The Effect of Leadership and Teamwork on ISD Project Success

References

• Enkel E, Gassmann O, Chesbrough H. Open r&d and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Manage. 2009;39(4):311–16. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollmann V, Lee H, Zo H, Ciganek AP. Examining success factors of open source software repositories: the case of osor. Eu Portal Int J Bus Inform Syst. 2013;14:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam r&d projects: a longitudinal study. Organ Sci. 2004;15(1):38–55. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus ML, Christiaanse E. Adoption and impact of collaboration electronic marketplaces. Inf Syst E-Bus Manag. 2003;1(2):139–55. doi:10.1007/s10257-003-0001-7.
   Google Scholar
• Krahn J, Hartment F. Effective project leadership: a combination of project manager skills and competencies in context. Effective project leadership: A combination of project manager skills and competencies in context. Biennial meeting of the Project Management Institute Research Conference; 2006; Montreal (Canada).
   Google Scholar
• Oz E, Sosik JJ. Why information systems projects are abandoned: a leadership and communication theory and exploratory study. J Comput Inform Syst. 2000;41:66–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L-R, Huang C-F, Wu K-S. The association among project manager’s leadership style, teamwork and project success. Int J Proj Manag. 2011;29(3):258–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch JE. Shared leadership and innovation: the role of vertical leadership and employee integrity. J Bus Psychol. 2013;28(2):159–74. doi:10.1007/s10869-012-9273-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller R, Turner JR. Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type. Int J Proj Manag. 2007;25(1):21–32. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.04.003.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson MH, Sun PYT. Reviewing leadership styles: overlaps and the need for a new ‘full‐range’theory. Int J Sci Res. 2017;19(1):76–96. doi:10.1111/ijmr.2017.19.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Hoch JE, Bommer WH, Dulebohn JH, Wu D. Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above and beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. J Manage. 2018;44:501–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piening EP. Dynamic capabilities in public organizations: a literature review and research agenda. Public Manag Rev. 2013;15(2):209–45. doi:10.1080/14719037.2012.708358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart M. Leadership in public organizations. New York, NY: Routledge; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne GA. Public and private management: what’s the difference? J Manage Stud. 2002;39(1):97–122. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooijberg R, Choi J. The impact of organizational characteristics on leadership effectiveness models: an examination of leadership in a private and a public sector organization. Admin Soc. 2001;33(4):403–31. doi:10.1177/0095399701334002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wart MV. Public‐sector leadership theory: an assessment. Public Admin Rev. 2003;63(2):214–28. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk P, Terje Karlsen J. A comparison of leadership roles in internal it projects versus outsourcing projects. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2005;105(9):1137–49. doi:10.1108/02635570510633220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohang A, Hatch M. Leadership effectiveness in it-centered organizations: gender and levels of management. J Comput Inform Syst. 2017;57:385–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohang A, Paliszkiewicz J, Goluchowski J. The impact of leadership on trust, knowledge management, and organizational performance: a research model. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2017;117(3):521–37. doi:10.1108/IMDS-02-2016-0072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saafein O, Shaykhian GA. Factors affecting virtual team performance in telecommunication support environment. Telemat Inform. 2014;31(3):459–62. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2013.10.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart M, Roman A, Wang X, Liu C. Integrating ict adoption issues into (e-) leadership theory. Telemat Inform. 2017;34(5):527–37. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2016.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graen GB, Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: development of leader-member exchange (lmx) theory of leadership over 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quart. 1995;6(2):219–47. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(95)90036-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass B. Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York, NY: The Free Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Bass BM, Avolio BJ. Transformational leadership development: manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Hartog DN, Muijen JJ, Koopman PL. Transactional versus transformational leadership: an analysis of the mlq. J Occup Organ Psych. 1997;70(1):19–34. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1997.tb00628.x.
   Google Scholar
• Afsar B F. Badir Y, Bin Saeed B. Transformational leadership and innovative work behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2014;114(8):1270–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alos-Simo L, Verdu-Jover AJ, Gomez-Gras J-M. How transformational leadership facilitates e-business adoption. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2017;117(2):382–97. doi:10.1108/IMDS-01-2016-0038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass BM. Does the transactional–transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? Am Psychol. 1997;52(2):130–39. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.2.130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thite M. Leadership styles in information technology projects. Int J Proj Manag. 2000;18(4):235–41. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00021-6.
