Antecedents and Outcomes of Blockchain Technology Adoption: Meta-Analysis

References

• Klöckner M, Schmidt CG, Wagner SM. When blockchain creates shareholder value: empirical evidence from international firm announcements. Prod Oper Manag. 2022;31(1):46–64. doi:10.1111/poms.13609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang T-P, Kohli R, Huang H-C, Z-L L. What drives the adoption of the blockchain technology? A fit-viability perspective. J Manage Inf Syst. 2021;38(2):314–37. doi:10.1080/07421222.2021.1912915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai C, Sarkis J. A supply chain transparency and sustainability technology appraisal model for blockchain technology. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(7):2142–62. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1708989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agi MAN, Jha AK. Blockchain technology in the supply chain: an integrated theoretical perspective of organizational adoption. Int J Prod Econ. 2022;247:108458. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodhi MS, Seyedghorban Z, Tahernejad H, Samson D. Why emerging supply chain technologies initially disappoint: blockchain, IoT, and AI. Prod Oper Manage. 2022;31(6):2517–37. doi:10.1111/poms.13694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babich V, Hilary G. Blockchain and other distributed ledger technologies in operations. FNT Technol Inf Oper Manage. 2019;12(2–3):152–72. doi:10.1561/0200000084.
   Google Scholar
• Sheel A, Nath V. Blockchain technology adoption in the supply chain (UTAUT2 with risk)–evidence from Indian supply chains. Int J Appl Manage Sci. 2020;12(4):324–46. doi:10.1504/IJAMS.2020.110344.
   Google Scholar
• Liu N, Ye Z. Empirical research on the blockchain adoption–based on TAM. Appl Econ. 2021;53(37):4263–75. doi:10.1080/00036846.2021.1898535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handoko BL, Lantu JE. UTAUT 2 model for predicting auditor’s blockchain technology adoption. The 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics; Beijing, China. 2021. p 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Arias-Oliva M, Pelegrín-Borondo J, Matías-Clavero G. Variables influencing cryptocurrency use: a technology acceptance model in Spain. Front Psychol. 2019;10:475. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cram WA, D’arcy J, Proudfoot JG. Seeing the forest and the trees: a meta-analysis of the antecedents to information security policy compliance. Mis Q. 2019;43(2):525–54. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2019/15117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M, Chakrabarti AK. Processes of technological innovation. USA: Lexington books; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Raj A, Jeyaraj A. Antecedents and consequents of industry 4.0 adoption using technology, organization and environment (TOE) framework: a meta-analysis. Ann Oper Res. 2023;322(1):101–24. doi:10.1007/s10479-022-04942-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K. Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices. J Purchasing Supply Manage. 2013;19(2):106–17. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2012.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Lu Y, Bulysheva L, Kataev MY. Applications of blockchain in industry 4.0: a review. Inf Syst Front. 2022;1–15. doi:10.1007/s10796-022-10248-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Bryde DJ, Dwivedi YK, Papadopoulos T. Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(11):3381–98. doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1722860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capurro G, Jardine CG, Tustin J, Driedger M. Communicating scientific uncertainty in a rapidly evolving situation: a framing analysis of Canadian coverage in early days of COVID-19. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1–14. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12246-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan R, Swink M. An investigation of visibility and flexibility as complements to supply chain analytics: an organizational information processing theory perspective. Prod Oper Manag. 2018;27(10):1849–67. doi:10.1111/poms.12746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah N, Mugahed Al-Rahmi W, Alkhalifah A. Predictors for distributed ledger technology adoption: integrating three traditional adoption theories for manufacturing and service operations. Prod Manuf Res. 2021;9(1):178–205. doi:10.1080/21693277.2021.1976963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y. Effect of digital marketing capabilities and blockchain technology on organizational performance and psychology. Front Psychol. 2022;12:805393. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.805393.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamble S, Gunasekaran A, Arha H. Understanding the blockchain technology adoption in supply chains-Indian context. Int J Prod Res. 2019;57(7):2009–33. doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1518610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath SD, Khayer A, Majumder J, Barua S. Factors affecting blockchain adoption in apparel supply chains: does sustainability-oriented supplier development play a moderating role? IMDS. 2022;122(5):1183–214. doi:10.1108/IMDS-07-2021-0466.
   Google Scholar
• Nayal K, Raut RD, Narkhede BE, Priyadarshinee P, Panchal GB, Gedam VV. Antecedents for blockchain technology-enabled sustainable agriculture supply chain. Ann Oper Res. 2021. doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04423-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin T, Wang W, Yang M, Duan Y, Chen Y. The moderating effect of managerial discretion on blockchain technology and the firms’ innovation quality: evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ. 2021;240:108219. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wamba SF, Queiroz MM, Trinchera L. Dynamics between blockchain adoption determinants and supply chain performance: an empirical investigation. Int J Prod Econ. 2020;229:107791. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philsoophian M, Akhavan P, Namvar M. The mediating role of blockchain technology in improvement of knowledge sharing for supply chain management. MD. 2022;60(3):784–805. doi:10.1108/MD-08-2020-1122.
   Google Scholar
• Afifa MMA, Van HV, Van TLH. Blockchain adoption in accounting by an extended UTAUT model: empirical evidence from an emerging economy. J Financ Rep Account. 2022;21(1):5–44. doi:10.1108/JFRA-12-2021-0434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj AK, Garg A, Gajpal Y. Determinants of blockchain technology adoption in supply chains by small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in India. Math Probl Eng. 2021;2021:1–14. doi:10.1155/2021/5537395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamdan IKA, Aziguli W, Zhang D, Sumarliah E, Usmanova K. Forecasting blockchain adoption in supply chains based on machine learning: evidence from Palestinian food SMEs. BFJ. 2022;124(12):4592–609. doi:10.1108/BFJ-05-2021-0535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury S, Rodriguez-Espindola O, Dey P, Budhwar P. Blockchain technology adoption for managing risks in operations and supply chain management: evidence from the UK. Ann Oper Res. 2022. doi:10.1007/s10479-021-04487-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu Afifa MM, Vo Van H, Le Hoang Van T. Blockchain adoption in accounting by an extended UTAUT model: empirical evidence from an emerging economy. JFRA. 2022;21(1):5–44. doi:10.1108/JFRA-12-2021-0434.
   Google Scholar
• Queiroz MM, Fosso Wamba S, De Bourmont M, Telles R. Blockchain adoption in operations and supply chain management: empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Int J Prod Res. 2020;1–17. doi:10.1080/00207543.2020.1803511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L-W, Leong L-Y, Hew J-J, Tan G-H, Ooi K-B. Time to seize the digital evolution: adoption of blockchain in operations and supply chain management among Malaysian SMEs. Int J Inf Manage. 2020;52:101997. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz MM, Fosso Wamba S. Blockchain adoption challenges in supply chain: an empirical investigation of the main drivers in India and the USA. Int J Inf Manage. 2019;46:70–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benzidia S, Makaoui N, Subramanian N. Impact of ambidexterity of blockchain technology and social factors on new product development: a supply chain and Industry 4.0 perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;169:120819. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittipaka V, Kumar S, Sivarajah U, Bowden J-H, Baral MM. Blockchain technology for supply chains operating in emerging markets: an empirical examination of technology-organization-environment (TOE) framework. Ann Oper Res. 2022. doi:10.1007/s10479-022-04801-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehman Khan SA, Yu Z, Sarwat S, Godil DI, Amin S, Shujaat S. The role of block chain technology in circular economy practices to improve organisational performance. Int J Logist Res Appl. 2022;25(4–5):605–22. doi:10.1080/13675567.2021.1872512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samad TA, Sharma R, Ganguly KK, Wamba SF, Jain G. Enablers to the adoption of blockchain technology in logistics supply chains: evidence from an emerging economy. Ann Oper Res. 2022. doi:10.1007/s10479-022-04546-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan SA, Mubarik MS, Kusi‐sarpong S, Gupta H, Zaman SI, Mubarik M. Blockchain technologies as enablers of supply chain mapping for sustainable supply chains. Bus Strat Env. 2022;31(8):3742–56. doi:10.1002/bse.3029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee D, Pacini C, Sambamurthy V. The shareholder-wealth and trading-volume effects of information-technology infrastructure investments. J Manage Inf Syst. 2002;19(2):7–42. doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Liu R, Shan Z. Is blockchain a silver bullet for supply chain management? Technical challenges and research opportunities. Decis Sci. 2020;51(1):8–37. doi:10.1111/deci.12396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao L, Bai X. A unified perspective on the factors influencing consumer acceptance of internet of things technology. Asia Pac J Mark Logist. 2014;26(2):211–31. doi:10.1108/APJML-06-2013-0061.
   Google Scholar
• Alalwan AA, Dwivedi YK, Rana NP, Williams MD. Consumer adoption of mobile banking in Jordan: examining the role of usefulness, ease of use, perceived risk and self-efficacy. J Enterpr Inf Manage. 2016;29(1):118–39. doi:10.1108/JEIM-04-2015-0035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen C, Luong T, Ho J, Djailani I. Social media marketing of IT service companies: analysis using a concept-linking mining approach. Ind Mark Manage. 2020;90:593–604. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.11.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Song W, Peng X, Shabbir M. Predictors for e-government adoption: integrating TAM, TPB, trust and perceived risk. Electron Libr. 2017;35(1):2–20. doi:10.1108/EL-08-2015-0141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelbst PJ, Green KW, Sower VE, Bond PL. The impact of RFID, IIoT, and blockchain technologies on supply chain transparency. JMTM. 2019;31(3):441–57. doi:10.1108/JMTM-03-2019-0118.
   Google Scholar
• Costa AC, Fulmer CA, Anderson NR. Trust in work teams: an integrative review, multilevel model, and future directions. J Organ Behav. 2018;39(2):169–84. doi:10.1002/job.2213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohan B, Buell RW, John LK. Lifting the veil: the benefits of cost transparency. Mark Sci. 2020;39(6):1105–21. doi:10.1287/mksc.2019.1200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu M, Wang K, Cai X, Guo S, Guo M, Rong C. A comprehensive survey of blockchain: from theory to IoT applications and beyond. IEEE Internet Things J. 2019;6(5):8114–54. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2019.2922538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci. 2000;46(2):186–204. doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kfoury B. The role of blockchain in reducing the cost of financial transactions in the retail industry. CEUR Workshop Proceedings; Naples, Italy. 2021. p 10–22.
   Google Scholar
• De Giovanni P. Leveraging the circular economy with a closed-loop supply chain and a reverse omnichannel using blockchain technology and incentives. IJOPM. 2022;42(7):959–94. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-07-2021-0445.
   Google Scholar
• Mori T. Financial technology: blockchain and securities settlement. J Secur Oper Custody. 2016;8:208–27.
   Google Scholar
• Chang Y, Iakovou E, Shi W. Blockchain in global supply chains and cross border trade: a critical synthesis of the state-of-the-art, challenges and opportunities. Int J Prod Res. 2020;58(7):2082–99. doi:10.1080/00207543.2019.1651946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastig GM, Sodhi MS. Blockchain for supply chain traceability: business requirements and critical success factors. Prod Oper Manage. 2020;29(4):935–54. doi:10.1111/poms.13147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta P, Choi T-M, Somani S, Butala R. Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev. 2020;142:102067. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.102067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopinath K, Narayanamurthy G. Early bird catches the worm! Meta-analysis of autonomous vehicles adoption – moderating role of automation level, ownership and culture. Int J Inf Manage. 2022;66:102536. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooda A, Gupta P, Jeyaraj A, Giannakis M, Dwivedi YK. The effects of trust on behavioral intention and use behavior within e-government contexts. Int J Inf Manage. 2022;67:102553. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey R, Gunasekaran A, Childe SJ, Papadopoulos T, Hazen BT, Roubaud D. Examining top management commitment to TQM diffusion using institutional and upper echelon theories. Int J Prod Res. 2018;56(8):2988–3006. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1394590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo SK, Xu X, Chiam YK, Lu Q. Evaluating suitability of applying blockchain. 2017 22nd international conference on engineering of complex computer systems (ICECCS); Fukuoka, Japan. IEEE, 2017. p 158–61.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Ke W, Wei KK, Gu J, Chen H. The role of institutional pressures and organizational culture in the firm’s intention to adopt internet-enabled supply chain management systems. J Oper Manage. 2010;28(5):372–84. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.11.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey R, Altay N, Gunasekaran A, Blome C, Papadopoulos T, Childe SJ. Supply chain agility, adaptability and alignment: empirical evidence from the Indian auto components industry. Int J Oper Prod Manage. 2018;38(1):129–48. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-04-2016-0173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Kouhizadeh M. Blockchain technology, supply chain information, and strategic product deletion management. IEEE Eng Manag Rev. 2019;47(1):36–44. doi:10.1109/EMR.2019.2898178.
   Google Scholar
• Lacity MC. Addressing key challenges to making enterprise blockchain applications a reality. MIS Q Executive. 2018;17:201–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fosso Wamba S, Guthrie C. The impact of blockchain adoption on competitive performance: the mediating role of process and relational innovation. Logistique Manage. 2020;28(1):88–96. doi:10.1080/12507970.2019.1679046.
   Google Scholar
• Tang YM, Chau KY, Fatima A, Waqas M. Industry 4.0 technology and circular economy practices: business management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(33):49752–69. doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19081-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Govindan K, Rajeev A, Padhi SS, Pati RK. Supply chain sustainability and performance of firms: a meta-analysis of the literature. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev. 2020;137:101923. doi:10.1016/j.tre.2020.101923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Methods of meta-analysis: correcting error and bias in research findings. UK: Sage; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Lipsey MW, Wilson DB. Practical meta-analysis. USA: SAGE publications, Inc; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Huedo-Medina TB, Sánchez-Meca J, Marin-Martinez F, Botella J. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: q statistic or I$^2$ index? Psychol Methods. 2006;11(2):193. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar