References
- Dybå T, Dingsøyr T. Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf Software Technol. 2008;50(9–10):833–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006.
- Serrador P, Pinto JK. Does agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Int J Project Manage. 2015;33(5):1040–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006.
- Andrei BA, Casu-Pop AC, Gheorghe SC, Boiangiu CA. A study on using waterfall and agile methods in software project management. J Inf Syst Oper Manag. 2019;13(1):125–35.
- CollabNet VersionOne. 13th annual state of agile report; 2019 [accessed 2020 May 27]. https://stateofagile.com/#ufh-i-613553418-13th-annual-state-of-agile-report/7027494.
- Gandomani TJ, Zulzalil H, Azim A, Ghani A, Bakar A, Sultan M, Nafchi MZ. Obstacles in moving to agile software development methods: at a glance. J Comp Sci. 2013;9(5):620–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2013.620.625.
- Waardenburg G, Vliet H. When agile meets the enterprise. Inf Software Technol. 2013;55(12):2154–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2013.07.012.
- Cao L, Mohan K, Xu P, Ramesh B. A framework for adapting agile development methodologies. Eur J Inf Syst. 2009;18(4):332–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.26.
- Chan FKY, Thong JYL. Acceptance of agile methodologies: a critical review and conceptual framework. Decis Support Syst. 2009;46(4):803–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.11.009.
- McAvoy J, Butler T. The role of project management in ineffective decision making within agile software development projects. Eur J Inf Syst. 2009;18(4):372–83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2009.22.
- Stettina CJ, Hörz J. Agile portfolio management: an empirical perspective on the practice in use. Int J Project Manage. 2015;33(1):140–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.008.
- Gandomani T, Nafchi M. Agile transition and adoption human-related challenges and issues: a grounded theory approach. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;62:257–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.009.
- Ganesh N, Thangasamy S. New agile testing modes. Inf Technol J. 2012;11(6):707–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.3923/itj.2012.707.712.
- Nerur S, Mahapatra R, Mangalaraj G. Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Commun ACM. 2005;48(5):72–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1060710.1060712.
- Pikkarainen M, Salo O, Kuusela R, Abrahamsson P. Strengths and barriers behind the successful agile deployment-insights from the three software intensive companies in Finland. Emp Soft Eng. 2012;17(6):675–702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-011-9185-5.
- Orlikowski WJ. CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Q. 1993;17(3):309–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/249774.
- Orlikowski WJ. Improvising organizational transformation over time: a situated change perspective. Inf Syst Res. 1996;7(1):63–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.7.1.63.
- Ramesh B, Mohan K, Cao L. Ambidexterity in agile distributed development: an empirical investigation. Inf Syst Res. 2012;23(2):323–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0351.
- Sheffield J, Lemétayer J. Factors associated with the software development agility of successful projects. Int J Project Manage. 2013;31(3):459–72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.09.011.
- Tiwana A, Keil M. The one-minute risk assessment tool. Commun ACM. 2004;47(11):73–77. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1029496.1029497.
- Campanelli AS, Parreiras FS. Agile methods tailoring: a systematic literature review. J Syst Software. 2015;110:85–100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2015.08.035.
- Kalus G, Kuhrmann M. Criteria for software process tailoring: a systematic review. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Series; 2013; New York (NY). p. 171–80.
- Bass JM. Artefacts and agile method tailoring in large-scale offshore software development programmes. Inf Software Technol. 2016;75:1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2016.03.001.
- Bass JM, Allison IK, Banerjee U. Agile method tailoring in a CMMI level 5 organization. J Int Technol Inf Manage. 2013;22:77–98.
- Boehm B, Turner R. Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations. IEEE Softw. 2005;22(5):30–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2005.129.
- Tam C, Moura EJC, Oliveira T, Varajão J. The factors influencing the success of on-going agile software development projects. Int J Project Manage. 2020;38(3):165–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.02.001.
- Agile Manifesto Org. Principles behind the Agile Manifesto; 2000 [accessed 2020 Dec 8]. https://agilemanifesto.org/principles.html.
- Cockburn A, Highsmith J. Agile software development: the people factor. Comput. 2001;34(11):131–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/2.963450.
- Cram WA. Agile development in practice: lessons from the trenches. Inf Syst Manag. 2019;36(1):2–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1553645.
- Fortmann L. Agile or fragile? The depleting effects of agile methodologies for software developers. Proceedings of 26th Eur. Conf. Inf. Syst; 2018; Portsmouth (UK). p. 11–29.
- Moe NB, Aurum A, Dybå T. Challenges of shared decision-making: a multiple case study of agile software development. Inf Software Technol. 2012;54(8):853–65. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2011.11.006.
- Gregory P, Barroca L, Taylor K, Salah DS, Sharp H, Gregory P, Barroca L, Taylor K. Agile challenges in practice: a thematic analysis. Proc Int Conf Agile Software Dev. 2015;64–80.
- Nishijima RT, dos Santos JG. The challenge of implementing SCRUM agile methodology in a traditional environment. Int J Comput Technol. 2013;5(2):98–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.24297/ijct.v5i2.3529.
- Stray VG, Lindsjorn Y, Sjoberg DIK Obstacles to efficient daily meetings in agile development projects: a case study. ACM/IEEE Int. Symp. Empir. Softw Eng. Measure; 2013; Baltimore, MD. p. 95–102.
- Kim HW, Kankanhalli A. Investigating user resistance to information systems implementation: a status quo perspective. MIS Q. 2009;33(3):567–82. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/20650309.
- Offenbeek M, Boonstra A, Seo DB. Towards integrating acceptance and resistance research: evidence from a telecare case study. Eur J Inf Syst. 2013;22(4):434–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.29.
- Polites G, Karahanna E. Shackled to the status quo: the inhibiting effects of incumbent system habit, switching costs, and inertia on new system. MIS Q. 2012;36(1):21–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41410404.
- Conforto EC, Amaral DC, da Silva SL, di Felippo A, Kamikawachi DSL. The agility construct on project management theory. Int J Project Manag. 2016;34(4):660–74. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.007.
- Hoda R, Noble J, Marshall S Agile undercover: when customers don’t collaborate. Proceedings of Int. Conf. Agile Softw. Dev; 2010; Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. p. 73–87.
- Dikert K, Paasivaara M, Lassenius C. Challenges, and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. J Syst Software. 2016;119:87–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013.
- Berger H, Beynon-Davies P. The utility of rapid application development in large-scale, complex projects. Inf Syst J. 2009;19(6):549–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00329.x.
- Lalsing V, Kishnah S, Pudaruth S. People factors in agile software development and project management. Int J Softw Eng Appl. 2012;3:117–37.
- Maruping LM, Venkatesh V, Agarwal R. A control theory perspective on agile methodology use and changing user requirements. Inf Syst Res. 2009;20(3):377–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0238.
- Campanelli AS, Camilo RD, Parreiras FS. The impact of tailoring criteria on agile practices adoption: a survey with novice agile practitioners in Brazil. J Syst Software. 2018;137:366–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.12.012.
- Papadakis E, Tsironis L. Hybrid methods and practices associated with agile methods, method tailoring and delivery of projects in a non-software context. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;138:739–46. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.097.
- Tripp J, Armstrong DJ. Agile methodologies: organizational adoption motives, tailoring, and performance. J Comput Inf Syst. 2018;58:170–79.
- Rasnacis A, Berzisa S. Method for adaptation and implementation of agile project management methodology. Procedia Comput Sci. 2017;104:43–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.01.055.
- Jovanović M, Mas A, Mesquida AL, Lalić B. Transition of organizational roles in agile transformation process: a grounded theory approach. J Syst Software. 2017;133:174–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2017.07.008.
- Queirós A, Faria D, Almeida F. Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. Eur J Educ Stud. 2017;3:369–87.
- Mehrad A, Tahriri M. Comparison between qualitative and quantitative research approaches: social sciences. Int J Res Educ Stud. 2019;5:1–6.
- Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications; 1990.
- Anwer F, Shabib A, Shah SSM, Waheed U. Comparative analysis of two popular agile process models: extreme programming and Scrum. Int J Comput Sci Telecommun. 2017;8:1–7.
- Bhavsar K, Shah V, Gopalan S. Scrum: an agile process reengineering in software engineering. Int J Innov Technol Exploring Eng. 2020;9:840–48.
- Glaser BG, Strauss AL. Discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London (UK): Weidenfield & Nicolson; 1967.
- Miles M, Huberman M. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications; 1994.
- Shameem M, Chandra B, Kumar RR, Kumar C. A systematic literature review to identify human related challenges in globally distributed agile software development: towards a hypothetical model for scaling agile methodologies. Proceedings of IEEE 4th Int. Conf. Comp. Commun. Automation; 2018; Greater Noida (India). p. 1–7.
- Conboy K, Coyle S, Wang X, Pikkarainen M. People over process: key challenges in agile development. IEEE Softw. 2009;28:48–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2010.132.
- Ferneley EH, Sobreperez P. Resist, comply or workaround? An examination of different facets of user engagement with information systems. Eur J Inf Syst. 2006;15(4):345–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000629.
- Rivard S, Lapointe L. Information technology implementers’ responses to user resistance: nature and effects. MIS Q. 2012;36(3):897–920. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41703485.
- Shastri Y, Hoda R, Amor R Understanding the roles of the manager in agile project management. ACM Int. Conf. Proceeding Series; 2017; New York (NY). p. 45–55.
- Boyatzis RE, Ratti F. Emotional, social and cognitive intelligence competencies distinguishing effective Italian managers and leaders in a private company and cooperatives. J Manag Dev. 2009;28:821–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/02621710910987674.
- Tirumala S, Ali S, Anjan BG. A hybrid agile model using SCRUM and feature driven development. Int J Comput Appl. 2016;156:1–5.
- Gill AQ, Henderson-Sellers B, Niazi M. Scaling for agility: a reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies. Inf Syst Frontiers. 2018;20(2):315–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9672-8.
- Bryant A, Charmaz K. The SAGE handbook of grounded theory. Los Angeles (CA): SAGE Publications; 2007.
- Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Pract. 2000;39(3):124–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
- Skulmoski GJ, Hartman FT. Information systems project manager soft competencies: a project-phase investigation. Proj Manag J. 2010;41(1):61–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.20146.