Latent-Curve Modeling of Continued-Use Intentions: Near- Versus Distant-Future

References

• DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J Manag Inf Syst. 2003;19:9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manage Sci. 1989;35(8):982–1003. doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacherjee A. Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quart. 2001;25(3):351–70. doi:10.2307/3250921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Browne GJ, Chau PYK. An empirical investigation of Web site use using a commitment-based model. Decision Sci. 2006;37(3):427–44. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00133.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French AM, Shim JP, Otondo R, Templeton G. An empirical study evaluating social networking continuance and success. J Comput Inf Syst. 2018;58(4):353–62. doi:10.1080/08874417.2017.1281075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han B. Social media burnout: definition, measurement instrument, and why we care. J Comput Inf Syst. 2018;58(2):122–30. doi:10.1080/08874417.2016.1208064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami R, Molla A, Goswami S, Brewster C. Green information systems use in social enterprise: the case of a community-led eco-localization website in the West Midlands region of the UK. Inf Syst Front. 2017;20(6):1345–61. doi:10.1007/s10796-016-9733-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen KA, Curran PJ. Latent curve models: a structural equation approach. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng T, Hsieh S. Determinants of emoticon usage in mobile instant messaging: a construal level theory perspective. Behav Inf Technol. 2019;38(3):289–301. doi:10.1080/0144929X.2018.1531927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballard DI, Seibold DR. Organizational members’ communication and temporal experience: scale development and validation. Communic Res. 2004;31(2):135–72. doi:10.1177/0093650203261504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beshears J, Milkman KL, Schwartzstein J. Beyond beta-delta: the emerging economics of personal plans. Am Econ Rev. 2016;106(5):430–34. doi:10.1257/aer.p20161100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Lin Z. Inventory replenishment policy for the decision maker with present-biased preference and time-inconsistency under inflation. J Syst Sci Syst Eng. 2017;16(5):628–45. doi:10.1007/s11518-016-5321-5.
   Google Scholar
• Strulik H, Trimborn T. Hyperbolic discounting can be good for your health. J Econ Psychol. 2018;69:44–57. doi:10.1016/j.joep.2018.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClure SM, Laibson DI, Loewenstein G, Cohen JD. Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science. 2004;306(5695):503–07. doi:10.1126/science.1100907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ittersum K, Feinberg FM. Cumulative timed intent: a new perspective too for technology adoption. J Marketing Res. 2010;47(5):808–22. doi:10.1509/jmkr.47.5.808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma M, Agarwal R. Through a glass darkly: information technology design, identity verification, and knowledge contribution in online communities. Inf Syst Res. 2007;18(1):42–67. doi:10.1287/isre.1070.0113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quart. 2003;27(3):425–78. doi:10.2307/30036540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajzen IA. Personality and Behavior. 2nd. Berkshire (England): Open University Press/McGraw-Hill; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Gerhard N, Koohikamali M. Social network migration and anonymity expectations: what anonymous social network apps offer. Computers Human Behav. 2019;95:101–13. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue T, Rabin M. Doing it now or later. Am Econ Rev. 1999;89(1):103–24. doi:10.1257/aer.89.1.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SA, Fuller RM, Vician C. Who’s afraid of the virtual world? Anxiety and computer–mediated communication. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2004;5(2):79–107. doi:10.17705/1jais.00046.
   Google Scholar
• Laibson D. Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. Q J Econ. 1997;112(2):443–77. doi:10.1162/003355397555253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khawaja A, Silverman D, Sloan F. Time preference, time discounting, and smoking decisions. J Health Econ. 2007;26(5):927–49. doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimoka A, Pavlou PA, Davis FD. Neuro-IS: the potential of cognitive neuroscience for information systems research. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, Canada, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Wakslak CJ, Trope Y, Liberman N. Transcending the now: time as a dimension of psychological distance. In: Glicksohn J, Myslobodsky MS, editors. Timing the Future: the Case for Time-Cued Prospective Memory. Singapore: World Scientific; 2006. p. 171–89.
   Google Scholar
• Eyal T, Sagristano MD, Trope Y, Liberman N, Chaiken S. When values matter: expressing values in behavioral intentions for the near vs. distant future. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009;45(1):35–43. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum S, Trope Y, Liberman N. Creeping dispositionism: the temporal dynamics of behavior prediction. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84(3):485–97. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. The forms of capital. In: Richardson J, editor. Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. Greenwood, New York, U.S.A: Greenwood Press; 1986. p. 241–58.
   Google Scholar
• Karahanna K, Preston DS. The effect of social capital of the relationship between the CIO and top management team on firm performance. J Manag Inf Syst. 2013;30(1):15–55. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222300101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler P, Kwon S. Social capital: prospects for a new concept. Acad Manag Rev. 2002;27(1):17–40. doi:10.5465/amr.2002.5922314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French AM, Luo X, Bose R. Toward a holistic understanding of continued use of social networking tourism: a mixed-methods approach. Inf Manag. 2017;54:802–13. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.10.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman L, Newell S, Bresnen M, Laurent S, Scarbrough H, Swan J. Satisfaction with project learning and transfer: an exploration of the role of intellectual and social capital. 6th European Conference on Organisational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Boston, MA, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu CM, Hsu MH, Wang ETG. Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decis Support Syst. 2006;42(3):1872–88. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2006.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corfman KP, Lehman DR. Models of cooperative group decision making and relative influence: an experimental investigation of family purchase decisions. J Consumer Res. 1987;14:1–13. doi:10.1086/209088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganesan S. Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. J Mark. 1994;58(2):1–19. doi:10.1177/002224299405800201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh JJPA, Rai A, Keil M. Understanding digital inequality: comparing continued use behavioral models of the socio-economically advantaged and disadvantaged. MIS Quart. 2008;32(1):97–126. doi:10.2307/25148830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preacher KJ, Wichman AL, MacCallum RC, Briggs NE. Latent growth curve modeling. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):411–23. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 8th. Boston (MA): Cengage; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Pedhazur EJ, Schmelkin LPM. Design, and analysis: an integrated approach. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Whitney DJ. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol. 2001;86(1):114–21. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A. Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manage Sci. 2006;52(12):1865–83. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1060.0597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown TA. Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY, USA: The Guilford Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: user’s reference guide. Lincolnwood (IL): Scientific Software, Inc.; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Redburn DE, Peterson K. Household bridging and bonding social capital: do “new urbanism” characteristics make a difference? Sociation Today. 2008;6(1). 1–12. http://www.ncsociology.org/sociationtoday/v61/redburn.htm
   Google Scholar