Factors Affecting Crowdfunding Success

References

• Fondevila Gascón JF, Rom-Rodríguez J, Mata-Monforte J, Santana-López E, Masip-Masip P. Crowdfunding as a formula for the financing of projects: an empirical analysis. Revista Científica Hermes. 2015;14:24–47. doi:10.21710/rch.v14i0.230.
   Google Scholar
• Por MH, Yang S-B, Kim T. Successful crowdfunding: the effects of founder and project factors. 2016 [accessed 2020 Jun 26]. https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/2971603.2971611.
   Google Scholar
• Kim T, Por MH, Yang S-B. Winning the crowd in online fundraising platforms: the roles of founder and project features. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2017;25:86–94. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahab Y, Ye Z, Riaz Y, Ntim CG. Individual’s financial investment decision-making in reward-based crowdfunding: evidence from China. Appl Econ Lett. 2019;26(4):261–66. doi:10.1080/13504851.2018.1464643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch J-A, Siering M. Crowdfunding success factors: the characteristics of successfully funded projects on crowdfunding platforms. 2015 [accessed 2020 Jun 26]. http://leeds-faculty.colorado.edu/bhagat/crowdfunding-success-factors.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gorbatai A, Nelson L. The narrative advantage: gender and the language of crowdfunding. Haas School of Business UC Berkeley. 2015 [accessed 2020 Jun 26]. https://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/gorbatai/working%20papers%20and%20word/Crowdfunding-GenderGorbataiNelson.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Radoynovska N, King BG. To whom are you true? Audience perceptions of authenticity in nascent crowdfunding ventures. Organ Sci. 2019;30(4):781–802. doi:10.1287/ORSC.2018.1253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin AH, Short JC, Drover W, Stevenson RM, McKenny AF, Allison TH. The power of positivity? The influence of positive psychological capital language on crowdfunding performance. J Bus Ventur. 2018;33(4):470–92. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanko MA, Henard DH. Toward a better understanding of crowdfunding, openness and the consequences for innovation. Res Policy. 2017;46(4):784–98. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CSR, Parhankangas A. Crowdfunding innovative ideas: how incremental and radical innovativeness influence funding outcomes. Entrep Theory Pract. 2017;41(2):237–63. doi:10.1111/etap.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng HC, Xu B, Wang T, Chen DY. Project implementation success in reward-based crowdfunding: an empirical study. Int J Electron Commer. 2017;21(3):424–48. doi:10.1080/10864415.2016.1319233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtney C, Dutta S, Li Y. Resolving information asymmetry: signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrep Theory Pract. 2017;41(2):265–90. doi:10.1111/etap.12267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butticè V, Orsenigo C, Wright M. The effect of information asymmetries on serial crowdfunding and campaign success. Economia e Politica Industriale. 2018;45(2):143–73. doi:10.1007/s40812-017-0074-9.
   Google Scholar
• Janku J, Kucerova Z. Successful crowdfunding campaigns: the role of project specifics, competition and founders’ experience. Finance a Úver-czech J Econ Finan. 2018;68:351–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usman SM, Bukhari FAS, Usman M, Badulescu D, Sial MS. Does the role of media and founder’s past success mitigate the problem of information asymmetry? Evidence from a UK crowdfunding platform. Sustainability. 2019;11(3):692. doi:10.3390/su11030692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barasinska N, Schafer D. Is crowdfunding different? Evidence on the relation between gender and funding success from a German peer-to-peer lending platform. Ger Econ Rev. 2014;15(4):436–52. doi:10.1111/geer.12052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg J, Mollick E. Activist choice homophily and the crowdfunding of female fundraisers. Adm Sci Q. 2017;62(2):341–74. doi:10.1177/0001839216678847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skirnevskiy V, Bendig D, Brettel M. The influence of internal social capital on serial creators’ success in crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract. 2017;41(2):209–36. doi:10.1111/etap.12272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Z, Li MX, Wang KL. “The more options, the better?” Investigating the impact of the number of options on backers’ decisions in reward-based crowdfunding projects. Inf Manag. 2019;56(3):429–44. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang NX, Li QX, Liang HG, Ye TF, Ge SL. Understanding the importance of interaction between creators and backers in crowdfunding success. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2018;27:106–17. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2017.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geiger M, Moore K. Attracting the crowd in online fundraising: a meta-analysis connecting campaign characteristics to funding outcomes. Comput Human Behav. 2022;128. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin M, Prabhala NR, Viswanathan S. Judging borrowers by the company they keep: friendship networks and information asymmetry in online peer-to-peer lending. Manage Sci. 2013;59(1):17–35. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1120.1560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming DJ, Leboeuf G, Schwienbacher A. Crowdfunding models: keep-it-all vs. all-or-nothing. Financ Manage. 2020;49(2):331–60. doi:10.1111/fima.12262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angerer M, Brem A, Kraus S, Peter A. Start-up funding via equity crowdfunding in Germany – a qualitative analysis of success factors. J Entrepreneurial Finance . 2017;9(1):1-34.
   Google Scholar
• Kang L, Jiang Q, Tan C-H. Remarkable advocates: an investigation of geographic distance and social capital for crowdfunding. Inf Manag. 2017;54(3):336–48. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hervé F, Manthé E, Sannajust A, Schwienbacher A. Determinants of individual investment decisions in investment-based crowdfunding. J Bus Finance Account. 2019;46(5–6):762–83. doi:10.1111/jbfa.12372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mochkabadi K, Volkmann CK. Equity crowdfunding: a systematic review of the literature. Small Bus Econ. 2020;54:75–118. doi:10.1007/s11187-018-0081-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu S, Kim YG. Money is not everything: a typology of crowdfunding project creators. Acad Manage Annu Meeting Proc. 2017;2017:15118.
   Google Scholar
• Lukkarinen A, Teich JE, Wallenius H, Wallenius J. Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns. Decis Support Syst. 2016;87:26–38. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2016.04.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollick E. The dynamics of crowdfunding: an exploratory study. J Bus Ventur. 2014;29(1):1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2013.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeuf B, Darveau J, Legoux R. Financing creativity-crowdfunding as a new approach for theatre projects. Int J Arts Manag. 2014;16:33–48,79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calic G, Mosakowski E. Kicking off social entrepreneurship: how a sustainability orientation influences crowdfunding success. J Manag Stud. 2016;53(5):738–67. doi:10.1111/joms.12201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlers GKC, Cumming D, Günther C, Schweizer D. Signaling in equity crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract. 2015;39(4):955–80. doi:10.1111/etap.12157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrimore L, Jiang L, Larrimore J, Markowitz D, Gorski S. Peer to peer lending: the relationship between language features, trustworthiness, and persuasion success. J Appl Commun Res. 2011;39(1):19–37. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.536844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbs J, Grigore G, Molesworth M. Success in the management of crowdfunding projects in the creative industries. Internet Research. 2016;26(1):146–66. doi:10.1108/IntR-08-2014-0202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollick E, Nanda R. Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Manage Sci. 2016;62(6):1533–53. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao AR, Monroe KB. The effect of price, brand name, and store name on buyers’ perceptions of product quality: an integrative review. J Mark Res. 1989;26(3):351–57. doi:10.2307/3172907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaartemo V. The elements of a successful crowdfunding campaign: a systematic literature review of crowdfunding performance. Int Rev Entrepreneurship. 2017;15:291–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison TH, Davis BC, Webb JW, Short JC. Persuasion in crowdfunding: an elaboration likelihood model of crowdfunding performance. J Bus Ventur. 2017;32(6):707–25. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis BC, Hmieleski KM, Webb JW, Coombs JE. Funders’ positive affective reactions to entrepreneurs’ crowdfunding pitches: the influence of perceived product creativity and entrepreneurial passion. J Bus Ventur. 2017;32(1):90–106. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu T, Sarker S, Sarker S. A conceptual framework for understanding crowdfunding. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2015;37:1–31. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.03701.
   Google Scholar
• Cha J. Crowdfunding for video games: factors that influence the success of and capital pledged for campaigns. Int J Media Manag . 2017;19(3):240–259.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Li D, Jing W, Yun X. The role of multidimensional social capital in crowdfunding: a comparative study in China and US. Inf Manag. 2014;51(4):488–96. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vismara S. Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Bus Econ. 2016;46(4):579–90. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9710-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal AK, Catalini C, Goldfarb A. The geography of crowdfunding. National Bur Econ Res. 2011. doi:10.3386/w16820.
   Google Scholar
• Lin MF, Viswanathan S. Home bias in online investments: an empirical study of an online crowdfunding market. Manage Sci. 2016;62(5):1393–414. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2015.2206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XC, Tang YH, Yang NR, Ren RY, Zheng HC, Zhou HB. The value of information disclosure and lead investor in equity-based crowdfunding. Nankai Bus Rev Int. 2016;7(3):301–21. doi:10.1108/nbri-01-2016-0002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S. An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inf Syst Res. 2013;24(3):499–519. doi:10.1287/isre.1120.0468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber EM, Hui J. Crowdfunding: motivations and deterrents for participation. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2013;20(6):1–32. doi:10.1145/2530540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ordanini A, Fisk RP, Miceli L, Pizzetti M, Parasuraman A. Crowd‐funding: transforming customers into investors through innovative service platforms. J Serv Manag. 2011;22(4):443–70. doi:10.1108/09564231111155079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• André K, Bureau S, Gautier A, Rubel O. Beyond the opposition between altruism and self-interest: reciprocal giving in reward-based crowdfunding. J Bus Ethics. 2017;146(2):313–32. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3652-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beier M, Wagner K. Crowdfunding success: a perspective from social media and e-commerce. 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015; 2015 [accessed 2020 Jun 26]. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Michael_Beier/publication/286779944.
   Google Scholar
• Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A. Individual crowdfunding practices. Venture Capital. 2013;15(4):313–33. doi:10.1080/13691066.2013.785151.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner LS, Kenworthy NJ. Producing a worthy illness: personal crowdfunding amidst financial crisis. Soc Sci Med. 2017;187:233–42. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi S, Liu ZY, Usman K. The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding. J Bus Res. 2017;71:10–18. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butticè V, Colombo MG, Wright M. Serial crowdfunding, social capital, and project success. Entrep Theory Pract. 2017;41(2):183–207. doi:10.1111/etap.12271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhang WT, Yan XB, Jin JH. The life-cycle influence mechanism of the determinants of financing performance: an empirical study of a Chinese crowdfunding platform. Rev Manag Sci. 2020;14(1):287–309. doi:10.1007/s11846-018-0295-y.
   Google Scholar
• Colombo MG, Franzoni C, Rossi-Lamastra C. Internal social capital and the attraction of early contributions in crowdfunding. Entrep Theory Pract. 2015;39(1):75–100. doi:10.1111/etap.12118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelius PB, Gokpinar B. The role of customer investor involvement in crowdfunding success. Manage Sci. 2020;66(1):452–72. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giudici G, Guerini M, Rossi-Lamastra C. Reward-based crowdfunding of entrepreneurial projects: the effect of local altruism and localized social capital on proponents’ success. Small Bus Econ. 2018;50(2):307–24. doi:10.1007/s11187-016-9830-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giudici G, Guerini M, Rossi-Lamastra C. Why crowdfunding projects can succeed: the role of proponents’ individual and territorial social capital. 2013 [accessed 2020 Jun 26]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2255944.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh H-C, Hsieh Y-C, Vu THC. How social movements influence crowdfunding success. Pacific-Basin Finance J. 2019;53(C):308–20. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2018.11.008.
   Google Scholar
• Josefy M, Dean TJ, Albert LS, Fitza MA. The role of community in crowdfunding success: evidence on cultural attributes in funding campaigns to “save the local theater.” Entrep Theory Pract. 2017;41(2):161–82. doi:10.1111/etap.12263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur H, Gera J. Effect of social media connectivity on success of crowdfunding campaigns. Procedia Comput Sci. 2017;122:767–74. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.435.
   Google Scholar
• Kim PH, Buffart M, Croidieu G. TMI: signaling credible claims in crowdfunding campaign narratives. Group Organ Manag. 2016;41(6):717–50. doi:10.1177/1059601116651181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz MM, Bretschneider U, Erler M, Leimeister JM. An empirical investigation of signaling in reward-based crowdfunding. Electron Commer Res. 2017;17(3):425–61. doi:10.1007/s10660-016-9249-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar A, Bose I. My words for your pizza: an analysis of persuasive narratives in online crowdfunding. Inf Manag. 2018;55(6):781–94. doi:10.1016/j.im.2018.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meoli A, Munari F, Bort J. The patent paradox in crowdfunding: an empirical analysis of Kickstarter data. Ind Corp Chang. 2019;28:1321–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parhankangas A, Renko M. Linguistic style and crowdfunding success among social and commercial entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur. 2017;32(2):215–36. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralcheva A, Roosenboom P. On the road to success in equity crowdfunding. 2016 [accessed 2020 Jun 26]. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2727742 or http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727742.
   Google Scholar
• Ralcheva A, Roosenboom P. Forecasting success in equity crowdfunding. Small Bus Econ. 2020;55(2020):39–56. doi:10.1007/s11187-019-00144-x.
   Google Scholar
• Vismara S. Sustainability in equity crowdfunding. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2019;141:98–106. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu LZ. Will a digital camera cure your sick puppy? Modality and category effects in donation-based crowdfunding. Telematics Inf. 2018;35(7):1914–24. doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue J, Sun FF. Influencing factors of equity crowdfunding financing performance -An empirical study. 2016 [accessed 2020 Jun 26]. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/8365594.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Vinig T. Hedonic value and crowdfunding project performance: a propensity score matching-based analysis. J Behav Finance. 2017;9(2):169–86. doi:10.1108/rbf-09-2016-0059.
   Google Scholar
• Orwin RG. A fail-safe n for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. 1983;8(2): 157–159.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. 1988. doi:10.4324/9780203771587.
   Google Scholar