Business-Driven Data Recommender System: Design and Implementation

References

• Tavera RC, Ortiz JH, Khalaf OI, Ríos Prado A. Business intelligence: business evolution after industry 4.0. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2021;13(18):10026. doi:10.3390/su131810026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power DJ. Decision support systems: concepts and resources for managers. Westport (CT): Greenwood Publishing Group; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Provost F, Fawcett T. Data science and its relationship to big data and data-driven decision making. Big Data. 2013;1(1):51–59. doi:10.1089/big.2013.1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negash S, Gray P. Business intelligence. Vol. 13. Springer; 2004. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-48716-6_9.
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger PA, Rahman N. Self-service business intelligence resulting in disruptive technology. J Comput Inf Sys. 2016;56(1):11–21. doi:10.1080/08874417.2015.11645796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imhoff C, White C. Self-service business intelligence: empow. Users to gener. Insights. 2011. TDWI Best practices report: TWDI; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Khurana D, Koli A, Khatter K, Singh S. Natural language processing: state of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimed Tools Appl. 2023;82(3):3713–44. doi:10.1007/s11042-022-13428-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhowmick SS, Choi B. Data-driven visual query interfaces for graphs: past, present, and (near) future. In Paper presented at the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data; 2022 Jun 12–17; Philadelphia, PA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Chan CY, Maier D. Query from examples: an iterative, data-driven approach to query construction. VLDB J. 2015;8(13):2158–69. doi:10.14778/2831360.2831369.
   Google Scholar
• Lennerholt C, Van LJ, Söderström E. Implementation challenges of self service business intelligence: a literature review. In Paper presented at: the 51st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences; 2018 Jan 3–6; Hawaii, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Lennerholt C, Van LJ, Söderström E. User-related challenges of self-service business intelligence. Inf Syst Manag. 2020;1–15. doi:10.1080/10580530.2020.1814458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpar P, Schulz M. Self-service business intelligence. Bus Inf Syst Eng. 2016;58(2):151–55. doi:10.1007/s12599-016-0424-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smuts M, Scholtz B, Calitz A. Design guidelines for business intelligence tools for novice users. In Paper presented at: the 2015 annual research conference on south african institute of computer scientists and information technologists; 2015 Sep 28–30; Stellenbosch, Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai CW, Lai CF, Chao HC, Vasilakos AV. Big data analytics: a survey. J Big Data. 2015;2(1):1–32. doi:10.1186/s40537-015-0030-3.
   Google Scholar
• Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S. A design science research methodology for information systems research. J Manag Inf Syst. 2007;24(3):45–77. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor S, Hevner AR. Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Manag Inf Syst Q. 2013;37(2):337–55. doi:10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber TR. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis. 1993;5(2):199–220. doi:10.1006/knac.1993.1008.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlinger L, Schrott J, Melichar M, Kirchmayr N, Wöß W. Data catalogs: a systematic literature review and guidelines to implementation. In Paper presented at the Database and Expert Systems Applications-DEXA 2021 Workshops: BIOKDD, IWCFS, MLKgraphs, AI-CARES, ProTime, AISys 2021; Vienna, Austria; 2021 Sep 27–30; Virtual Event.
   Google Scholar
• Ibrahim ME, Yang Y, Ndzi DL, Yang G, Al-Maliki M. Ontology-based personalized course recommendation framework. IEEE Access. 2018;7:5180–99. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2889635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameen A. Knowledge based recommendation system in semantic web-a survey. Int J Comput Appl. 2019;182(43):20–25. doi:10.5120/ijca2019918538.
   Google Scholar
• Smyth B. Case-based recocmmendation. In: Brusilovsky P,Kobsa A, Nejdl W, editors. The adaptive web. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2007. p. 342–76. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_11.
   Google Scholar
• Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S. Design science in information systems research. Manag Inf Syst Q. 2008;28(1):6. doi:10.2307/25148625.
   Google Scholar
• Bhowmick SS, Choi B, Dyreson C. Data-driven visual graph query interface construction and maintenance: challenges and opportunities. VLDB J. 2016;9(12):984–92. doi:10.14778/2994509.2994517.
   Google Scholar
• Catarci T, Mecella M, Kimani S, Santucci G. Visual query interfaces. Wiley Handb Hum Comput Interact. 2018;2:561–77. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-314-2.ch002.
   Google Scholar
• Silva E, Fidalgo R, Ferro M, Franco N. Visual query languages to design complex queries: a systematic literature review. Softw Syst Modeling. 2022;1–33. doi:10.1007/s10270-022-01071-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva E, Franco N, Ferro M, Fidalgo R. Mental workload impact of a visual language on understanding sql queries. In Paper presented at the Anais do XXX Brazilian Symposium on Informatics in Education 2019; 2019 Nov 11–14; Brasilia.
   Google Scholar
• Lloret-Gazo J. A survey on visual query systems in the web era. In Paper presented at the 27th International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications; 2016 Sep 5–8; Porto, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Bukhari SAC, Dar HS, Lali MI, Keshtkar F, Malik KM, Kadry S. Frameworks for querying, databases using natural language: a literature review–NLP-to-DB querying frameworks. Int J Data WarehMining. 2021;17(2):21–38. doi:10.4018/IJDWM.2021040102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira A, Almeida JR, Lopes RP, Oliveira JL. Querying semantic catalogues of biomedical databases. J Biomed Inf. 2023;137:104272. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francia M, Gallinucci E, Golfarelli M. COOL: a framework for conversational OLAP. Inf Sys. 2022;104:101752. doi:10.1016/j.is.2021.101752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Androutsopoulos I, Ritchie GD, Thanisch P. Natural language interfaces to databases–an introduction. Nat Lang Eng. 1995;1(1):29–81. doi:10.1017/S135132490000005X.
