Strategic Responses to Digital Disruption in Incumbent Firms – A Strategy-as-Practice Perspective

References

• Vial G. Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2019;28:118–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armengaud E, Schneider D, Reich J, Sorokos I. DDI: a novel technology and innovation model for dependable, collaborative and autonomous systems. 2021 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE). Virtual, 2021, IEEE, 1626–31.
   Google Scholar
• Weill P, Woerner SL. Thriving in an increasingly digital ecosystem. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2015;56:27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanias S, Myers MD, Hess T. Digital transformation strategy making in pre-digital organizations: the case of a financial services provider. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2019;28(1):17–33. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2018.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen CM. The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chan CM, Teoh SY, Yeow A, Pan G. Agility in responding to disruptive digital innovation: case study of an SME. Inf Syst J. 2019;29(2):436–55. doi:10.1111/isj.12215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytinen K, Rose GM. The disruptive nature of information technology innovations: the case of internet computing in systems development organizations. MIS Q. 2003;27(4):557–95. doi:10.2307/30036549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimi J, Walter Z. The role of dynamic capabilities in responding to digital disruption: a factor-based study of the newspaper industry. J Manag Inf Syst. 2015;32(1):39–81. doi:10.1080/07421222.2015.1029380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoef PC, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, Bhattacharya A, Qi Dong J, Fabian N, Haenlein M. Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J Bus Res. 2021;122:889–901. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M. Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q. 2017;41(1):223–38. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svahn F, Mathiassen L, Lindgren R. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: how Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Q. 2017;41(1):239–53. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosler M, Burr W, Ihring L. Digital innovation in incumbent firms: an exploratory analysis of value creation. Int J Innov Technol Manag. 2021;18(2):2040003. doi:10.1142/S0219877020400039.
   Google Scholar
• Keller R, Ollig P, Rövekamp P. Pathways to developing digital capabilities within entrepreneurial initiatives in pre-digital organizations. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 2022;64:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigala M. Collaborative commerce in tourism: implications for research and industry. Curr Issues Tour. 2017;20(4):346–55. doi:10.1080/13683500.2014.982522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högberg K. Persistent digital service encounters: challenges of organizational use of social media in a hotel chain. Trollhattan: University West; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory R, Wagner H-T, Tumbas S, Drechsler K. At the crossroads between digital innovation and digital transformation. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Munich, Germany, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Metzler DR, Muntermann J. The impact of digital transformation on incumbent firms: an analysis of changes, challenges, and responses at the business model level. Presented at the ICIS 2020 Proceedings, Hyderabad, India, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Buhalis D, Harwood T, Bogicevic V, Viglia G, Beldona S, Hofacker C. Technological disruptions in services: lessons from tourism and hospitality. J Serv Manag. 2019;30(4):484–506. doi:10.1108/JOSM-12-2018-0398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebastian IM, Ross JW, Beath C, Mocker M, Moloney KG, Fonstad NO. How big old companies navigate digital transformation. MIS Q Executive. 2017;16(3):133–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgelman RA, Floyd SW, Laamanen T, Mantere S, Vaara E, Whittington R. Strategy processes and practices: dialogues and intersections. Strateg Manag J. 2018;39(3):531–58. doi:10.1002/smj.2741.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Newell S, Huang J, Pan S-L. Site-shifting as the source of ambidexterity: empirical insights from the field of ticketing. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2014;23(1):29–44. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2014.01.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlikowski WJ. Using technology and constituting structures: a practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organ Sci. 2000;11(4):404–28. doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington R. The work of strategizing and organizing: for a practice perspective. Strateg Organ. 2003;1(1):117–25. doi:10.1177/147612700311006.
   Google Scholar
• Klein HK, Myers MD. A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 1999;23(1):67–94. doi:10.2307/249410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A, El Sawy OA, Pavlou PA, V. Venkatraman N. Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights. MIS Q. 2013;37:471–82. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanelt A, Bohnsack R, Marz D, Antunes Marante C. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. J Manag Studies. 2021;58(5):1159–97. doi:10.1111/joms.12639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallinikos J, Aaltonen AV, Marton A. The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MIS Q MIS QUART. 2013;37(2):357–70. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessel L, Baiyere A, Ologeanu-Taddei R, Cha J, Blegind-Jensen T. Unpacking the difference between digital transformation and IT-enabled organizational transformation. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2021;22(1):102–29. doi:10.17705/1jais.00655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wimelius H, Mathiassen L, Holmström J, Keil M. A paradoxical perspective on technology renewal in digital transformation. Inf Syst J. 2021;31(1):198–225. doi:10.1111/isj.12307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vom Brocke J, Schmid AM, Simons A, Safrudin N. IT-enabled organizational transformation: a structured literature review. Bus Process Manag J. 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández WD, Goode S, Robinson M. Uneasy alliances: tradition and ICT transformation in the value chain. J Organ Comput Electron Commer. 2010;20(3):234–56. doi:10.1080/10919392.2010.494526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matt C, Hess T, Benlian A. Digital transformation strategies. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 2015;57(5):339–43. doi:10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross JW, Beath CM, Sebastian IM. How to develop a great digital strategy. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2017;58:7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane GC. How digital transformation is making health care safer, faster and cheaper. MIT Sloan Manag Rev. 2015;57:4–4.
   Google Scholar
• Yeow A, Soh C, Hansen R. Aligning with new digital strategy: a dynamic capabilities approach. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2018;27(1):43–58. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2017.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busulwa R, Evans N, Oh A, Kang M. Hospitality management and digital transformation: balancing efficiency, agility and guest experience in the era of disruption. Routledge; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Beritelli P, Schegg R. Maximizing online bookings through a multi-channel-strategy: effects of interdependencies and networks. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag. 2016;28:68–88. doi:10.1108/IJCHM-07-2014-0326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam C, Law R. Readiness of upscale and luxury-branded hotels for digital transformation. Int J Hosp Manag. 2019;79:60–69. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.12.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigala M, Gretzel U. Advances in social media for travel, tourism and hospitality: new perspectives, practice and cases. California, UK: Routledge; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson V, Holmström J. Social media strategy: understanding social media, IT strategy, and organizational responsiveness in times of crisis. Cutter IT J. 2013;26:18–23.
   Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski P, Whittington R. Hard to disagree, mostly. Strateg Organ. 2008;6(1):101–06. doi:10.1177/1476127007087155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakravarthy BS, Doz Y. Strategy process research: focusing on corporate self-renewal. Strateg Manag J. 1992;13(S1):5–14. doi:10.1002/smj.4250131003.
   Google Scholar
• Arvidsson V, Holmström J. Digitalization as a strategy practice: what is there to learn from strategy as practice research? In: The Routledge companion to management information systems. London, UK: Routledge; 2017. p. 218–31.
   Google Scholar
• Yin R. Case study research: design and methods. Los Angeles, US: Sage publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Langley A. Strategies for theorizing from process data. Acad Manage Rev. 1999;24(4):691–710. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton M. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Serv Res. 1999;34:1189–208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew AM. The character and significance of strategy process research. Strateg Manag J. 1992;13(S2):5–16. doi:10.1002/smj.4250130903.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss A, Corbin JM. Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks, California. US: Sage; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland BT. Building process theory with narrative: from description to explanation. Acad Manage Rev. 1999;24(4):711–24. doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittington R, Mayer M. The European corporation: strategy, structure, and social science. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press on Demand; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Vesti H, Rosenstand CAF, Gertsen F. Structured literature review of digital disruption literature. ISPIM Innov Summit Build Innov Century. 2018; 34:345–365.
   Google Scholar
• Sebastian IM, Ross JW, Beath C, Mocker M, Moloney KG, Fonstad NO. How big old companies navigate digital transformation. In: Strategic information management. California, US: Routledge; 2020. p. 133–50.
   Google Scholar
• Morton J, Wilson AD, Cooke L. The digital work of strategists: using open strategy for organizational transformation. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2020;29(2):101613. doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2020.101613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara E, Whittington R. Strategy-as-practice: taking social practices seriously. Acad Manag Ann. 2012;6(1):285–336. doi:10.5465/19416520.2012.672039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raguseo E, Neirotti P, Paolucci E. How small hotels can drive value their way in infomediation. The case of ‘Italian hotels vs. OTAs and TripAdvisor.’ Inf Manag. 2017;54(6):745–56. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.12.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bughin J, Catlin T, Hirt M, Willmott P. Why digital strategies fail 2018;1:61–75.
   Google Scholar