References
- Cushman M, McLean R. Exclusion, inclusion and changing the face of information systems research. Inf Technol People. 2008;21(3):213–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840810895993.
- Norris P. Digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
- Kvasny L, Trauth EM, Morgan AJ. Power relations in IT education and work: the intersectionality of gender, race, and class. Urquhart C, ed. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc. 2009;7(2/3):96–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/14779960910955828.
- Windeler JB, Riemenschneider CK. The influence of ethnicity on organizational commitment and merit pay of IT workers: the role of leader support: ethnic differences in IT workers’ commitment and merit pay. Inf Sys J. 2016;26(2):157–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12058.
- Cultural KL. (re) production of digital inequality in a US community technology initiative. Inf Commun Soc. 2006;9(2):160–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600630740.
- Kvasny L, Keil M. The challenges of redressing the digital divide: A tale of two US cities. Inf Sys J. 2006;16(1):23–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2006.00207.x.
- Cushman M, Klecun E. How (can) non-users engage with technology: bringing in the digitally excluded. In: Trauth E, Howcroft D, Butler T, Fitzgerald B, Gross JD, editors. Social inclusion: societal and organisational implications for information systems. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2006. p. 347–365.
- Payton FC. Digital divide or digital equity: other considerations? In: Darity, WA Jr, editor. International encyclopedia of the social sciences. 2nd ed. Detroit, MI, USA: Macmillian Reference USA; 2008. p. 366–368
- Trauth E. A research agenda for social inclusion in information systems. ACM SIGMIS Data. 2017;48(2):9–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3084179.3084182.
- Trauth E, Joshi KD, Yarger LK. ISJ editorial. Inf Sys J. 2018;28(6):989–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12201.
- Trauth EM, Howcroft D. Social inclusion and the information systems field: why now? In: Trauth E, Howcroft D, Butler T, Fitzgerald B, Gross JD, editors. New York, NY, USA: Social inclusion: societal and organizational implications for information systems. Springer; 2006. p. 3–12.
- Servon LJ. Bridging the digital divide: technology, community and public policy. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
- Warschauer M, Matuchniak T. New technology and digital worlds: analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Rev Res Educ. 2010;34(1):179–225. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09349791.
- Perry M Chart of the day: the astronomical rise in college textbook prices vs. consumer prices and recreational books. Carpe Diem, the American Enterprise Institute; 2016 Sept 1 [accessed 2018 Oct 18]. http://www.aei.org/publication/chart-of-the-day-the-astronomical-rise-in-college-textbook-prices-vs-consumer-prices-and-recreational-books/
- Hansen C Hard copy or electronic textbooks? Professors are more concerned about keeping them affordable. The Chronicle of Higher Education; 2018 Aug 31. Accessed 2018 Oct 18. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Hard-Copy-or-Electronic/244425
- McMurtrie B Use of free textbooks is rising, but barriers remain. The Chronicle of Higher Education; 2018 Jan 5 [accessed 2018 Oct 18]. https://www.chronicle.com/article/Use-of-Free-Textbooks-Is/242086
- Pawlowski JM, Bick M. Open educational resources. Bus Inf Sys Eng. 2012;4(4):209–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-012-0219-3.
- Jhangiani R Unleashing openness in the teaching of introductory psychology. Working Paper; 2016 [accessed 2016 Oct 27]. https://osf.io/drfk8/
- Atkins D, Brown JS, Hammond A A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. The William and Flora Hewitt Foundation; 2007 [accessed 2018 Oct 24]. http://www.ictliteracy.info/rf.pdf/OERMovement.pdf
- Hylén J. Open educational resources: opportunities and challenges. Proc Open Educ. 2006;4963:4963.
- Hills J, Le Grand J, Piachaud D. Understanding social exclusion. Oxford, England, UK: Oxford University Press; 2002.
- Percy-Smith J. Introduction: the contours of social exclusion. In: Percy-Smith J, editor. Policy responses to social exclusion: towards inclusion? Maidenhead, England, UK: Open University Press; 2002. p. 1–21.
- Annabi H, Lebovitz S. Improving the retention of women in the IT workforce: an investigation of gender diversity interventions in the USA. Inf Sys J. 2018;28(6):1049–81. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12182.
- Armstrong DJ, Riemenschneider CK, Giddens LG. The advancement and persistence of women in the information technology profession: an extension of Ahuja’s gendered theory of IT career stages. Inf Sys J. 2018;28(6):1082–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12185.
- Trauth E, Joshi KD, Graham K, Nithithanatchinnapat B An exploratory study of identity and IT career choice for military service members and veterans with disabilities. In: Proceedings of AMCIS 2015. San Juan, Puerto Rico: AIS Electronic Library (AISeL); 2015.
- Fox G, Connolly R. Mobile health technology adoption across generations: narrowing the digital divide. Inf Sys J. 2018;28(6):995–1019. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12179.
- Iivari N, Kinnula M, Molin-Juustila T, Kuure L. Exclusions in social inclusion projects: struggles in involving children in digital technology development. Inf Sys J. 2018;28(6):1020–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12180.
- McGee K. The influence of gender, and race/ethnicity on advancement in information technology (IT). Inf Organ. 2018;28(1):1–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2017.12.001.
- Quesenberry JL, Trauth EM. The (dis) placement of women in the IT workforce: an investigation of individual career values and organisational interventions. Inf Sys J. 2012;22(6):457–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00416.x.
- Cain CC, Trauth E. Black men in IT: theorizing an autoethnography of a Black Man’s journey into IT within the United States of America. ACM SIGMIS Data. 2017;48(2):35–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/3084179.3084184.
- Deng X, Joshi K, Galliers RD. The duality of empowerment and marginalization in microtask crowdsourcing: giving voice to the less powerful through value sensitive design. Mis Q. 2016;40(2):279–302. doi:https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2016/40.2.01.
- Csikszentmihalyi M, Rathunde K, Whalen S. Talented teenagers: the roots of success and failure. Cambridge, England, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
- Mills MJ, Fullagar CJ. Motivation and flow: toward an understanding of the dynamics of the relation in architecture students. J Psychol. 2008;142(5):533–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.142.5.533-556.
- Hsieh T-L. Motivation matters? The relationship among different types of learning motivation, engagement behaviors and learning outcomes of undergraduate students in Taiwan. Higher Educ. 2014;68(3):417–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9720-6.
- McKeachie W, Pintrich P, Lin Y, Smith D. Teaching and learning in the college classroom: a review of literature. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan; 1986.
- Pintrich PR, Smith DA, García T, McKeachie WJ. Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educ Psychol Meas. 1993;53(3):801–13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024.
- Credé M, Phillips LA. A meta-analytic review of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Learn Individ Differ. 2011;21(4):337–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.03.002.
- Dunn KE, Lo W-J, Mulvenon SW, Sutcliffe R. Revisiting the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire: a theoretical and statistical reevaluation of the metacognitive self-regulation and effort regulation subscales. Educ Psychol Meas. 2012;72(2):312–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164411413461.
- Hilpert JC, Stempien J, van der Hoeven Kraft KJ, Husman J. Evidence for the latent factor structure of the MSLQ: a new conceptualization of an established questionnaire. SAGE Open. 2013;3(4):215824401351030. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013510305.
- Pintrich PR. A process‐oriented view of student motivation and cognition. In: Stark J, Mets L, editors. Improving teaching and learning through research: new directions for institutional research. Vol. 57. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass; 1988. p. 65–79.
- Pintrich PR. Student learning and college teaching. In: Young RE, Eble KE, editors. College teaching and learning: preparing for new commitments. new directions for teaching and learning. Vol. 33. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey Bass; 1988. p. 71–86.
- Pintrich PR, Schrauben B. Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. In: Schunk D, Meece JL, editors. Student perceptions in the classroom. Vol. 7. New York, NY, USA: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group; 1992. p. 149–83.
- Anderman EM, Wolters CA. Goals, values, and affect: influences on student motivation. In: Alexander PA, Winne PH editors. Handbook of educational psychology. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006. p. 369–90.
- Pintrich PR, Smith DAF, Garcia T, McKeachie WJ. A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI, USA: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning; 1991. p. 76.
- McKeachie WJ Teaching and Learning in the College Classroom. A Review of the Research Literature (1986) and November 1987 Supplement; 1987.
- Colvard NB, Watson CE, Park H. The impact of open educational resources on various student success metrics. Int J Teach Learn High Educ. 2018;30:262–76.
- Engler JN, Shedlosky-Shoemaker R. Facilitating student success: the role of open educational resources in introductory psychology courses. Psychol Learn Teach. 2019;18(1):36–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725718810241.
- Clinton V, Khan S. Efficacy of open textbook adoption on learning performance and course withdrawal rates: a meta-analysis. AERA Open. 2019;5(3):233285841987221. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858419872212.
- Hilton III J. Empirical outcomes of openness. Int Rev Res Open Distrib Learn. 2017;18:4.
- Sanchez G. PLS path modeling with R. Berkeley, CA, USA: Trowchez Editions; 2013.
- Bhattacherjee A Social science research: principles, methods, and practices. University of South Florida Scholar Commons; 2012. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/oa_textbooks/3
- Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA editor. Modern methods for business research. Mahwah, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998. p. 295–336.
- Barclay D, Thompson RL, Higgins CA. The partial least squares (PLS) approach to causal modeling personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Technol Stud. 1995;2:285–309.
- Fornell CR, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104.
- Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. Partial least squares structural equation modeling: rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Plann. 2013;46(1–2):1–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001.
- Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
- Sulčič V, Lesjak D. E-learning and study effectiveness. J Comput Inf Syst. 2009;49(3):40–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2009.11645322.
- von Hellens L, Trauth E, Fisher J. Increasing the representation of women in the information technology professions: research on interventions. Inf Sys J. 2012;22(5):343–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00412.x.