   Google Scholar
• Őzcan F, Quamar A, Sen J, Lei C, Efthymiou V. State of the art and open challenges in natural language interfaces to data. In Paper presented at: the 2020 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, Portland, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Emani CK, Cullot N, Nicolle C. Understandable big data: a survey. Comput Sci Rev. 2015;17:70–81. doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2015.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Antunes AL, Cardoso E, Barateiro J. Incorporation of ontologies in data warehouse/business intelligence systems-a systematic literature review. Int Inf Manag Data Insights. 2022;2(2):100131. doi:10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100131.
   Google Scholar
• Burke R. Knowledge-based recommender systems. Encycl Libr Inf Syst. 2000;69:175–86.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández-López M, Gómez-Pérez A, Juristo N. Methontology: from ontological art towards ontological engineering. In Paper presented at the 1997 AAAI Spring Symposium; 1997 Mar 24–25; Palo Alto, California.
   Google Scholar
• Vaisman A, Zimányi E. Data warehouse systems: Design and ImplementationData-centric Systems and Applications. Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cyganiak R. The RDF data cube vocabulary - W3C recommendation. 2014 Jan 16 [accessed 2023 May 31]. https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/.
   Google Scholar
• Albertoni R, Browning D, Cox S, Beltran AG, Perego A, Winstanley P. Data catalog vocabulary (DCAT) – W3C working draft. 2023 Mar 7 [accessed 2023 May 31]. https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-3/.
   Google Scholar
• Noy NF, Crubézy M, Fergerson RW, Knublauch H, Tu SW, Vendetti V, Musen MA. Prot ́eg ́e-2000: an open-source ontology-development and knowledge-acquisition environment. In Paper presented at the 2003 AMIA annual symposium; 2003 Nov 12; Washington DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Melville P, Sindhwani V. Recommender systems. Encyclopedia Mach Learn. 2010;1:829–38. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1964.
   Google Scholar
• Tarus JK, Niu Z, Mustafa G. Knowledge-based recommendation: a review of ontology-based recommender systems for e-learning. Artif Int Rev. 2018;50(1):21–48. doi:10.1007/s10462-017-9539-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S, Cai X. Bilateral knowledge graph enhanced online course recommendation. Inf Sys. 2022;107:102000. doi:10.1016/j.is.2022.102000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinon S, Burnay C, Linden I. Opportunities of semantic recommendation systems for self-service business intelligence. In Paper presented at the EWG-DSS 2022 international conference on decision support system technology; 2022 May 23–25; Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Peis E, Castillo JM, Delgado-Ĺopez JA. Semantic recommender systems. Analysis of the state of the topic. Hipertext net. 2008;6:1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chen RC, Huang YH, Bau CT, Chen SM. A recommendation system based on domain ontology and SWRL for anti-diabetic drugs selection. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(4):3995–4006. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamy JB. Owlready: ontology-oriented programming in python with automatic classification and high level constructs for biomedical ontologies. Artif Intell Med. 2017;80:11–28. doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2017.07.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouraga S, Jureta I, Faulkner S, Herssens C. Knowledge-based recommendation systems: a survey. Int J Int Inf Technol. 2014;10(2):1–19. doi:10.4018/ijiit.2014040101.
   Google Scholar
• Slimani T. Description and evaluation of semantic similarity measures approaches. Int J Comput Appl. 2013;80(10):25–33. doi:10.5120/13897-1851.
   Google Scholar
• Elavarasi SA, Akilandeswari J, Menaga K. A survey on semantic similarity measure. Int J Res Advent Technol. 2014;2(3):389–98. doi:10.1109/ICAC347590.2019.9036843.
   Google Scholar
• Gomaa WH, Fahmy AA. A survey of text similarity approaches. Int J Comput Appl. 2013;68(13):13–18. doi:10.5120/11638-7118.
   Google Scholar
• OpenAI. GPT3 algorithm. [accessed 2023 Jun 14]. https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/gpt-3-5.
   Google Scholar
• Kalla D, Smith N. Study and analysis of chat GPT and its impact on different fields of study. Int J Innovative Sci Res Technol. 2023;8(3).
   Google Scholar
• Katsogiannis-Meimarakis G, Tsapelas C, Koutrika G. Natural language data interfaces: from keyword search to ChatGPT, are we there yet? In Paper presented at the 6th International Workshop on Big Data Visual Exploration and Analytics co-located with EDBT/ICDT 2023 Joint Conference; 2023 Mar 38–31; Ioannina, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Maddigan P, Susnjak T. Chat2vis: Generating data visualisations via natural language using chatgpt, codex and gpt-3 large language models. In IEEE Access. 2023. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2302.02094.
   Google Scholar
• Python language. [accessed 2023 Jun 14]. https://www.python.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll J, Herman I, Patel-Schneider PF OWL 2 web ontology language RDF-based semantics. W3C Recomm. 2015 2009 Oct 27.
   Google Scholar
• rdflib documentation. [accessed 2022 Nov 10]. https://rdflib.readthedocs.io/en/stable/.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin J, Chang MW, Lee K, Toutanova K. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805. 2018. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805.
   Google Scholar
• Purao S. Design research in the technology of information systems: truth or dare. GSU Depart CIS Working Paper. 2002;34:45–77.
   Google Scholar
• Venable J, Pries-Heje J, Baskerville R. FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Eur J Inf Syst. 2016;25(1):77–89. doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.36.14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar