The Role of Attitude toward Challenge in Serious Game Design

References

• Cheng X, Wang Y, Sankar CS. Using serious games in data communications and networking management course. J Comput Inf Syst. 2018;58(1):39–48. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1183465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zee DJ, Holkenborg B, Robinson S. Conceptual modeling for simulation-based serious gaming. Decis Support Syst. 2012;54(1):33–45. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2012.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• https://hbsp.harvard.edu/product/4700-HTM-ENG
   Google Scholar
• http://www.sandboxmodel.com/content/project-management-essentials-simulation
   Google Scholar
• https://simulationpl.com/training-simulations/simproject/
   Google Scholar
• Chau M, Wong A, Wang M, Lai S, Chan KW,Li TM, ... & Sung, WK. Using 3D virtual environments to facilitate students in constructivist learning. Decision Support Systems. 2013;56:115–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lui RW, Lee PT,Ng VT. Design and evaluation of PMS: a computerized simulation game for software project management. Comput Games J. 2015;4(1–2):101–121.
   Google Scholar
• Lui R,Au CH. Is educational game: adoption in teaching search engine optimization (SEO). JComput Inform Syst. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle EA, Hainey T, Connolly TM, Gray G, Earp J, Ott M, Lim T, Ninaus M, Riberio C, Pereira J. An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Comput Educ. 2016;94:178–92. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderón A, Ruiz M. A systematic literature review on serious games evaluation: an application to software project management. Comput Educ. 2015;87:396–422. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepehr S, Head M. Understanding the role of competition in video gameplay satisfaction. Inf & Manage. 2018;55(4):407–21. doi:10.1016/j.im.2017.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santhanam R, Liu D, Shen WCM. Research note—gamification of technology-mediated training: not all competitions are the same. Inf Syst Res. 2016;27(2):453–65. doi:10.1287/isre.2016.0630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter RJ, Holderness DK Jr, Wood DA. Applying basic gamification techniques to IT compliance training: evidence from the lab and field. J Inf Syst. 2015;30:119–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Jiang Q, Tan CH, Wei KK. Enhancing user-game engagement through software gaming elements. J Manage Inf Syst. 2014;30(4):115–50. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222300405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu D, Santhanam R, Webster J. Toward meaningful engagement: a framework for design and research of gamified information systems. Mis Q. 2017;41(4):1011–34. doi:10.25300/MISQ.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garris R, Ahlers R, Driskell JE. Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simul Gaming. 2002;33(4):441–67. doi:10.1177/1046878102238607.
   Google Scholar
• Kiili K. Evaluations of an experiential gaming model. Hum Technol. 2006;2(2):187–201. doi:10.17011/ht/urn.201506212393.
   Google Scholar
• Malone TW, Lepper MR. Making learning fun: a taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In: Snow RE, Federico PA, Montague WE, editors. Aptitude, learning, and instruction. New York, NY: L. Erlbaum Associates; 1987. p. 223–53.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetser P, Wyeth P. GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games. Comput Entertainment. 2005;3:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Hamari J, Shernoff DJ, Rowe E, Coller B, Asbell-Clarke J, Edwards T. Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Comput Human Behav. 2016;54:170–79. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedwell WL, Pavlas D, Heyne K, Lazzara EH, Salas E. Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning: an empirical study. Simul Gaming. 2012;43(6):729–60. doi:10.1177/1046878112439444.
   Google Scholar
• Magerko B, Heeter C, Medler B. Different strokes for different folks: tapping into the hidden potential of serious games. In: Van Eck R, editor. Gaming and cognition: theories and perspectives from the learning sciences. Hershey (PA, US): IGI Global; 2010. p. 255–80.
   Google Scholar
• Deterding S, Dixon D, Khaled R, Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining gamification. In: Lugmayr A, editor. Proceedings of the 15th international academic mindtrek conference: envisioning future media environments. Tampere (Finland): ACM; 2011 Sep. p. 9–15.
   Google Scholar
• Armarego J. Advanced software design: a case in problem-based learning. In: Werner B, editor. Proceedings of the 15th conference on software engineering education and training. Kentucky (US): IEEE; 2002. p. 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Budgen D. Is teaching software design a ‘wicked’ problem too? In: Ibrahim RL, editor. Conference on software engineering education. Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 1995. p. 239–54.
   Google Scholar
• Oh E, Van der Hoek A. Adapting game technology to support individual and organizational learning. In: Proceedings of SEKE; 2001; Buenos Aires (Argentina). Knowledge Systems Institute. p. 347–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cronan TP, Léger PM, Robert J, Babin G, Charland P. Comparing objective measures and perceptions of cognitive learning in an ERP simulation game: a research note. Simul Gaming. 2012;43(4):461–80. doi:10.1177/1046878111433783.
   Google Scholar
• Faria AJ. Business simulation games: current usage levels—an update. Simul Gaming. 1998;29(3):295–308. doi:10.1177/1046878198293002.
   Google Scholar
• Léger PM. Using a simulation game approach to teach enterprise resource planning concepts. J Inf Syst Educ. 2006;17:441–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bednar AK, Cunningham D, Duffy TM, Perry JD. Theory into practice: how do we link. In: Duffy TM, Jonassen DH, editors. Constructivism and the technology of instruction: A conversation. New York (US): Routledge; 1992. p. 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Gredler ME. Educational games and simulations: A technology in search of a (research) paradigm. In: Spector JM, Merrill MD, Elen J, Bishop MJ, editors. Handbook of research of technology and communication. New York (US): Springer; 1996. p. 521–40.
