The Moderating Effect of Industry Types on IT-Coordination Costs Relationship

References

• Aral S, Brynjolfsson E, Van Alstyne M. Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Inform Sys Res. 2012;23(3):849–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayabakan S, Bardhan IR, Zheng Z. A data envelopment analysis approach to estimate IT-enabled production capability. MIS Q. 2017;41(1):1897–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua A, Kriebel CH, Mukhopadhyay T. Information technologies and business value: an analytic and empirical investigation. Inform Sys Res. 1995;6(1):3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua A, Lee B. The information technology productivity paradox revisited: a theoretical and empirical investigation in the manufacturing sector. Int J Flex Manuf Sys. 1997;9(2):145–166.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt ER, Morrison CJ. High-tech capital formation and economic performance in US manufacturing industries: an exploratory analysis. J Econom. 1995;65(1):9–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black SE, Lynch LM. How to compete: the impact of workplace practices and information technology on productivity. Rev Econ Stat. 2001;83(3):434–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom N, Garicano L, Sadun R, Van Reenen J. The distinct effects of information technology and communication technology on firm organization. Manag Sci. 2014;60(12):2859–2885.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E. The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun ACM. 1993;36(12):66–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Manag Sci. 1996;42(4):541–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson E, Malone TW, Gurbaxani V, Kambil A. Does information technology lead to smaller firms? Manag Sci. 1994l;40(12):1628–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JV, Su B-C, Hiele TM. The impact of IT–coordination costs on firm size and productivity: transaction cost perspective. Int J Electron Comm. 2017;21(1):103–131.
   Google Scholar
• Chen W, Kamal F. The impact of information and communication technology adoption on multinational firm boundary decisions. J Int Bus Stud. 2016;47(5):563–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi M, Zhao J, George JF, Li Y, Zhai S. The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: the moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity. Int J Inform Manag. 2017;37(2):43–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemons EK, Reddi SP, Row MC. The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: the “move to the middle” hypothesis. JManag Inform Sys. 1993;10(2):9–35.
   Google Scholar
• Coase RH. The nature of the firm. Economica 1937;4(16):386–405.
   Google Scholar
• Drnevich PL, Croson DC. Information technology and business-level strategy: toward an integrated theoretical perspective. MIS Q. 2013;37(2):483–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis J, Schipper K. Have financial statements lost their relevance? J Account Res. 1999;37(2):319–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattiker TF, Goodhue DL. What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Q. 2005;29(3):559–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez J, Salazar I, Vargas P. Firm boundaries, information processing capacity, and performance in manufacturing firms. J Manag Inform Sys. 2016;33(3):809–842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurbaxani V, Whang, S. The impact of information systems on organizations and markets. Commun ACM. 1991;34(1):59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haenlein M, Kaplan AM. A beginner’s guide to partial least squares analysis. Understan Stat. 2004;3(4):283–297.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Hult GTM, Ringle C, Sarstedt M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Los Angeles (CA): Sage Publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Häkkinen K, Kettunen O. Incorporating coordination costs into purchasing lot size decisions. Int J Procur Manag. 2015;8(4):476–493.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer M, Stanton S. How process enterprises really work. Harvard Bus Rev. 1999;77:108–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han K, Bong Chang Y, Hahn J. Information technology spillover and productivity: the role of information technology intensity and competition. J Manag Inform Sys. 2011;28(1):115–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao S, Song M. Technology-driven strategy and firm performance: are strategic capabilities missing links? J Bus Res. 2016;69(2):751–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardgrave BC, Langford S, Waller M, Miller R. Measuring the impact of RFID on out of stocks at Wal-Mart. MIS Q Exec. 2008;7(4):181–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E. Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Q. 1996;20(2):121–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt MA, Hoskisson RE, Kim H. International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Acad Manag J. 1997;40(4):767–798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Q, Quan J. Evaluating the impact of IT investments on productivity: a causal analysis at industry level. Int J Inform Manag. 2005;25(1):39–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang CJ, Liu CJ. Exploration for the relationship between innovation, IT and performance. J Intellectual Capital 2005;6(2):237–252.
   Google Scholar
• Im KS, Grover V, Teng JTC. Do large firms become smaller by using information technology? Inform Sys Res. 2013;24(2):470–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John G, Weitz BA. Forward integration into distribution: an empirical test of transaction cost analysis. J Law Econ Organ. 1988;4(2):337–355.
   Google Scholar
• Keil M, Tan BC, Wei K-K, Saarinen T, Tuunainen V, Wassenaar A. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behavior in software projects. MIS Q. 2000;24(2):299–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ. Information technology and firm performance: the role of supply chain integration. Oper Manag Res. 2017;1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Klein B, Crawford RG, Alchian AA. Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J Law Econ. 1978;21(2):297–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleis L, Chwelos P, Ramirez RV, Cockburn, I. Information technology and intangible output: the impact of IT investment on innovation productivity. Inform Sys Res. 2012;23(1):42–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Devaraj S. Measuring information technology payoff: a meta-analysis of structural variables in firm-level empirical research. Inform Sys Res. 2003;14(2):127–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohli R, Devaraj S, Ow TT. Does information technology investment influence a firm’s market value? A case of non-publicly traded healthcare firms. MIS Q. 2012;36(4):1145–1163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee B, Barua A. An integrated assessment of productivity and efficiency impacts of information technology investments: old data, new analysis and evidence. J Prod Anal. 1999;12(1):21–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Kim, SH. A lag effect of IT investment on firm performance. Inform Resour Manag J. 2006;19(1):43–69.
   Google Scholar
• Lu Z, Jinghua H. The moderating factors in the relationship between ERP investments and firm performance. J Comput Inform Sys. 2012;53(2):75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone TW. Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Manag Sci. 1987;33(10):1317–1332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Rockart JF. Computers, networks and the corporation. Sci Am. 1991;265(3):128–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun ACM. 1987;30(6):484–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masten SE. The organization of production: evidence from the aerospace industry. J Law Econ. 1984;27(2):403–417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville N, Kraemer K, Gurbaxani V. Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Q. 2004;28(2):283–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Ramasubbu N, Sambamurthy V. How information management capability influences firm performance. MIS Q. 2011;35(1):237–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mithas S, Rust, RT. How information technology strategy and investments influence firm performance: conjecture and empirical evidence. MIS Q. 2016;40(1):223–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris SA, Strickland, TH. Exploration of information system process improvements and firm performance. J Comput Inform Sys. 2008;49(2):86–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaou AI. Firm performance effects in relation to the implementation and use of enterprise resource planning systems. J Inform Sys. 2004;18(2):79–105.
   Google Scholar
• Nurmilaakso J-M. Business-to-business integration and coordination costs. Int J Bus Inform Sys. 2013;13(1):1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Ong C-S, Chen P-Y. A valuation model for information technology capability-enabled firm value. J Comput Inform Sys. 2016;56(2):137–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli G, Ives B. Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Q. 2005;29(4):747–776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Millar VE. How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Bus Rev 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Patnayakuni N. Technology investment and business performance. Commun ACM. 1997;40(7):89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray G, Barney JB, Muhanna WA. Capabilities, business processes, and competitive advantage: choosing the dependent variable in empirical tests of the resource‐based view. Strategic Manag J. 2004;25(1):23–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren F, Dewan S. Industry-level analysis of information technology return and risk: what explains the variation? J Manag Inform Sys. 2015;32(2):71–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Jeyaraj A. Information technology impacts on firm performance: an extension of Kohli and Devaraj (2003). MIS Q. 2015;39(4):809–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt M, Henseler J, Christian M. Multi-group analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: alternative methods and empirical results. Adv Int Market. 2011;22:195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Shin N. The impact of information technology on coordination costs: implications for firm productivity. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems. Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Association for Information Systems. 1997, pp. 133–146.
   Google Scholar
• Shin N. Does information technology improve coordination? An empirical analysis. Logistics Inform Manag. 1999;12(1/2):138–144.
   Google Scholar
• Tallon PP, Coltman T, Queiroz M, Sharma R. Business process and information technology alignment: construct conceptualization, empirical illustration, and directions for future research. J Assoc Inform Sys. 2016;17(9):563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambe P, Hitt LM. The productivity of information technology investments: new evidence from IT labor data. Inform Sys Res. 2012;23(3-part-1):599–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinekar V, Teng JT. IT impact in information and physical product industries. J Comput Inform Sys. 2012;53(1):65–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker J, Ekman P, Thompson S. How multinational corporations use information technology to manage global operations. J Comput Inform Sys. 2017;57(2):112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. Transaction-cost economics: the governance of contractual relations. J Law Econ. 1979;22(2):233–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. The modern corporation: origins, evolution, attributes. JEconLiterature 1981;19(4):1537–1568.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism Firms Markets Relational Contracting. New York, NY: Free Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. Economic Organization: Firms, Markets and Policy Control. New York: The Free Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. The Mechanisms of Governance. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. Strategy research: governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Manag J. 1999;20(12):1087–1108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson OE. Transaction Cost Economics. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Xue L, Ray G, Sambamurthy V. Efficiency or innovation: how do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? MIS Q. 2012;36(2):509–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar