Self-efficacy in Information Security: A Replication Study

References

• Rhee HS, Kim C, Ryu YU. Self-efficacy in information security: its influence on end users’ information security practice behavior PRINTDATE \* MERGEFORMAT. Comput Sec. 2009;28(8):816–26. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2009.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balozian P, Leidner D. IS security menace: when security creates insecurity. In: 37th International Conference on Information Systems; 2016; Dublin.
   Google Scholar
• Warkentin M, Willison R. Behavioral and policy issues in information systems security: the insider threat. Eur J Inf Syst. 2009;18(2):101–05. doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verizon. Insider Threat 2020 Report. Verison; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Crossler RE, Johnston AC, Lowry PB, Hu Q, Warkentin M, Baskerville R. Future directions for behavioral information security research. Comput Sec. 2013;32:90–101. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2012.09.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu Q, Xu Z, Dinev T, Ling H. Does deterrence work in reducing information security policy abuse by employees? Commun ACM. 2011;54(6):54–60. doi:10.1145/1953122.1953142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ifinedo P. Understanding information systems security policy compliance: an integration of the theory of planned behavior and the protection motivation theory. Comput Sec. 2012;31(1):83–95. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2011.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Galletta DF, Lowry PB, Luo X, Moody GD, Willison R. Understanding inconsistent employee compliance with information security policies through the lens of the extended parallel process model. Inf Syst Res. 2021;32(3):1043–65. doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balozian P, Leidner D, Xue B. Toward an intellectual capital cyber security theory: insights from Lebanon. J Intellect Cap. Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nord JH, Floyd K, Paliszkiewicz J. Impact of habits on information security policy compliance. Issues Inf Syst. 2020;21:217–26.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston AC, Warkentin M, McBride M, Carter L. Dispositional and situational factors: influences on information security policy violations. Eur J Inf Syst. 2016;25(3):231–51. doi:10.1057/ejis.2015.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herath T, Rao HR. Encouraging information security behaviors in organizations: role of penalties, pressures and perceived effectiveness. Decis Support Syst. 2009;47(2):154–65. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng L, Li Y, Li W, Holm E, Zhai Q. Understanding the violation of IS security policy in organizations: an integrated model based on social control and deterrence theory. Comput Sec. 2013;39:447–59. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2013.09.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warkentin M, Johnston AC, Shropshire J. The influence of the informal social learning environment on information privacy policy compliance efficacy and intention. Eur J Inf Syst. 2011;20(3):267–84. doi:10.1057/ejis.2010.72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balozian P, Leidner D, Warkentin M. Managers’ and employees’ differing responses to security approaches. J Comput Inf Syst. 2019;59:197–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue B, Xu F, Luo XR, Warkentin M. Ethical leadership and employee ISP violation: exploring dual-mediation paths. Organ Cybersecurity J Pract Process People. 2021;1:5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Feng G, Zhu J, Wang N, Liang H. How paternalistic leadership influences IT security policy compliance: the mediating role of the social bond. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2019;20:1650–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohang A, Nowak A, Paliszkiewicz J, Nord JH. Information security policy compliance: leadership, trust, role values, and awareness. J Comput Inf Syst. 2020;60:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis AR, Valacich JS. A replication manifesto. AIS Trans Replication Res. 2014;1(1):1–5. doi:10.17705/1atrr.00001.
   Google Scholar
• NTT. Meeting the expectations of a new generation. Risk: Value 2019 Report. NTT Database; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Berthon P, Pitt L, Ewing M, Carr CL. Potential research space in MIS: a framework for envisioning and evaluating research replication, extension, and generation. Inf Syst Res. 2002;13(4):416–27. doi:10.1287/isre.13.4.416.71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koohang A, Joanna P, Gołuchowski J, Nord JH. Active learning for knowledge construction in E-learning: a replication study. J Comput Inf Syst. 2016;56:238–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston AC, Warkentin M. Fear appeals and information security behaviors: an empirical study. MIS Q. 2010;34(3):549–66. doi:10.2307/25750691.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siponen M, Mahmood MA, Pahnila S. Employees’ adherence to information security policies: an exploratory field study. Inf Manag. 2014;51(2):217–24. doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.08.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84(2):191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 1995;19(2):189–211. doi:10.2307/249688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu S-I. The relationship between life stress and smartphone addiction on Taiwanese university student: a mediation model of learning self-efficacy and social self-efficacy. Comput Human Behav. 2014;34:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon J, Vonortas NS, Han S. Do-It-Yourself laboratories and attitude toward use: the effects of self-efficacy and the perception of security and privacy. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2020;159:120192. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutchler LA. Response awareness and instructional self-efficacy: influences on intent. Inf Comput Secur. 2019;27(4):489–507. doi:10.1108/ICS-05-2018-0061.
   Google Scholar
• Ifinedo P. Information systems security policy compliance: an empirical study of the effects of socialisation, influence, and cognition. Inf Manag. 2014;51(1):69–79. doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safa NS, Sookhak M, Von Solms R, Furnell S, Ghani NA, Herawan T. Information security conscious care behaviour formation in organizations. Comput Sec. 2015;53:65–78. doi:10.1016/j.cose.2015.05.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameed MA, Arachchilage NAG. The role of self-efficacy on the adoption of information systems security innovations: a meta-analysis assessment. Pers Ubiquitous Comput. 2021;25:911–25. doi:10.1007/s00779-021-01560-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. J Soc Clin Psychol. 1986;4(3):359–73. doi:10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marakas G, Johnson R, Clay P. The evolving nature of the computer self-efficacy construct: an empirical investigation of measurement construction, validity, reliability and stability over time. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2007;8:15–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan JH, Warkentin M, Wallace L. So many ways for handling outliers: what really works and does it matter? J Bus Res. 2021;132:530–43. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.03.066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod Methods Bus Res. 1998;295:295–336.
   Google Scholar
• Lowry PB, Posey C, Bennett RBJ, Roberts TL. Leveraging fairness and reactance theories to deter reactive computer abuse following enhanced organisational information security policies: an empirical study of the influence of counterfactual reasoning and organisational trust. Inf Syst J. 2015;25(3):193–273. doi:10.1111/isj.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamjidyamcholo A, Baba MSB, Tamjid H, Gholipour R. Information security–Professional perceptions of knowledge-sharing intention under self-efficacy, trust, reciprocity, and shared-language. Comput Educ. 2013;68:223–32. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuganesan S, Steele C, Hart A. How senior management and workplace norms influence information security attitudes and self-efficacy. Behav Inf Techno. 2018;37(1):50–65. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2017.1397193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahri AB, Ismail Z, Mohanna S. The impact of the security competency on “self-efficacy in information security” for effective health information security in Iran. J Med Syst. 2016;40(11):1–9. doi:10.1007/s10916-016-0591-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall JD, Palvia P, Lowry PB. Control-related motivations and information security policy compliance: the role of autonomy and efficacy. J Inf Priv Secur. 2013;9:52–79.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen QN, Kim DJ. Enforcing information security protection: risk propensity and self-efficacy perspectives. In: 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2017; Waikoloa Village.
   Google Scholar
• Bulgurcu B, Cavusoglu H, Benbasat I. Information security policy compliance: an empirical study of rationality-based beliefs and information security awareness. MIS Q. 2010;34(3):523–48. doi:10.2307/25750690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Wang N, Liang H. Motivating information security policy compliance: the critical role of supervisor-subordinate guanxi and organizational commitment. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;54:102152. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo CW, Goo J, Rao HR. Is cybersecurity a team sport? A multilevel examination of workgroup information security effectiveness. MIS Q. 2020;44(2):907–31. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2020/15477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Miller AS, Zhou Z, Warkentin M. Does government social media promote users’ information security behavior towards COVID-19 scams? Cultivation effects and protective motivations. Gov Inf Q. 2021;38(2):101572. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Chen L, Wu D. Factors that influence employees’ security policy compliance: an awareness-motivation-capability perspective. J Comput Inf Syst. 2018;58:312–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwood-Brown C, Levy Y, D’Arcy J. Cybersecurity awareness and skills of senior citizens: a motivation perspective. J Comput Inf Syst. 2021;61:195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar