References
- Sharpe W. Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. J Finance. 1964;19:425–42.
- Lederer AL, Sethi V. The implementation of strategic information systems planning methodologies. MIS Q. 1988;12:445–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249212.
- Lapointe L, Rivard S. A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Q. 2005;29:461–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148692.
- Benaroch M, Lichtenstein Y, Robinson K. Real options in information technology risk management: An empirical validation of risk-option relationships. MIS Q. 2006;30:827–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148756.
- Dewan S, Ren F. Risk and return of information technology initiatives: Evidence from electronic commerce announcements. Inf Syst Res. 2007;18(4):370–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0120.
- Dewan S, Shi C, Gurbaxani V. Investigating the risk–return relationship of information technology investment: Firm-level empirical analysis. Manage Sci. 2007;53(12):1829–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0739.
- Tian F, Xu S. How do enterprise resource planning systems affect firm risk? Post-implementation impact. MIS Q. 2015;39(1):39–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.1.03.
- Brynjolfsson E,Yang S. Information technology and productivity: A review of the literature. Advances in computers. Vol. 43. Academic Press; 1996. p. 179–214.
- Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L. Computing productivity: Firm-level evidence. Rev Econ Stat. 2003;85(4):793–808. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/003465303772815736.
- Brigham EF, Ehrhardt MC. Financial management: Theory & practice. Cengage Learning; 2013.
- Solow RM 1987. We’d better watch out. Boston, MA: New York Times Book Review, 36. July 12.
- Anderson MC, Banker RD, Ravindran S. The new productivity paradox. Commun ACM. 2003;46(3):91–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/636772.636776.
- Brynjolfsson E, Hitt L. Paradox lost? Firm-level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Manage Sci. 1996;42(4):541–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.4.541.
- Tanriverdi H, Ruefli T. The role of information technology in risk/return relations of firms. J Assoc Inf Sys. 2004;5(11–12):421–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00061.
- Dewan S, Ren F. Information technology and firm boundaries: Impact on firm risk and return performance. Inf Syst Res. 2011;22(2):369–88. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0261.
- Kim K, Mithas S, Kimbrough M. Information technology investments and firm risk across industries: Evidence from the bond market. MIS Q. 2017;41(4):1347–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.4.15.
- Zhang DD, Nault BR. Measuring risk from IT initiatives using implied volatility. J Assoc Inf Sys. 2019;20:5.
- Hamada RS. The effect of the firm’s capital structure on the systematic risk of common stocks. J Finance. 1972;27(2):435–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00971.x.
- McAlister L, Srinivasan R, Kim M. Advertising, research and development, and systematic risk of the firm. J Mark. 2007;71(1):35–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.71.1.35.
- Brynjolfsson E. The contribution of information technology to consumer welfare. Inf Syst Res. 1996;7(3):281–300. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.3.281.
- Keil M. Pulling the plug: Software project management and the problem of project escalation. MIS Q. 1995;19(4):421–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249627.
- Cho W, Shaw M. Portfolio selection model for enhancing information technology synergy. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2013;60:739–49.
- Ewusi-Mensah K, Przasnyski ZH. On information systems project abandonment: An exploratory study of organizational practices. MIS Q. 1991;15(1):67–86. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249437.
- Salaway G. An organizational learning approach to information systems development. MIS Q. 1987;11(2):245–64. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249370.
- Cha H, Pingry D, Thatcher M. Managing the knowledge supply chain: An organizational learning model of information technology offshore outsourcing. MIS Q. 2008;32(2):281–306. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148841.
- David P. The dynamo and the computer: An historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. Am Econ Rev. 1990;80:355–61.
- Bresnahan T, Trajtenberg M. General purpose technologies: ‘Engines of Growth’? J Econom. 1995;65:83–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T.
- Powell TC, Dent‐Micallef A. Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Manage J. 1997;18(5):375–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<375::AID-SMJ876>3.0.CO;2-7.
- Curley KF, Pyburn PJ. “Intellectual” technologies: The key to improving white-collar productivity. Sloan Manage Rev (Pre-1986). 1982;24:31.
- Kaul A, Wittink DR. Empirical generalizations about the impact of advertising on price sensitivity and price. Marketing Sci. 1995;14(3_supplement):151–60. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.14.3.G151.
- Gustafsson A, Johnson MD, Roos I. The effects of customer satisfaction, relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention. J Mark. 2005;69(4):210–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.210.
- Petkova R, Zhang L. Is value riskier than growth? J Financ Econ. 2005;78(1):187–202. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.001.
- Tuli KR, Bharadwaj SG. Customer satisfaction and stock returns risk. J Mark. 2009;73(6):184–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.6.184.
- Malone TW, Yates J, Benjamin RI. Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Commun ACM. 1987;30(6):484–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/214762.214766.
- Baganha MP, Cohen MA. The stabilizing effect of inventory in supply chains. Oper Res. 1998;46(3–supplement–3):S72–S83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.46.3.S72.
- Dooley KJ, Yan T, Mohan S, Gopalakrishnan M. Inventory management and the bullwhip effect during the 2007–2009 recession: Evidence from the manufacturing sector. J Supply Chain Manage. 2010;46(1):12–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03183.x.
- Lee HL, Padmanabhan V, Whang S. The bullwhip effect in supply chains. MIT Sloan Manage Rev. 1997;38:93.
- Chen F, Drezner Z, Ryan JK, Simchi-Levi D. Quantifying the bullwhip effect in a simple supply chain: the impact of forecasting, lead times, and information. Manage Sci. 2000;46(3):436–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.3.436.12069.
- Barua A, Konana P, Whinston AB, Yin F. An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Q. 2004;28(4):585–620. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/25148656.
- Devaraj S, Krajewski L, Wei JC. Impact of eBusiness technologies on operational performance: The role of production information integration in the supply chain. J Oper Manage. 2007;25(6):1199–216. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2007.01.002.
- Yu Z, Yan H, Edwin Cheng TC. Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2001;101(3):114–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570110386625.
- Prajogo D, Olhager J. Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;135(1):514–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.09.001.
- Sambamurthy V, Bharadwaj A, Grover. V. Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Q. 2003;27(2):237–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/30036530.
- Forman C. The corporate digital divide: Determinants of internet adoption. Manage Sci. 2005;51(4):641–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0343.
- Xue L, Ray G, Sambamurthy V. Efficiency or innovation: How do industry environments moderate the effects of firms’ IT asset portfolios? MIS Q. 2012;36(2):509–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41703465.
- Hitt, Brynjolfsson. Productivity, profitability, and consumer surplus: Three different measures of information technology value. MIS Q. 1996;20(2):121–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249475.
- Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J. Americans do IT better: US multinationals and the productivity miracle. Am Econ Rev. 2012;102(1):167–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.167.
- Chwelos P, Ramirez R, Kraemer KL, Melville N. Research note —does technological progress alter the nature of information technology as a production input? New evidence and new results. Inf Syst Res. 2010;21:392–408. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0229.
- Berndt ER, Rappaport NJ. Price and quality of desktop and mobile personal computers: A quarter-century historical overview. Am Econ Rev. 2001;91(2):268–73. doi:https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.2.268.
- Wooldridge JM. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. New York, NY: MIT press; 2010.
- Wimble M, Singh H, Phillips B. A multilevel model of information technology value. J Comput Inf Syst. 2017;57(3):201–07. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2016.1183994.
- Dardan S, Stylianou A, Kumar R. The impact of customer-related IT investments on customer satisfaction and shareholder returns. J Comput Inf Syst. 2006;47:100–11.