Information Systems and Operations/Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review

References

• Zwass V. Information system. Britannica; No date [accessed 2021 June 15]. https://www.britannica.com/topic/information-system.
   Google Scholar
• Grover V, Lyytinen K. New state of play in information systems research: the push to the edges. MIS Quarterly. 2015;39(2):271–96. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2015/39.2.01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K, Park J, Suh J. Investigating knowledge flows between information systems and other disciplines: seeking greater research opportunities. Data Base Adv Inf Sys. 2018;49(2):14–34. doi:10.1145/3229335.3229338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt JA, Hauser K, Sugimoto CR. Defining the intellectual structure of information systems and related college of business disciplines: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics. 2012;93(2):279–304. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0668-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell R, Taylor B. 2019. Operations and supply chain management. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar A. A bibliometric study of supply chain management. Manage Res Pract. 2016;8:25–38.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Subramanian N, Papadopoulos T. 2017. Information technology for competitive advantage within logistics and supply chains: a review. Transp Res Part E, Logist Transp Rev. 99:14–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyedghorban Z, Tahernejad H, Meriton R, Graham G. Supply chain digitalization: past, present and future. Prod Plann Control. 2020;31(2–3):96–114. doi:10.1080/09537287.2019.1631461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann R, Ferreira L, Moreira AC. The influence of supply chain on the innovation process: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2016;21(3):289–304. doi:10.1108/scm-07-2015-0266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arunachalam D, Kumar N, Kawalek JP. 2018. Understanding big data analytics capabilities in supply chain management: unravelling the issues, challenges and implications for practice. Transp Res Part E-Logist Transp Rev. 114:416–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa MW, Vicente AD, Ladeira MB, de Oliveira MPV. Managing supply chain resources with big data analytics: a systematic review. Int J Logist Res Appl. 2018;21(3):177–200. doi:10.1080/13675567.2017.1369501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamble SS, Gunasekaran A. Big data-driven supply chain performance measurement system: a review and framework for implementation. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(1):65–86. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1630770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhosale VA, Kant R. Metadata analysis of knowledge management in supply chain investigating the past and predicting the future. Bus Proc Manage J. 2016;22(1):140–72. doi:10.1108/bpmj-02-2015-0014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahal H, Gupta M, Bhan N, Cheng TCE. 2020. Operations management research grounded in the resource-based view: a meta-analysis. Int J Prod Econ. 230:16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danese P, Molinaro M, Romano P. Investigating fit in supply chain integration: a systematic literature review on context, practices, performance links. J Purchasing Supply Manage. 2020;26(5):19. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuschner R, Rogers DS, Charvet FF. A meta-analysis of supply chain integration and firm performance. J Supply Chain Manage. 2013;49(2):34–57. doi:10.1111/jscm.12013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Ngai EWT. Information systems in supply chain integration and management. Eur J Oper Res. 2004;159(2):269–95. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2003.08.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahid S, Lehoux N, de Santa-eulalia LA, D’Amours S, Frayret J-M, Venkatadri U. Supply chain modelling frameworks for forest products industry: a systematic literature review. INFOR Inf Sys Oper Res. 2016;54(1):52–75. doi:10.1080/03155986.2016.1149312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schryen G. 2015. Writing qualitative IS literature reviews—Guidelines for synthesis, interpretation, and guidance of research. Commun Assoc Inf Sys. 37:12.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe F. What literature review is not: diversity, boundaries and recommendations. Eur J Inf Syst. 2014;23(3):241–55. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meho LI, Sugimoto CR. Assessing the scholarly impact of information studies: a tale of two citation databases-scopus and web of science. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2009;51(12):2499–508. doi:10.1002/asi.21165.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, KR , Eargle, D. 2021. Theories used in IS research wiki: human behavior project. Boulder, CO; Provo, UT: University of Colorado; Brigham Young University. [accessed 2021 Jun 15]. https://is.theorizeit.org/wiki/
   Google Scholar
• Kembro J, Selviaridis K, Näslund D. Theoretical perspectives on information sharing in supply chains: a systematic literature review and conceptual framework. Supply Chain Manage. 2014;19(5/6):609–25. doi:10.1108/SCM-12-2013-0460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenworthy T, Balakrishnan J. Theory usage in empirical operations management research: a review and discussion. Manage Decis. 2016;54(10):2413–32. doi:10.1108/MD-01-2016-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merigó JM, Yang J-B. 2017. A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega (Oxford). 73:37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen CG, Aase GR, Heiser DR. Journal ranking analyses of operations management research. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2011;31(4):405–22. doi:10.1108/01443571111119533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tüselmann H, Sinkovics RR, Pishchulov G. 2015. Towards a consolidation of worldwide journal rankings – a classification using random forests and aggregate rating via data envelopment analysis. Omega (Oxford). 51:11–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson K, Montabon F. A ranking of supply chain management journals based on departmental lists. Int J Prod Res. 2014;52(14):4364–77. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.885144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing AW. Journal quality list. Harzing.com; 68 th Ed 2021 July 4 [ accessed 2021 06 15]. https://harzing.com/resources/journal-quality-list.