   Google Scholar
• Walumbwa FO, Avolio BJ, Gardner WL, Wernsing TS, Peterson SJ. Authentic leadership: development and validation of a theory-based measure. J Manage. 2008;34:89–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng J-W, Chang S-C, Kuo J-H, Cheung Y-H. Ethical leadership, work engagement, and voice behavior. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2014;114(5):817–31. doi:10.1108/IMDS-10-2013-0429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer DM, Aquino K, Greenbaum RL, Kuenzi M. Who displays ethical leadership, and why does it matter? An examination of antecedents and consequences of ethical leadership. Acad Manage J. 2012;55(1):151–71. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.0276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford MD, Strange JM Vision and mental models: the case of charismatic and ideological leadership. In. Vision and mental models: the case of charismatic and ideological leadership. Transformational and charismatic leadership: the road ahead 10th anniversary edition. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Fry LW. Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. Leadership Quart. 2003;14(6):693–727. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dierendonck D. Servant leadership: a review and synthesis. J Manage. 2011;37:1228–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee FL, Chan JM. Digital media use and participation leadership in social protests: the case of Tiananmen commemoration in Hong Kong. Telemat Inform. 2015;32(4):879–89. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2015.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricard LM, Klijn EH, Lewis JM, Ysa T. Assessing public leadership styles for innovation: a comparison of Copenhagen, Rotterdam and Barcelona. Public Manag Rev. 2017;19(2):134–56. doi:10.1080/14719037.2016.1148192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers LG, Knies E. Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector. Public Admin Rev. 2013;73(6):859–68. doi:10.1111/puar.12138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen A, Byrne Z, Kiersch C. How interpersonal leadership relates to employee engagement. J Manage Psychol. 2014;29(8):953–72. doi:10.1108/JMP-11-2012-0343.
   Google Scholar
• Renko M, El Tarabishy A, Carsrud AL, Brännback M. Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. J Small Bus Manage. 2015;53(1):54–74. doi:10.1111/jsbm.12086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell C, Gash A. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Publ Adm Res Theor. 2008;18(4):543–71. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidle K, Normann RH. Who can govern? Comparing network governance leadership in two norwegian city regions. Eur Plan Stud. 2013;21(2):115–30. doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire M, Agranoff R. The limitations of public management networks. Public Admin. 2011;89(2):265–84. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Gemuenden HG. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organ Sci. 2001;12(4):435–49. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.4.435.10635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrman SA, Cohen SG, Morhman AM Jr. Designing team-based organizations: new forms for knowledge work. Jossey-Bass; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA. On teams, teamwork, and team performance: discoveries and developments. Hum Factors. 2008;50(3):540–47. doi:10.1518/001872008X288457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst G, Mann L. A model of R&D leadership and team communication: the relationship with project performance. R&D Manage. 2004;34(2):147–60. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2004.00330.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin L, Hsu J, Stern M. Evaluating the usage of cloud-based collaboration services through teamwork. J Educ Bus. 2016;91(4):227–35. doi:10.1080/08832323.2016.1170656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuthyola KF, Liu JY-C, Klein G Influence of task interdependence on teamwork quality and project performance. Influence of task interdependence on teamwork quality and project performance. International Conference on Business Information Systems: Poznan, Poland: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Akgün AE, Lynn GS, Keskin H, Dogan D. Team learning in it implementation projects: antecedents and consequences. Int J Inform Manage. 2014;34(1):37–47. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Manage Sci. 2000;46(12):1554–68. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubé C, Rousseau V. Team goal commitment and team effectiveness: the role of task interdependence and supportive behaviors. Group Dyn-Theor Res. 2005;9(3):189–204. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.3.189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hackman J. The design of work teams. In: Lorsch IW, editor. Handbook of organizational behavior. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice-Hall; 1987, 315–342.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto MB, Pinto JK. Project team communication and cross‐functional cooperation in new program development. J Prod Innovat Manag. 1990;7(3):200–12. doi:10.1016/0737-6782(90)90004-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeppesen LB, Frederiksen L. Why do users contribute to firm-hosted user communities? The case of computer-controlled music instruments. Organ Sci. 2006;17(1):45–63. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu J, Maynard MT, Rapp T, Gilson L. Team effectiveness 1997–2007: a review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. J Manage. 2008;34:410–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingsøyr T, Lindsjørn Y. Team performance in agile development teams: Findings from 18 focus groups. International Conference on Agile Software Development: Vienna, Austria: Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Aronson ZH, Reilly RR, Lynn GS. The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: the moderating role of uncertainty. J Eng Technol Manage. 2006;23(3):221–47. doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dionne SD, Yammarino FJ, Atwater LE, Spangler WD. Transformational leadership and team performance. J Organ Change Manag. 2004;17(2):177–93. doi:10.1108/09534810410530601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basten D, Joosten D, Mellis W. Managers’ perceptions of information system project success. J Comput Inform Syst. 2011;52:12–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standing C, Guilfoyle A, Lin C, Pe L. The attribution of success and failure in it projects. Ind Manage Data Syst. 2006;106(8):1148–65. doi:10.1108/02635570610710809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denison DR, Hart SL, Kahn JA. From chimneys to cross-functional teams: developing and validating a diagnostic model. Acad Manage J. 1996;39:1005–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundstrom E, De Meuse KP, Futrell D. Work teams: applications and effectiveness. Am Psychol. 1990;45(2):120–33. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.45.2.120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baccarini D. The logical framework method for defining project success. Proj Manag J. 1999;30(4):25–32. doi:10.1177/875697289903000405.
   Google Scholar
• DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inform Syst Res. 1992;3(1):60–95. doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dvir D, Lechler T. Plans are nothing, changing plans is everything: the impact of changes on project success. Res Policy. 2004;33(1):1–15. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2003.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller R, Turner R. The influence of project managers on project success criteria and project success by type of project. Eur Manag J. 2007;25(4):298–309. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2007.06.003.
   Google Scholar
• Hayfield F. Basic factors for a successful project.6th Internet Congress; 1979; Garmisch-Partenkirchen FRG.
   Google Scholar
• Baker BN, Murphy DC, Fisher D. Factors affecting project success. In: Cleland DI, King WR, editors. Factors affecting project success. Project management handbook. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Belout A, Gauvreau C. Factors influencing project success: the impact of human resource management. Int J Proj Manag. 2004;22(1):1–11. doi:10.1016/S0263-7863(03)00003-6.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto JK, Prescott JE. Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. J Manage. 1988;14:5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besner C, Hobbs B. The perceived value and potential contribution of project management practices to project success. Proj Manag J. 2006;37(3):37–48. doi:10.1177/875697280603700305.
   Google Scholar
• Hanisch B, Wald A. A project management research framework integrating multiple theoretical perspectives and influencing factors. Proj Manag J. 2011;42(3):4–22. doi:10.1002/pmj.20241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korzaan M, Erskine M. The influence of goal orientation, goal commitment, and implementation mindset on project success. The influence of goal orientation, goal commitment, and implementation mindset on project success. Americas Conference On Information Systems; 2018; New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Maqbool R, Sudong Y, Manzoor N, Rashid Y. The impact of emotional intelligence, project managers’ competencies, and transformational leadership on project success: an empirical perspective. Proj Manag J. 2017;48(3):58–75. doi:10.1177/875697281704800304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed R Impact of project manager’s intellectual competencies on project success. In. Impact of project manager’s intellectual competencies on project success; 2017. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3044362.
   Google Scholar
• Papke-Shields KE, Boyer-Wright KM. Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. Int J Proj Manag. 2017;35(2):169–79. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glisson C, James LR. The cross‐level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(6):767–94. doi:10.1002/job.162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson HA, Vandenberg RJ. Integrating managerial perceptions and transformational leadership into a work‐unit level model of employee involvement. J Organ Behav. 2005;26(5):561–89. doi:10.1002/job.329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernald LW, Solomon GT, Tarabishy A. A new paradigm: entrepreneurial leadership. South Bus Rev. 2005;30:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Swiercz PM, Lydon SR. Entrepreneurial leadership in high-tech firms: a field study. Leadership Org Dev J. 2002;23(7):380–89. doi:10.1108/01437730210445810.
   Google Scholar
• Yammarino FJ, Salas E, Serban A, Shirreffs K, Shuffler ML. Collectivistic leadership approaches: putting the “we” in leadership science and practice. Ind Organ Psychol-Us. 2012;5(4):382–402. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01467.x.
   Google Scholar
• Mehra A, Smith BR, Dixon AL, Robertson B. Distributed leadership in teams: the network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quart. 2006;17(3):232–45. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu JS-C, Shih S-P, Chiang JC, Liu JY-C. The impact of transactive memory systems on is development teams’ coordination, communication, and performance. Int J Proj Manag. 2012;30(3):329–40. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Ernst H, Proserpio L. How teamwork matters more as team member dispersion increases. J Prod Innovat Manag. 2007;24(2):156–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00240.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod Methods Bus Res. 1998;295:295–336
   Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(3):382–88. doi:10.1177/002224378101800313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking R, Pendleton O. The regression dilemma. Commun Stat Theory. 1983;12(5):497–527. doi:10.1080/03610928308828477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarstedt M, Henseler J, Ringle CM. Multigroup analysis in partial least squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. In Measurement and research methods in international marketing  (pp. 195-218). Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito Vinzi V, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H. Handbook of partial least squares: concepts, methods and applications. Heidelberg (Dordrecht, London, New York): Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Aga DA, Noorderhaven N, Vallejo B. Transformational leadership and project success: the mediating role of team-building. Int J Proj Manag. 2016;34(5):806–18. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.02.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dóci E, Hofmans J. Task complexity and transformational leadership: the mediating role of leaders’ state core self-evaluations. Leadership Quart. 2015;26(3):436–47. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller RT. Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: a longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. J Appl Psychol. 2006;91(1):202. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich TL, Vessey WB, Schuelke MJ, Ruark GA, Mumford MD. A framework for understanding collective leadership: the selective utilization of leader and team expertise within networks. Leadership Quart. 2009;20(6):933–58. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford MD, Friedrich TL, Vessey WB, Ruark GA. Collective leadership: thinking about issues vis-à-vis others. Ind Organ Psychol-Us. 2012;5(4):408–11. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2012.01469.x.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez S, Cho YJ, Perry JL. Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. Leadership Quart. 2010;21(2):308–23. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goleman D. Leadership that gets results (Harvard business review classics). Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar