Project Control, Coordination, and Performance in Complex Information Systems Outsourcing

References

• Solli-Sæther H, Gottschalk P. Stages-of-growth in outsourcing, offshoring and backsourcing: back to the future? J Comput Inf Syst. 2015;55(2):88–94. doi:10.1080/08874417.2015.11645760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earl M. The risks of outsourcing IT. MIT Sloan Manage Rev. 1996;37(3):26–32. Spring
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski M A bit of history: outsourced development and offshore development 2013 [cited 2018 December 10]. https://cayugasoft.com/bit-history-outsourced-development-offshore-development/
   Google Scholar
• Fish KE, Seydel J. Where it outsourcing is and where it is going: a study across functions and department sizes. J Comput Inf Syst. 2006;46:96–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte. Outsourcing amid complexity 2013. https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Governance-Risk-Compliance/dttl-grc-outsourcingamidcomplexity.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Overby S. Outsourcing Contracts and Negotiations Getting More Complex. CIO. 2012 April 28.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava S, Teo T. Contract performance in offshore systems development: role of control mechanisms. J Manage Inf Syst. 2012;29(1):115–58. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222290104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai A, Maruping L, Venkatesh V. Offshore information systems project success: the role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Q. 2009;33(3):617–41. doi:10.2307/20650313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditmore J Why IT outsourcing often fails. Information Week. 2012:1339.
   Google Scholar
• McDougall D. The distributed criterion design. J Behav Educ. 2006;15(4):236–46. doi:10.1007/s10864-006-9030-x.
   Google Scholar
• Toolbox.com. ITtoolbox outsourcing survey 2004 [cited 2018 December 10]. http://hosteddocs.ittoolbox.com/dell1_survey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Maruping LM, Venkatesh V, Agarwal R. A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Inf Syst Res. 2009;20(3):377–99. doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayanaswamy B, Gonde C, Tredger M, Hussain M, Vergani D, Davenport M. Serial circulating markers of inflammation in biliary atresia—evolution of the post‐operative inflammatory process. Hepatology. 2007;46(1):180–87. doi:10.1002/hep.21701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan I, Schroter A, Damian D. Does socio-technical congruence have an effect on software build success? A study of coordination in a software project. IEEE Trans Software Eng. 2011;37(3):307–24. doi:10.1109/TSE.2011.29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bapna R, Barua A, Mani D, Mehra A. Research commentary-cooperation, coordination, and governance in multisourcing: an agenda for analytical and empirical research. Inf Syst Res. 2010;21(4):785–95. doi:10.1287/isre.1100.0328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha H, Pingry D, Thatcher M. Managing the knowledge supply chain: an organizational learning model of information technology offshore outsourcing. MIS Q. 2008;32(2):281–306. doi:10.2307/25148841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaar P, van Fenema P, Tiwari V. Cocreating understanding and value in distributed work: how members of onsite and offshore vendor teams give, make, demand, and break sense. MIS Q. 2008;32(2):227–55. doi:10.2307/25148839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rico R, Sabcgez-Mnznares M, Gil F, Gibson C. Team implicit coordination processes: a team knowledge-based approach. Acad Manage Rev. 2008;33:163–84. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.27751276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani D, Barua A, Whinston AB. Outsourcing contracts and equity prices. Inf Syst Res. 2013;24(4):1028–49. doi:10.1287/isre.2013.0478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mockus A, Fielding R, Herbsleb J. Two case studies of open source software development: apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans Software Eng Method. 2002;11(3):309–46. doi:10.1145/567793.567795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabherwal R, Becerra‐Fernandez I. An empirical study of the effect of knowledge management processes at individual, group, and organizational levels. Decision Sciences. 2003;34(2):225–60. doi:10.1111/deci.2003.34.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Espinosa JA, Gosain S, Darcy DP. Coordination and performance in global software service delivery: the vendor‘s perspective. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2011;58(4):772–85. doi:10.1109/TEM.2010.2096821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikanth K, Puranam P. The firm as a coordination system: evidence from software services offshoring. Organ Sci. 2014;25(4):1253–71. doi:10.1287/orsc.2013.0886.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaworski B. Toward a theory of marketing control: environmental context, control types, and consequences. J Mark. 1988;52(3):23–39. doi:10.1177/002224298805200303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ. The management of complex tasks in organizations: controlling the systems development process. Organ Sci. 1996;7(1):1–21. doi:10.1287/orsc.7.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson JC, Lee S. Managing I/S design teams: a control theories perspective. Manage Sci. 1992;38(6):757–77. doi:10.1287/mnsc.38.6.757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ, Sambamurthy V, Ko D-G, Purvis RL. controlling information systems development projects: the view from the client. Manage Sci. 2002;48(4):484–98. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.4.484.204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidumolu SR, Subramani MR. The matrix of control: combining process and structure approaches to managing software development. J Manage Inf Syst. 2003;20(3):159–96. doi:10.1080/07421222.2003.11045774.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM. Control: organizational and economic approaches. Manage Sci. 1985;31(2):134–49. doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.2.134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouchi W. A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Manage Sci. 1979;25(9):833–48. doi:10.1287/mnsc.25.9.833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopal A, Gosain S. Research note-The role of organizational controls and boundary spanning in software development outsourcing: implications for project performance. Inf Syst Res. 2010;21(4):960–82. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwana A, Keil M. Control in internal and outsourced software projects. J Manage Inf Syst. 2009;26(3):9–44. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222260301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnan MS, Kellner MI. Measuring process consistency: implications for reducing software defects. IEEE Trans Software Eng. 1999;25(6):800–15. doi:10.1109/32.824401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz D, Kahn R. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ, Ko D-G, Haney M. Investigating the antecedents of team-based clan control: adding social capital as a predictor. Organ Sci. 2010;21(2):469–89. doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittell J. Organizing work to support relational co-ordination. Int J Hum Resour Manag. 2000;11(3):517–39. doi:10.1080/095851900339747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White S, Siu‐Yun Lui S. Distinguishing costs of cooperation and control in alliances. Strategic Manage J. 2005;26(10):913–32. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch LJ. Portfolios of control modes and IS project management. Inf Syst Res. 1997;8(3):215–39. doi:10.1287/isre.8.3.215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okhuysen GA, Bechky BA. 10 coordination in organizations: an integrative perspective. Acad Manag Ann. 2009;3(1):463–502. doi:10.5465/19416520903047533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith JR. Organization Design. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Gulati R, Singh H. The architecture of cooperation: managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Adm Sci Q. 1998;43(4):781–814. doi:10.2307/2393616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt KM, Furr N, Bingham C. Crossroads - Microfoundations of performance: balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organ Sci. 2010;21(6):1263–73. doi:10.1287/orsc.1100.0564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowston K. A coordination theory approach to organizational process design. Organ Sci. 1997;8(2):157–75. doi:10.1287/orsc.8.2.157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cray D. Control and coordination in multinational corporations. J Int Bus Stud. 1984;15(2):85–98. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker H. Control of inter-organizational relationships: evidence on appropriation concerns and coordination requirements. Acc,Organ Soc. 2004;29(1):27–49. doi:10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00056-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimoski RJ, Mohammed S. Team mental model: construct or Metaphor. J Manage. 1994;20(2):403–37. doi:10.1177/014920639402000206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu J, Heffner TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85:273–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helgeson J, Voss K, Terpening W. Determinants of mail‐survey response: survey design factors and respondent factors. Psychol Marketing. 2002;19(3):303–28. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden H. Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organ Sci. 2004;15(1):38–55. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberatore M, Luo W. The analytics movement: implications for operations research. Interfaces. 2010;40(4):313–24. doi:10.1287/inte.1100.0502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susarla A, Subramanyam R, Karhade P. Contractual provisions to mitigate holdup: evidence from information technology outsourcing. Inf Syst Res. 2010;21(1):37–55. doi:10.1287/isre.1080.0204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GC, Benbasat I. Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res. 1991;2(3):192–222. doi:10.1287/isre.2.3.192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP. Performance and satisfaction in an industrial sales force: an examination of their antecedents and simultaneity. J Mark. 1980;44(2):65–77. doi:10.1177/002224298004400208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Neter J, Wasserman W, Kutner M. Applied linear statistical models: Regression, analysis of variance, and experimental designs. Homewood (IL): Irwin; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Preacher KJ. Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2014;67:451–70. doi:10.1111/bmsp.12028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Hayes AF. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. J Educ Behav Stat. 2008;40:879–91.
   Google Scholar
• Shrout P, Bolger N. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods. 2002 December;74(4):422–45. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory RW, Beck R, Keil M. Control balancing in information systems development offshoring projects. MIS Q. 2013;37(4):1211–32. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj S, Sproull L. Coordinating Expertise in Software Development Teams. Manage Sci. 2000;46(12):1554–68. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar