The Role of Identity in Green IT Attitude and Intention

References

• Butler T. Compliance with institutional imperatives on environmental sustainability: building theory on the role of Green IS. J Strategic Inf Syst. 2011;20(1):6–26. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2010.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugesan S. Harnessing Green IT: principles and practices. IT Prof. 2008;10(1):24–33. doi:10.1109/MITP.2008.10.
   Google Scholar
• Melville NP. Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS Q. 2010;34:1–21. doi:10.2307/20721412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EPA, O. A strategic approach to sustainability. [accessed 2021 Jul 11]. https://www.epa.gov/sustainability/strategic-approach-sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Molla A, Abareshi A. Organizational green motivations for information technology: empirical study. J Comput Inf Syst. 2012;52:92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi S, Dahlan HM. Organizational research in the field of Green IT: a systematic literature review from 2007 to 2016. Telematics Inf. 2017;34(7):1191–249. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molla A, Cooper V, Pittayachawan S. The Green IT readiness (G-Readiness) of organizations: an exploratory analysis of a construct and instrument. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2011;29(1):4. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.02904.
   Google Scholar
• Hedwig M, Malkowski S, Neumann D Taming energy costs of large enterprise systems through adaptive provisioning. In: ICIS 2009 proceedings.Phoenix (AZ); 2009. p. 140.
   Google Scholar
• Elliot S. Transdisciplinary perspectives on environmental sustainability: a resource base and framework for IT-enabled business transformation. MIS Q. 2011;35:197–236. doi:10.2307/23043495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper VA, Molla A. Absorptive capacity and contextual factors that influence Green IT assimilation. Australas J Inf Syst. 2014;18(3). doi:10.3127/ajis.v18i3.1099.
   Google Scholar
• Ryoo SY, Koo C. Green practices-IS alignment and environmental performance: the mediating effects of coordination. Inf Syst Front. 2013;15(5):799–814. doi:10.1007/s10796-013-9422-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Shi SI, Chow WS. Investigating users’ extrinsic motivation for green personal computing. J Comput Inf Syst. 2016;56(1):70–78. doi:10.1080/08874417.2015.11645803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedman J, Henningsson S. Developing ecological sustainability: a green IS response model. Inf Syst J. 2016;26(3):259–87. doi:10.1111/isj.12095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh M, Sahu GP. Towards adoption of Green IS: a literature review using classification methodology. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;54:102147. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahardika H, Thomas D, Ewing MT, Japutra A. Comparing the temporal stability of behavioural expectation and behavioural intention in the prediction of consumers pro-environmental behaviour. J Retailing Consum Serv. 2020;54:101943. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfahani MD, Shahbazi H, Nilashi M, Samad S. Green IT/IS adoption within organizations: a systematic literature review and research agenda. J Soft Comput Decis Support Syst. 2018;5:8–42.
   Google Scholar
• Gholami R, Watson RT, Hasan H, Molla A, Bjorn-Andersen N. Information systems solutions for environmental sustainability: how can we do more? J Assoc Inf Syst. 2016;17(8):2. doi:10.17705/1jais.00435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter M, Grover V. Me, myself, and I (T). MIS Q. 2015;39(4):931–58. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.4.9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I, Fishbein M. A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychol Bull. 1975;82(2):261. doi:10.1037/h0076477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckmann J, editors. Action control. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. p. 11–39.
   Google Scholar
• Chow WS, Chen Y. Intended belief and actual behavior in Green computing in Hong Kong. J Comput Inf Syst. 2009;50:136–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra D, Akman I, Mishra A. Theory of reasoned action application for Green information technology acceptance. Comput Human Behav. 2014;36:29–40. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalvi-Esfahani M, Alaedini Z, Nilashi M, Samad S, Asadi S, Mohammadi M. Students’ Green information technology behavior: beliefs and personality traits. J Clean Prod. 2020;257:120406. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior: frequently asked questions. Hum Behav Emerging Technol. 2020;2(4):314–24. doi:10.1002/hbe2.195.
   Google Scholar
• Gatersleben B, Steg L, Vlek C. Measurement and determinants of environmentally significant consumer behavior. Environ Behav. 2002;34(3):335–62. doi:10.1177/0013916502034003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern PC. Psychological dimensions of global environmental change. Ann Rev Psychol. 1992;43(1):269–302. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.001413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stets JE, Burke PJ. Identity theory and social identity theory. Soc Psychol Q. 2000;63:224–37. doi:10.2307/2695870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rise J, Sheeran P, Hukkelberg S. The role of self-identity in the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analysis. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2010;40(5):1085–105. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00611.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granberg E. Is that all there is? Possible selves, self-change, and weight loss. Soc Psychol Q. 2006;69(2):109–26. doi:10.1177/019027250606900201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Charng HW, Piliavin JA, Callero PL. Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Soc Psychol Q. 1988;51:303–17. doi:10.2307/2786758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. Br J Social Psychol. 2001;40(4):471–99. doi:10.1348/014466601164939.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddle BJ, Bank BJ, Slavings RL. Norms, preferences, identities and retention decisions. Soc Psychol Q. 1987;50:322–37. doi:10.2307/2786817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks P, Shepherd R. Self-identity and the theory of planned behavior: assessing the role of identification with” Green consumerism”. Soc Psychol Q. 1992;55:388–99. doi:10.2307/2786955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conner M, McMillan B. Interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour: studying cannabis use. Br J Social Psychol. 1999;38(2):195–222. doi:10.1348/014466699164121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arbore A, Soscia I, Bagozzi RP. The role of signaling identity in the adoption of personal technologies. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2014;15(2):1. doi:10.17705/1jais.00352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP. Social influence and the self. In: Ruvio A, Belk R, editors. The Routledge companion to identity and consumption. New York: Routledge; 2013. p. 255–64.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel H, Turner JC. The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Worchel S, Austing WG, editors. Psychology of intergroup relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall; 1986. p. 7–24.
   Google Scholar
• Ojo AO, Fauzi MA. Environmental awareness and leadership commitment as determinants of IT professionals engagement in Green IT practices for environmental performance. Sustainable Prod Consumption. 2020;24:298–307. doi:10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markus H. The self in thought and memory. Self Social Psychol. 1980;1:41–70.
   Google Scholar
• Turner JC. Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In: Tajfel H, editor.Social identity and intergorup relations. Cambridge (UK): University Press; 1982. p. 15–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol. 1982;37(2):122–47. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmuss A, Agyeman J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res. 2002;8(3):239–60. doi:10.1080/13504620220145401.
   Google Scholar
• Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32(4):665–83. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res. 1995;6(2):144–76. doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steelman ZR, Hammer BI, Limayem M. Data collection in the digital age: innovative alternatives to student samples. MIS Q. 2014;38(2):355–78. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Ringle CM, Sarstedt M. PLS-SEM: indeed a silver bullet. J Marketing Theory Pract. 2011;19(2):139–52. doi:10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A power primer. Psychol Bull. 1992;112(1):155–59. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulland J. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Manage J. 1999;20(2):195–204. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm Sci Q. 1991;36:421–58. doi:10.2307/2393203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Marketing Res. 1981;18(1):39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1974;36(2):111–47. 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1974.tb00994.x
   Google Scholar
• Mannetti L, Pierro A, Livi S. Recycling: planned and self-expressive behaviour. J Environ Psychol. 2004;24(2):227–36. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nigbur D, Lyons E, Uzzell D. Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. Br J Social Psychol. 2010;49(2):259–84. doi:10.1348/014466609X449395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry DJ, Hogg MA. Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: a role for group identification. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1996;22(8):776–93. doi:10.1177/0146167296228002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White KM, Terry DJ, Hogg MA. Safer sex behavior: the role of attitudes, norms, and control factors. J Appl Soc Psychol. 1994;24(24):2164–92. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1994.tb02378.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol. 2003;88(5):879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlou PA, Liang H, Xue Y. Understanding and mitigating uncertainty in online exchange relationships: a principal-agent perspective. MIS Q. 2007;31(1):105–36. doi:10.2307/25148783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar