Achieving Industry-aligned Education through Digital-Commons: A Case Study

References

• Kumar A. Personal, academic and career development in higher education: Soaring to success. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. 2007; ISBN10: 0–415–42359–7.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard L, Jones K, Lang G. Information system curriculum versus employer needs: a gap analysis. J Inf Syst Educ. 2019;17:32.
   Google Scholar
• Tan YL, Nakata K, Paul D. Aligning is masters programs with industry. J Inf Syst Educ. 2018;29:169–82.
   Google Scholar
• Römgens I, Scoupe R, Beausaert S. Unraveling the concept of employability, bringing together research on employability in higher education and the workplace. Stud High Educ. 2020;45(12):2588–603. doi:10.1080/03075079.2019.1623770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFillippi RJ, Arthur MB. The boundaryless career: a competency‐based perspective. J Organ Behav. 1994;15(4):307–24. doi:10.1002/job.4030150403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancha R, Shankaranarayanan G. Educating an innovative workforce for the digital economy. AMCIS 2017 Proceedings; August 10-12, 2017; Boston, MA, USA. 2017;32.
   Google Scholar
• Luke A, Sefton-Green J, Graham P, Kellner D, Ladwig J. Digital ethics, political economy, and the curriculum: this changes everything. In: Handbook of Writing, Literacies, and Education in Digital Cultures; Mills, Kathy, Stornaiuolo, Amy, Smith, Anna, Pandya, Jessica Zacher. New York: Routledge; 2018. doi:10.4324/9781315465258.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang D, Ma Z, Wang M. The information systems core: a study from the perspective of is core curricula in the us. J Inf Syst Educ. 2015;13(6):27. doi:10.5859/KAIS.2015.24.1.27.
   Google Scholar
• Cummings J, Janicki T. Survey of technology and skills in demand: 2020 update. J Inf Syst Educ. 2021;32:150–59.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens G; Elearnspace. Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Elearnspace org; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Utecht J, Keller D. Becoming relevant again: applying connectivism learning theory to today’s classrooms. Crit Questions Educ. 2019;10:107–19.
   Google Scholar
• Goldie JGS. Connectivism: a knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Med Teach. 2016;38(10):1064–69. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess C, Ostrom E. Understanding knowledge as a commons. Cambridge (Massachusetts, London, England): The MIT Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Frischmann BM, Madison MJ, Strandburg KJ. Governing knowledge commons. New York: Oxford University Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Acharya R, Gundi M, Ngo T, Pandey N, Patel SK, Pinchoff J, Rampal S, Saggurti N, Santhya K, White C. Covid-19-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices among adolescents and young people in Bihar and Uttar Pradesh. India: Study description; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Brasseux C, Ngo T. Dataset: case reports of covid-19 in the United States by poverty, gender and race—a data review protocol. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Downes S. Recent work in connectivism. Eur J Open Distance E-Learn. 2019;22(2):113–32. doi:10.2478/eurodl-2019-0014.
   Google Scholar
• Dulong de Rosnay M, Stalder F. Digital commons. Internet Policy Rev. 2020;9(4):1–22. doi:10.14763/2020.4.1530.
   Google Scholar
• Morell MF. Governing Knowledge Commons. In: Madison, M. J, Strandburg, K, Frischmann, B, editors. Governance of online creation communities for the building of digital commons: Viewed through the framework of the institutional analysis and development; New York: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 281.
   Google Scholar
• Berger D, Shashidhar N, Varol C. Using ITIL 4 in security management. 2020 8th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS); Beirut, Lebanon; 2020: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• De Haes S, Van Grembergen W, Debreceny RS. Cobit 5 and enterprise governance of information technology: building blocks and research opportunities. J Inf Syst. 2013;27(1):307–24. doi:10.2308/isys-50422.
   Google Scholar
• Leidig P, Salmela H. Is 2020:A competency model for undergraduate programs in information systems. ACM, AIS, and Education SIG of the Association for Information Systems; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Proehl T, Langkau TF, Erek K, Kolbe LM, Zarnekow R. It service management within the is curriculum: comparing two German experiences. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems; 2013 August 15-17; Chicago, Illinois.
   Google Scholar
• Cater-Steel A, Hine MJ, Grant G. Embedding it service management in the academic curriculum: a cross-national comparison. J Glob Inf Manag. 2010;13(4):64–92. doi:10.1080/1097198X.2010.10856526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin-Stephens S, Smith S, Peso M, Pang V. The career information literacy learning framework: a case study of information systems, information technology and engineering capstone units of an Australian university. 20th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2016; Chiayi, Taiwan; 2016: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Setor TK, Joseph D. College-based career interventions: raising it employability and persistence in early careers of it professionals. J Inf Syst Educ. 2021;32:262–73.
   Google Scholar
• Elrod CC, Flachsbart BB, Kehr WR. Improving student employability by embedding marketing concepts in information science and technology courses. Issues Inf Syst. 2009;10:155–66.
   Google Scholar
• Laguador JM, Ramos LR. Industry-partners’ preferences for graduates: input on curriculum development. J Educ Lit. 2014;1:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Carmichael G, Jordan C, Ross A, Evans Adnani A. Curriculum-aligned work-integrated learning: a new kind of industry-academic degree partnership. Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education; Baltimore, Maryland USA; 2018: 586–91.
   Google Scholar
• Saltz J, Serva MA, Heckman R. The get immersion experience: a new model for leveraging the synergies between industry and academia. J Inf Syst Educ. 2013;24:121.
   Google Scholar
• Grebski W, Grebski M. Keeping higher education aligned with the requirements and expectations of the knowledge-based economy. Production Engineering Archives. 2018;21: 3–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ramakrishnan M, Shrestha A, Soar J. Innovation centric knowledge commons—a systematic literature review and conceptual model. J Open Innov: Technol Mark Complex. 2021;7(1):35. doi:10.3390/joitmc7010035.
   Google Scholar
• Allarakhia M, Walsh S. Analyzing and organizing nanotechnology development: application of the institutional analysis development framework to nanotechnology consortia. Technovation. 2012;32(3–4):216–26. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2011.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha A, Cater-Steel A, Toleman M, Behari S, Rajaeian MM. Development and evaluation of a software-mediated process assessment method for it service management. Inf Manag. 2020;57(4):103213. doi:10.1016/j.im.2019.103213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarà M, Barberà E. Learning online: massive open online courses (MOOCs), connectivism, and cultural psychology. Distance Educ. 2013;34(1):129–36. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.770428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Alan RH, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 2004;28(1):75–105. doi:10.2307/25148625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. Manag Inf Syst. 2007;24(3):45–77. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hevner AR. A three cycle view of design science research. Scand J Inf Syst. 2007;19:4.
   Google Scholar
• Potgieter B, Botha J, Lew C. Evidence that use of the ITIL framework is effective. 18th Annual conference of the national advisory committee on computing qualifications; 2005; Tauranga, NZ.
   Google Scholar
• Cater-Steel A, Tan W-G, Toleman M. Challenge of adopting multiple process improvement frameworks. Proceedings of 14th European conference on information systems (ECIS 2006); Istanbul, Turkey; 2006: 1375–86.
   Google Scholar
• Jeners S, Lichter H, Rosenkranz CG. Efficient adoption and assessment of multiple process improvement reference models. e-Informatica. 2013;7:15–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pardo C, Pino FJ, Garcia F, Baldassarre MT, Piattini M. From chaos to the systematic harmonization of multiple reference models: a harmonization framework applied in two case studies. J Syst Softw. 2013;86(1):125–43. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2012.07.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardo C, Pino FJ, García F, Piattini M, Baldassarre MT. An ontology for the harmonization of multiple standards and models. Comput Stand Interfaces. 2012;34(1):48–59. doi:10.1016/j.csi.2011.05.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls JG, Widmeyer GR, El Sawy OA. Building an information system design theory for vigilant eis. Inf Syst Res. 1992;3(1):36–59. doi:10.1287/isre.3.1.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walls JG, Widermeyer GR, El Sawy OA. Assessing information system design theory in perspective: how useful was our 1992 initial rendition? J Inf Technol Theory Appl. 2004;6:6.
   Google Scholar
• Kuechler W, Vaishnavi V. A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. J Assoc Inf Syst. 2012;13(6):395. doi:10.17705/1jais.00300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong MIU, Ameedeen MA, Kamarudin IE. Approaches in creating meta-requirement: a systematic literature review. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 2020;769(1):012049. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/769/1/012049.
   Google Scholar
• Mindel V, Mathiassen L, Rai A. The sustainability of polycentric information commons. MIS Q. 2018;42(2):607–32. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2018/14015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Rodas-Silva J, Galindo JA, García-Gutiérrez J, Benavides D. Selection of software product line implementation components using recommender systems: an application to wordpress; IEEE Access; 2019;7: 69226–69245. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2918469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cater-Steel A, Toleman M, Tan W-G. Transforming it service management-the ITIL impact. Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2006); Adelaide, Australia; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Marrone M, Gacenga F, Cater-Steel A, Kolbe L. It service management: a cross-national study of ITIL adoption. Commun Assoc Inf Syst. 2014;34. doi:10.17705/1CAIS.03449.
   Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Rothenberger M, Tuunanen T, Vaezi R. Design science research evaluation. International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems; Las Vegas, USA; 2012: 398–410.
   Google Scholar
• Venable J, Pries-Heje J, Baskerville R. Feds: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur J Inf Syst. 2016;25(1):77–89. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøegh J. A new standard for quality requirements. IEEE Softw. 2008;25(2):57–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes A, Illowsky B, Dean S. Introductory business statistics. Houston (Texas): OpenStax College, Rice University; 2017. Includes bibliographical references and index
   Google Scholar
• Reichheld FF. The one number you need to grow. Harv Bus Rev. 2003;81:46–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S. Net promoter score: using nps to measure it customer support satisfaction. Proceedings of the 2018 ACM SIGUCCS Annual Conference; Orlando, USA; 2018: 63–64.
   Google Scholar
• Plaza B. Google analytics for measuring website performance. Tour Manag. 2011;32(3):477–81. doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2010.03.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura JR, Palos-Sánchez P, Cerdá Suárez LM. Understanding the digital marketing environment with KPIs and web analytics. Future Internet. 2017;9(4):76. doi:10.3390/fi9040076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studente S, Ellis S. Enhancing the online student experience through creating learning communities—the benefits of chatbots in higher education. In: Tertiary online teaching and learning 1. Singapore: Springer; 2020;1. doi:10.1007/978-981-15-8928-7.
   Google Scholar