References
- Terras M. Melisaterras [blog]; n.d. [accessed 2020 Feb] http://melissaterras.blogspot.co.uk/.
- Rosenzweig S, Grinstein A, Ofek E. Social Network utilization and the impact of academic research in marketing. Int J Res Marketing. 2016;33(4):818–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2016.02.002.
- Shipilov A. Network strategies and performance of Canadian investment banks. Acad Manage J. 2006;49(3):590–604. doi:https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794676.
- Al- Aufi A, Fulton C. Use of social networking tools for informal scholarly communication in humanities and social sciences disciplines. Procedia- Soc Behav Sci. 2014;147:436–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.135.
- Holmberg K, Thelwall M. Disciplinary differences in Twitter scholarly communication. Scientometrics. 2014;101(2):1027–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1229-3.
- Letierce J, Passant A, Breslin J, Decker S Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. Proceedings of the WebSci10: Extending the frontiers of society on-line; 2010 April 26–27; Raleigh (NC): US. [accessed 2019 Dec] http://journal.webscience.org/314/.
- Noorden van R. Scientists and the social network. Nature. 2014;512(1):126–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a.
- De Winter JCF. The relationship between tweets, citations, and article views for PLOS ONE articles. Scientometrics. 2015;102(1):1773–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a.
- Eysenbach G. Can tweets predict citations? Metrics of social impact based on twitter and correlation with traditional metrics of scientific impact. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(4):100–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2012.
- Shuai X, Pepe A, Bollen J. How the scientific community reacts to newly submitted preprints: article downloads, Twitter mentions and citations. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047523.
- Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivie`re V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):64–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
- Bielinska-Kwapisz A. Published, not perished but has anybody read it? Citation success of finance research articles. Appl Financial Econ. 2012;22(5):1679–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09603107.2012.667549.
- Hamermesh D, Johnson G, Weisbrof B. Scholarship, citations and salaries: economic reverse in economics. South Econ J. 1982;49(2):472–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1058497.
- Di Vaio G, Weisdorf J. Ranking economic history journals: a citation- based impact-adjusted analysis. Cliometrica. 2010;4(1):1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-009-0039y.
- Laband D, Piette M. The relative impacts of economics journals: 1970-1990. J Econ Lit. 1994;32(2):640–66. [accessed 2019 Dec]. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2728698?seq=1.
- Pyke G. Achieving research excellence and citation success: what’s the point and how do you do it? BioScience. 2014 December;64(2):90–91 [accessed 2019]. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ae8e/9635bc19929db2d322726e969f082c67abb6.pdf.
- Meho LI, Yang K. Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of LIS faculty: web of science versus Scopus and Google scholar. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2007;58(13):2105–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20677.
- Glänzel W, Debackere K On the ‘multi-dimensionality’ of rankings: some methodological and mathematical questions to be solved in university assessment. The 2009 international symposium on university ranking; 2009; Leiden, Netherlands. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2532-6
- Liu NC, Cheng Y, Liu L. Academic ranking of world universities using scientometrics–a comment to the “fatal attraction”. Scientometrics. 2005;64(1):101–09. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0241-z.
- Warwick University Website; N.D. [accessed 2020 Feb] https://warwick.ac.uk/services/library/staff/research/disseminating-research/cited/.
- Cann A. Social media: a guide for researchers [Accessed 2019 Dec] http://www.rin.ac.uk/system/files/attachments/social_media_guide_for_screen_0.pdf.
- Rowlands I, Nicholas D, Russell B, Canty N, Watkinson A. Social media use in the research workflow. Learned Publishing. 2011;24(3):183–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1087/20110306.
- Tapscott D. Grown up digital: How the next generation is changing your world HC. McGraw-Hill; 2008.
- Collins K, Shiffman D, Rock J. How are scientists using social media in the workplace? PLoS One. 2016;11(10):10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162680.
- Schleyer T, Butler BS, Song M, Spallek H. Conceptualizing and advancing research networking systems. ACM Trans Comput-Human Interact (TOCHI). 2012;19(1):2–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2147783.2147785.
- Mazurek G, Górska AM, Korzyński P How to form international teams: the role of social media in scholarly collaboration. Working Paper; 2019
- Peterson I. Touring the scientific web. Sci Commun. 2001;22(3):246–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547001022003002.
- Brody T, Harnad S, Carr L. Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2006;57(8):1060–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20373.
- Trench B. Internet: turning science communication inside-out. In: Handbook of public communication of science and technology. Routledge; 2008.
- Mas-Bleda A, Thelwall M, Kousha K, Aguillo I. Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web? Scientometrics. 2014;103(1):337–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1345-0.