   Google Scholar
• Adobor H, Daneshfar A. Management simulations: determining their effectiveness. J Manage Dev. 2006;25(2):151–68. doi:10.1108/02621710610645135.
   Google Scholar
• Pasin F, Giroux H. The impact of a simulation game on operations management education. Comput Educ. 2011;57(1):1240–54. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldrich C. Learning by doing: A comprehensive guide to simulations, computer games, and pedagogy in e-learning and other educational experiences. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Cook RW, Swift CO. The pedagogical efficacy of a sales management simulation. Marketing Educ Rev. 2006;16(3):37–46. doi:10.1080/10528008.2006.11488971.
   Google Scholar
• Moneta GB, Csikszentmihalyi M. The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. J Pers. 1996;64(2):275–310. doi:10.1111/jopy.1996.64.issue-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M, Csikszentmihalyi I. Optimal experience: psychological studies of flow in consciousness. Cambridge, United Kingdoms: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M. The concept of flow. In: Nakamura J, Csikszentmihalyi M, editors. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer; 2014. p. 239–63.
   Google Scholar
• McClelland DC, Atkinson JW, Clark RA, Lowell EL. The achievement motive. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1953.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson JW. Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychol Rev. 1957;64(6):359–72. doi:10.1037/h0043445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckhausen H. The anatomy of achievement motivation. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Maehr ML, Nicholls JG. Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In: Warren N, editor. Studies in cross-cultural psychology. New York, NY: Academic Press; 1980. p. 221–67.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholls JG. Achievement motivation: conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychol Rev. 1984;9(3):328–46. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duda JL, Nicholls JG. Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport. J Educ Psychol. 1992;84(3):290–99. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harackiewicz JM, Barron KE, Tauer JM, Elliot AJ. Predicting success in college: a longitudinal study of achievement goals and ability measures as predictors of interest and performance from freshman year through graduation. J Educ Psychol. 2002;94(3):562. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ames C. Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. J Educ Psychol. 1992;84(3):261–71. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Toward a psychology of optimal experience. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, editors. Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. p. 209–26.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. Beyond boredom and anxiety: experiencing flow in work and play. San Francisco, United States: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Hektner J, Asakawa K. Learning to like challenges. In: Csikszentmihalyi M, Schneider B, editors. Becoming adult: how teenagers prepare for the world of work. New York (US): Basic Books; 2000. p. 95–112.
   Google Scholar
• Marcolin BL, Compeau DR, Munro MC, Huff SL. Assessing user competence: conceptualization and measurement. Inf Syst Res. 2000;11(1):37–60. doi:10.1287/isre.11.1.37.11782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist. 1989;44(9):1175–84. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham S, Weiner B. Theories and principles of motivation. In: Alexander PA, Winne PH, editors. Handbook of educational psychology. New York (US): Psychology Press; 1996. p. 63–84.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist. 1982;37(2):122–47. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RD, Marakas GM. The role of behavioral modeling in computer skills acquisition: toward refinement of the model. Inf Syst Res. 2000;11(4):402–17. doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.402.11869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lui RW, Leung HK, Ng VT,Lee PT. PMS–A simulation game for interactive learning of software project management. In Technology in Education. Transforming Educational Practices with Technology (pp. 104-115). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York (US): Macmillan; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Law KM, Lee VC, Yu YT. Learning motivation in e-learning facilitated computer programming courses. Comput Educ. 2010;55(1):218–28. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod Methods Bus Res. 1998;295:295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Ringle CM, Wende S, Will A. SmartPLS 2.0 M3; 2005 [accessed 2019 Aug 24]. http://www.smartpls.de/.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler J, Chin WW. A comparison of approaches for the analysis of interaction effects between latent variables using partial least squares path modeling. Struct Equation Model. 2010;17(1):82–109. doi:10.1080/10705510903439003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little TD, Bovaird JA, Widaman KF. On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Struct Equation Model. 2006;13(4):497–519. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1304_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW, Marcolin BL, Newsted PR. A partial least squares latent variab Alinier le modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf Syst Res. 2003;14(2):189–217. doi:10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong KKK. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bull. 2013;24:1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcoulides GA, Saunders C. Editor’s comments: PLS: a silver bullet? Mis Q. 2006;30(2):iii–ix. doi:10.2307/25148727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(3):382–88. doi:10.1177/002224378101800313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werts CE, Linn RL, Jöreskog KG. Intraclass reliability estimates: testing structural assumptions. Educ Psychol Meas. 1974;34(1):25–33. doi:10.1177/001316447403400104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Marketing Sci. 1988;16(1):74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327.
   Google Scholar
• Chin WW. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In: Vinzi VE, Chin WW, Henseler J, Wang H, editors. Handbook of partial least squares. Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany: Springer; 2010. p. 655–90.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (Michigan, US): Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lee PT, Lui RW,Chau M. How does competition help future learning in serious games? an exploratory study in learning search engine optimization. J Informa Syst Edu. 2019;30(3):3.
   Google Scholar
• Landers RN. Developing a theory of gamified learning: linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simul Gaming. 2014;45(6):752–68. doi:10.1177/1046878114563660.
   Google Scholar
• Abuhamdeh S, Csikszentmihalyi M. The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated, goal-directed activities. Personality and Social Psychol Bull. 2012;38(3):317–30. doi:10.1177/0146167211427147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar