364
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Trade off Cybersecurity Concerns for Co-Created Value

, , &

References

  • Hu T, Wang H. Social media usage as a service: a service-dominant logic perspective. Lecture Notes Comput Sci. 2015;9391:88–99.
  • Sundararajan A, Provost F, Oestreicher-Singer G, Aral S. Information in digital, economic, and social media. Inf Syst Res. 2013;24(4):883–905. doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0472.
  • Bessette C. Fortune 500: The top companies using social media. June 2, 2014. http://fortune.com/2014/06/02/500-social-media/
  • Baethge C, Klier J, Klier M. Social commerce: state-of-the-art and future research directions. Electron Markets. 2016;26(3):269–90. doi:10.1007/s12525-016-0225-2.
  • Stieger S, Burger C, Bohn M, Voracek M. Who commits virtual identity suicide? Differences in privacy concerns, internet addiction, and personality between Facebook users and quitters. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, Social Networking. 2013;16(9):629–34. doi:10.1089/cyber.2012.0323.
  • Belanger F, Corssler R. Privacy in the digital age: A review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Q. 2011;35(4):1017–41. doi:10.2307/41409971.
  • Dinev T, Hart P. An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Inf Syst Res. 2006;17(1):61–80. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0080.
  • Smith HJ, Dinev T, Xum H. Information privacy research: an interdisciplinary review. MIS Q. 2011;35(4):989–1015. doi:10.2307/41409970.
  • Cao J, Basoglu KA, Sheng H, Lowry PB. A systematic review of social networks research in information systems: building a foundation for exciting future research. Communications of the AIS. 2015;36:727–58.
  • Ngai EWT, Tao SSC, Moon KKL. Social media research: theories, constructs, and conceptual framework. Int J Inf Manage. 2015;35(1):33–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.09.004.
  • Gefen D, Pavlou PA. The boundaries of trust and risk: the quadratic moderating role of institutional structures. Inf Syst Res. 2012;23(3):940–59. doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0395.
  • Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: A principal–agent perspective. MIS Q. 2007;31(1):105–36. doi:10.2307/25148783.
  • Bansal G. Distinguishing between privacy and security concerns: an empirical examination and scale validation. J Comput Inf Syst. 2017;57(4):330–43. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1232981.
  • Michel S, Brown SW, Gallan AS. An expanded and strategic view of discontinuous innovations: developing a service-dominant logic. J Acad Marketing Sci. 2008;36(1):54–66. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0066-9.
  • Mousavizadeh M, Kim DJ, Chen R. Effects of assurance mechanisms and consumer concerns on online purchase decisions: an empirical study. Decis Support Syst. 2016;92:79–90. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.09.011.
  • Lusch RF, Nambisan S. Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q. 2015;39(1):155–75. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
  • Cases AS, Fournier C, Dubois PL, Tanner JF. Web site spill over to email campaigns: the role of privacy, trust and shoppers’ attitudes. J Bus Res. 2010;63(9–10):993–99. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.02.028.
  • Eastlick MA, Lotz SL, Warrington P. Understanding online B-to-C relationships: an integrated model of privacy concerns, trust, and commitment. J Bus Res. 2006;59(8):877–86. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.02.006.
  • Joinson AN, Reips UD, Buchanan T, Schofield CBP. Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online. Human–Computer Interaction. 2010;25(1):1–24. doi:10.1080/07370020903586662.
  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF. Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark. 2004;68(1):1–17. doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036.
  • Vargo SL, Lusch RF. Why service?. J Acad Marketing Sci. 2008;36(1):25–38. doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0068-7.
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
  • Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1980.
  • Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;13(3):319–39. doi:10.2307/249008.
  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi:10.2307/30036540.
  • Co-Creation: ZV. Toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. Int J Electron Commerce. 2010;15(1):11–48. doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415150101.
  • Hu T, Kettinger W, Poston R. The effect of online social value on satisfaction and continued use of social media. Eur J Inf Syst. 2015;24(4):391–410. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.22.
  • Hu T, Poston RS, Kettinger WJ. Nonadopters of online social network services: is it easy to have fun yet?. Communications Assoc Inf Syst. 2011;29:441–58.
  • Hu T, Stafford TF, Kettinger W, Zhang X, Dai H. Formation and effects of social media usage habit. J Comput Inf Syst. 2018;58(4):334–43. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1261378.
  • Limayem M, Hirt SG, Cheung CMK. How habit limits the predictive power of intention: the case of information systems continuance. MIS Q. 2007;31(4):705–37. doi:10.2307/25148817.
  • Diamantopoulos A, Winklhofer HM. Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. J Marketing Res. 2001;38(2):269–77. doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845.
  • Turel O, Serenko A, Giles P. Integrating technology addiction and use: an empirical investigation of online auction users. MIS Q. 2011;35(4):1043–61. doi:10.2307/41409972.
  • Rainie L Americans’ complicated feelings about social media in an era of privacy concerns. March 27, 2018. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/03/27/americans-complicated-feelings-about-social-media-in-an-era-of-privacy-concerns/
  • Wang X, Li Y. How trust and need satisfaction motivate producing user-generated content. J Comput Inf Syst. 2016;57(1):49–57. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1181493.
  • Kalakota R, Whinston AB. Frontiers of electronic commerce. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1996.
  • Li Y. Empirical studies on online information privacy concerns: literature review and an integrative framework. Communications of AIS. 2011;28:453–96.
  • Ranjan KR, Read S. Value co-creation: concept and measurement. J Acad Marketing Sci. 2016;44(3):290–315. doi:10.1007/s11747-014-0397-2.
  • Nambisan S, Nambisan P. How to profit from a better virtual customer environment. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2008;49:53–61.
  • Kohler T, Fueller J, Matzler K, Stieger D. Co-creation in virtual worlds: the design of the user experience. MIS Q. 2011;35(3):773–88. doi:10.2307/23042808.
  • Zhang H, Lu Y, Wang B, Wu S. The impacts of technological environments and co-creation experiences on customer participation. Inf Manag. 2015;52(4):468–82. doi:10.1016/j.im.2015.01.008.
  • Turel O, Serenko A. The benefits and dangers of enjoyment with social networking websites. Eur J Inf Syst. 2012;21(5):512–28. doi:10.1057/ejis.2012.1.
  • Fang Y, Qureshi I, Sun H, McCole P, Ramsey E, Lim KH. Trust, satisfaction, and online repurchase intention: the moderating role of perceived effectiveness of e-commerce institutional mechanisms. MIS Q. 2014;38(2):407–27. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
  • Burton-Jones A, Gallivan MJ. Toward a deep understanding of system usage in organizations: A multilevel perspective. MIS Q. 2007;31(4):657–79. doi:10.2307/25148815.
  • Barki H, Titah R, Boffo C. Information system use-related activity: an expanded behavioral conceptualization of individual-level information system use. Inf Syst Res. 2007;18(2):173–92. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0122.
  • Burton-Jones A, Straub D. Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test. Inf Syst Res. 2006;17(3):228–46. doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0096.
  • Hu T, Zhang P. Social media usage as a formative construct: conceptualization, validation and implications. J Inf Technol Manag. 2016;27:151–68.
  • Keh HT, Teo CW. Retail customers as partial employees in service provision: a conceptual framework. Int J Retail Distribution Manag. 2001;29(8):370–78. doi:10.1108/09590550110396944.
  • Revilla-Camacho MA, Vega-Vázquez M, Cossío-Silva FJ. Customer participation and citizenship behavior effects on turnover intention. J Bus Res. 2015;68(7):1607–11. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.02.004.
  • Bove L, Pervan SJ, Beatty SE, Shiu E. Service worker role in encouraging customer organizational citizenship behaviors. J Bus Res. 2009;62(7):698–705. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.07.003.
  • Chiu C, Fang Y, Wang E. Building community citizenship behaviors: the relative role of attachment and satisfaction. J AIS. 2015;16:947–79.
  • Jarvis CB, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM. A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. J Consumer Res. 2003;30(2):199–218. doi:10.1086/jcr.2003.30.issue-2.
  • Petter S, Straub D, Rai A. Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q. 2007;31(4):623–56. doi:10.2307/25148814.
  • Blank G, Bolsover G, Dubois E. A new privacy paradox: young people and privacy on social network sites. In: Proceeding of the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association. San Francisco (CA); 2014;1–33, Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
  • Chang HH, Chen SW. Consumer perception of interface quality, security, and loyalty in electronic commerce. Inf Manag. 2009;46(7):411–17. doi:10.1016/j.im.2009.08.002.
  • Martin K. The penalty for privacy violations: how privacy violations impact trust online. J Bus Res. 2018;82:103–16. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.034.
  • Belanger F, Hiller JS, Smith WJ. Trustworthiness in electronic commerce: the role of privacy, security, and site attributes. J Strategic Inf Syst. 2002;11(3):245–70. doi:10.1016/S0963-8687(02)00018-5.
  • Merz MA, Zarantonello L, Grappi S. How valuable are your customers I the brand value-co-creation process? the development of a customer co-creation value (CCCV) scale. J Bus Res. 2018;82:79–89. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.08.018.
  • Schoenbachler DD, Gordon GL. Trust and customer willingness to provide information in database-driven relationship marketing. J Interactive Marketing. 2002;16(3):2–16. doi:10.1002/dir.10033.
  • Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad Manag Rev. 1995;20(3):709–34. doi:10.5465/amr.1995.9508080335.
  • SimilarWeb. Facebook.com analytics. May 21, 2017. https://www.similarweb.com/website/facebook.com.
  • Rai A, Patnayakuni R, Seth N. Firm performance impacts of digitally enabled supply chain integration capabilities. MIS Q. 2006;30(2):225–46. doi:10.2307/25148729.
  • Tourangeau R, Rips LJ, Rasinski K. Psychology of survey response. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press; 2000.
  • Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86:114–21.
  • Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A. Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manage Sci. 2006;52(12):1865–83. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597.
  • Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA, editor. Modern Business Research Methods. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 1998;295–336.
  • Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric Theory. New York (NY): McGraw Hill; 1994.
  • Fornell C, Larcker VF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312.
  • Cenfetelli RT, Bassellier G. Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Q. 2009;33(4):689–707. doi:10.2307/20650323.
  • Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. Br J Manag. 2006;17(4):263–82. doi:10.1111/bjom.2006.17.issue-4.
  • Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR. A partial least square latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf Syst Res. 2003;14(2):189–217. doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erbaum Associates; 1988.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.