- Priem J, Costello K. How and why scholars cite on Twitter. Proc Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2010;47(1):1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701201.
- Hansen MT. The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Adm Sci Q. 1999;44(1):82–111. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2667032.
- Cronin B, Shaw D. Peers and peers of influence: situating Rob King? Iinf Soc. 2007;23(4):221–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240701444147.
- Friedkin N. A test of structural features of granovetter’s strength of weak ties theory. Soc Networks. 1980;2(4):411–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(80)90006-4.
- Gargiulo M. Two-step leverage: managing constraints in organizational politics. Adm Sci Q. 1993;38(1):1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2393252.
- Stremersch S, Verniers I, Verhoef P. The quest for citations: drivers of article’s impact. J Mark. 2007;71(7):171–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.3.171.
- Eaton J, Ward J, Kumar A, Reingen P. Structural analysis of co-author relationship and author productivity in selected outlets for consumer behavior research. J Consum Psychol. 1999;8(1):39–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0801_02.
- Borgman CL. Scholarly communication and bibliometrics revisited. In: Cronin B, Atkins HB, editors. The web of knowledge — A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. Medford: Information Today Inc; 2000. p. 143–62.
- Ghasemian F, Zamanifar K, Ghasem- Aqaee N, Contractor N. Toward a better scientific collaboration success prediction model through the feature space expansion. Scientometrics. 2016;108(2):777–801. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1999-x.
- Borner K, Contractor N, Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Fiore SM, Hall KL, Keyton J, Spring B, Stokols D, Trochim W, Uzzi B. A multi-level systems perspective for the science of team science. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(49):24–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.3001399.
- Merton RK. The Matthew effect in science. Sci. 1968;159(3810):56–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56.
- Bornmann L, Daniel H. Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review–a citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants. Scientometrics. 2006;68(3):427–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0121-1.
- Warner J. Critical review of the application of citation studies to the research assessment exercises. J Inf Sc. 2000;26(6):453–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150002600607.
- Wouters P, Thelwall M, Kousha K, Franssen T, Waltman L, Rijcke S, Rushforth A, Franssen T The metric tide: literature review (Supplementary report I to the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management). Hefce. [accessed 2020 Feb]. doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.5066.3520.
- Hamermesh D, Johnson G, Weisbrof B. Scholarship, citations and salaries: economic rewards in economics. South Econ J. 1982 Nov;49(2):472–81 [accessed 2019]. https://www.scholars.northwestern.edu/en/publications/scholarships-citations-and-salaries-economic-rewards-in-economics.
- ResearchGate. ResearchGate about [accessed 2020 Feb] https://www.researchgate.net/about.
- Abbasi A, Wigand RT, Hossain L. Measuring social capital through network analysis and its influence on individual performance. Libr Inf Sci Res. 2014;36(1):66–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545.
- Jacob M, Meek LV. Scientific mobility and international research networks: trends and policy tools for promoting research excellence and capacity building. Stud Higher Educ. 2013;38(3):3. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.773789.
- Bianchini L Social networks for scientists: what social media to use for your research activity. [accessed 2019 Dec]. https://www.mysciencework.com/news/6400/social-networks-for-scientists.
- Weller M. The digital scholar: How technology is transforming scholarly practice. UK: Blooms-bury Academic; 2011.
- Xu J, Yand T, Cong T, Zeng Y. Use of social networking sites among Chinese and American researchers: a comparative study. J Scholarly Publishing. 2015;47(1):60–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.47.1.03.
- Moran M, Seaman J, Tinti- Kane H. Teaching, learning and sharing: how today’s higher education faculty use social media. Boston: Persona Learning Solutions and Babsey Research Group; 2011.
- Kaplan A, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus Horiz. 2010;53(1):69–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003.
- Thelwall M, Kousha K. Academia. edu: social network or academic network? J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 2014;65(4):721–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23038.
- Bar-Ilan J, Haustein S, Peters I, Priem S, Shema H, Terliesner J. Beyond citations: scholars’ visibility on the social Web. Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, 2011; 2012; Montreal: Science-Metrix and OST. pp. 98–109
- Statista. Number of Facebook users worldwide 2008-2020; 2020. [accessed 2020 Feb]. https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/.
- Haustein S, Peters I, Sugimoto CR, Thelwall M, Lariviere V. Tweeting biomedicine: an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2013;65(4):656–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23101.
- Hilbe JM. Negative binominal regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
- Pyke G. Struggling scientists: please cite our papers! Curr Sci. 2013;105:1061–66. accessed 2019 Dec. https://www.currentscience.ac.in/Volumes/105/08/1061.pdf.
- Tollefson J China declared world’s largest products of scientific articles. Nature news. [accessed 2020 March] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-00927-4.