   Google Scholar
• Han JH, Wang YL, Naim M. 2017. Reconceptualization of information technology flexibility for supply chain management: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ. 187:196–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin Y, Vonderembse M, Ragu-Nathan TS, Smith JT. 2014. Exploring relationships among it-enabled sharing capability, supply chain flexibility, and competitive performance. Int J Prod Econ. 153:24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Van Donk DP, van der Vaart T. The different impact of inter-organizational and intra-organizational ICT on supply chain performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2016;36(7):803–24. doi:10.1108/ijopm-11-2014-0516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusset X. 2016. Does supply chain visibility enhance agility? Int J Prod Econ. 171:46–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe CM, Leidner DE, Roldan JL, Leal-Rodriguez AL. Impact of IS capabilities on firm performance: the roles of organizational agility and industry technology intensity. Decis Sci. 2020;51(3):575–619. doi:10.1111/deci.12379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laihonen H, Pekkola S. Impacts of using a performance measurement system in supply chain management: a case study. Int J Prod Res. 2016;54(18):5607–17. doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1181810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evangelista P, Mogre R, Perego A, Raspagliesi A, Sweeney E. A survey based analysis of it adoption and 3PLS’ performance. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2012;17(2):172–86. doi:10.1108/13598541211212906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg E, Abrahamsson M. Logistics capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage. Int J Logist Res Appl. 2011;14(1):61–75. doi:10.1080/13675567.2010.551110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubbio I, Bruccoleri M, Pietrosi A, Ragonese B. Digital health technology enhances resilient behaviour: evidence from the ward. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2019;39(4):594–627. doi:10.1108/ijopm-02-2018-0057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Zhao XD, Lyles M. Effects of absorptive capacity, trust and information systems on product innovation. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2018;38(2):493–512. doi:10.1108/ijopm-11-2015-0687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bravo MIR, Montes FJL, Moreno AR. Open innovation and quality management: the moderating role of interorganisational IT infrastructure and complementary learning styles. Prod Plann Control. 2017;28(9):744–57. doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1306895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali Z, Bi GB, Mehreen A. Does supply chain finance improve SMES performance? The moderating role of trade digitization. Bus Proc Manage J. 2018;26(1):150–67. doi:10.1108/bpmj-05-2018-0133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burin ARG, Perez-Arostegui MN, Llorens-Montes J. Ambidexterity and IT competence can improve supply chain flexibility? A resource orchestration approach. J Purchasing Supply Manage. 2020;26(2):15. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakrabarty S, Wang L. Sensitivity about inventory leanness. J Manuf Technol Manage. 2021;32(2):376–99. doi:10.1108/jmtm-12-2019-0422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SS, Ou-Yang C, Chou TC. Developing SCM framework associated with IT-enabled SC network capabilities. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 2017;47(9):820–42. doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2016-0217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen M, Chen Y, Liu HF, Xu H. Influence of information technology capability on service innovation in manufacturing firms. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2021;121(2):173–91. doi:10.1108/imds-04-2020-0218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng LC, Gibson ML, Carrillo EE, Fitch G. A technology-centric framework for investigating business operations. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2011;111(3–4):509–30. doi:10.1108/02635571111133524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng JH, Chen MC, Huang CM. Assessing inter-organizational innovation performance through relational governance and dynamic capabilities in supply chains. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2014;19(2):173–86. doi:10.1108/SCM-05-2013-0162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choy KL, Gunasekaran A, Lam HY, Chow KH, Tsim YC, Ng TW, Tse YK, Lu XA. Impact of information technology on the performance of logistics industry: the case of Hong Kong and Pearl Delta region. J Oper Res Soc. 2014;65(6):904–16. doi:10.1057/jors.2013.121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding MJ, Kam BH, Lalwani CS. Operational routines and supply chain competencies of Chinese logistics service providers. Int J Logist Manage. 2012;23(3):383–407. doi:10.1108/09574091211289237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng C, Xi NN, Zhuang GJ, Hamari J. The role of interactive practice in business performance. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2020;120(8):1521–42. doi:10.1108/imds-01-2020-0042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao PR, Zhang JL, Gong YM, Li HT. Effects of technical IT capabilities on organizational agility the moderating role of IT business spanning capability. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2020;120(5):941–61. doi:10.1108/imds-08-2019-0433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong FM, Kung DS, Zeng T. 2018. The impact of different contract structures on IT investment in logistics outsourcing. Int J Prod Econ. 195:158–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo BF, Ul Haq MZ, Gu MH. The impact of IT application on supply chain learning and service performance. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2019;120(1):1–20. doi:10.1108/imds-10-2018-0476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huscroft JR, Hazen BT, Hall DJ, Hanna JB. Task-technology fit for reverse logistics performance. Int J Logist Manage. 2013;24(2):230–46. doi:10.1108/ijlm-02-2012-0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang Y, Zhao J. Co-creating business value of information technology. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2014;114(1):53–69. doi:10.1108/imds-04-2013-0171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu Q, Liu BN, Song H. How can SMES acquire supply chain financing: the capabilities and information perspective. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2020;120(4):784–809. doi:10.1108/imds-02-2019-0072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novais L, Marin JMM, Moyano-Fuentes J. Lean production implementation, cloud-supported logistics and supply chain integration: interrelationships and effects on business performance. Int J Logist Manage. 2020;31(3):629–63. doi:10.1108/ijlm-02-2019-0052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qrunfleh S, Tarafdar M. 2014. Supply chain information systems strategy: impacts on supply chain performance and firm performance. Int J Prod Econ. 147:340–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roeck D, Sternberg H, Hofmann E. Distributed ledger technology in supply chains: a transaction cost perspective. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(7):2124–41. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1657247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangari MS, Hosnavi R, Zahedi MR. The impact of knowledge management processes on supply chain performance an empirical study. Int J Logist Manage. 2015;26(3):603–26. doi:10.1108/ijlm-09-2012-0100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tai YM. Competitive advantage impacts of direct procurement management capabilities and web-based direct procurement system. Int J Logist Res Appl. 2013;16(3):193–208. doi:10.1080/13675567.2013.811481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarafdar M, Qrunfleh S. Agile supply chain strategy and supply chain performance: complementary roles of supply chain practices and information systems capability for agility. Int J Prod Res. 2017;55(4):925–38. doi:10.1080/00207543.2016.1203079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao Y, Kohli R, Sherer SA, Cederlund J. Learning curves in collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment (CPFR) information systems: an empirical analysis from a mobile phone manufacturer. J Oper Manage. 2013;31(6):285–97. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye F, Wang ZQ. Effects of information technology alignment and information sharing on supply chain operational performance. Comput Ind Eng. 2013;65(3):370–77. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2013.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chod J, Trichakis N, Tsoukalas G, Aspegren H, Weber M. On the financing benefits of supply chain transparency and blockchain adoption. Manage Sci. 2020;66(10):4378–96. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2019.3434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du MX, Chen QJ, Xiao J, Yang HH, Ma XF. Supply chain finance innovation using blockchain. IEEE Trans Eng Manage. 2020;67(4):1045–58. doi:10.1109/tem.2020.2971858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Bryde DJ, Dwivedi YK, Papadopoulos T. Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(11):3381–98. doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1722860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo F, Nicoletti L, Padovano A, d’Atri G, Forte M. 2019. Blockchain-enabled supply chain: an experimental study. Comput Ind Eng. 136:57–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue XF, Dou JP, Shang Y. Blockchain-driven supply chain decentralized operations - Information sharing perspective. Bus Proc Manage J. 2021;27(1):184–203. doi:10.1108/bpmj-12-2019-0518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi ML, Nandi S, Moya H, Kaynak H. Blockchain technology-enabled supply chain systems and supply chain performance: a resource-based view. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2020;25(6):841–62. doi:10.1108/scm-12-2019-0444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandi S, Sarkis J, Hervani A, Helms M. Do blockchain and circular economy practices improve post covid-19 supply chains? A resource-based and resource dependence perspective. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2021;121(2):333–63. doi:10.1108/imds-09-2020-0560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez V, Zhao M, Blujdea C, Han X, Neely A, Albores P. Blockchain-driven customer order management. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2019;39(6/7/8):993–1022. doi:10.1108/ijopm-01-2019-0100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cegielski CG, Jones-Farmer LA, Wu Y, Hazen BT. Adoption of cloud computing technologies in supply chains an organizational information processing theory approach. Int J Logist Manage. 2012;23(2):184–211. doi:10.1108/09574091211265350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodero AC, Rabinovich E, Sinha RK. Drivers and outcomes of open-standard interorganizational information systems assimilation in high-technology supply chains. J Oper Manage. 2013;31(6):330–44. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chong AYL, Liu MJ, Luo J, Keng-Boon O. 2015. Predicting RFID adoption in healthcare supply chain from the perspectives of users. Int J Prod Econ. 159:66–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng BC, Yao T, Jiang B, Talluri S. How to motivate vendor’s RFID adoption beyond mandate? A retailer’s perspective. Int J Prod Res. 2014;52(7):2173–93. