upon intention to use online applications. Inform Manag Comput Security 2005;13(2):106–120.
  • Lui HK, Jamieson R. Integrating trust and risk perceptions in business to consumer electronic commerce with technology acceptance model. ECIS 2003 Proceedings, 60.
  • Mitchell VW. Consumer perceived risk: conceptualisations and models. Eur J Mark. 1999;33(1/2):163–195.
  • Nicolaou AI, McKnight DH. Perceived information quality in data exchanges: effects on risk, trust, and intention to use. Inform Sys Res. 2006;17(4):332.
  • Özkan S, Bindusara G, Hackney, R. Facilitating the adoption of e-payment systems: theoretical constructs and empirical analysis. J Enterprise Inform Manag. 2010;23(3):305–325.
  • Parasuraman A, Grewal D. The impact of technology on the quality-value-loyalty chain: a research agenda. J Acad Market Sci. 2000;28(1):168–1.
  • Pavlou PA. Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. Int J Electron Comm. 2003;7(3):101–134.
  • Peterson RM. Course participation: an active learning approach employing student documentation. J Market Educ. 2001;23(3):187–194.
  • Pires G, Stanton J, Eckford A. Influences on the perceived risk of purchasing online. J Consum Behav. 2004;4(2):118–131.
  • Podder B. Factors influencing the adoption and usage of internet banking: a New Zealand perspective [dissertation]. Auckland University of Technology; 2005.
  • Rynes SL, Hillman A, Ireland RD, Kirkman B, Law K, Miller CC, Rajagopalan N, Shapiro D. Everything you’ve always wanted to know about AMJ (but may have been afraid to ask). Acad Manag J. 2005;48(5):732–737.
  • Sam MFM, Tahir MNH. Website quality and consumer online purchase intention of air ticket. Int J Basic Appl Sci. 2009;9(10):20–25.
  • Samadi M, Yaghoob-Nejadi A. A survey of the effect of consumers’ perceived risk on purchase intention in e-shopping. Bus Intelligence J. 2009;2(2):261–275.
  • Schaupp LC, Carter L. The impact of trust, risk and optimism bias on E-file adoption. Inform Sys Frontiers 2010;12(3):299–309.
  • Teo TSH, Liu J. Consumer trust in e-commerce in the United States, Singapore and China. Omega 2007;35(1):22–38.
  • Udo GJ, Bagchi KK, Kirs PJ. An assessment of customers’ service quality perception, satisfaction and intention. Int J Inform Manag. 2010;30(6):481–492.
  • van der Heijden H, Ogertschnig M, van der Gaast L. Effects of context relevance and perceived risk on user acceptance of mobile information services. ECIS 2005 Proceedings, 7.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;425–478.
  • Wareham J, Zheng JG, Straub D. Critical themes in electronic commerce research: a meta-analysis. J Inform Tech. 2005;20(1):1–19.
  • Weber EU, Blais AR, Betz NE. A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J Behav Deci Mak. 2002;15(4):263–290.
  • Yousafzai S, Pallister J, Foxall G. Multi-dimensional role of trust in Internet banking adoption. Serv Ind J. 2009;29(5):591–605.
  • Zafiropoulos K, Ioannis K, Vrana V. Assessing the adoption of e-government services by teachers in Greece. Future Internet 2012;4(2):528–544.
  • Zhu DS, Lee ZC, O’Neal GS. Mr. Risk! Please trust me: trust antecedents that increase online consumer purchase intention. J Internet Banking Comm. 2011;16(3):1–23.
  • Zwass V. Structure and Macro-Level Impacts of Electronic Commerce: From Technological Infrastructure to Electronic Marketplaces. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1988.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.