How Social Impact Affects Smartphone Brand Loyalty

References

• Quester P, Lim AL. Product involvement/brand loyalty: is there a link? J Prod Brand Manag. 2003;12(1):22–38. doi:10.1108/10610420310463117.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett R. Experience as a moderator of involvement and satisfaction on brand loyalty in a business-to-business setting 02-314R. Ind Marketing Manag. 2005;34(1):97–107. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2004.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MK, Wong SF, Chang Y, Park JH. Determinants of customer loyalty in the Korean smartphone market: moderating effects of usage characteristics. Telematics Inform. 2016;33(4):936–49. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra R, Ahtola OT. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Mark Lett. 1991;2(2):159–70. doi:10.1007/BF00436035.
   Google Scholar
• Veryzer, Jr. J,RW, Hutchinson JW. The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. J Consumer Res. 1998;24(4):374–85. doi:10.1086/jcr.1998.24.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkie WL. Consumer Behavior. 3rd eth. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wu PH, Lin CP. Learning to foresee the effects of social identity complexity and need for social approval on technology brand loyalty. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2016;111:188–97. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox S, Walker D. Empirical developments in the measurement of involvement, brand loyalty and their relationship in grocery markets. J Strategic Marketing. 2003;11(4):271–86. doi:10.1080/0965254032000159072.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington P, Shim S. An empirical investigation of the relationship between product involvement and brand commitment. Psychol Marketing. 2000;17(9):761–82. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett R. Involvement, satisfaction, and brand loyalty in a small business services setting. J Bus Res. 2007;60(12):1253–60. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laurent G, Kapferer JN. Measuring consumer involvement profiles. J Marketing Res. 1985;22(1):41–53. doi:10.2307/3151549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal B, Lee MS. A causal model of consumer involvement. J Econ Psychol. 1989;10(3):363–89. doi:10.1016/0167-4870(89)90030-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox S, Walker D, Marshall C. Measuring consumer involvement with grocery brands: model validation and scale‐reliability test procedures. J Marketing Manag. 1994;10(1–3):137–52. doi:10.1080/0267257X.1994.9964264.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira AG, Coelho FJ. Product involvement, price perceptions, and brand loyalty. J Prod Brand Manag. 2015;24(4):349–64. doi:10.1108/JPBM-06-2014-0623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeh CH, Wang YS, Yieh K. Predicting smartphone brand loyalty: consumer value and consumer-brand identification perspectives. Int J Inf Manage. 2016;36(3):245–57. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CF, Tsai MH. Perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty of TV travel product shopping: involvement as a moderator. Tourism Manag. 2008;29(6):1166–71. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2008.02.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu YJ. Exploring the relationship between customer involvement, brand equity, perceived risk and customer loyalty: the case of electrical consumer products. Int J Organizational Innovation. 2011;4:111–27.
   Google Scholar
• Bruwer J, Buller C. Product involvement, brand loyalty, and country-of-origin brand preferences of Japanese wine consumers. J Wine Res. 2013;24(1):38–58. doi:10.1080/09571264.2012.717221.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian S, Raghunathan R, Mahajan V. Consumers in a multichannel environment: product utility, process utility, and channel choice. J Inter Marketing. 2005;19(2):12–30. doi:10.1002/dir.20032.
   Google Scholar
• Gill T, Lei J. Convergence in the high-technology consumer markets: not all brands gain equally from adding new functionalities to products. Mark Lett. 2009;20(1):91–103. doi:10.1007/s11002-008-9050-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta S. Some approaches to complementary product strategy. J Prod Innovation Manag. 1998;15(4):352–67. doi:10.1016/S0737-6782(97)00106-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mas-Colell A, Whinston MD, Green JR. Microeconomics Theory. New York, NY: Oxford Univ, Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Dowling M, Lechner C, Thielmann B. Convergence–innovation and change of market structures between television and online services. Electron Markets. 1998;8(4):31–35. doi:10.1080/10196789800000053.
   Google Scholar
• Arruda-Filho EJM, Lennon MM. How iPhone innovators changed their consumption in iDay2: hedonic post or brand devotion. Int J Inf Manage. 2011;31(6):524–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotler P, Keller K. Marketing Management. 14th. New Jersey, USA: Pearson International Edition; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Rochford L, Rudelius W. New product development process: stages and successes in the medical products industry. Ind Marketing Manag. 1997;26(1):67–84. doi:10.1016/S0019-8501(96)00115-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers E. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th. New York, NY: Free Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Katz ML, Shapiro C. Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev. 1985;75:424–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebowitz SJ, Margolis SE. Network externality: an uncommon traged. J Econ Perspect. 1994;8(2):133–50. doi:10.1257/jep.8.2.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dranove D, Gandal N. The DVD-vs.-DIVX standard war: empirical evidence of network effects and preannouncement effects. J Econ Manag Strateg. 2003;12(3):363–86. doi:10.1162/105864003322309518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung JH, Yoo TH. Government policy, network externalities and mobile telecommunication services: evidence from OECD countries. Appl Econ. 2015;47(21):2173–83. doi:10.1080/00036846.2015.1005816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner KR. Obtaining strategic advantage from being imitated: when can encouraging clones pay? Manage Sci. 1995;41(2):209–25. doi:10.1287/mnsc.41.2.209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewa N, Readb S. The more we get together: coordinating network externality product introduction in the RFID industry. Technovation. 2007;27(10):p569–581. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2006.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph F, Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. Rand J Econ. 1985;16(1):70–83. doi:10.2307/2555589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearden WO, Etzel MJ. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. J Consumer Res. 1982;9(2):183–94. doi:10.1086/jcr.1982.9.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs (NJ, US): Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein MA, Ajzen I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Laroche M, Habibi MR, Richard MO. To be or not to be in social media: how brand loyalty is affected by social media? Int J Inf Manage. 2013;33(1):76–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpińska-Krakowiak M. The effects of social networking sites on consumer–brand relationships. J Comput Inf Syst. 2016;56(3):204–10. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1153894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass R, Suhong L. Social influence and instant messaging adoption. J Comput Inf Syst. 2010;51:24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park CW, Lessig VP. Students and housewives: differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. J Consumer Res. 1977;4(2):102–10. doi:10.1086/jcr.1977.4.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnkrant RE, Cousineau A. Informational and normative social influence in buyer behavior. J Consumer Res. 1975;2(3):206–15. doi:10.1086/jcr.1975.2.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pincus S, Waters L. Informational social influence and product quality judgments. J Appl Psychol. 1977;62(5):615–19. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.62.5.615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee AV. A simple model of herd behavior. Q J Econ. 1992;107(3):797–817. doi:10.2307/2118364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar R, Bulte CV, Choi J. Distinguishing among Mechanisms of Social Contagion in New Product Adoption: Framework and Illustration. MSI Report No. 11–119. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ross G, Bruner JS, Wood D. The role of tutoring in problem solving. J Psychol Psychiatry. 1976;17:89–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascu DN, Zinkhan G. Consumer conformity: review and applications for marketing theory and practice. J Marketing Theory Pract. 1999;7(3):1–12. doi:10.1080/10696679.1999.11501836.
   Google Scholar
• Kiesler CA, Kiesler SB. Conformity. BookZombie (Hanford (CA, U.S.A.)): Addison Wesley Publishing Company; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• FIND, “MIC report – the number of domestic mobile phone users is more than 16 million (in Chinese),” 2015, Retrieved December 20, 2016, from iThome website http://www.ithome.com.tw/news/97479.
   Google Scholar
• Pae JH, Hyun JS. The impact of technology advancement strategies on consumers’ patronage decisions. J Prod Innovation Manag. 2002;19(5):375–83. doi:10.1016/S0737-6782(02)00154-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu CL, Lu HP. Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience. Inf Manag. 2004;41(7):853–68. doi:10.1016/j.im.2003.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertenbroch K, Dhar R. Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. J Marketing Res. 2000;37(1):60–71. doi:10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A, Premkumar G. Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Q. 2004;28(2):229–54. doi:10.2307/25148634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman M. Differentiated brand experience in brandparity through branded branding strategy. J Strategic Marketing. 2014;22(7):603–15. doi:10.1080/0965254X.2014.914061.
   Google Scholar