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.860493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basole RC, Nowak M. 2018. Assimilation of tracking technology in the supply chain. Transp Res Part E-Logist Transp Rev. 114:350–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin CH, Lin MC. The determinants of using cloud supply chain adoption. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2019;119(2):351–66. doi:10.1108/imds-12-2017-0589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams Z, Garver MS, Richey Jr RG. Security capability and logistics service provider selection: an adaptive choice study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 2019;49(4):330–55. doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-04-2018-0173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aral S, Bakos Y, Brynjolfsson E. Information technology, repeated contracts, and the number of suppliers. Manage Sci. 2018;64(2):592–612. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathauer M, Hofmann E. Technology adoption by logistics service providers. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 2019;49(4):416–34. doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2019-0064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mola L, Russo I, Giangreco A, Rossignoli C. Who knows what? Reconfiguring the governance and the capabilities of the supply chain between physical and digital processes in the fashion industry. Prod Plann Control. 2017;28(16):1284–97. doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1375147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldanha JP, Mello JE, Knemeyer AM, Vijayaraghavan TAS. Implementing supply chain technologies in emerging markets: an institutional theory perspective. J Supply Chain Manage. 2015;51(1):5–26. doi:10.1111/jscm.12065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan TR, Richey Jr RG, Autry CW. Developing a reverse logistics competency the influence of collaboration and information technology. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 2016;46(3):293–315. doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2014-0124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epelbaum FMB, Martinez MG. 2014. The technological evolution of food traceability systems and their impact on firm sustainable performance: a RBV approach. Int J Prod Econ. 150:215–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kembro JH, Danielsson V, Smajli G. Network video technology exploring an innovative approach to improving warehouse operations. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 2017;47(7):623–45. doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-02-2017-0112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pu XD, Chong AYL, Cai Z, Lim MK, Tan KH. Leveraging open-standard interorganizational information systems for process adaptability and alignment an empirical analysis. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2019;39(6/7/8):962–92. doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2018-0747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn BB, Huo B, Zhao X. The impact of supply chain integration on performance: a contingency and configuration approach. J Oper Manage. 2010;28(1):58–71. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiga AS, Nilsson A, Ax C. 2015. Relationships between internal and external information systems integration, cost and quality performance, and firm profitability. Int J Prod Econ. 169:422–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei SB, Yin JM, Chen XY. Paradox of supply chain integration and firm performance: the moderating roles of distributive and procedural justice*. Decis Sci. 2021;52(1):78–108. doi:10.1111/deci.12438.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu DH, Huo BF, Sun LY. Relationships between intra-organizational resources, supply chain integration and business performance. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2014;114(8):1186–206. doi:10.1108/imds-05-2014-0156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song G, Song SH, Sun LY. Supply chain integration in omni-channel retailing: a logistics perspective. Int J Logist Manage. 2019;30(2):527–48. doi:10.1108/ijlm-12-2017-0349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon-Jones E, Squire B, Autry CW, Petersen KJ. A contingent resource-based perspective of supply chain resilience and robustness. J Supply Chain Manage. 2014;50(3):55–73. doi:10.1111/jscm.12050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai Z, Huang Q, Liu HF, Liang L. The moderating role of information technology capability in the relationship between supply chain collaboration and organizational responsiveness evidence from China. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2016;36(10):1247–71. doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2014-0406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Papadopoulos T, Luo ZW, Roubaudl D. Upstream supply chain visibility and complexity effect on focal company’s sustainable performance: Indian manufacturers’ perspective. Ann Oper Res. 2020;290(1–2):343–67. doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2544-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu QN, Jitpaipoon T, Yang J. 2017. The impact of information integration on financial performance: a knowledge-based view. Int J Prod Econ. 191:221–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HF. Antecedents and consequences of electronic supply chain management diffusion the moderating effect of knowledge sharing. Int J Logist Manage. 2017;28(2):699–718. doi:10.1108/ijlm-01-2016-0023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu HF, Wei SB, Ke WL, Wei KK, Hua ZS. The configuration between supply chain integration and information technology competency: a resource orchestration perspective. J Oper Manage. 2016;44(1):13–29. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2016.03.009.
   Google Scholar
• Mora-Monge C, Quesada G, Gonzalez ME, Davis JM. Trust, power and supply chain integration in web-enabled supply chains. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2019;24(4):524–39. doi:10.1108/scm-02-2018-0078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shou YY, Li LJ, Kang MG, Park Y. Enhancing quality management through intra- and inter-plant integration in manufacturing networks. Total Qual Manage Bus Excellence. 2020;31(5–6):623–35. doi:10.1080/14783363.2018.1440968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng PH, Liao CH. Supply chain integration, information technology, market orientation and firm performance in container shipping firms. Int J Logist Manage. 2015;26(1):82–106. doi:10.1108/ijlm-09-2012-0088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei HL, Wong CWY, Lai KH. Linking inter-organizational trust with logistics information integration and partner cooperation under environmental uncertainty. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;139(2):642–53. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.05.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei SB, Ke WL, Liu HF, Wei KK. Supply chain information integration and firm performance: are explorative and exploitative IT capabilities complementary or substitutive? Decis Sci. 2020;51(3):464–99. doi:10.1111/deci.12364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CWV, Lai KH, Cheng TCE, Lun YHV. 2015. The role of IT-enabled collaborative decision making in inter-organizational information integration to improve customer service performance. Int J Prod Econ. 159:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CY, Wong CWY, Boon-itt S. Effects of green supply chain integration and green innovation on environmental and cost performance. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(15):4589–609. doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1756510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CS, Yeo GT, Vinh TV. The effects of intra- and extra-organisational integration capabilities in the container shipping freight industry. Int J Logist Res Appl. 2015;18(4):325–41. doi:10.1080/13675567.2014.945402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CS. The antecedents and consequences of supply chain service capabilities in the context of container shipping. Int J Logist Manage. 2016;27(2):236–62. doi:10.1108/ijlm-09-2014-0151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Y, Chaudhuri A, Farooq S. Interplant coordination, supply chain integration, and operational performance of a plant in a manufacturing network: a mediation analysis. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2016;21(5):550–68. doi:10.1108/scm-10-2015-0391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Swink M. Leveraging supply chain integration through planning comprehensiveness: an organizational information processing theory perspective. Decis Sci. 2015;46(5):823–61. doi:10.1111/deci.12166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu KK, Luo BN, Feng X, Liu JN. Supply chain information integration, flexibility, and operational performance: an archival search and content analysis. Int J Logist Manage. 2018;29(1):340–64. doi:10.1108/ijlm-08-2016-0185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeter K, Szasz L, Racz BG. 2016. The impact of subsidiaries’ internal and external integration on operational performance. Int J Prod Econ. 182:73–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett SE, Wallin C, Allred C, Fawcett AM, Magnan GM. Information technology as an enabler of supply chain collaboration: a dynamic-capabilities perspective. J Supply Chain Manage. 2011;47(1):38–59. doi:10.1111/j.1745-493X.2010.03213.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandal S, Jha RR. Exploring the importance of collaborative assets to hospital-supplier integration in healthcare supply chains. Int J Prod Res. 2018;56(7):2666–83. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1381349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruggero G, Deflorin P, Scherrer M. Exploiting the potential of manufacturing network embeddedness an OM perspective. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2016;36(12):1741–68. doi:10.1108/ijopm-11-2014-0559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanpoucke E, Vereecke A, Muylle S. Leveraging the impact of supply chain integration through information technology. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2017;37(4):510–30. doi:10.1108/ijopm-07-2015-0441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Xie HM, Liu HW, Duan HR. Leveraging informational and relational capabilities for performance an empirical investigation. Int J Logist Manage. 2018;29(3):985–1000. doi:10.1108/ijlm-04-2017-0087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FTS, Chong AYL, Zhou L. An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration diffusion in SMES. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;138(2):329–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson D, Jin YH, Fawcett AM, Fawcett SE. Collaborative process design a dynamic capabilities view of mitigating the barriers to working together. Int J Logist Manage. 2017;28(2):571–99. doi:10.1108/ijlm-02-2016-0044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camara SB, Fuentes JM, Marin JMM. Cloud computing, web 2.0, and operational performance the mediating role of supply chain integration. Int J Logist Manage. 2015;26(3):426–58. doi:10.1108/ijlm-07-2013-0085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shee H, Miah SJ, Fairfield L, Pujawan N. The impact of cloud-enabled process integration on supply chain performance and firm sustainability: the moderating role of top management. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2018;23(6):500–17. doi:10.1108/scm-09-2017-0309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irani Z, Sharif AM, Papadopoulos T, Love PED. Social media and web 2.0 for knowledge sharing in product design. Prod Plann Control. 2017;28(13):1047–65. doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1329955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao L, Zhong RY, Zhang YF. Cooperative models for technology supply chain in online social community. Comput Ind Eng. 2020;145(10):106460. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2020.106460.
   Google Scholar
• Chen DQ, Preston DS, Xia WD. Enhancing hospital supply chain performance: a relational view and empirical test. J Oper Manage. 2013;31(6):391–408. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanyoma KE, Agbola FW, Oloruntoba R. An evaluation of supply chain integration across multi-tier supply chains of manufacturing-based SMES in Malawi. Int J Logist Manage. 2018;29(3):1001–24. doi:10.1108/ijlm-10-2017-0277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanyoma KE, Agbola FW, Oloruntoba R. Inhibitors and enablers of supply chain integration across multiple supply chain tiers: evidence from Malawi. Int J Logist Manage. 2021;32(2):618–49. doi:10.1108/ijlm-06-2019-0161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauremaa J, Tanskanen K. Designing interorganizational information systems for supply chain integration: a framework. Int J Logist Manage. 2016;27(1):71–94. doi:10.1108/ijlm-01-2013-0008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirkovski K, Lowry PB, Feng B. Factors that influence interorganizational use of information and communications technology in relationship-based supply chains: evidence from the Macedonian and American wine industries. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2016;21(3):334–51. doi:10.1108/scm-08-2015-0343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZQ, Huo BF, Qi YN, Zhao XD. A resource-based view on enablers of supplier integration: evidence from China. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2016;116(3):416–44. doi:10.1108/imds-04-2015-0146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao XD, Huo BF, Selen W, Yeung JHY. The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration. J Oper Manage. 2011;29(1–2):17–32. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Dai J, Cui L. 2020. The impact of digital technologies on economic and environmental performance in the context of industry 4.0: a moderated mediation model. Int J Prod Econ. 229:13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor DE. Maximizing the potential of contemporary workplace monitoring: techno-cultural developments, transactive memory, and management planning. J Bus Logist. 2016;37(1):18–25. doi:10.1111/jbl.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Swink M. An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: an organizational information processing theory perspective. Prod Oper Manage. 2018;27(10):1849–67. doi:10.1111/poms.12746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamba SF, Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Akter S. 2020. The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: the moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Int J Prod Econ. 222:14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorentz H, Aminoff A, Kaipia R, Pihlajamaa M, Ehtamo J, Tanskanen K. Acquisition of supply market intelligence - an information processing perspective. J Purchasing Supply Manage. 2020;26(5):16. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz MM, Telles R. Big data analytics in supply chain and logistics: an empirical approach. Int J Logist Manage. 2018;29(2):767–83. doi:10.1108/ijlm-05-2017-0116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker T, Jayaraman V. Managing information and supplies inventory operations in a manufacturing environment. Part 1: an action research study. Int J Prod Res. 2012;50(6):1666–81. doi:10.1080/00207543.2010.550697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangari MS, Razmi J. Business intelligence competence, agile capabilities, and agile performance in supply chain an empirical study. Int J Logist Manage. 2015;26(2):356–80. doi:10.1108/ijlm-01-2013-0012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafiq A, Ahmed MU, Mahmoodi F. 2020. Impact of supply chain analytics and customer pressure for ethical conduct on socially responsible practices and performance: an exploratory study. Int J Prod Econ. 225:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey R, Bryde DJ, Foropon C, Tiwari M, Dwivedi Y, Schiffling S. An investigation of information alignment and collaboration as complements to supply chain agility in humanitarian supply chain. Int J Prod Res. 2021;59(5):1586–605. doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1865583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bala H, Venkatesh V. Employees’ reactions to IT-enabled process innovations in the age of data analytics in healthcare. Bus Proc Manage J. 2017;23(3):671–702. doi:10.1108/bpmj-11-2015-0166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Roubaud D, Wamba SF, Giannakis M, Foropon C. 2019. Big data analytics and organizational culture as complements to swift trust and collaborative performance in the humanitarian supply chain. Int J Prod Econ. 210:120–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Yi SP. A study on supply chain investment decision-making and coordination in the big data environment. Ann Oper Res. 2018;270(1–2):235–53. doi:10.1007/s10479-017-2424-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamba SF, Akter S. Understanding supply chain analytics capabilities and agility for data-rich environments. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2019;39(6/7/8):887–912. doi:10.1108/ijopm-01-2019-0025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu WT, Chavez R, Jacobs MA, Feng MY. 2018. Data-driven supply chain capabilities and performance: a resource-based view. Transp Res Part E-Logist Transp Rev. 114:371–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae B, Olson D, Sheu C. The impact of supply chain analytics on operational performance: a resource-based view. Int J Prod Res. 2014;52(16):4695–710. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.861616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavez R, Yu WT, Jacobs MA, Feng MY. Data-driven supply chains, manufacturing capability and customer satisfaction. Prod Plann Control. 2017;28(11–12):906–18. doi:10.1080/09537287.2017.1336788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelseth P, Molka-Danielsen J, White BE. On data and connectivity in complete supply chains. Bus Proc Manage J. 2019;25(5):1145–63. doi:10.1108/bpmj-09-2017-0251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen BT, Weigel FK, Ezell JD, Boehmke BC, Bradley RV. 2017. Toward understanding outcomes associated with data quality improvement. Int J Prod Econ. 193:737–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood R, Meriton R, Graham G, Hennelly P, Kumar M. Exploring the influence of big data on city transport operations: a Markovian approach. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2017;37(1):75–104. doi:10.1108/ijopm-03-2015-0179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjya J, Ellison AB, Pang V, Gezdur A. Creation of unstructured big data from customer service: the case of parcel shipping companies on Twitter. Int J Logist Manage. 2018;29(2):723–38. doi:10.1108/ijlm-06-2017-0157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae B. 2015. Insights from hashtag #supplychain and Twitter analytics: considering Twitter and Twitter data for supply chain practice and research. Int J Prod Econ. 165:247–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo VE, Bell JE, Rose WJ, Rodrigues AM. Crowdsourcing last mile delivery: strategic implications and future research directions. J Bus Logist. 2018;39(1):7–25. doi:10.1111/jbl.12173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang ZH, Xu ML. 2020. Dynamic game strategies of a two-stage remanufacturing closed-loop supply chain considering big data marketing, technological innovation and overconfidence. Comput Ind Eng. 145:15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith JR, Yost J, Lopez H. 2020. Electronic data interchange and enterprise resource planning technology in supply chain contracts. Comput Ind Eng. 142:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Bryde DJ, Giannakis M, Foropon C, Roubaud D, Hazen BT. 2020. Big data analytics and artificial intelligence pathway to operational performance under the effects of entrepreneurial orientation and environmental dynamism: a study of manufacturing organisations. Int J Prod Econ. 226:12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov D, Tang CS, Dolgui A, Battini D, Das A. Researchers’ perspectives on industry 4.0: multi-disciplinary analysis and opportunities for operations management. Int J Prod Res. 2021;59(7):2055–78. doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1798035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport TT. From analytics to artificial intelligence. J Bus Anal. 2018a;1(2):73–80. doi:10.1080/2573234X.2018.1543535.
   Google Scholar
• Yao YL, Dong Y, Dresner M. Supply chain learning and spillovers in vendor managed inventory. Decis Sci. 2012;43(6):979–1001. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00379.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang TS, Fu HP, Ku CY. A novel model to implement ERP based on dynamic capabilities a case study of an IC design company. J Manuf Technol Manage. 2015;26(7):1053–68. doi:10.1108/jmtm-12-2013-0185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M, Suresh NC, Kocabasoglu-Hillmer C. An impact of manufacturing flexibility and technological dimensions of manufacturing strategy on improving supply chain responsiveness: business environment perspective. Int J Prod Res. 2013;51(18):5597–611. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.790569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra AN, Devaraj S, Vaidyanathan G. Capability hierarchy in electronic procurement and procurement process performance: an empirical analysis. J Oper Manage. 2013;31(6):376–90. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang W, Min H. Assessing the impact of ERP on supplier performance. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2013;113(7):1025–47. doi:10.1108/imds-01-2013-0035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta S, Kumar S, Singh SK, Foropon C, Chandra C. Role of cloud ERP on the performance of an organization: contingent resource-based view perspective. Int J Logist Manage. 2018;29(2):659–75. doi:10.1108/ijlm-07-2017-0192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiengarten F, Fynes B, Humphreys P, Chavez RC, McKittrick A. Assessing the value creation process of e-business along the supply chain. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2011;16(4):207–19. doi:10.1108/13598541111139035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang D, Min H. Identifying the drivers of enterprise resource planning and assessing its impacts on supply chain performances. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2015;115(3):541–69. doi:10.1108/imds-10-2014-0284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amrouche N, Yan RL. A manufacturer distribution issue: how to manage an online and a traditional retailer. Ann Oper Res. 2016;244(2):257–94. doi:10.1007/s10479-015-1982-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiengarten F, Humphreys P, McKittrick A, Fynes B. Investigating the impact of e-business applications on supply chain collaboration in the German automotive industry. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2013;33(1):25–48. doi:10.1108/01443571311288039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiengarten F, Bhakoo V, Gimenez C. The impact of host country regulatory quality on the value creation process in e-business supply chains. Int J Prod Res. 2015;53(16):4963–78. doi:10.1080/00207543.2015.1008108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhakoo V, Chan C. Collaborative implementation of e-business processes within the health-care supply chain: the Monash pharmacy project. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2011;16(3):184–93. doi:10.1108/13598541111127173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsironis LK, Gotzamani KD, Mastos TD. E-business critical success factors: toward the development of an integrated success model. Bus Proc Manage J. 2017;23(5):874–96. doi:10.1108/bpmj-02-2016-0030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen JV, Chen Y, Capistrano EPS. Process quality and collaboration quality on B2B e-commerce. Ind Manage Data Sys. 2013;113(6):908–26. doi:10.1108/imds-10-2012-0368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu QH, Liu N. Pricing games of mixed conventional and e-commerce distribution channels. Comput Ind Eng. 2013;64(1):122–32. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2012.09.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenherr T, Mabert VA. A comparison of online and offline procurement in B2B markets: results from a large-scale survey. Int J Prod Res. 2011;49(3):827–46. doi:10.1080/00207540903473359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauppi K, Brandon-Jones A, Ronchi S, van Raaij EM. Tools without skills: exploring the moderating effect of absorptive capacity on the relationship between e-purchasing tools and category performance. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2013;33(7):828–57. doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2011-0445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng KN, Lee Z, Shomali H. Airline firm boundary and ticket distribution in electronic markets. Int J Prod Econ. 2012;137(1):137–44. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanorkar S, Donohue K, Linderman K. Repurposing materials and waste through online exchanges: overcoming the last hurdle. Prod Oper Manage. 2015;24(9):1473–93. doi:10.1111/poms.12345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao L, Chen YJ. Strategic motive for introducing internet channels in a supply chain. Prod Oper Manage. 2014;23(1):36–47. doi:10.1111/poms.12051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghobakhloo M, Fathi M. Corporate survival in industry 4.0 era: the enabling role of lean-digitized manufacturing. J Manuf Technol Manage. 2020;31(1):1–30. doi:10.1108/jmtm-11-2018-0417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardito L, Petruzzelli AM, Panniello U, Garavelli AC. Towards industry 4.0 mapping digital technologies for supply chain management-marketing integration. Bus Proc Manage J. 2019;25(2):323–46. doi:10.1108/bpmj-04-2017-0088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillani F, Chatha KA, Jajja MSS, Farooq S. 2020. Implementation of digital manufacturing technologies: antecedents and consequences. Int J Prod Econ. 229:21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bag S, Gupta S, Luo ZW. Examining the role of logistics 4.0 enabled dynamic capabilities on firm performance. Int J Logist Manage. 2020;31(3):607–28. doi:10.1108/ijlm-11-2019-0311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waschull S, Bokhorst JAC, Molleman E, Wortmann JC. 2020. Work design in future industrial production: transforming towards cyber-physical systems. Comput Ind Eng. 139:11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazen BT, Byrd TA. Toward creating competitive advantage with logistics information technology. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manage. 2012;42(1):8–35. doi:10.1108/09600031211202454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrle M, Lechler S, von der Gracht HA, Hartmann E. Digitalization and its impact on the future role of SCM executives in talent management - an international cross-industry Delphi study. J Bus Logist. 2020;41(4):356–83. doi:10.1111/jbl.12259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneshvar Kakhki M, Gargeya VB. Information systems for supply chain management: a systematic literature analysis. Int J Prod Res. 2019;57(2):1–22. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1570376.
   Google Scholar
• Matook S, Brown SA. Characteristics of IT artifacts: a systems thinking-based framework for delineating and theorizing IT artifacts. Inf Sys J. 2017;27(3):309–46. doi:10.1111/isj.12108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang CT, Kou TC, Koo TL. A systematic literature review of the IT-based supply chain management system: towards a sustainable supply chain management model. Sustainability. 2021;13(5):2547. doi:10.3390/su13052547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkel HS, Hartmann E. Internet of things - the future of managing supply chain risks. Supply Chain Manage Intl J. 2020;25(5):535–48. doi:10.1108/scm-09-2019-0356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz R, Benninghaus C, Friedli T, Netland TH. Digitization of manufacturing: the role of external search. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2020;40(7–8):1129–52. doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2019-0498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar